Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:12 PM
Whoa_Nelly (21,021 posts)
Mass Shooting at Sikh Temple in Oak Creek, Wisconsin
Source: abc.com
A mass shooting has occurred at a Sikh temple in Oak Creek, Wisc., this morning. At least four people have been reported injured in the mass shooting and no suspect has been identified. The incident reportedly occurred around 10:45 a.m. at the temple, just outside of Milwaukee. According to information broadcast over police radio, a witness to the shooting told law enforcement the shooter was a white male, bald, with a heavy build. He was wearing a sleeveless T-shirt, according to Oak Creek Patch. He was last seen with two handguns. Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/US/shooting-oak-creek-sikh-temple-milwaukee-oak-creek/story?id=16933779#.UB6pHk1lTP8
|
189 replies, 19987 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| Whoa_Nelly | Aug 2012 | OP | |
| villager | Aug 2012 | #1 | |
| grahamhgreen | Aug 2012 | #10 | |
| Keefer | Aug 2012 | #29 | |
| nichomachus | Aug 2012 | #50 | |
| AnotherMcIntosh | Aug 2012 | #97 | |
| Doctor_J | Aug 2012 | #173 | |
| AnotherMcIntosh | Aug 2012 | #176 | |
| Doctor_J | Aug 2012 | #181 | |
| AnotherMcIntosh | Aug 2012 | #183 | |
| RC | Aug 2012 | #98 | |
| villager | Aug 2012 | #131 | |
| Whoa_Nelly | Aug 2012 | #2 | |
| CJCRANE | Aug 2012 | #71 | |
| otohara | Aug 2012 | #3 | |
| alfredo | Aug 2012 | #4 | |
| JohnnyRingo | Aug 2012 | #57 | |
| BlueMTexpat | Aug 2012 | #59 | |
| alfredo | Aug 2012 | #114 | |
| Skittles | Aug 2012 | #125 | |
| GliderGuider | Aug 2012 | #155 | |
| alfredo | Aug 2012 | #171 | |
| Smilo | Aug 2012 | #5 | |
| slackmaster | Aug 2012 | #6 | |
| Whoa_Nelly | Aug 2012 | #14 | |
| AlbertCat | Aug 2012 | #20 | |
| Odin2005 | Aug 2012 | #7 | |
| Posteritatis | Aug 2012 | #9 | |
| scarletwoman | Aug 2012 | #18 | |
| Odin2005 | Aug 2012 | #24 | |
| yardwork | Aug 2012 | #52 | |
| Spitfire of ATJ | Aug 2012 | #54 | |
| GoCubsGo | Aug 2012 | #101 | |
| arely staircase | Aug 2012 | #140 | |
| Spitfire of ATJ | Aug 2012 | #148 | |
| JI7 | Aug 2012 | #151 | |
| madrchsod | Aug 2012 | #110 | |
| sarge43 | Aug 2012 | #22 | |
| Posteritatis | Aug 2012 | #23 | |
| harun | Aug 2012 | #34 | |
| lonestarnot | Aug 2012 | #66 | |
| Shankapotomus | Aug 2012 | #73 | |
| TheCowsCameHome | Aug 2012 | #8 | |
| Odin2005 | Aug 2012 | #16 | |
| TheCowsCameHome | Aug 2012 | #17 | |
| patrice | Aug 2012 | #113 | |
| progressivebydesign | Aug 2012 | #11 | |
| AnotherMcIntosh | Aug 2012 | #51 | |
| progressivebydesign | Aug 2012 | #61 | |
| AnotherMcIntosh | Aug 2012 | #84 | |
| UnrepentantLiberal | Aug 2012 | #62 | |
| AnotherMcIntosh | Aug 2012 | #104 | |
| KamaAina | Aug 2012 | #78 | |
| AnotherMcIntosh | Aug 2012 | #83 | |
| progressivebydesign | Aug 2012 | #116 | |
| mysuzuki2 | Aug 2012 | #12 | |
| Odin2005 | Aug 2012 | #28 | |
| Le Taz Hot | Aug 2012 | #13 | |
| Whoa_Nelly | Aug 2012 | #15 | |
| Adsos Letter | Aug 2012 | #27 | |
| Whoa_Nelly | Aug 2012 | #35 | |
| xchrom | Aug 2012 | #19 | |
| Don C. Nuttin | Aug 2012 | #21 | |
| AlbertCat | Aug 2012 | #25 | |
| Don C. Nuttin | Aug 2012 | #36 | |
| AlbertCat | Aug 2012 | #42 | |
| Don C. Nuttin | Aug 2012 | #46 | |
| azurnoir | Aug 2012 | #90 | |
| AnotherMcIntosh | Aug 2012 | #99 | |
| azurnoir | Aug 2012 | #117 | |
| AnotherMcIntosh | Aug 2012 | #122 | |
| azurnoir | Aug 2012 | #128 | |
| AnotherMcIntosh | Aug 2012 | #134 | |
| exboyfil | Aug 2012 | #108 | |
| coalition_unwilling | Aug 2012 | #161 | |
| harun | Aug 2012 | #38 | |
| Don C. Nuttin | Aug 2012 | #39 | |
| AlbertCat | Aug 2012 | #48 | |
| Don C. Nuttin | Aug 2012 | #55 | |
| harun | Aug 2012 | #103 | |
| DesertRat | Aug 2012 | #85 | |
| azurnoir | Aug 2012 | #86 | |
| Don C. Nuttin | Aug 2012 | #91 | |
| azurnoir | Aug 2012 | #95 | |
| independentpiney | Aug 2012 | #120 | |
| 2pooped2pop | Aug 2012 | #26 | |
| twizzler | Aug 2012 | #32 | |
| kestrel91316 | Aug 2012 | #138 | |
| twizzler | Aug 2012 | #149 | |
| progressivebydesign | Aug 2012 | #41 | |
| Zoeisright | Aug 2012 | #56 | |
| Plucketeer | Aug 2012 | #82 | |
| DBoon | Aug 2012 | #92 | |
| primavera | Aug 2012 | #146 | |
| progressivebydesign | Aug 2012 | #162 | |
| DisgustipatedinCA | Aug 2012 | #30 | |
| ForgoTheConsequence | Aug 2012 | #31 | |
| Comrade_McKenzie | Aug 2012 | #33 | |
| ForgoTheConsequence | Aug 2012 | #37 | |
| Botany | Aug 2012 | #40 | |
| progressivebydesign | Aug 2012 | #43 | |
| bluedigger | Aug 2012 | #47 | |
| LadyHawkAZ | Aug 2012 | #64 | |
| DBoon | Aug 2012 | #93 | |
| TahitiNut | Aug 2012 | #106 | |
| progressivebydesign | Aug 2012 | #118 | |
| Heather MC | Aug 2012 | #65 | |
| Doctor_J | Aug 2012 | #174 | |
| Jessy169 | Aug 2012 | #80 | |
| PavePusher | Aug 2012 | #87 | |
| Care Acutely | Aug 2012 | #121 | |
| LadyHawkAZ | Aug 2012 | #127 | |
| Jessy169 | Aug 2012 | #139 | |
| RedStateLiberal | Aug 2012 | #44 | |
| yardwork | Aug 2012 | #133 | |
| IcyPeas | Aug 2012 | #45 | |
| auntAgonist | Aug 2012 | #49 | |
| iamthebandfanman | Aug 2012 | #53 | |
| Jessy169 | Aug 2012 | #144 | |
| slackmaster | Aug 2012 | #169 | |
| progressivebydesign | Aug 2012 | #163 | |
| slackmaster | Aug 2012 | #167 | |
| WorseBeforeBetter | Aug 2012 | #58 | |
| Shadowflash | Aug 2012 | #60 | |
| TahitiNut | Aug 2012 | #88 | |
| JoeyT | Aug 2012 | #172 | |
| gasser85 | Aug 2012 | #130 | |
| Shadowflash | Aug 2012 | #132 | |
| citizen blues | Aug 2012 | #63 | |
| lonestarnot | Aug 2012 | #69 | |
| UnrepentantLiberal | Aug 2012 | #67 | |
| Whoa_Nelly | Aug 2012 | #68 | |
| onehandle | Aug 2012 | #70 | |
| slackmaster | Aug 2012 | #76 | |
| Hissyspit | Aug 2012 | #72 | |
| kestrel91316 | Aug 2012 | #74 | |
| Ruby the Liberal | Aug 2012 | #75 | |
| kestrel91316 | Aug 2012 | #77 | |
| ForgoTheConsequence | Aug 2012 | #79 | |
| BootinUp | Aug 2012 | #81 | |
| hue | Aug 2012 | #89 | |
| handmade34 | Aug 2012 | #94 | |
| revolution breeze | Aug 2012 | #105 | |
| blaze | Aug 2012 | #150 | |
| Doctor_J | Aug 2012 | #177 | |
| revolution breeze | Aug 2012 | #189 | |
| Archae | Aug 2012 | #96 | |
| Whoa_Nelly | Aug 2012 | #100 | |
| alfredo | Aug 2012 | #115 | |
| Iliyah | Aug 2012 | #102 | |
| onehandle | Aug 2012 | #107 | |
| Archae | Aug 2012 | #111 | |
| Doctor_J | Aug 2012 | #178 | |
| Archae | Aug 2012 | #179 | |
| patrice | Aug 2012 | #109 | |
| AtomicKitten | Aug 2012 | #112 | |
| GliderGuider | Aug 2012 | #124 | |
| primavera | Aug 2012 | #142 | |
| LadyHawkAZ | Aug 2012 | #129 | |
| primavera | Aug 2012 | #147 | |
| LadyHawkAZ | Aug 2012 | #153 | |
| AtomicKitten | Aug 2012 | #154 | |
| LadyHawkAZ | Aug 2012 | #156 | |
| BanTheGOP | Aug 2012 | #119 | |
| Codeine | Aug 2012 | #145 | |
| liberalhistorian | Aug 2012 | #160 | |
| JI7 | Aug 2012 | #165 | |
| slackmaster | Aug 2012 | #168 | |
| MindMover | Aug 2012 | #123 | |
| Tx4obama | Aug 2012 | #126 | |
| brewens | Aug 2012 | #135 | |
| kestrel91316 | Aug 2012 | #141 | |
| primavera | Aug 2012 | #136 | |
| kestrel91316 | Aug 2012 | #137 | |
| kestrel91316 | Aug 2012 | #143 | |
| get the red out | Aug 2012 | #152 | |
| kestrel91316 | Aug 2012 | #159 | |
| Kalidurga | Aug 2012 | #157 | |
| lib2DaBone | Aug 2012 | #158 | |
| Mojorabbit | Aug 2012 | #164 | |
| Doctor_J | Aug 2012 | #182 | |
| friendly_iconoclast | Aug 2012 | #184 | |
| Doctor_J | Aug 2012 | #185 | |
| hack89 | Aug 2012 | #186 | |
| Doctor_J | Aug 2012 | #187 | |
| hack89 | Aug 2012 | #188 | |
| davidpdx | Aug 2012 | #166 | |
| sufrommich | Aug 2012 | #170 | |
| Doctor_J | Aug 2012 | #175 | |
| friendly_iconoclast | Aug 2012 | #180 |
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:15 PM
villager (18,983 posts)
1. Bald white male with multiple guns!?
|
Who possibly could have guessed....
|
Response to villager (Reply #1)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:21 PM
grahamhgreen (9,791 posts)
10. You mean this guy?
![]() |
Response to grahamhgreen (Reply #10)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:43 PM
Keefer (219 posts)
29. That is a rifle...
|
The story said two HANDGUNS.
Darth isn't wearing a sleeveless T-shirt either. I think he's off the hook on this one. |
Response to grahamhgreen (Reply #10)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 02:04 PM
nichomachus (10,085 posts)
50. Nah! He never shot a man he didn't like n/t
Response to grahamhgreen (Reply #10)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 04:02 PM
AnotherMcIntosh (7,540 posts)
97. Wayne LaPierre (on the left) began as a legislative aide to Democratic Virginia Delegate Vic Thomas
|
and was a Democratic legislative aide when he joined the NRA in 1977.
In 1996 when some Democrats in positions of power in Washington, DC pushed for anti-gun legislation, LaPierre's influence and the influence of the NRA under his leadership increased signifigantly. Many Democrats in Congress lost their seats because they acted contrary to the public's wishes and acted in an undemocratic manner. The anti-gun legislative efforts helped elect a signfigant number of Republicans, including VP Cheney who obtained five draft deferments and never held a M-14 or M-16 in Viet Nam. Should anyone think that resuming a push for anti-gun legislation would produce a different result? If so, just look at the smirk on Cheney's face and remember all those Republicans who were elected. |
Response to AnotherMcIntosh (Reply #97)
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 12:10 PM
Doctor_J (26,355 posts)
173. Yeah, it's probably a perfect time to join the pro-gun culture
|
|
Response to Doctor_J (Reply #173)
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 12:23 PM
AnotherMcIntosh (7,540 posts)
176. Bill Clinton seems to have some expertise.
|
With respect to the 1994 election, in his recently-released book "My Life," he said:
"Just before the House vote (on the crime bill), Speaker Tom Foley and majority leader Dick Gephardt had made a last-ditch appeal to me to remove the assault weapons ban from the bill. They argued that many Democrats who represented closely divided districts had already...defied the NRA once on the Brady bill vote. They said that if we made them walk the plank again on the assault weapons ban, the overall bill might not pass, and that if it did, many Democrats who voted for it would not survive the election in November. Jack Brooks, the House Judiciary Committee chairman from Texas, told me the same thing...Jack was convinced that if we didn't drop the ban, the NRA would beat a lot of Democrats by terrifying gun owners....Foley, Gephardt, and Brooks were right and I was wrong. The price...would be heavy casualties among its defenders." (Pages 611-612)
"On November 8, we got the living daylights beat out of us, losing eight Senate races and fifty-four House seats, the largest defeat for our party since 1946....The NRA had a great night. They beat both Speaker Tom Foley and Jack Brooks, two of the ablest members of Congress, who had warned me this would happen. Foley was the first Speaker to be defeated in more than a century. Jack Brooks had supported the NRA for years and had led the fight against the assault weapons ban in the House, but as chairman of the Judiciary Committee he had voted for the overall crime bill even after the ban was put into it. The NRA was an unforgiving master: one strike and you're out. The gun lobby claimed to have defeated nineteen of the twenty-four members on its hit list. They did at least that much damage...." (Pages 629-630) I'm not sure whether "it's probably a perfect time to join the pro-gun culture," but it is time for those who are opposed to the private ownership of firearms for self-defense or other lawful purposes to act in a way consistent with Democratic values, learn from experience, and listen to the voices of Democrats and independents. This includes listening with respect to gun-owning Democrats and gun-owning independents. |
Response to AnotherMcIntosh (Reply #176)
Tue Aug 7, 2012, 11:24 AM
Doctor_J (26,355 posts)
181. Obama has pandered to the NRA
|
more than any other Dem in history, and the result is that he appears weak and appeasing - trying to make friends with those who hate his guts. For every Hate Radio addict that might suddenly have an epiphany and vote for him, he will lose 5 votes from the people who elected him in 2008. Those people expected him to take on the NRA, not befreind them. Of course they also expected him to support unions, reduce military spending, support public education, reject Republican economic policies, hold firm on social security and Medicare, and actually fight back when the fascists attack him. They've been disappointed on all fronts, and will of course be blamed for not supporting him enough.
|
Response to Doctor_J (Reply #181)
Tue Aug 7, 2012, 12:38 PM
AnotherMcIntosh (7,540 posts)
183. Although mentioning "the NRA" is a dog-whistle to some, it has no effect on me because
|
(1) I have no serious interest in the NRA and do not perceive whatever it is that you think that they've done that is wrong, and
(2) the association falacy does not work with me. From Wikipedia: An association fallacy is an inductive informal fallacy of the type hasty generalization or red herring which asserts that qualities of one thing are inherently qualities of another, merely by an irrelevant association. The two types are sometimes referred to as guilt by association and honor by association. Association fallacies are a special case of red herring, and can be based on an appeal to emotion.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_fallacy In contrast to FDR, JFK, and other Democratic Presidents who were life members of the NRA when it existed exclusively or primarily as a gun-safety organization (prior to the politicalization of the organization with the 1994 anti-gun law), I don't even know whether Obama has ever been a member of the NRA. The NRA has become politicalized thanks to the 1994 Act. But I don't see how that affects me or (if the NRA has engaged in some wrong undescribed by you) how I can change that. Since 1994, the NRA has become an active supporter of many Republican candidates. But it also remains an active supporter of some Democratic candidates. The mere fact that the NRA has supported some Republican candidates is not inherently unusual nor does it show that everything that the NRA does is wrong. If you believe that NRA has done something wrong, why not describe that wrong instead of saying "Obama has pandered to the NRA." As Wikipedia explains, McCarthyism is the practice of making accusations of disloyalty, subversion, or treason without proper regard for evidence.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCarthyism You say that "Obama has pandered to the NRA more than any other Dem in history." I see no evidence of that. In fact, I don't even know or suspect Obama of being a NRA sympathizer. If you have evidence to support your statement "Obama has pandered to the NRA more than any other Dem in history," where is it? |
Response to grahamhgreen (Reply #10)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 04:05 PM
RC (21,628 posts)
98. The guy on the right looks like he is already fantasizing about being alone with that gun.
|
Probably why they cropped the picture where they did.
I really do not understand why people can be so enamored with killing machines. The more macho looking the better. |
Response to grahamhgreen (Reply #10)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 05:43 PM
villager (18,983 posts)
131. Well, those are definitely domestic terrorists...
|
Last edited Sun Aug 5, 2012, 05:43 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) n/t
|
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:15 PM
Whoa_Nelly (21,021 posts)
2. Local Police Scanner link
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Reply #2)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 02:51 PM
CJCRANE (13,338 posts)
71. Thanks for the link. nt
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:15 PM
otohara (21,587 posts)
3. Another Moment of Silence - Guns
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:18 PM
alfredo (46,554 posts)
4. Sikhs believe in the brotherhood of man, and equality of all. The shooter must have seen his turban,
|
and thought they were Muslims. Thank the Republicans and their illiterate followers in the Christian right.
|
Response to alfredo (Reply #4)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 02:22 PM
JohnnyRingo (9,327 posts)
57. That was my 1st thought.
|
Maybe not, but the right wing media distortion of any religion except Christian, and the description of the shooters, indicates a hate crime to me. Freeper types see anyone with dark skin and a turban as a "muzzie" coming to impose Shariah law.
Sometimes the more information some people absorb, the dumber they get. |
Response to JohnnyRingo (Reply #57)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 04:53 PM
alfredo (46,554 posts)
114. Ignorance and a gun is a bad mix.
Response to alfredo (Reply #4)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 05:22 PM
Skittles (86,285 posts)
125. how about sisterhood of women?
|
just curious
|
Response to Skittles (Reply #125)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 07:48 PM
GliderGuider (15,149 posts)
155. Equality of women in Sikhism
|
http://realsikhism.com/index.php?subaction=showfull&id=1248311765&ucat=7
Q: What is the role and status of women in Sikh society?
A: In Sikhism men and women are equal. In fourteenth century, before the time Guru Nanak Dev Ji, Indian women were severely degraded and oppressed by their society. Given no education or freedom to make decisions, their presence in religious, political, social, cultural, and economic affairs was virtually non-existent. Woman was referred to as the root of all evil, snare, and temptress. Her function was only to perpetuate the race, do household work, and serve the male members of society. Female infanticide was common, and the practice of sati was encouraged, sometimes even forced. In Sati system, if the husband of any women dies then the women was to cremate alive with his husband’s body. Guru Amar Das Ji, the third Guru of Sikhs, raised his voice and denounced the Sati system. He made every possible attempt to eliminate the Sati system and achieve equality for women. Guru Nanak Dev Ji condemned this man-made notion of the inferiority of women, and protested against their long subjugation. The Ultimate Truth was revealed to Guru Nanak Dev Ji through a mystic experience, in direct communion with God. Guru Nanak Dev Ji conveys this Truth through his scripture as follows: "Man is born from a woman; within woman, man is conceived; to a woman he is engaged and married. Man is friends with woman; through woman, the future generations exist. When his woman passes away, he seeks another woman; to a woman a man is bound. So why call her bad? From her, kings are born. From a woman, woman is born; without woman there would be no one at all" (Guru Granth Sahib Ji, 473). |
Response to Skittles (Reply #125)
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 11:28 AM
alfredo (46,554 posts)
171. In their case brotherhood includes both genders.
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:18 PM
Smilo (1,886 posts)
5. My thoughts and prayers
|
go out to the Sikh community.
The Sikh religion is one of the most tolerant I know. Hope they get the shooter and quickly. |
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:18 PM
slackmaster (60,567 posts)
6. The perpetrator probably mistook it for a mosque
|
Or something equally dumb.
|
Response to slackmaster (Reply #6)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:25 PM
Whoa_Nelly (21,021 posts)
14. Regardless of the shooter possibly making any associative mistakes
|
This had to be premeditated, making it fall under several categories, including Attempted First Degree Murder, Terrorism, Hate Crime, and more.
I hope they get this guy soon. |
Response to slackmaster (Reply #6)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:33 PM
AlbertCat (10,450 posts)
20. Or something equally dumb.
|
Last edited Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:33 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) I agree, a Sikh temple is not quite as dumb as a mosque.
I KNOW what you meant! English is hard though..... |
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:19 PM
Odin2005 (48,255 posts)
7. $100 that this guy is a wingnut bigot who mistook Sikhs for Muslims.
Response to Odin2005 (Reply #7)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:32 PM
scarletwoman (25,190 posts)
18. That's probably a given. Although it's also possible he just thought anyone non-Christian & foreign
|
needed to be eliminated.
|
Response to scarletwoman (Reply #18)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:37 PM
Odin2005 (48,255 posts)
24. I remember after 9/11 hearing that a lot of Sikhs were harassed...
|
...because people thought turbans = Evil Muslin Terrist.
|
Response to Odin2005 (Reply #24)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 02:08 PM
yardwork (37,074 posts)
52. A Sikh man was murdered right after 9/11.
Response to Odin2005 (Reply #24)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 02:14 PM
Spitfire of ATJ (7,361 posts)
54. In Texas an idiot shot a gas station owner right after 9/11
|
and then hung around for the police and was all grins thinking he was going to get a bounty or a medal.
When he was told the guy he shot was from India, he said, "What difference does it make?" These racist bastards consider anything non-white as sub-human. |
Response to Spitfire of ATJ (Reply #54)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 04:09 PM
GoCubsGo (13,002 posts)
101. I believe another was killed in Phoenix, too.
|
It was within two or three days of 9/11.
|
Response to Spitfire of ATJ (Reply #54)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 06:20 PM
arely staircase (4,149 posts)
140. i think that guy was executed a couple of years ago or even more recently nt
Response to arely staircase (Reply #140)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 06:47 PM
Spitfire of ATJ (7,361 posts)
148. Yup...
http://www.thehindu.com/news/international/article2279185.ece Check out the video at this link: http://www.cbs19.tv/story/15122625/texas-inmate-executed?clienttype=printable |
Response to arely staircase (Reply #140)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 07:20 PM
JI7 (40,073 posts)
151. i think one of the guys he shot but survived said he didn't think he should be executed
|
i think he was just against the death penalty. and the guy wanted forgiveness.
but this is just ignorance in this country. when wingnuts complain about muliculturalism they create ignorance. why are wingnuts so against learning , especially about things that are different or might show things are not as they thought before. why are they so scared. and these are the people who tend to go out arming themselves . |
Response to Odin2005 (Reply #24)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 04:42 PM
madrchsod (55,717 posts)
110. crap like that happened in my city...
Response to Odin2005 (Reply #7)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:35 PM
sarge43 (17,460 posts)
22. Easy bet.
|
Also a member of a local 'militia' gang.
Hard bet: First MSM talking head to say "terrorism". |
Response to sarge43 (Reply #22)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:37 PM
Posteritatis (17,277 posts)
23. My bet on that one would be "first talking head to appear, period." (nt)
Response to Odin2005 (Reply #7)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:49 PM
harun (9,742 posts)
34. Not going to bet against that
Response to Odin2005 (Reply #7)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 02:48 PM
lonestarnot (71,133 posts)
66. And hates women and children apparently.
Response to Odin2005 (Reply #7)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 02:52 PM
Shankapotomus (2,315 posts)
73. +1
|
I came here just to say that only to see about a bazillion people beat me to it.
On a somber note, it this really sucks. Guy must be an idiot on multiple levels. My heart goes out to the victims of that imbecile. |
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:20 PM
TheCowsCameHome (27,694 posts)
8. That's an interesting description of the perp
|
now who could possibly fit a mold like that? Hmmmm. Let me think........
|
Response to TheCowsCameHome (Reply #8)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:28 PM
Odin2005 (48,255 posts)
16. It's pretty mcuh a stereotype, innit?
Response to Odin2005 (Reply #16)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:30 PM
TheCowsCameHome (27,694 posts)
17. Another 'if the shoe fits' situation, I suspect.
|
It'll be interesting to see his background once he's nabbed.
|
Response to Odin2005 (Reply #16)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 04:50 PM
patrice (47,372 posts)
113. Stereotyping is a basic cognitive process, helps us function in unfamiliar contexts, like a
|
hypothesis, they're useful, but become dysfunctional when they cease to be hypotheses and become conclusions instead, even after reliable and valid information that may or may not support the stereotype is perceived.
|
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:22 PM
progressivebydesign (19,363 posts)
11. That's horrific. I hope they find the perp. No doubt he has a trial of rants online they can trace.
|
Reminds me of the scary person that posted the gun pointed at the camera, while ranting in a rage against the "being liberal" page. Same personality. Disgruntled white men, who are angry at how their own lives turned out, and need to blame other people. The Fox "news" machine has done what the set out to do... dehumanize people who are different, so that guys like that have someone to blame for their failures and for the fleecing of the middle class... instead of the real bad guys.
I hope everyone recovers fully from this shooting. I remember when the bullshit rhetoric after 9/11 and during Palin's campaign, led to many attacks on Sikhs, because people believed they were Muslim. |
Response to progressivebydesign (Reply #11)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 02:05 PM
AnotherMcIntosh (7,540 posts)
51. "Disgruntled white men" = racist
|
You are overlooking the criminality and deaths caused persons of other races.
Just as one example, last week not far from the latest shooting, George Hites, 58, of Milwaukee was shot multiple times by Thaiv Xiong, 23, of Milwaukee about 6 p.m. Thursday at the northwest side manufacturing plant at 7878 N. 86th St.
... "We have the classic disgruntled employee-immediate supervisor circumstance where sadly, for reasons that are best known to the deceased employee, he developed a grudge against his boss and acted out in a violent way that resulted in that man's death," (Milwaukee Police Chief) Flynn said. http://www.jsonline.com/news/crime/counselors-on-hand-after-workplace-shooting-0d6bsss-164873936.html |
Response to AnotherMcIntosh (Reply #51)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 02:34 PM
progressivebydesign (19,363 posts)
61. Um Okay. You're right.. there are NO angry white men who blame people of other races. n/t
Response to progressivebydesign (Reply #61)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 03:21 PM
AnotherMcIntosh (7,540 posts)
84. Wrong. In fact, I think that "angry white men who blame people of other races" can be KKK members
|
or other people with racists tendencies.
You certainly don't want to be like those in the KKK and use a broad brush to blame "angry white men." If you otherwise do, there is no excuse for your actions. |
Response to AnotherMcIntosh (Reply #51)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 02:35 PM
UnrepentantLiberal (11,700 posts)
62. Us poor maligned white guys.
|
It's racism I tell ya.
|
Response to UnrepentantLiberal (Reply #62)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 04:16 PM
AnotherMcIntosh (7,540 posts)
104. Well, it's not all bad. Nor are white guys always maligned. Some religious worshippers belief that
|
there is a God which looks like us. A white male bipod. Except for the invisible part.
|
Response to AnotherMcIntosh (Reply #51)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 03:09 PM
KamaAina (45,232 posts)
78. FAIL. Going postal on your ex-supervisor != emptying a gun into a place of worship.
|
|
Response to KamaAina (Reply #78)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 03:18 PM
AnotherMcIntosh (7,540 posts)
83. Um, FAIL yourself. "Disgruntled white men" != either "Going postal on your ex-supervisor" or
|
Last edited Sun Aug 5, 2012, 03:44 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) "emptying a gun into a place of worship".
"Disgruntled white men" means "Disgruntled white men". |
Response to KamaAina (Reply #78)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 04:59 PM
progressivebydesign (19,363 posts)
116. thank you. nicely put. n/t
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:23 PM
mysuzuki2 (2,885 posts)
12. Oh boy. I am appalled at this.
|
Last edited Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:24 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) I live in Milwaukee and I hate to see something like this in our community. There are a number of Sikhs in this area and they are a tolerant and peaceful bunch. The people suggesting that they were mistaken for Muslims and targeted by a bigot may well prove true. We have our share of that sort here too, unfortunately.
|
Response to mysuzuki2 (Reply #12)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:40 PM
Odin2005 (48,255 posts)
28. There is a Sikh who lives in my apartment building.
|
Really nice guy, studying to become a psychiatrist.
|
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:25 PM
Le Taz Hot (14,425 posts)
13. My god.
|
What do you want to bet: THIS is what happens when you get ignorant assholes loaded to the teeth with weaponry they should be too stupid and/or hateful to have.
Sending positive healing vibes to the victims and their families. |
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:27 PM
Whoa_Nelly (21,021 posts)
15. Police scanner reporting fires breaking out in the temple
|
Last edited Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:27 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) Apparently there are a few small fires breaking out inside the temple building due to the shooting.
Meanwhile, on the scanner, they are already widening the search area quickly and sending police to multiple locations to check out people of interest. |
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Reply #15)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:39 PM
Adsos Letter (13,984 posts)
27. Abandoned food burning on the stove, according to the scanner.
Response to Adsos Letter (Reply #27)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:51 PM
Whoa_Nelly (21,021 posts)
35. Thanks EOM
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:32 PM
xchrom (90,523 posts)
19. du rec. nt
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:33 PM
Don C. Nuttin (84 posts)
21. Say a prayer.
|
Two weeks ago today, my wife and I had lunch at the home of a Sikh friend and her children. I asked her if the Sikh god was the god of Islam. She said it was not. I told her that I asked because the god of Abraham (the god of the Jews) is the Christian god and is the Muslim god. She said she knew that. I told her I am Christian, and that I personally believe my god hears all prayers. She said she believes her god hears all prayers. But she added that she does not believe that Muslims in general believe that their god hears the prayers of non-Muslims. I told her that I was under that impression, too.
I left her home thinking that she and I do worship the same god, but that we each ernestly believe in different stories of god. Today the Sikhs are in my prayers. |
Response to Don C. Nuttin (Reply #21)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:37 PM
AlbertCat (10,450 posts)
25. What a conversation!
|
It appears though that nobody's god heard anybody's prayers....so.... maybe neither of those gods are even there! They both are pretty unreliable.
|
Response to AlbertCat (Reply #25)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:51 PM
Don C. Nuttin (84 posts)
36. An unfathomable event, indeed.
|
Have a good day and a good life, AlbertCat.
Days like today are indeed hard on people of faith, just as they are hard on people without faith. That said, I do not presume to know what everybody's prayers are. And I certainly do not elevate my prayers to the level of God's wisdom. |
Response to Don C. Nuttin (Reply #36)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:57 PM
AlbertCat (10,450 posts)
42. And I certainly do not elevate my prayers to the level of God's wisdom.
|
That's a pretty low bar!
|
Response to AlbertCat (Reply #42)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 02:00 PM
Don C. Nuttin (84 posts)
46. Peace.
|
Peace.
|
Response to AlbertCat (Reply #25)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 03:37 PM
azurnoir (26,608 posts)
90. They are indeed the same G-d
|
it has been a component of Rightwing Islamiphobic disinformation to claim that Allah means some other G-d when in fact it does not, I wish I could be surprised at seeing it repeated here on DU
Islam believes its follows are descendents of Ishmael another of Abraham's sons |
Response to azurnoir (Reply #90)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 04:05 PM
AnotherMcIntosh (7,540 posts)
99. "the same G-d"? A male bipod who looks just like us? Except for being invisible?
Response to AnotherMcIntosh (Reply #99)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 05:01 PM
azurnoir (26,608 posts)
117. actually that depiction G-d is from Christianity
|
far more than Islam or Judaism who believe G-d is without form
|
Response to azurnoir (Reply #117)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 05:12 PM
AnotherMcIntosh (7,540 posts)
122. Interesting.
|
That's another thing which I did not know.
Of course, logically, if the Christian God has a form and the Islam/Judasim G-d does not, then they cannot be the same God or G-d. It is somewhat more logical to believe in a God or G-d which does not have any form. But if I wanted to believe in a God or G-d, I think that I would prefer to have him look like me. |
Response to AnotherMcIntosh (Reply #122)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 05:38 PM
azurnoir (26,608 posts)
128. I think it is the Jesus thing
|
Last edited Sun Aug 5, 2012, 05:40 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) my understanding of Christian beliefs is that Jesus was G-d taken physical form as G-ds son but I could be wrong too
eta it's the Messiah thing Christians believe Jesus was the Messiah where as Muslims and Jews believe the Messiah has not yet come same G-d though |
Response to azurnoir (Reply #128)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 06:00 PM
AnotherMcIntosh (7,540 posts)
134. And (I'm not making this up) Mormons apparently believe that Satan is the brother of Jesus.
Response to AlbertCat (Reply #25)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 04:33 PM
exboyfil (3,392 posts)
108. The joy is that we can regularly have these conversations in this country
|
They go on in college dorms all across the country and on buses going to high school activities like speech, sports, etc. That is America. My Jewish debate partner and I had wonderful converstations as well as I grew up. My atheist roommate from Hong Kong was a wonderful person to share a room with and spend time enjoying our mutual interests and understanding each others beliefs. My Muslim friend from one of my jobs was one of the kindest and most caring persons I have ever met (as could be said about my Mormon boss at another job).
God will damn us if we can't keep that joy alive in my opinion. I know what my church teaches about salvation, but I also know what it teaches about how you treat your fellow man and woman. |
Response to AlbertCat (Reply #25)
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 12:05 AM
coalition_unwilling (14,180 posts)
161. Maybe Shiva, the Hindu God of Destruction, was listening? (Shiva is the God
|
Robert Oppenheimer alluded to upon the successful A-bomb test at Los Alamos.)
|
Response to Don C. Nuttin (Reply #21)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:53 PM
harun (9,742 posts)
38. As-Samia (All Hearing)
|
For Muslims, one of the 99 names of God is All Hearing. Meaning He hears all, including prayers from all people.
Any 8 year old Muslim would know this. There can be only one Creator of the Universe, and that is the God Muslims worship. FYI |
Response to harun (Reply #38)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:56 PM
Don C. Nuttin (84 posts)
39. Thank you.
|
Obviously my Sikh friend did not know that.
Obviously I did not know that. Neither one of us is 8 years old. But neither one of us is Muslim. I thank you. |
Response to Don C. Nuttin (Reply #39)
AlbertCat This message was hidden by Jury decision.
Response to AlbertCat (Reply #48)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 02:18 PM
Don C. Nuttin (84 posts)
55. Peace.
|
Wiktionary seems to agree with Harun that for Muslims one of the 99 names of God is All Hearing.
You do point out that people who believe in God (and especially people who believe in one god) have more in common with one another than they do with non-believers. As I have admitted, I am substantially ignorant of Islam. But I've got no need to make fun of Harun. I do unconditionally wish you peace. Do you wish peace for me, for my Sikh friend, and for Harun? For any one or two of us? Or are all three of us just objects of ridicule to you? How about the decedents and their loved ones? Want to take another jab or two at their particular faith? |
Response to Don C. Nuttin (Reply #39)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 04:12 PM
harun (9,742 posts)
103. No thank you
|
It is very nice to hear when people enjoy engaging others about things they don't know instead of hating them.
And about the eight year old comment, unfortunately this is basic teachings that somehow people forget when they are older. So just because the religion teaches it doesn't stop people from being human. So there are plenty of bad examples out there, I won't deny that. Glad you have a nice friend to talk to and share with. |
Response to Don C. Nuttin (Reply #21)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 03:26 PM
DesertRat (9,281 posts)
85. I believe God hears all prayers
|
But the answers are not always what we want/expect. My prayers are with those killed today and their families.
|
Response to Don C. Nuttin (Reply #21)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 03:27 PM
azurnoir (26,608 posts)
86. well you and your Sikh 'friend' are wrong very wrong
|
Last edited Sun Aug 5, 2012, 03:27 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) Al-Baqarah 2:62.19
Those who believe (in the Qur'an), and those who follow the Jewish (scriptures), and the Christians and the Sabians,- any who believe in God and the Last Day, and work righteousness, shall have their reward with their Lord; on them shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve. Islam believes that they are the descendents of Abraham's son Ishmael, the 4 major prophets of Islam are Abraham, Moses, Jesus, and Mohammad |
Response to azurnoir (Reply #86)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 03:46 PM
Don C. Nuttin (84 posts)
91. Well, okay.
|
I am not sure why the word friend is in quotation marks.
Is it not okay to grieve the victims of the shooting (or, more generally, ever to grieve)? Are Sikhs just out in terms of any possibility of favor with God because they: - do not believe in the Qur'an - do not follow the Jewish (scriptures) - are not Christians or Sabians It seems to me that Sikhs believe in God, although I don't know where they are on that whole Last Day thing. They are quite committed to working righteousness, if working righeousness generally equates to helping people in need of help. So I don't know how those plusses and question marks work together vis a vis the Sikhs. I just hate being so very wrong and so very clueless. |
Response to Don C. Nuttin (Reply #91)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 03:54 PM
azurnoir (26,608 posts)
95. Sikhs are not mentioned in the Quran because Sikhs emerged in the 15th century
|
around 7 or 8 centuries after the Quran was written
|
Response to Don C. Nuttin (Reply #91)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 05:08 PM
independentpiney (1,172 posts)
120. Sikhs do not worship the Abrahamic god.
|
They do not revere Jesus or Muhammad or any of your prophets and don't believe in a judgement day. They believe in reincarnation and are probably closer to Hinduism in overall beliefs.
|
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:39 PM
2pooped2pop (2,611 posts)
26. it's not the guns
|
It's the atmosphere of hate and bigotry that has been allowed to not only peep out, but to proudly stand full monty.
It's the hate radio. It's the media lies. It's the new and faux Christians. It's all hate, all the time. |
Response to 2pooped2pop (Reply #26)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:46 PM
twizzler (206 posts)
32. I tend to agree with you
|
this person probably saw people wearing turbans, assumed they were Muslims, and decided to get even for, who the fuck knows.
My prayers to the Sikh community and to those injured and to the families of the injured. |
Response to twizzler (Reply #32)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 06:16 PM
kestrel91316 (45,386 posts)
138. ......because those ragheads did 9-11......
|
Of course, that Sikhism has nothing whatsoever to do with Islam never occurs to the RW freaks......... |
Response to kestrel91316 (Reply #138)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 06:48 PM
twizzler (206 posts)
149. Totally agree
|
All this fucking bigot saw was turbans and said, oh look, muslims, I'm going to get revenge for 9/11.
At least the cop that was shot was able to return fire and kill him, limiting the carnage. A true hero. People rag on the police all the time, but most have no idea what we go through every day we pin the badge on. |
Response to 2pooped2pop (Reply #26)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:56 PM
progressivebydesign (19,363 posts)
41. How many people could that guy take down at once with a knife or bat before being tackled?
|
Guns are weapons of FAST destruction, AND they contribute to a culture of violence.
|
Response to progressivebydesign (Reply #41)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 02:22 PM
Zoeisright (7,828 posts)
56. + One billion.
|
Anyone who says "it's not the guns" has a real problem.
|
Response to progressivebydesign (Reply #41)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 03:15 PM
Plucketeer (6,276 posts)
82. Guns are people, my friend!
|
An' ya gotta feel sorry for them being forced to do something they weren't meant to do....... wait, that don't sound right.
|
Response to progressivebydesign (Reply #41)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 03:47 PM
DBoon (12,247 posts)
92. I think a can of gasoline and some matches would do
|
While I agree that the worship of guns in the US contributes to these crimes a mass killer can find other equally dramatic ways of taking people out
|
Response to DBoon (Reply #92)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 06:38 PM
primavera (5,137 posts)
146. I'd rather take my chances with the can of gas
|
I have a pretty decent chance of getting out of a burning building. A few hundred rounds intentionally aimed at me? Not so much.
|
Response to DBoon (Reply #92)
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 12:35 AM
progressivebydesign (19,363 posts)
162. Yes, but it's the ease and convenience of weapons that are the issue.
|
A morning service, in a very large temple, and one guy with a gas can and match. Not going to do much.
Guns are perfect for cowards. The can be far away from their target, and all they have to do is wiggle a finger to destroy hundreds of lives in a dozen shots. All the plots that people come up with as a way to say 'it didn't have to be a gun,' all require more work, more foresight, than just grabbing the guns and putting on gear. |
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:45 PM
DisgustipatedinCA (5,407 posts)
30. There are conflicting reports that there are 2 gunmen holding hostages
|
Who knows if this will turn out to be correct, but some are retweeting local media saying that they're receiving SMS from inside the temple saying there are 2 gunmen.
|
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:46 PM
ForgoTheConsequence (978 posts)
31. Wouldn't be the first time.
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Balbir_Singh_Sodhi
On September 15, 2001, Frank Roque shot Sodhi five times, killing him instantly. Roque, who apparently wanted revenge for September 11, mistook him for an Arab because of the clothes he wore, his turban, and his beard. Within 25 minutes of his death, the Phoenix police reported four further attacks on people who either were Middle Easterners or who dressed with clothes thought to be worn by Middle Easterners. |
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:48 PM
Comrade_McKenzie (2,526 posts)
33. "Reports indicate 12 Children being held Hostage by Militia Men in Sikh Temple"
|
Per @sikhactivist on Twitter.
|
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:52 PM
ForgoTheConsequence (978 posts)
37. Meanwhile the headline on Drudge?
|
Serena Williams dancing at the Olympics.
|
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:56 PM
Botany (36,040 posts)
40. and yet the gun industry and gun culture rolls on and on
Michael Moore was right after the shootings in Colorado nothing will change and we have another and another mass shooting and nobody will do dick about it. Bottom line: IT IS THE GUNS. |
Response to Botany (Reply #40)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:58 PM
progressivebydesign (19,363 posts)
43. Oh but guns are sooo SEXY (barf) Every video, movie, tv show, that features guns glamorizes them.
|
I hate it. They serve one purpose: to kill.
|
Response to Botany (Reply #40)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 02:02 PM
bluedigger (10,577 posts)
47. Bottom line is that it is RELIGIOUS INTOLERANCE.
|
Guns don't cause hate crimes. Hate causes hate crimes.
|
Response to bluedigger (Reply #47)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 02:45 PM
LadyHawkAZ (3,891 posts)
64. It's easier to attack the 2nd amendment
|
and blame the guns, than attack the 1st amendment and blame their god.
I personally would think that the mindset needs to be dealt with much more urgently than the weapons, but what do I know... |
Response to bluedigger (Reply #47)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 03:49 PM
DBoon (12,247 posts)
93. a violent gun-worshipping society makes hate much more deadly
|
nt
|
Response to bluedigger (Reply #47)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 04:27 PM
TahitiNut (71,568 posts)
106. It's a cruel irony that a fundamental tenet of Sikhism is respect for all religions ....
|
... and a commitment to DEFEND the rights of all people to worship according to their own faith. Sikhism has many VERY admirable basic principles, including equality and freedom of ALL people. They were "casteless" when India was deeply caste-based and believed in full gender equality as far back as the 15th century!
It would be difficult to find daylight between Sikh beliefs and the UN Declaration of Human Rights ... and Sikhs got it right more than FIVE HUNDRED YEARS EARLIER. The very notion of directing such hatred toward a community so devoted to defending EVERYONE'S rights is an abomination on top of an abomination. |
Response to bluedigger (Reply #47)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 05:02 PM
progressivebydesign (19,363 posts)
118. Sorry, but there are intolerant people EVERYWHERE, but the US is the place where they use guns
|
In America, where it's every angry asshole in the Country can get numerous weapons, it becomes a gun issue.
There are intolerant people in Japan, and in the UK, but their sane gun laws and lack of gun-glorified culture, means that shit like this doesn't happen all the time, or that mentally ill people are not allowed to amass large cache of weapons. |
Response to Botany (Reply #40)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 02:46 PM
Heather MC (4,805 posts)
65. Cue the NRA to blame the person, his mother, and bad aiming
Response to Heather MC (Reply #65)
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 12:12 PM
Doctor_J (26,355 posts)
174. And the fact that the Sikh's didn't arm themselves properly
|
for services.
|
Response to Botany (Reply #40)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 03:11 PM
Jessy169 (412 posts)
80. That photo makes me sick
|
|
Response to Jessy169 (Reply #80)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 03:27 PM
PavePusher (15,374 posts)
87. Why? Did they have anything to do with this crime? n/t
Response to PavePusher (Reply #87)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 05:09 PM
Care Acutely (1,370 posts)
121. yes
|
The glorification of guns, gun porn and gun culture do have something to do with gun crimes.
|
Response to Care Acutely (Reply #121)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 05:36 PM
LadyHawkAZ (3,891 posts)
127. +1
|
I can't watch this show. They don't build weapons, they build idols to worship.
|
Response to PavePusher (Reply #87)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 06:18 PM
Jessy169 (412 posts)
139. In an indirect way, I believe yes, they did
|
Before Columbine in 1999, mass shootings in America were rare events. After 1999, there have been at least one or two mass shootings per year every year (except one i believe), and three mass shootings a few times and prior to this year, four mass shootings in one year. This year, we already have four mass shootings, and we still have almost have a year left to go. The rise in mass shootings, almost all of which were perpetrated with semi-automatic weapons, are most certainly directly related to the massive saturation of our society WITH semi-automatic weapons -- weapons that were never meant for hunting, just for killing people. The folks in that photograph are perfect poster-childs for the NRA lunacy that allows any wreck of a human being to walk into the gun store and walk out armed to the teeth. The smirk on the gal's face is an insult to the many people who have died or had their lives ruined as result of the proliferation of semi-automatic weapons into our society.
|
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:58 PM
RedStateLiberal (1,374 posts)
44. Obviously, we don't know the motivation for this shooting but...
|
...one thing's for sure from my recent experience. Wingnuts are angry. REALLY angry. I myself have been the target of outrageous outbursts of irrational hatred from close family members over partisan politics. We've seen more and more examples of right-wingers saying nutty things and acting crazy.
They are desperate. The Republican party is self-imploding. With every day it is becoming more clear that Obama will be re-elected and the GOP is on its way out - and it's their own damn fault for bowing down to the extremist elements in their party and nominating a terrible candidate for president. I wouldn't be surprised if this shooting is a hate crime inspired by the wild accusations of Bachmann and other Rethugs. I wouldn't be surprised if this is a hate-inspired wingnut lashing out due to the irrational hatred that is whipped up by the lying liars such as Beck and Limbaugh. Of course, I'm just speculating about this shooting but we should all beware. Today's Republicans are basically fascists. If they can't have their way they will act out and I wouldn't put violence past them. After I vote on election day I'm going on lockdown because I just can't hope for the best from people who seem so delusional and full of irrational hatred. I hope I'm wrong about this shooting, I really do, but it's hard to imagine it not being a hate crime inspired by wingnut rhetoric when the right's crazy levels are off the charts these days. If that turns out to be true then they damn well better be held accountable. |
Response to RedStateLiberal (Reply #44)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 05:58 PM
yardwork (37,074 posts)
133. I'm noticing the same thing. The chickens are coming home to roost.
|
People are angry and a lot of people are angry about the right things but for all the wrong reasons, and the targets of their anger are all wrong. It's not "liberals" that tanked the economy. It turns out that global warming isn't just a liberal myth made up to make Al Gore rich. It turns out that "Obamacare" is not socialist enough rather than being way too socialist. It turns out that "buy American" was a good idea that the Republicans destroyed. It turns out that Sikhs aren't Muslim and anyway the Muslims didn't do this to us we did it to ourselves.
|
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 01:58 PM
IcyPeas (3,201 posts)
45. he shot a cop too. this is on cnn live right now
Response to IcyPeas (Reply #45)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 02:03 PM
auntAgonist (16,651 posts)
49. Officer shot, will survive ...
|
SikhActivistNetwork @sikhactivist
Update: Police Officer shot, will survive. One suspect down at Sikh temple shooting. #TempleShooting. |
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 02:13 PM
iamthebandfanman (6,744 posts)
53. Sure are alot of PEOPLE killing lately..
|
Last edited Sun Aug 5, 2012, 02:13 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) who just happen to be using a WEAPON designed SOLEY and SPECIFICALLY to KILL that has no other purpose beyond KILLING..
|
Response to iamthebandfanman (Reply #53)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 06:24 PM
Jessy169 (412 posts)
144. yep, we're on track for a record year of mass shootings
|
Before this year, four mass-shootings in one year was the record. We're at four mass shootings this year already, with five months left to go. Record idiocy in the Republican Party. Record heat from global warming. Record mass shootings. Not a good year. If Romney somehow "wins", this could go down as one of the worst years ever.
|
Response to Jessy169 (Reply #144)
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 09:30 AM
slackmaster (60,567 posts)
169. Prove to me that you didn't just make something up and post it
Response to iamthebandfanman (Reply #53)
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 12:38 AM
progressivebydesign (19,363 posts)
163. Well.. in the past four years, an astronomical number of guns have been sold in America.
|
Because the NRA and the assholes on right wing radio and tv, have scared the unstable and ignorant people that 1) the economy is going to collapse. 2) the right wingers will be sent to fema camps 3) there will be martial law and the democrats will come for the guns 4) there are scary people with hoodies out there to steal their tv.
More guns on the street = more crime. Period. Whatever dipshit wrote "an armed society is a polite society" is full of shit. it's quite the opposite, actually. |
Response to progressivebydesign (Reply #163)
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 09:27 AM
slackmaster (60,567 posts)
167. In spite of the fear-mongering, murders and other violent crimes have decreased for the past 4 years
|
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/preliminary-annual-ucr-jan-dec-2011/data-tables/table-3
http://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2012/june/crimes_061112/crimes_061112 More guns on the street = more crime. The numbers just don't support that claim, progressivebydesign. |
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 02:22 PM
WorseBeforeBetter (7,657 posts)
58. K&R, sadly.
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 02:32 PM
Shadowflash (798 posts)
60. If only
|
All the folks from the temple were packing too................
|
Response to Shadowflash (Reply #60)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 03:31 PM
TahitiNut (71,568 posts)
88. Well, their (ceremonial) daggers are pretty useless against semi-automatic handguns.
|
Every Sikh male must carry one, along with a comb and other items traditionally required by their faith.
|
Response to TahitiNut (Reply #88)
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 11:58 AM
JoeyT (4,549 posts)
172. Even if he hadn't had a gun,
|
IIRC they aren't allowed to use them as a weapon, and it would be considered a terrible thing to do so.
My sleep deprived brain may be remembering wrong. |
Response to Shadowflash (Reply #60)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 05:43 PM
gasser85 (40 posts)
130. =More dead bodies
|
I know your post was sarcastic but I too have become intolerant of that crazy logic. As with the Aurora Massacre I've heard the usual people using that logic. It would just start a firestorm of wildly fired bullets causing greater loss of life.
|
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 02:40 PM
citizen blues (169 posts)
63. Another Christian Terrorist!
|
Carrying out a violent attack against a peaceful people.
|
Response to citizen blues (Reply #63)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 02:51 PM
lonestarnot (71,133 posts)
69. Nothing Christian about slaughter of the unarmed. Just nutfuckerian.
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 02:49 PM
UnrepentantLiberal (11,700 posts)
67. CNN says
|
7 people dead.
|
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 02:49 PM
Whoa_Nelly (21,021 posts)
68. Police: Officer at Sikh temple shooting "put down" 1 shooter; no word on shooter's condition
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 02:51 PM
onehandle (35,428 posts)
70. Just more guns used for their intended purpose. nt
Response to onehandle (Reply #70)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 03:01 PM
slackmaster (60,567 posts)
76. Ignore the gun psychos, onehandle.
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 02:51 PM
Hissyspit (40,059 posts)
72. New York Times reports seven dead.
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 02:53 PM
kestrel91316 (45,386 posts)
74. 6 victims dead, plus 1 gunman dead
|
Hostage situation ongoing
|
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 02:56 PM
Ruby the Liberal (23,501 posts)
75. Live feed at link:
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 03:08 PM
kestrel91316 (45,386 posts)
77. Press release from the Indian embassy:
|
http://www.indianembassy.org/prdetail2006/press-release
"Washington, DC "We have seen reports on the tragic incident earlier today of firing at a group of worshippers in a Gurudwara in the Milwaukee suburb of Oak Creek, Wisconsin. The Embassy is seized of the situation and has been in touch with the National Security Council in Washington, D.C. Our Consulate General in Chicago too has been in close touch with the local authorities to monitor the situation. An official has been deputed to visit the site to ascertain the situation on-the-spot." |
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 03:10 PM
ForgoTheConsequence (978 posts)
79. 4 hours in and still nothing on Drudge.
|
Still Serena Williams dancing.
|
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 03:13 PM
BootinUp (25,607 posts)
81. Skinhead?
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 03:37 PM
hue (2,543 posts)
89. I can hardly handle this--very close to where I live & I know some who worship here! :-(
Response to hue (Reply #89)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 03:51 PM
handmade34 (9,488 posts)
94. hundreds of miles away
|
and I am angry and sad...
|
Response to handmade34 (Reply #94)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 04:20 PM
revolution breeze (871 posts)
105. My new next door neighbor came over to see if our Dish was working.
|
His family is in Wisconsin and he had lost his television signal due to a thunderstorm. He does not have Internet access yet and wanted to keep abreast of what is happening. Thankfully his mother and sister both finally called and had not left yet left home when this occurred.
|
Response to revolution breeze (Reply #105)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 07:14 PM
blaze (2,470 posts)
150. (((RB))) nt
Response to revolution breeze (Reply #105)
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 02:30 PM
Doctor_J (26,355 posts)
177. Hopefully you didn't let him tune to Fox Lies
Response to Doctor_J (Reply #177)
Wed Aug 8, 2012, 11:05 AM
revolution breeze (871 posts)
189. My satellite was out too
|
But he was able to get on our computer and find news as well as chat with a friend. And it gave us a chance to get to know him better. Great addition to our diverse neighborhood.
|
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 03:56 PM
Archae (26,367 posts)
96. Even money he's a teabagging Michelle Bachmann groupie.
|
"Those Muslims are infiltrating our government!"
|
Response to Archae (Reply #96)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 04:07 PM
Whoa_Nelly (21,021 posts)
100. More likely a member or wannbe of the Aryan Nation EOM
Response to Archae (Reply #96)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 04:55 PM
alfredo (46,554 posts)
115. Whatever he was, he's dead now and no longer a threat.
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 04:11 PM
Iliyah (2,347 posts)
102. Prayers upon prayers to everyone there
|
I also bet the NRA is seeing more $$$$ signs.
|
Response to Iliyah (Reply #102)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 04:33 PM
onehandle (35,428 posts)
107. Yep. Mass murder has become that gun industry lobby's best money making scheme.
|
Started with their favorite gun rights poster boy, Timothy McVeigh.
|
Response to onehandle (Reply #107)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 04:46 PM
Archae (26,367 posts)
111. McVeigh didn't use a gun.
Response to Archae (Reply #111)
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 02:32 PM
Doctor_J (26,355 posts)
178. And there hasn't been another McVeigh in 17 years
|
while gun massacres are getting to be a weekly news item.
Moron. |
Response to Doctor_J (Reply #178)
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 02:34 PM
Archae (26,367 posts)
179. Are you calling me a moron?
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 04:37 PM
patrice (47,372 posts)
109. The Sikhs amongst my acquaintences are absolutely hands down the most peaceful people I know.
|
|
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 04:46 PM
AtomicKitten (39,585 posts)
112. Seven dead. So, how many more need to die before we address gun control?
Response to AtomicKitten (Reply #112)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 05:19 PM
GliderGuider (15,149 posts)
124. How many more need to die before you address GOP control?
|
The socialist hordes up here in Canuckistan are getting restless.
|
Response to GliderGuider (Reply #124)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 06:22 PM
primavera (5,137 posts)
142. You and us both
|
I'm beginning to think we should wall off the US like "Escape from New York." The whole country can be just one big penal colony for wing-nuts and the rest of the world can live in peace for a change.
|
Response to AtomicKitten (Reply #112)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 05:39 PM
LadyHawkAZ (3,891 posts)
129. Before we address racism? Before we address religious hatred?
|
I agree we need basic controls on firearms, but they're far from being the root of the problem.
|
Response to LadyHawkAZ (Reply #129)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 06:46 PM
primavera (5,137 posts)
147. Those too
|
But they're not mutually exclusive. When the US has a culture that does not kill 30,000 people a year with guns, I will be the first to champion gun rights. Until then, we can no more be trusted with them than an infant can be trusted with a hand grenade. Whatever the root causes of our numerous problems may be, we clearly are NOT ready for prime time when it comes to guns. To continuously pour deadly weapons into a society that is the sociological equivalent of a retarded child is suicidal.
|
Response to primavera (Reply #147)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 07:26 PM
LadyHawkAZ (3,891 posts)
153. Yes, but that's what I was saying
|
There's been a huge rush lately to condemn the weapon while glossing over the actual problems.
|
Response to LadyHawkAZ (Reply #129)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 07:42 PM
AtomicKitten (39,585 posts)
154. Gun control would be a hell of a lot easier than curing ignorance, extremism, and bigotry.
Response to AtomicKitten (Reply #154)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 07:54 PM
LadyHawkAZ (3,891 posts)
156. Indeed.
|
Last edited Sun Aug 5, 2012, 09:24 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) Even if we succeeded in banning guns tomorrow, this time next year we'd be wondering what to do about all these bombings. The actual problems need to be addressed first.
|
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 05:08 PM
BanTheGOP (1,028 posts)
119. Again. 7 humans dead by the existence of the GOP.
|
Until the GOP is banned, we will not make inroads on banning weapons. Priorities.
|
Response to BanTheGOP (Reply #119)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 06:27 PM
Codeine (12,676 posts)
145. Would you stop making the same stupid-ass post
|
Last edited Sun Aug 5, 2012, 06:28 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) across this board? No progressive has ever argued in favor of banning a political party -- that's just dumb. You're either a troll or you're just not too damned bright.
edited for punctuation |
Response to Codeine (Reply #145)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 11:47 PM
liberalhistorian (18,992 posts)
160. Methinks he's both,
|
a troll AND not too bright. Way too obvious from the beginning, his handlers must have cut back on the training budget.
|
Response to Codeine (Reply #145)
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 01:17 AM
JI7 (40,073 posts)
165. troll for sure, i thought he had been banned
|
but i guess not.
|
Response to BanTheGOP (Reply #119)
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 09:29 AM
slackmaster (60,567 posts)
168. Crime rates have been falling for almost 20 years. The last four years are no different.
|
In spite of the misleading vividness of spectacular crimes that are hyped by the media.
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/preliminary-annual-ucr-jan-dec-2011/data-tables/table-3 |
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 05:18 PM
MindMover (2,798 posts)
123. