HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Military limiting Guantan...

Tue Aug 7, 2012, 10:08 PM

Military limiting Guantanamo detainee access to lawyers

Source: CNN

By Bill Mears, CNN Supreme Court Producer

The Obama administration has begun limiting the legal rights of terror suspects held at the Guantanamo Bay military prison in Cuba, telling a federal judge Tuesday the government alone should decide when the prisoners deserve regular access to their counsel.

In a 52-page filing, Justice Department lawyers said they have started restricting when Guantanamo prisoners can challenge their detention in a Washington-based federal court. If approved, any relaxing of the rules would be made on a case-by-case basis at the exclusive discretion of military officials, not by the courts.

At issue is whether a Supreme Court decision on detainee rights from 2008 gives federal courts the ultimate power to control so-called "habeas" petitions from foreign combatants in U.S. military custody. Volunteer private lawyers say they deserve regular access to their imprisoned clients, even if there is no active habeas challenge pending in court, or any pending charges.

Under the proposed changes, the Navy base commander at Guantanamo would have sole veto power over attorney access, as well as access to classified material, including information provided directly by the detainees from interrogations.

Read more: http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2012/08/07/military-limiting-guantanamo-detainee-access-to-lawyers/?hpt=hp_t1

6 replies, 1425 views

Thread informationRemove bookmarkTrash this thread

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 6 replies Author Time Post
Reply Military limiting Guantanamo detainee access to lawyers (Original post)
MisterP Aug 2012 OP
a2liberal Aug 2012 #1
msanthrope Aug 2012 #4
Mnemosyne Aug 2012 #2
msanthrope Aug 2012 #3
MNBrewer Aug 2012 #5
Mojorabbit Aug 2012 #6

Response to MisterP (Original post)

Tue Aug 7, 2012, 10:34 PM

1. Hopefuly the ACLU will take this on (n/t)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to a2liberal (Reply #1)

Tue Aug 7, 2012, 10:48 PM

4. They might do an amicus, but Mr. Esmail seems to have perfectly reasonable

counsel advocating for him.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MisterP (Original post)

Tue Aug 7, 2012, 10:44 PM

2. ...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MisterP (Original post)

Tue Aug 7, 2012, 10:47 PM

3. Interesting. Without a habeas action, can you claim habeas rights under Boumendiene?

And do you have a right to counsel before the Periodic Review Board? If so, then what are its limits?

Should be an interesting case.

My understanding is that this case concerns this gentleman...Mr. Esmail. Mr. Esmail claims that that the only reason he was captured at Tora Bora in December of 2001 was because of some bizarre kidnap plot. Mr. Esmail's habeas was denied by the courts.

http://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/CF90BB9790E6DDB68525786C004EBE28/$file/10-5282-1302328.pdf

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MisterP (Original post)

Tue Aug 7, 2012, 11:14 PM

5. Forward!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MisterP (Original post)

Tue Aug 7, 2012, 11:32 PM

6. Makes me want to cry. This is not what our party stands for. IMO nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread