Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

FreakinDJ

(17,644 posts)
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 10:01 AM Jan 2012

Occupy Oakland plans more antipolice rallies

Carolyn Jones,Henry K. Lee, Chronicle Staff Writers

Tensions between Oakland police and Occupy protesters escalated Sunday, a day after an antipolice rally downtown turned violent and resulted in six arrests.

Protesters pledged to hold weekly demonstrations against the police, who they say have been overzealous in enforcing no-lodging, trespassing and other laws to break up Occupy encampments.

"The solution is very obvious. All (Mayor Jean Quan) has to do is stop enforcing these laws," said Occupy Oakland activist Phil Horne. "If they set reasonable rules, we'll abide by them."

Clashes with police have been a hallmark of Occupy Oakland since October, when police made their initial clearance of a camp in front of City Hall that had become a gathering spot for economic injustice protests modeled on Occupy Wall Street.



Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/01/08/BAS61MMFQ7.DTL#ixzz1iyAro6gE

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Occupy Oakland plans more antipolice rallies (Original Post) FreakinDJ Jan 2012 OP
It's an abuse of their civil rights. The laws need to go for that reason. lunatica Jan 2012 #1
Civil rights. Right. randome Jan 2012 #3
That's what they're doing. Protesting lunatica Jan 2012 #16
Most people would not agree that 'protest' equals 'setting up tents on public space'. randome Jan 2012 #17
Here is the video - judge for yourself FreakinDJ Jan 2012 #4
Occupy Oakland is the black sheep of the Occupy Movement. Thaddeus Kosciuszko Jan 2012 #2
What laws are these people being charged for? DocMac Jan 2012 #5
"The police better think about the whole picture before the weather improves." Thaddeus Kosciuszko Jan 2012 #14
Did you enjoy typing that personal attack on me? DocMac Jan 2012 #18
"If they really want to see some changes, they need to get their ass out and vote." hack89 Jan 2012 #6
This paragraph highlights the problem with OWS in a nutshell: hack89 Jan 2012 #7
The Interfaith Council are politicians - Of Course FreakinDJ Jan 2012 #9
Politicians are not going to just disappear hack89 Jan 2012 #10
They are doing a better job of speaking to the average American then the GOP Candidates are FreakinDJ Jan 2012 #11
Is that why the Oakland mayor and the police are buckling from the huge voter backlash? hack89 Jan 2012 #12
Not silly kids endcorporatecontrol Jan 2012 #19
How are you going to 'occupy' an institution when you don't want to 'engage' it? randome Jan 2012 #20
didn't mean don't engage endcorporatecontrol Jan 2012 #21
How do you "occupy" these institutions? hack89 Jan 2012 #24
common sense not a hallmark of TPTB barbtries Jan 2012 #8
"carrying "F- the police" banners..." hack89 Jan 2012 #13
not great endcorporatecontrol Jan 2012 #22
I hope the smarter, more credible occupiers disown this nonsense loyalsister Jan 2012 #15
very very counterproductive endcorporatecontrol Jan 2012 #23

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
1. It's an abuse of their civil rights. The laws need to go for that reason.
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 10:08 AM
Jan 2012

I imagine many arrestees will be taking it to court, which makes sense.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
3. Civil rights. Right.
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 10:47 AM
Jan 2012

Do you have the 'right' to start living on, say, public school property?

There is a reason we have camp grounds in public parks.

Now if Occupy Oakland wants to hold a protest, I'm all for them.

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
16. That's what they're doing. Protesting
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 04:39 PM
Jan 2012

Knowing full well it will get them arrested. Perhaps you're too busy finding fault with what everyone says to make the connection I was making regarding their Constitutional right to demand redress.

You just never give up in your negative opinions about OWS do you?

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
17. Most people would not agree that 'protest' equals 'setting up tents on public space'.
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 04:42 PM
Jan 2012

By trying to take over public space for their own use, OWS set up an inevitable conflict that didn't need to occur.

And, as usual, when two large groups have disparate goals, over-reaction occurred.

 

FreakinDJ

(17,644 posts)
4. Here is the video - judge for yourself
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 11:39 AM
Jan 2012


No doubt tempers are flaring on both sides of the line - but to me the police acted out inappropriately more often causing the confrontations
 
2. Occupy Oakland is the black sheep of the Occupy Movement.
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 10:22 AM
Jan 2012
"The solution is very obvious. All (Mayor Jean Quan) has to do is stop enforcing these laws," said Occupy Oakland activist Phil Horne.

