HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Paul Ryan Tells Fox: ‘I D...

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 01:43 PM

Paul Ryan Tells Fox: ‘I Didn’t Know About’ The Letters I Signed Asking For Stimulus Funds

Source: Think Progress

Paul Ryan Tells Fox: ‘I Didn’t Know About’ The Letters I Signed Asking For Stimulus Funds
By Igor Volsky on Aug 18, 2012 at 1:32 pm

During an interview with Fox News’ Carl Cameron on Saturday, Paul Ryan tried to explain why he denied requesting stimulus funds for a local energy company in 2009 after voting against and demagoguing the Recovery Act. “My office sends tens of thousands of letters to various federal agencies and this goes through what we call a case work system and we treat it as a case work for constituents,” Ryan said:


RYAN: I didn’t know about the letters until recently and they were brought to my attention, they were to the case work system and I take full responsibility for that. The point I’m trying to make is stimulus was a failure.


Read more: http://thinkprogress.org/election/2012/08/18/710751/paul-ryan-tells-fox-i-didnt-know-about-the-letters-i-signed-asking-for-stimulus-funds/

64 replies, 7031 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 64 replies Author Time Post
Reply Paul Ryan Tells Fox: ‘I Didn’t Know About’ The Letters I Signed Asking For Stimulus Funds (Original post)
kpete Aug 2012 OP
Angry Dragon Aug 2012 #1
rucky Aug 2012 #43
Angry Dragon Aug 2012 #51
Gman Aug 2012 #2
FiveGoodMen Aug 2012 #12
Kennah Aug 2012 #14
Kablooie Aug 2012 #3
louis-t Aug 2012 #4
PD Turk Aug 2012 #5
wordpix Aug 2012 #11
Blue_Tires Aug 2012 #16
peace frog Aug 2012 #6
Kalidurga Aug 2012 #7
Politicalboi Aug 2012 #8
jpbollma Aug 2012 #9
Ebadlun Aug 2012 #49
Rosa Luxemburg Aug 2012 #10
Doctor_J Aug 2012 #13
philly_bob Aug 2012 #15
Blue_Tires Aug 2012 #19
tabasco Aug 2012 #42
alfredo Aug 2012 #47
Cali_Democrat Aug 2012 #53
philly_bob Aug 2012 #61
csziggy Aug 2012 #62
bhikkhu Aug 2012 #17
alfredo Aug 2012 #48
WestSeattle2 Aug 2012 #18
jtuck004 Aug 2012 #20
williesgirl Aug 2012 #21
The Last Democrat Aug 2012 #22
DallasNE Aug 2012 #23
DonRedwood Aug 2012 #24
Pachamama Aug 2012 #25
zeemike Aug 2012 #26
tclambert Aug 2012 #27
kestrel91316 Aug 2012 #28
liberal N proud Aug 2012 #29
Jackpine Radical Aug 2012 #30
CountAllVotes Aug 2012 #31
Marr Aug 2012 #32
IggleDoer Aug 2012 #33
madashelltoo Aug 2012 #34
KansDem Aug 2012 #35
madashelltoo Aug 2012 #39
xxqqqzme Aug 2012 #36
CanonRay Aug 2012 #37
SoapBox Aug 2012 #38
underpants Aug 2012 #40
Herlong Aug 2012 #41
SunSeeker Aug 2012 #44
MichiganVote Aug 2012 #45
6000eliot Aug 2012 #46
HooptieWagon Aug 2012 #50
cr8tvlde Aug 2012 #52
Blue Owl Aug 2012 #54
aint_no_life_nowhere Aug 2012 #55
Enrique Aug 2012 #56
rtracey Aug 2012 #57
GeorgeGist Aug 2012 #58
lonestarnot Aug 2012 #59
SylviaD Aug 2012 #60
thecrow Aug 2012 #63
avebury Aug 2012 #64

Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 01:45 PM

1. You Lie

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Angry Dragon (Reply #1)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 05:59 PM

43. I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt

and assume he's incompetent

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rucky (Reply #43)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 09:03 PM

51. perhaps an incompetent liar

Last edited Sat Aug 18, 2012, 09:06 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

his lies are so easy to throw in his face

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 01:46 PM

2. What? Does he have Radar O'Reilly as his aide or something?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gman (Reply #2)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 02:17 PM

12. Beat me to it!

First thing I thought of as well.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gman (Reply #2)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 02:21 PM

14. Henry Blake was a man who cared about people

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 01:50 PM

3. He's probably telling the truth.

He didn't know anyone had discovered the letters he signed.

He didn't say that he didn't know what they were when he signed them.
Just that he didn't know anyone had found them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 01:58 PM

4. This is a guy you want in a position of power?

This shows total incompetance.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 02:09 PM

5. Video of Ryan signing papers

&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PD Turk (Reply #5)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 02:16 PM

11. I've gotta watch that movie again, classic!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PD Turk (Reply #5)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 02:30 PM

16. brilliant

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 02:09 PM

6. What's that stench?

Oh yeh, Ryan's speaking. Don't step in the BS.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 02:10 PM

7. New headline "Paul Ryan, doesn't read the chit he signs.'

I can't believe no one is nailing him on this.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 02:12 PM

8. He's so Reaganesque

"I don't recall".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Politicalboi (Reply #8)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 02:14 PM

9. So...

Next question. Would he ask the company to give the funds back?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Politicalboi (Reply #8)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 08:57 PM

49. Bit harder to pull off

when you're only in your early 40s.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 02:14 PM

10. Ryan should be called out

many of the republican voters were suppoerting him because he was against the stimulus

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 02:19 PM

13. So he was against taking the money, but didn't tell his staff that

Moron, liar, both?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 02:25 PM

15. Not a big deal. Entirely possible he didn't know. Concentrate on other Ryan weaknesses. (nt)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to philly_bob (Reply #15)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 02:46 PM

19. I say bollocks to that

Too many red state pols got away scot-free with their public grandstanding against the stimulus while their states were struggling, only to beg for it on the sly later...

If Ryan gets to criticize it in his speeches to voters, we get to remind them how he benefitted from it...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to philly_bob (Reply #15)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 05:44 PM

42. LOL!

Yes, let's overlook the lying and/or incompetence.

Let's focus on important things.

You lost?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to philly_bob (Reply #15)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 08:33 PM

47. His staff had to trick him into doing something good for his state.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to philly_bob (Reply #15)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 09:18 PM

53. He didn't know? Who signed the letter then?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cali_Democrat (Reply #53)

Sun Aug 19, 2012, 01:32 PM

61. It's plausible he signed them in a stack of constituent service letters.

Again, folks, choose your battles.

Ryan is awful. His beliefs are heartless and irrational. But attack those beliefs, not GOTCHA technicalities.

I think a stronger case for his hypocrisy can be made by looking at his Bush-era vote for stimulus package. No explaining that away.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to philly_bob (Reply #15)

Sun Aug 19, 2012, 03:12 PM

62. Sure, let's remind people of how Ryan wholeheartedly supported stimulus

When it was under President Bush:

VIDEO: Paul Ryan defended stimulus in 2002, when George W. Bush wanted it
By Sal Gentile
Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:40 AM EDT
<SNIP>
But in 2002, when then-President Bush was seeking a roughly $120 billion package of tax cuts, tax incentives for business and unemployment benefits to jump-start the economy, Ryan offered a vigorous defense of the plan. “What we're trying to accomplish today with the passage of this third stimulus package is to create jobs and help the unemployed,” Ryan said in video that aired today on Up w/ Chris Hayes. The remarks came during a House debate on the measure on Feb. 14, 2002.

Ryan’s comments reveal a strikingly different economic analysis than the one he has become known for in recent years as the “intellectual leader” of the Republican Party and, now, Mitt Romney’s running mate. In 2002, Ryan argued that unemployment would remain at elevated levels even after the economy began to recover, and that aggressive stimulus would be a necessary and effective antidote.

“What we're trying to accomplish here is the recognition of the fact that in recessions, unemployment lags on well after a recovery has taken place,” Ryan said at the time. “We have a lot of laid-off workers, and more layoffs are occurring. And we know, as a historical fact, that even if our economy begins to slowly recover, unemployment is going to linger on and on well after that recovery takes place.”

Ryan’s advocacy of stimulus spending wasn’t limited to Washington, either. When he returned home to face constituents, he used similar language to make the case for the Bush stimulus bill. “You have to spend a little to grow a little,” Ryan told constituents at a town hall in Wisconsin in January 2002, according to the Journal-Times, a local newspaper. “What we're trying to do is stimulate that part of the economy that's on its back."

More, including the video of Ryan's remarks: http://upwithchrishayes.msnbc.com/_news/2012/08/19/13361928-video-paul-ryan-defended-stimulus-in-2002-when-george-w-bush-wanted-it

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 02:34 PM

17. I'm sure, if elected, he'll be just as clueless

Half the work of being a republican in office is to maintain a plausible ignorance of the job.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bhikkhu (Reply #17)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 08:34 PM

48. Norquist wants a president to sign whatever shit they hand him.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 02:43 PM

18. And Romney pronounced this guy ready to be president if need be. LOL

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 02:51 PM

20. Awww, now that they're best buds, Ryan borrowed the etch-a-sketch.



He would have been a lot better off if he just said "Yes, I have sinned, I'm just like many others, but I have seen the error of my ways".

Now he just looks like a liar. And if he changes his tune he will look like he is taking pandering lessons from Mi$$.

I love how "representing the people" or talking with the neighbors has become "case work for constituents". Is that dehumanizing, or just necessary so one can subordinate it to their fundraising? I wonder how many hundreds of others see us that way?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 02:55 PM

21. So he signs off on a $21 million request and doesn't read it first! Worse than lying about it.

He's a jerk and a liar. rec'd

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 03:01 PM

22. I Don't believe that,

“WE THE PEOPLE” needs someone in this position that doesn’t read what he signs.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 03:06 PM

23. The Overworked Congressman Excuse

Now Ryan is lying about the lie. How many layers deep will he carry the lying, one wonders. But I will give Ryan this; he has been a quick learner when it comes to lying, and even the lying about the lying. Romney picked well. He has a soulmate.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 03:13 PM

24. kr

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 03:16 PM

25. Question: Who is a bigger liar - Romney or Ryan???

Answer: dont know.... They are both big effing liars, hard to know who lies more....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 03:16 PM

26. this kind of concerns me in a different way

And the question I have is why they think they can boldly lie and get away with it...Rmoney has made a string of them and now Ryan is too...the only reason someone would do that is if they knew it did not matter...that the media would not call them on it or that the results of the election is already known.
I think after the convention we will know if we see the polls getting tighter...that the fix is in....because no one who has rejected Rmoney now will change it because of some well produced convention....or some single issue that Rmoney has raised.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 03:23 PM

27. Charles Barkley claimed to have been misquoted in his autobiography.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 03:28 PM

28. He's either a self-serving liar or an incompetent boob.

Which is it, Paul????

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 03:35 PM

29. If he didn't know about letters HE signed, it shows a huge character flaw

How could he possibly be qualified to serve the 2nd highest office in the land if he can't recall signing important documents.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 03:44 PM

30. Goddamit, look at the upside here.

Not being able to recall stuff is an absolute requirement for a Republican politician.

Ryan's got selective amnesia in spades.

No wonder they love him.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 03:45 PM

31. Gee that is like Ann Rmoney!

I didn't know I was rich!

recommend.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 04:02 PM

32. Oh-- so not a fraud, just incompetent and sloppy. Check.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 04:02 PM

33. What else would you expect from a Congressman who slept with a lobbyist?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 04:26 PM

34. What? I did the same thing once.

I signed four letters requesting $21 million, signed it and mailed it. Didn't get the money though.

Oh, that's right. I forgot. I never did that at all. Sorry.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to madashelltoo (Reply #34)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 04:31 PM

35. Could you do it retroactively?

Write a letter saying you want to retroactively request $21 million. It should work!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to KansDem (Reply #35)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 05:02 PM

39. Don't encourage me.

I'm so broke I'm willing to try retroactive.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 04:36 PM

36. "...stimulus was a failure..."

Did the company getting the money fail? Were any jobs created or were the funds denied and the company went out of business?

How is it a failure?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 04:45 PM

37. Once again: What happened to "personal responsibility"?

Republicans are 50lbs of bullshit in a 25lb bag.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 04:49 PM

38. What a POS

Liar.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 05:14 PM

40. The "Stimulus" (a Repub term) was all that kept this country afloat

The Stimulus worked.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 05:35 PM

41. He Didn’t Know He Signed Letters Asking For Stimulus Funds

Next Obama/Obama PAC ad in five for three two....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 07:17 PM

44. He means he didn't know we had the letters.

What a lying sack of liquid crap!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 07:52 PM

45. Uh huh. Sure. Well he'll have 2 go to confession.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 08:03 PM

46. Is he too stupid to understand the concept of signing a letter?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 6000eliot (Reply #46)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 08:59 PM

50. Nope. He's just counting on GOP voters

being too stupid to recognize the lies.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HooptieWagon (Reply #50)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 09:14 PM

52. One minor correction ... "too stupid to care about lies."

And usually the GOP voters don't disappoint.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 09:20 PM

54. I want a VP who'll just sign anything that comes across his desk

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 09:55 PM

55. Now that he realizes the "mistake" I expect he'll be returning the funds

he never intended to request. I'm sure his right wing constituents won't miss the big government help.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 10:11 PM

56. just like Romney with the SEC Documents

"our signatures on paper mean nothing, make us your president and vice president."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 11:48 PM

57. What

You little Eddie Munster look a like. He got caught in a major lie his first few days...you arrogant Ayn Rand follwn jerk.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sun Aug 19, 2012, 10:18 AM

58. Point made ...

he's just as stupid in real life as he is in Congress.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sun Aug 19, 2012, 12:01 PM

59. Yeah, and you're stupid too! Lumphead forgets what century it is. We have the vid. so we'll remind

you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sun Aug 19, 2012, 12:44 PM

60. Why are we being so "easy" on Ryan? His views are reprehensible! Highlight them! n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sun Aug 19, 2012, 07:55 PM

63. Well, then does he remember praising the Bush** stimulus in 2002?

Or did he "misspeak"?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sun Aug 19, 2012, 08:02 PM

64. My response to both Ryan and Rmoney would be: Don't you read

anything you sign? If you are that careless then why should anybody vote for you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread