Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:34 PM
kpete (38,896 posts)
After Ryan, Romney cancels TV interviews (including Gwen Ifill)
Source: Politico
After Ryan, Romney cancels TV interviews By DYLAN BYERS | 8/11/12 11:43 AM EDT Mitt Romney has cancelled this weekend's scheduled television interviews, following today's announcement that Paul Ryan had been tapped as running mate. PBS Newshour confirms that the Romney campaign has cancelled today's interview with Gwen Ifill, which was to air on Monday. The Romney campaign also cancelled one-on-one interviews with local networks in the Virginia area, where Romney launched his bus tour. The Romney campaign did not respond to request for comment. Read more: http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2012/08/after-ryan-romney-cancels-tv-interviews-131785.html hmmmmmmm...
|
71 replies, 9144 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| kpete | Aug 2012 | OP | |
| NRaleighLiberal | Aug 2012 | #1 | |
| progressivebydesign | Aug 2012 | #8 | |
| Berlum | Aug 2012 | #28 | |
| dixiegrrrrl | Aug 2012 | #68 | |
| monmouth | Aug 2012 | #27 | |
| Roy Rolling | Aug 2012 | #41 | |
| monmouth | Aug 2012 | #44 | |
| Justice wanted | Aug 2012 | #46 | |
| Rosa Luxemburg | Aug 2012 | #2 | |
| goclark | Aug 2012 | #9 | |
| bupkus | Aug 2012 | #20 | |
| Rosa Luxemburg | Aug 2012 | #26 | |
| nxylas | Aug 2012 | #61 | |
| MissNostalgia | Aug 2012 | #42 | |
| a2liberal | Aug 2012 | #3 | |
| TeamPooka | Aug 2012 | #15 | |
| wordpix | Aug 2012 | #25 | |
| truthisfreedom | Aug 2012 | #4 | |
| CaliforniaPeggy | Aug 2012 | #5 | |
| Firebrand Gary | Aug 2012 | #10 | |
| bupkus | Aug 2012 | #21 | |
| JDPriestly | Aug 2012 | #37 | |
| bupkus | Aug 2012 | #47 | |
| amandabeech | Aug 2012 | #50 | |
| bucklaw | Aug 2012 | #60 | |
| global1 | Aug 2012 | #6 | |
| LibDemAlways | Aug 2012 | #7 | |
| wordpix | Aug 2012 | #19 | |
| coalition_unwilling | Aug 2012 | #22 | |
| BREMPRO | Aug 2012 | #11 | |
| LibDemAlways | Aug 2012 | #13 | |
| BREMPRO | Aug 2012 | #70 | |
| LibDemAlways | Aug 2012 | #71 | |
| tularetom | Aug 2012 | #12 | |
| tavalon | Aug 2012 | #59 | |
| Athame | Aug 2012 | #67 | |
| bayareaboy | Aug 2012 | #14 | |
| Snarkoleptic | Aug 2012 | #18 | |
| bupkus | Aug 2012 | #16 | |
| JDPriestly | Aug 2012 | #38 | |
| csziggy | Aug 2012 | #65 | |
| Lone_Star_Dem | Aug 2012 | #17 | |
| Cracklin Charlie | Aug 2012 | #33 | |
| sofa king | Aug 2012 | #56 | |
| underpants | Aug 2012 | #64 | |
| louis-t | Aug 2012 | #23 | |
| elleng | Aug 2012 | #36 | |
| wordpix | Aug 2012 | #24 | |
| warrior1 | Aug 2012 | #29 | |
| Festivito | Aug 2012 | #30 | |
| Kalidurga | Aug 2012 | #31 | |
| muriel_volestrangler | Aug 2012 | #32 | |
| elleng | Aug 2012 | #34 | |
| Ratty | Aug 2012 | #35 | |
| Major Hogwash | Aug 2012 | #39 | |
| kiranon | Aug 2012 | #40 | |
| goclark | Aug 2012 | #55 | |
| ailsagirl | Aug 2012 | #43 | |
| magical thyme | Aug 2012 | #45 | |
| Ilsa | Aug 2012 | #48 | |
| magical thyme | Aug 2012 | #51 | |
| Ilsa | Aug 2012 | #52 | |
| and-justice-for-all | Aug 2012 | #49 | |
| madrchsod | Aug 2012 | #53 | |
| gkhouston | Aug 2012 | #54 | |
| davidpdx | Aug 2012 | #57 | |
| tavalon | Aug 2012 | #58 | |
| dixvilleninotchka | Aug 2012 | #62 | |
| underpants | Aug 2012 | #63 | |
| sofa king | Aug 2012 | #66 | |
| underpants | Aug 2012 | #69 |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:36 PM
NRaleighLiberal (28,623 posts)
1. are they getting ready to pull a switcheroo?
|
Freudian slip on the ship this AM?
|
Response to NRaleighLiberal (Reply #1)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:39 PM
progressivebydesign (19,363 posts)
8. OMG. Maybe Romney did NOT misspeak when he intro'd him as the "next president" of the U.S.
|
Do you think??? Or is Ryan just schooling Romney on the Ryan/Norquist/Koch/Rand ways???
|
Response to progressivebydesign (Reply #8)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 01:35 PM
Berlum (3,712 posts)
28. That was part of the Republican OCCULT maneuver they so carefully planned
|
Nothing happens by ac cid ent
|
Response to progressivebydesign (Reply #8)
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 11:14 AM
dixiegrrrrl (30,831 posts)
68. Did he really "intro'd him as the "next president" of the U.S."?
|
I missed that bit...tell me more, pls.
|
Response to NRaleighLiberal (Reply #1)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 01:32 PM
monmouth (21,078 posts)
27. I think Romney is tired, too much "work" for him after a hectic week..LOL..n/t
Response to monmouth (Reply #27)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 03:10 PM
Roy Rolling (1,011 posts)
41. Cancelled Media Appearances
|
Last edited Sat Aug 11, 2012, 03:10 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) "Romney cancelled all media appearances and polls showed an immediate 10-point bump"
|
Response to Roy Rolling (Reply #41)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 03:17 PM
monmouth (21,078 posts)
44. Bwahaha..Good one....n/t
Response to NRaleighLiberal (Reply #1)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 03:22 PM
Justice wanted (2,657 posts)
46. I was been thinking the Leadership of the party wants Romney out. He can't capture the base the
|
way Ryan can AND after he caused so many problems overseas Romney really screwed himself.
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:36 PM
Rosa Luxemburg (22,020 posts)
2. Is Romney stepping down?
?w=468&h=344 |
Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Reply #2)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:40 PM
goclark (30,404 posts)
9. That is the first thing I was thinking
|
Rmoney is on total overload and he really needs Rehab |
Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Reply #2)
bupkus This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to bupkus (Reply #20)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 01:28 PM
Rosa Luxemburg (22,020 posts)
26. could be correct
|
well hopefully they don't steal the election like Bush did
|
Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Reply #26)
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 04:14 AM
nxylas (4,697 posts)
61. Oh, they'll try
|
If the Democrats have any sense, their election campaign will be about 45% actual campaigning, 55% trying to ensure that everyone who is eligible to vote is allowed to do so.
|
Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Reply #2)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 03:12 PM
MissNostalgia (137 posts)
42. I cant even imagine the horror
|
This is chilling.
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:36 PM
a2liberal (996 posts)
3. gotta work on a new "message" (set of lies) first... (n/t)
Response to a2liberal (Reply #3)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:45 PM
TeamPooka (3,297 posts)
15. getting their stories straight
Response to TeamPooka (Reply #15)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 01:21 PM
wordpix (12,478 posts)
25. especially since O's "Son of Boss" ad, see post #24
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:37 PM
truthisfreedom (17,677 posts)
4. Their numbers are down so far there's no hope, and Ryan will not help.
|
Plus, rMoney doesn't even know the guy, so he'd be hard-pressed to answer any questions about him.
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:37 PM
CaliforniaPeggy (103,998 posts)
5. That's weird. What's going on?
|
I just don't get this.
|
Response to CaliforniaPeggy (Reply #5)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:41 PM
Firebrand Gary (3,313 posts)
10. That's a very Palin move....Canceling interviews???? Hmmmm
|
I don't get it either!
|
Response to Firebrand Gary (Reply #10)
bupkus This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to bupkus (Reply #21)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 02:59 PM
JDPriestly (37,760 posts)
37. Romney most likely reads enough and knows what day it is and the names of.
|
newspapers. So he is way ahead of Palin in that respect.
Romney has an MBA and a law degree from Harvard I believe. Romney's problem is that he is a poor little rich boy -- a Little Lord Fauntleroy for those in my generation. He is simply spoiled and does not know what life is like in our real, Main Street world. Our refrigerator broke down. We had to call a repairman. Romney doesn't have to deal with calling the repairman when his help's refrigerator breaks down. Even when his wife cooks, they don't have to worry about the cheapest way to repair the refrigerator. And they certainly have no anxiety about the cost of losing a refrigerator full of food to spoilage. They have no idea, no clue as to our problems, or ordinary, everyday problems. |
Response to JDPriestly (Reply #37)
bupkus This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to bupkus (Reply #47)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 04:46 PM
amandabeech (8,298 posts)
50. Rmoney is a spreadsheet geek.
|
He likes numbers, not people.
I don't like what Bain did, but it is easy to see that it reflects its creator, Mitt. Running the U.S. government does require the leader to known some numbers, but it is more important that the leader can work with and understand people. Harvard law and b schools likely do not communicate with the graduate departments of psychology, sociology and political science. So . . . if students of law a b schools don't "get it" with people before they matriculate, then they won't learn it by graduation. |
Response to bupkus (Reply #47)
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 03:26 AM
bucklaw (3 posts)
60. HE IS USING HIS HARDWARE STUFF.
|
Bushy two graduated from Harvard and Yale. Can you say, "REFUND?"
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:38 PM
global1 (10,589 posts)
6. Very Interesting - Hmmmm.......
|
does his campaign staff have to prepare him with answers for questions that might come up now that he picked Ryan. Have the been looking at the comments being made here on DU and the President's response to the pick and are now having second thoughts?
This could get interesting. |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:38 PM
LibDemAlways (12,942 posts)
7. This is rich. Rmoney doesn't want to answer questions about
|
his taxes, his business dealings, and now, apparently, his choice of running mate. He gives new meaning to the word wuss.
|
Response to LibDemAlways (Reply #7)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 01:04 PM
wordpix (12,478 posts)
19. +1000 - "I made positive news today with the Ryan pick, and no questions will be answered"
Response to wordpix (Reply #19)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 01:15 PM
coalition_unwilling (14,180 posts)
22. "You people know all you need to know about my decision" - n/t
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:41 PM
BREMPRO (2,142 posts)
11. wtf! should be huge media blitz to promote his VP pic.. they are amateurs..
|
as Romney always says (projects) about Obama = he's in over his head.. no idea what he's doing... this has to be the most lame ass disorganized loser campaign i've ever seen... maybe they need to have an emergency rebranding and campaign rhetoric orientation session now before they hit the press? (should have already done this in advance) fizzzle!!
|
Response to BREMPRO (Reply #11)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:44 PM
LibDemAlways (12,942 posts)
13. They already screwed up majorly in making the VP
|
announcement at 9 AM on a Sat. on the East Coast when most of the country was still asleep. These people are in way, way over their heads.
|
Response to LibDemAlways (Reply #13)
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 03:53 PM
BREMPRO (2,142 posts)
70. Right! Saturday am? That's when you pass legislation and make recess appointments you don't want
|
Last edited Mon Aug 13, 2012, 03:56 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) anyone to know about!
I suspect there is a smugness and arrogance that comes from the top.. Romney himself making these calls.. used to being in charge and not listening to advisors at risk of hurting his own delicate oversized ego. They probably told him 1) don't pick Ryan and 2) don't announce your vp pick saturday am.. he said.. no i'm going to do it my way.. i'm decisive and smart.. Ryan's my guy and i'll let the little people know on Saturday am... it's decided. final answer. lol!! |
Response to BREMPRO (Reply #70)
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 07:26 PM
LibDemAlways (12,942 posts)
71. As another poster commented, they might as well have done it at midnight. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid.
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:42 PM
tularetom (17,402 posts)
12. In the immortal words of Gob Bluth
|
Romney realizes "I've made a terrible mistake".
|
Response to tularetom (Reply #12)
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 03:19 AM
tavalon (25,689 posts)
59. Gob Bluth
|
LOL
|
Response to tularetom (Reply #12)
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 11:04 AM
Athame (1,340 posts)
67. Gob Bluth
|
Perfect reference. We were just rewatching last night. Now I will have Romney in my head whenever we see Gob again.
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:45 PM
bayareaboy (585 posts)
14. Mittens! ...
|
Mr Incommunicado. It is gonna happen a lot more too. I guess he feels now that his handlers have it in control. Just play the one he did with Shepard Smith at FOX, over and over, if you want to see the real man. |
Response to bayareaboy (Reply #14)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:59 PM
Snarkoleptic (2,561 posts)
18. Domo Arigato Mr. Incommunicado (err roboto)
Response to kpete (Original post)
bupkus This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to bupkus (Reply #16)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 03:04 PM
JDPriestly (37,760 posts)
38. Ryan was on Social Security benefits at 16. He has worked for the government
|
or in jobs not in the business sector all his life, and is that well off at his young age. How did he do it? Where did the money he invests come from?
Is his wife's family wealthy? Where did her living trust come from? We need to know the answer to these questions. Who has provided Ryan's cushion, his personal and private safety net? How much has his wealth increased since 1998 when he first came to Congress? |
Response to JDPriestly (Reply #38)
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 10:16 AM
csziggy (14,206 posts)
65. Ryan's wife was a lobbyist when they married
|
And comes from a politically active family:
Meet Janna Little Ryan, Who Wants To Be America's Second Lady Janna Little Ryan grew up in Oklahoma, the niece of the state's former Democratic governor and senator. She graduated from Wellesley College, the private women's college in Massachusetts whose alumnae also include Hillary Clinton, and George Washington University Law School in DC. Just a few years later, she met and soon married a freshman member of Congress, Rep. Paul Ryan. Today, Mitt Romney introduced Ryan as his running mate, and Janna Little Ryan, a year older than Ryan, could become the Second Lady of the United States. More: http://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/meet-janna-little-ryan-who-wants-to-be-americas |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:56 PM
Lone_Star_Dem (27,597 posts)
17. So this implies he wasn't planning this for a while.
|
Not the oddly timed Saturday announcement. Not the selection of Ryan.
If he had been he'd have his talking points ready to roll. Instead they're going to let their surrogates soften the crowd on Sunday before he has to take any questions on Monday regarding this selection. If my speculation is true, they really were in a panic. More so than I'd realized. |
Response to Lone_Star_Dem (Reply #17)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 02:09 PM
Cracklin Charlie (561 posts)
33. What do you think brought on the panic?
|
This campaign seems to have been running in panic mode ever since Mitt secured the "nomination". Either that, or the campaign staff is just hideously inept.
Is it at all customary to name the vp choice this far in advance of their convention? I have felt for months that Ryan would be Romney's choice. Especially since Sen Reid came out with the news about Mittens' taxes. Ryan is really about the only Republican who could have a chance to get Mitt's taxes out of the headlines...no way could those other milque-toast clowns have diverted that enormous issue. And it's doubtful that Paul Ryan will be up to that job, either. I'm gonna go out on a limb here, and predict that before the convention, we'll be like Cousin Vinny, saying about Paul Ryan..."I'm done with this guy". Next witness. |
Response to Cracklin Charlie (Reply #33)
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 01:03 AM
sofa king (8,707 posts)
56. I can hazard a guess.
|
There was a disturbance in the Force somewhere in the second half of this past week. I saw someone here mention that some Republican in the know was blabbing about the VP pick. Romney told the press he was going to make the announcement next week (surprise! another lie).
But it's a pain in the ass to go back and separate the guesses from those who sound like they know, so I'll wait for someone else to tease out who the leaker I am postulating really was. Fox News unloaded the announcement apparently on cue at about 11 pm last night, which used to be called the "Friday night graveyard" slot. That, along with this change of television plans, suggests to me that there was enough time to choreograph an announcement within a day or a weekend, but not within a week. I think Mitt's people intentionally scheduled the convention itself to entirely avoid the Olympics, which further suggests to me that this announcement was not planned very far in advance. The overall timing of the announcement about three weeks out from the convention, doesn't strike me as particularly unusual, though. Okay, so here's my guess: Many different and competing entities could lay claim to a say in the choice of the VP. I think one of them forced the issue by "leaking" their own choice, and leaving Mitt to decide whether or not to try to walk that crap back like he's walked back all of his other lies, or to run with it. He would not have had much time to decide, knowing that the leak would certainly bleed onto the front page by Sunday. The source would have to be very powerful to make such a leak stick when every kook in the country (myself included) was pitching guesses. My suspicion is that the Kochs did it. |
Response to Lone_Star_Dem (Reply #17)
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 09:47 AM
underpants (105,621 posts)
64. This - look at how spooky and canny we are - article says they have been working on this since Feb
|
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014191586
So on one hand we have the story of how vetted all the choices were (including YEARS of tax returns) but now we hear "Oh we just did this because we are soooo BOLD" |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 01:18 PM
louis-t (12,506 posts)
23. No, Ryan will do all the talking from now on.
|
Romney made too many mistakes. Romney will get a momentary bump, but this will force scrutiny on Ryan's budget fiasco. People are not going to like what they see. Up to now, it has been sold as a cure-all. Ryan is a good salesman, but he will have to dance like Michael Jackson to sell this load of horseshit.
|
Response to louis-t (Reply #23)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 02:23 PM
elleng (40,545 posts)
36. Sounds like a good idea to me, for them.
|
SHHHHH, DON'T TELL THEM!
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 01:19 PM
wordpix (12,478 posts)
24. no doubt has to do with "one of largest tax avoidance schemes in history," the Son of Boss, & O ad:
|
Rachel had a segment on this. Has to do with Rmoney heading up Marriot Corp's audit committee and sheltering $70,000,000 in taxes. Court ruled against Marriott. http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterjreilly/2012/08/10/son-of-boss-dont-blame-romney-blame-his-tax-pros/ Note: I'm including this article above because it explains what a Son of Boss scheme is, and NOT b/c I agree with writer that Rmoney is not to blame. Rmoney needs to get his "I knew nothing" story straight about Son of Boss so he can do his Olympic contortion act with the press and win his match. |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 01:43 PM
warrior1 (9,260 posts)
29. they needed to change the subject
|
Hey Mitt where are you Tax returns?
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 01:47 PM
Festivito (12,283 posts)
30. Well, that should help his ratings. /nt
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 02:05 PM
Kalidurga (4,822 posts)
31. Cowards...
|
Someone needs to tell Mitt he is running for President and that he can run, but he can't hide.
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 02:05 PM
muriel_volestrangler (65,349 posts)
32. Does this show how risky Ryan is as a choice?
|
If they felt confident they could sell him, they'd have announced this on a weekday, after the Olympics, and be ready with talking points on how 'marvelous' Ryan is. They'd love to be dominating the news with their spin on Ryan, through interviews.
I think they are unsure how it will all play out, so they've announced it at the start of the final weekend of the Olympics, where it won't be the only thing the news can talk about - instead, they will be able to check the reactions of the media, and of the Democrats, and then plan how to respond. They're afraid. Very afraid. |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 02:12 PM
elleng (40,545 posts)
34. NOT a bfd, imo; perfectly expectable.
|
Team message has to be sculpted.
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 02:18 PM
Ratty (1,837 posts)
35. Isn't this the way it is for Republicans nowdays?
|
Shunning the liberal biased lamestream media who only want to score ratings points with their "gotcha" questions like "what do you read?" Expect lots of fair and balanced Fox and Friends interviews and maybe an appearance or two with Hannity and Rush Limbaugh.
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 03:09 PM
Major Hogwash (12,365 posts)
39. "I have nothing to say. Don't quote me on that." Haha haha!!!!
|
Last edited Sat Aug 11, 2012, 03:12 PM USA/ET - Edit history (2) What else do you want to stop talking about, Mitt, besides your time at Bain?
Your income tax returns? Your term as Governor of Massachusetts? Your pick for veep candidate, Ryan? Your position on Medicare? Your disposition on Medicaid? Your desire to ruin Social Security? Your expert analysis of Obama's foreign policy? That damn veep dartboard just doesn't work the same as the oiuja board, when it comes to answering questions does it, Big Fella? You lost your Magic 8-ball, didn't ya? Hoo-haw!! |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 03:10 PM
kiranon (1,407 posts)
40. Romney wants to be King and Ryan wants to be the President.
|
No press interviews makes no sense. Just waiting for Romney to withdraw. How odd that he introduced his VP choice as the next President of the United States. If elected Romney would be the President in name only. An empty suit with a VP who wants to control.
|
Response to kiranon (Reply #40)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 11:43 PM
goclark (30,404 posts)
55. what do u bet that
|
Mittwit will step aside "for family reasons?
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 03:15 PM
ailsagirl (9,584 posts)
43. One would THINK they'd want to "shout it from the rooftops!"
|
I wish one of us had a friend in Team Romney and could clue us in. I'm dying to know!
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 03:22 PM
magical thyme (4,083 posts)
45. hail mary pass. didn't have talking points ready in advance.
|
Mittens couldn't even handle the simple announcement without screwing up. They're in total panic mode, operating tactically in the moment with no plan b after plan a (referendum on economy) was a total fail.
Obama's team, on the other hand, had their first ad out within a couple hours of the announcement. Either they knew Ryan was going to be the final choice, or they had several ads in the can and ready to go, depending on the choice. Watch for a repeat of the pounding Romney took from the starting gate. All rolling out in carefully planned sequence, for sure. |
Response to magical thyme (Reply #45)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 03:44 PM
Ilsa (31,684 posts)
48. Isn't Gibbs running the campaign?
|
Whoever it is, they are doing a masterful job, including running ads on the Internet and making sure it gets prime time TV and news exposure without ever paying a dime in advertising.
|
Response to Ilsa (Reply #48)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 07:09 PM
magical thyme (4,083 posts)
51. Jim Messina is, but really the whole team is doing a masterful job
|
Think of Stephanie Cutter planting the felony idea and then, when they assumed she'd be thrown under the bus, she instead was put front and center to sweetly facing them down and eviscerate them on Sunday am teevee.
They've outspent Romney on advertising in swing states, but their ads have been so brilliant that the ads themselves have netted additional showing on news programs and Sunday talk shows. They are able to outspend Romney up to the convention because rules say they can only use primary $$ until official nomination. Romney busted his budget on the primary, whereas Obama wasn't primaried. Or if he was, nobody noticed. |
Response to magical thyme (Reply #51)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 08:42 PM
Ilsa (31,684 posts)
52. Excellent explanation. Many thanks. Learned slot. nt
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 04:17 PM
and-justice-for-all (14,763 posts)
49. They know they are going to lose...
|
which is their only option...and I am quite happy with that result.
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 11:19 PM
madrchsod (55,740 posts)
53. amateur hour....
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 11:24 PM
gkhouston (21,642 posts)
54. Probably hoping that if he waits a bit, questions will be about Ryan instead of son of BOSS. n/t
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 02:38 AM
davidpdx (8,796 posts)
57. So he's going back to the "I'm not talking to the media" strategy
|
How did that work out for you last time Mitt?
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 03:16 AM
tavalon (25,689 posts)
58. uh oh,
|
wonder if they are considering a retroactive abortion?
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 04:39 AM
dixvilleninotchka (5 posts)
62. WTF? This is NOT how to run a presidential campaign...
|
Ok, so are we to infer that this douchebag is simply NOT running for president in any serious way? I mean, we've already figured out that he's not going to beat the President. He's added Ryan to the ticket which shuts up some of the Tea Baggers, brings out a few more voters in November who otherwise would have stayed home, and tries to set Ryan up for 2016.
But, you know, you take advantage of the press coverage when you name a VP. You get your message out. You look good on TV and bring your "ideas" to the people with a huge blast of free media. You take a bump in the polls and try to leverage it as much as possible. Has Romney already decided not to take this run for president seriously? It's as if he's given up. I mean, that's fine with me, but we did have a few more things on the dance card to take care of before we wrap it up in November. |
Response to dixvilleninotchka (Reply #62)
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 09:45 AM
underpants (105,621 posts)
63. Exactly - you get to frame the VP all weekend long
|
WTF ARE they doing???
|
Response to underpants (Reply #63)
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 10:37 AM
sofa king (8,707 posts)
66. I think the Kochs stuck it on him.
|
I don't think Mitt had actually decided yet. The Dems seem to have traced Ryan's private plane on Friday night and they certainly would have tried to fizzle the pick by tipping it early. But they would have leaked to a source Republicans can't stand (which fucks with the minds of right wingers when an authority they don't trust tells them an unavoidable truth). They wouldn't have given it to Fox News.
I think it was the Kochs who decided to pull an end-run around all the other people who think they own Mitt and staged the Fox unveiling at 11 on Friday--the worst announcement time and day outside of 2am on a weeknight. Then they presented Mitt with the fait accompli and left him to decide whether or not to run on the false start or try to lie his way out of it... again. |
Response to sofa king (Reply #66)
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 02:44 PM
underpants (105,621 posts)
69. Push-pull
|
what you posted is the most likely - the other side is that Mitt knew that Ryan would keep Koch/Adelson money pouring in
|


?w=468&h=344