Actually, Mr. Horne's statement makes it obvious why Occupy Oakland has experienced far more encounters with law enforcement than any of the other Occupy protesters.

DocMac

(1,628 posts)
5. What laws are these people being charged for?
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 12:20 PM
Jan 2012

Walking in the street, standing on a sidewalk, failure to disperse, or some other ridiculus misdemeanor?

The very sight of police showing up in riot gear, waving clubs, and using them on people for minor violations, doesn't exactly allow me much sympothy for the police.

The police better think about the whole picture before the weather improves.

 
14. "The police better think about the whole picture before the weather improves."
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 04:00 PM
Jan 2012

Fortunately, the Occupy Movement has for the most part, been governed by individuals who possess quite a bit more savoir-faire, than you exhibit.

To be successful, a positive public image must be maintained at all costs; and that includes enduring the misconduct of law enforcement officials. Your childish declaration regarding what The police better think about indicates that you are unable to see the trap that has been set for you.

THIS IMAGE WILL WIN FAR MORE SUPPORT


THAN THIS ONE WILL


DocMac

(1,628 posts)
18. Did you enjoy typing that personal attack on me?
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 04:54 PM
Jan 2012

Perhaps you can advise the Occupy participants how better to be beat and pepper sprayed to further advance their cause? Tossing about french words does not impress me, maybe they work on cops.

I could explain my post in more detail, but you were never interested to start with.

Have a nice day and save the reply, as i'm not interested.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
6. "If they really want to see some changes, they need to get their ass out and vote."
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 12:55 PM
Jan 2012

not feeling the love there.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
7. This paragraph highlights the problem with OWS in a nutshell:
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 12:59 PM
Jan 2012
Occupiers don't plan to participate in the forum because they distrust city organizations, Yassin said. In addition, they don't support any Occupy-related discussions between city officials and members of the Interfaith Council, like the one that occurred Thursday which city staff touted as a productive step toward allowing ongoing demonstrations.


bunch of spoiled kids - not willing to play nicely with others. Are they serious about bringing about change or not?



 

FreakinDJ

(17,644 posts)
9. The Interfaith Council are politicians - Of Course
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 01:22 PM
Jan 2012

The four representatives of the Interfaith Council, including former Councilman Wilson Riles, met with city staffers

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/01/05/BA9A1MLAHJ.DTL#ixzz1iyzZndPY

hack89

(39,171 posts)
12. Is that why the Oakland mayor and the police are buckling from the huge voter backlash?
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 02:03 PM
Jan 2012

oh ..... wait. Never mind.

19. Not silly kids
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 05:20 PM
Jan 2012

The occupiers unwillingness to not engage local institutional organizations is understandable. Most of these city organizations are populated by, and controlled by people with similar interests as the corporate power holders the occupiers are protesting against.

That said, it is very important to occupy these institutions, we need to make them ours. If something is being talked about about occupy, we need to have our own representatives there.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
20. How are you going to 'occupy' an institution when you don't want to 'engage' it?
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 05:31 PM
Jan 2012

By getting thrown off public land? Not sure how that helps.

21. didn't mean don't engage
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 05:45 PM
Jan 2012

I didn't mean that they should not engage these organizations. I actually think it is nesesary to. I was just explaining the very real reasons why they do not trust them.

barbtries

(28,769 posts)
8. common sense not a hallmark of TPTB
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 01:14 PM
Jan 2012

re: "The solution is very obvious. All (Mayor Jean Quan) has to do is stop enforcing these laws," said Occupy Oakland activist Phil Horne. "If they set reasonable rules, we'll abide by them."

22. not great
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 05:47 PM
Jan 2012

While many of us may feal that way. Carrying a sign like that is idiotic. Go ahead and give Fox news a nece clip to play whenever they talk about the movement.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
15. I hope the smarter, more credible occupiers disown this nonsense
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 04:30 PM
Jan 2012

Calling the police out for misconduct is legitimate. But, changing the entire conversation to a rebellion against legal authority is totally counterproductive.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Occupy Oakland plans more...