Thu Aug 16, 2012, 12:37 AM
truthisfreedom (17,675 posts)
Gallup: No immediate bounce for Romney after Ryan VP pick
Source: CBS News
(CBS News) Despite conservative enthusiasm surrounding the announcement that Paul Ryan has been tapped as Mitt Romney's presidential running mate, a new Gallup tracking poll shows that the presumptive GOP nominee has not benefited from any material bounce in its poll since the pick was made public. According to the survey, 47 percent of registered voters surveyed in the four day period following Romney's announcement said they supported Romney, while 45 percent said they would vote for President Obama. In the four days prior to the announcment, 46 percent backed Romney and 45 percent backed Mr. Obama. --- According to that poll, 39 percent of Americans said they thought Ryan was either "excellent" or "pretty good" as a VP choice, while 42 percent called the choice "only fair" or "poor." Nineteen percent expressed no opinion. By contrast, 46 percent of voters called Sarah Palin an "excellent" or "pretty good" choice in 2008, and 46 percent said the same of Biden. Compared to recent vice presidential candidates, only Dan Quayle has scored higher than Ryan among those who believed him to be an "only fair" or "poor" VP pick. Read more: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57493936-503544/gallup-no-immediate-bounce-for-romney-after-ryan-vp-pick/ Dan Quayle. Now that's a blast from the past. I'm not surprised Eddie Munster didn't help.
|
20 replies, 3039 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| truthisfreedom | Aug 2012 | OP | |
| SoapBox | Aug 2012 | #1 | |
| mimi85 | Aug 2012 | #5 | |
| AndyTiedye | Aug 2012 | #2 | |
| Grassy Knoll | Aug 2012 | #3 | |
| Honeycombe8 | Aug 2012 | #7 | |
| regnaD kciN | Aug 2012 | #9 | |
| Honeycombe8 | Aug 2012 | #10 | |
| mwooldri | Aug 2012 | #18 | |
| regnaD kciN | Aug 2012 | #8 | |
| SleeplessinSoCal | Aug 2012 | #11 | |
| msongs | Aug 2012 | #4 | |
| Liberal_Stalwart71 | Aug 2012 | #6 | |
| INdemo | Aug 2012 | #12 | |
| RoccoR5955 | Aug 2012 | #15 | |
| INdemo | Aug 2012 | #19 | |
| bucolic_frolic | Aug 2012 | #13 | |
| sendero | Aug 2012 | #14 | |
| JoePhilly | Aug 2012 | #16 | |
| savalez | Aug 2012 | #20 | |
| mwooldri | Aug 2012 | #17 |
Response to truthisfreedom (Original post)
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 12:47 AM
SoapBox (5,812 posts)
1. The more I see of CouponPaul...
|
the more he creeps me out.
All I can think of is Damien / Satan. |
Response to SoapBox (Reply #1)
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 01:15 AM
mimi85 (407 posts)
5. The only one who creeps me out more
|
is Eric Cantor - smug bastard. Boehner should watch his back with him around. You can see Eric just drooling for the tan man's job. I do agree about Paul - he's super creepy crawly.
|
Response to truthisfreedom (Original post)
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 12:51 AM
AndyTiedye (22,977 posts)
2. Does Anybody But Gallup Think RMoney is Ahead?
Response to AndyTiedye (Reply #2)
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 01:01 AM
Grassy Knoll (4,271 posts)
3. Yep, Rasmussen Poll, The dick head that works with....
|
fox news, Google Scott Rasmussen, Right leaning for quite some time.
|
Response to Grassy Knoll (Reply #3)
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 01:36 AM
Honeycombe8 (18,006 posts)
7. Hmmmm. Still, something to pay attention to. I remember that Kerry polls
|
showed he was trending downward, but no one believed them. They turned out to be fairly accurate.
What matters now, I think, is what the swing states do, and whether the trend is up or down for Obama. |
Response to Honeycombe8 (Reply #7)
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 02:07 AM
regnaD kciN (17,427 posts)
9. I have no idea what you're talking about...
|
There were no "Kerry polls" that were "trending downward." The polls in 2004 showed a dead heat, and so it turned out -- close enough for voting "irregularities" in Ohio to determine the outcome.
|
Response to regnaD kciN (Reply #9)
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 02:16 AM
Honeycombe8 (18,006 posts)
10. I have them saved on my other, old computer. Yes, it was a dead heat, with Kerry
|
trending slightly downward, and often slightly less than Bush. Pretty much how the end result was. I remembered that at the time, I disregarded the ones that showed that, and believed the ones that showed Kerry slightly ahead.
We see what we want to see. Two national polls show Romney slightly ahead. So....two national polls show Romney slightly ahead. That means something. Maybe not much, in the end. But it means something, if you are a fact seeker. |
Response to Honeycombe8 (Reply #10)
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 08:36 AM
mwooldri (5,985 posts)
18. National polls, scmashional polls.
|
It's where those votes are that matters.
If Romney's up 2% in NC, then that's not good news for Obama. If Romney is up 2% in Texas - well that doesn't mean diddly squat. |
Response to AndyTiedye (Reply #2)
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 02:04 AM
regnaD kciN (17,427 posts)
8. Rasmussen and Purple Strategies...
|
In other news, a poll of the College of Cardinals has revealed that 100% of all respondents think Roman Catholic dogma is completely true.
|
Response to AndyTiedye (Reply #2)
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 03:37 AM
SleeplessinSoCal (1,635 posts)
11. nope
Response to truthisfreedom (Original post)
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 01:06 AM
msongs (30,485 posts)
4. palin got the T&A + curiosity factor to give her a bounce lol nt
Response to truthisfreedom (Original post)
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 01:25 AM
Liberal_Stalwart71 (13,841 posts)
6. That means that hopefully those Medicare ads aren't working for Robme.
Response to truthisfreedom (Original post)
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 06:07 AM
INdemo (3,160 posts)
12. Here is a zogby poll that shows a little different story !
Response to INdemo (Reply #12)
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 08:05 AM
RoccoR5955 (6,490 posts)
15. Give me a break, Newsmax?!?!
|
I don't care who did the poll, if Newsmax has it, they crafted the questions to look like the result they wanted.
|
Response to RoccoR5955 (Reply #15)
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 11:07 AM
INdemo (3,160 posts)
19. That was my point ..this right wing rag
|
shows an Obama lead..unlike (R)ammussen...But I will agree I should have used a different source...
|
Response to truthisfreedom (Original post)
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 06:47 AM
bucolic_frolic (708 posts)
13. Hey Mitt! Tax Amnesty? Clairol?
Response to truthisfreedom (Original post)
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 07:46 AM
sendero (25,000 posts)
14. Despite the best efforts..
|
.. of the MSM and NPR. Oops I'm redundant.
|
Response to truthisfreedom (Original post)
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 08:07 AM
JoePhilly (15,979 posts)
16. Hey Gallup, if the "bounce" isn't immediate, there was NO bounce. Geeeze!!
|
I mean, what are they expecting a DELAYED BOUNCE? Like maybe a week after the announcement of Ryan people suddenly get excited about him?
|
Response to JoePhilly (Reply #16)
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 01:53 PM
savalez (1,983 posts)
20. Ha ha. Exactly! No immediate bounce means there was NO BOUNCE.
Response to truthisfreedom (Original post)
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 08:34 AM
mwooldri (5,985 posts)
17. You mean this time the cat lived?
|
There was no so-called "dead cat bounce" ?
If so I'm glad to hear the kitty is safe and well. May the big snowball keep rolling down that mountain, getting larger and larger as it goes to wham! into Romney's political career. Hopefully taking down Ryan too. |

