Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Survivoreesta

(221 posts)
Fri Jan 6, 2012, 10:53 PM Jan 2012

Short NBC gig for Chelsea?

Chelsea Clinton’s much-trumpeted deal with NBC seems to be nearly done. Her contract is for only 90 days, and while she’ll provide the network with two more stories, sources say it is not certain she’ll immediately sign again.

Some sources believe Chelsea was “set up for a fall” after NBC trumpeted her deal to become a full-time special correspondent for the network in the New York Times in November.

NBC News president Steve Capus said Chelsea would work on its “Making a Difference” series on “Rock Center” and “Nightly News.” Capus told the Times, “We both want to see how this goes . . . But I hope it’s the beginning of a nice, long-term relationship.” He didn’t mention at the time it was for 90 days.

So there was huge anticipation for her Dec. 12 debut. Time wrote, “While it was never going to have the magnitude of the moon landing, the amount of hype leading up to Chelsea Clinton’s debut . . . was akin to one small step for Chelsea, one giant leap for network television.” The Washington Post’s Hank Stuever wrote after it aired, “Either we’re spoiled by TV’s unlimited population of giant personalities or this woman is one of the most boring people of her era.”

Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/pagesix/short_nbc_gig_for_chelsea_Hm0IfRCcUCYS0JvX9hmLiL#ixzz1ijkRe6dw

Mixed feelings. I don't think she's qualified to be a major network reporter. But that doesn't seem to hinder the sons of the famous now does it?

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Beaverhausen

(24,470 posts)
1. My understanding is she is doing 'feature' stories about charities and not new stories
Fri Jan 6, 2012, 11:00 PM
Jan 2012

if Chelsea does a story about a charity and that charity benefits from it, what is the harm?

TexasProgresive

(12,155 posts)
2. I don't think anyone is qualified to be a network reporter
Fri Jan 6, 2012, 11:01 PM
Jan 2012

without gaining some experience in small local markets. We get these kids all the time and they are pathetic to begin with but many grow into the job.

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
4. Doesn't hinder the daughters either if their fathers are republicans
Fri Jan 6, 2012, 11:48 PM
Jan 2012

McCain's valley girl daughter is all over the TV anymore and the blond Bush kid used to be on the Today show every time I saw it (which wasn't very often but anyway...)

 

glowing

(12,233 posts)
5. They gave a gig to Luke Russert.. and then there was one network who gave
Fri Jan 6, 2012, 11:51 PM
Jan 2012

one of the Bush girls a spot on one of the AM shows.. Its all about the 1% elite taking care of their 1% elite selves.

razorman

(1,644 posts)
6. Regardless of how celebrity kids get their jobs as TV "journalists", all that matters at the end of
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 09:06 AM
Apr 2012

the day is whether they have the chops for it. If they cannot attract and keep an audience, they will not have the job long. So, if either Chelsea Clinton or the Bush twins cannot bring the numbers(and money) in, they will be out on their asses.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Short NBC gig for Chelsea...