HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Coloradoans likely to vot...

Wed Aug 8, 2012, 06:29 PM

Coloradoans likely to vote on ‘fetal personhood’ for a third time in November

Source: Raw Story

Coloradoans likely to vote on ‘fetal personhood’ for a third time in November
By Eric W. Dolan
Wednesday, August 8, 2012 18:04 EDT



Personhood Colorado has announced it collected 112,121 signatures for a proposed anti-abortion amendment to the state’s constitution. If 86,105 of those signatures are valid, the proposed amendment will be placed on the Colorado ballot for the third time in four years.

“Once again, we are amazed at the tenacity of our nearly fifteen hundred volunteers,” said Rosalinda Lozano of Rachel’s Vineyard, one of the sponsors of the proposed amendment. “We had seven fewer weeks to petition due to another failed lawsuit from Planned Parenthood, yet we are turning in over thirty thousand signatures more than in 2010.”

The ballot measure would define a human being as “a member of the species homo sapiens at any stage of development.” The proposed amendment is meant to set up a legal challenge to Roe v. Wade, by completely prohibiting a woman from terminating her pregnancy, even in cases of incest or rape.

A similar constitutional amendment was defeated by Colorado voters in 2008 and again 2010. Critics of the previous amendments claimed that it would do more than just outlaw abortion. They said it would also affect common birth control methods, the treatment of ectopic pregnancy, in vitro fertilization treatment, and stem cell research.


Read more: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/08/08/coloradoans-likely-to-vote-on-fetal-personhood-for-a-third-time-in-november/

27 replies, 2441 views

Thread informationRemove bookmarkTrash this thread

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 27 replies Author Time Post
Reply Coloradoans likely to vote on ‘fetal personhood’ for a third time in November (Original post)
Judi Lynn Aug 2012 OP
CrispyQ Aug 2012 #1
Botany Aug 2012 #2
Dont_Bogart_the_Pretzel Aug 2012 #26
xxqqqzme Aug 2012 #3
lame54 Aug 2012 #4
azurnoir Aug 2012 #5
Judi Lynn Aug 2012 #20
azurnoir Aug 2012 #24
HockeyMom Aug 2012 #6
grantcart Aug 2012 #7
davidpdx Aug 2012 #8
Panasonic Aug 2012 #15
davidpdx Aug 2012 #18
CrispyQ Aug 2012 #27
Thor_MN Aug 2012 #17
davidpdx Aug 2012 #19
smirkymonkey Aug 2012 #9
Judi Lynn Aug 2012 #21
tanyev Aug 2012 #10
uppityperson Aug 2012 #11
sakabatou Aug 2012 #12
Panasonic Aug 2012 #13
awoke_in_2003 Aug 2012 #14
Lone_Star_Dem Aug 2012 #16
Drahthaardogs Aug 2012 #22
sofa king Aug 2012 #23
blaze Aug 2012 #25

Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Wed Aug 8, 2012, 06:34 PM

1. I am so goddamned fucking sick of this goddamned fucking shit.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Wed Aug 8, 2012, 06:34 PM

2. All men opposed to abortion should never get one.

"they" are against abortion but they are against birth control, health care,
education, and helping out people in general ...... when you are a fetus they
are all there but once you are born you are on your own.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Botany (Reply #2)

Thu Aug 9, 2012, 08:32 PM

26. +1

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Wed Aug 8, 2012, 06:37 PM

3. Here in California,

we had to put up w/ 'parental notification' as a constitutional amendment. It fined and imprisoned doctors if they did not notify parents of a minor seeking a termination. It was defeated 3 times in 5 years, each time by a larger majority. They tried again in 2010 and couldn't get enough signatures to turn the measure into the SoS.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Wed Aug 8, 2012, 06:38 PM

4. Can fetuses vote?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Wed Aug 8, 2012, 06:49 PM

5. maybe someone should start a meme that 4 in 5 fetus's born to single mothers

will grow up to be Democrats , that'll stop 'em if nothing else does

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to azurnoir (Reply #5)

Thu Aug 9, 2012, 03:29 AM

20. Now there's a thought! Good one, indeed. It'd be bound to work. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Reply #20)

Thu Aug 9, 2012, 07:39 PM

24. The best part is I'm betting it's true

They're just that clueless

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Wed Aug 8, 2012, 07:11 PM

6. My ectopic "person" could never have been born

from my fallopian tube. Dead "baby". Dead woman. Never conceived, or born, younger sibling.

WHO has a "right to life"? Me? Younger sibling? Or a doomed embyro in a fallopian tube?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HockeyMom (Reply #6)

Wed Aug 8, 2012, 07:15 PM

7. or in the terms of these nutjobs it is a crime scene.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Wed Aug 8, 2012, 07:20 PM

8. I'd like to see states pass laws saying the same ballot measure can't be voted on again for 3 years

if it is defeated. These people believe they can dupe the voters if they just keep putting the measure on the ballot.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to davidpdx (Reply #8)

Wed Aug 8, 2012, 08:18 PM

15. I've voted for the same damn amendment in '08 and '10 and it's back again.

 

If anything at all, that petition should be banned from consideration for at least 10 years. Any attempts to go-around that ban will increase the ban to another 10 years, effectively banning pro-lifers from fucking with other people's lives.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Panasonic (Reply #15)

Thu Aug 9, 2012, 01:01 AM

18. It's frustrating for sure

Similar stuff has happened in Oregon, but not nearly as bad as that. Maybe we keep our crazies in check better then you guys do.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Panasonic (Reply #15)

Thu Aug 9, 2012, 08:53 PM

27. ++++1!

This shit keeps cropping it's ugly head election after election. Time to decapitate it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to davidpdx (Reply #8)

Wed Aug 8, 2012, 09:48 PM

17. Change even one word and it's a different measure...

I can't imagine trying to get people to agree that it is substantially the same measure and should not be allowed.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Thor_MN (Reply #17)

Thu Aug 9, 2012, 01:02 AM

19. That's true, the loopholes that would be put in would likely be big enough to drive a tank

through them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Wed Aug 8, 2012, 07:30 PM

9. I think abortion should be legal until the "person" is about, well...

about - how old is that guy in the photo?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to smirkymonkey (Reply #9)

Thu Aug 9, 2012, 03:35 AM

21. If there'd ever be a case -> for <- abortion, he'd be the first exhibit. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Wed Aug 8, 2012, 07:52 PM

10. Because it's not a democracy until they get their way!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Wed Aug 8, 2012, 08:01 PM

11. k&r to get on greatest page for wider exposure.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Wed Aug 8, 2012, 08:04 PM

12. I think it's time to bring George Carlin from the dead:

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Wed Aug 8, 2012, 08:15 PM

13. *sigh* Those pro-lifers don't get it. We said NO twice before.

 

While I'm voting FUCK YES on Amendment 64 (make pot legal), That personhood amendment will be voted out.

Any more attempts to put it in again by the election should be banned from petitioning and held in prison for wasting Colorado's time and money on an useless amendment that will never pass.

Any pro-lifers should be paying the State $5 million to have the petition EVEN considered (before rejecting) and keeping the money.

But first, we must remove Gessler from SoS, and we can't remove him until '14, I think. He replaced a very good SoS who has kept integrity on the election side. Gessler is already busy trying to disenfranchise the voters, but the courts are kicking his ass right now.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Wed Aug 8, 2012, 08:17 PM

14. I bet he supports war and the death penalty. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Wed Aug 8, 2012, 09:40 PM

16. If at first you don't succeed, use the same shit to rally your base to the polls again.

Sadly, the people this is aimed at don't get that they're being played. They don't expect it to pass, it's just to get the people most likely to vote against a Democrat in office to the polls.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Thu Aug 9, 2012, 06:54 AM

22. Damn I wish Focus on the Family would get the hell out of Colorado Springs.

It was always a different city, not really "Colorado", but these whackjobs have to leave. They are setting policy for the whole state. Focus on the Family and Douglas Bruce = two worst things that ever happened to Colorado.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Thu Aug 9, 2012, 09:06 AM

23. It's working against them, now.

The demographics have changed, and I would hazard the guess that they have changed faster than anyone thought because the people who shambled to the polls to oppose it have died from Republican causes.

And yes, I think there is a lot of irony in that, because if those people had voted just once in their own best interests instead of telling people they don't know what they can do with their own internal plumbing, they would still be an important political lobby today.

Instead, they are old, sick, dying, and being told to go out and vote to raise their own taxes.

Spike it for us, Coloradans!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Reply to this thread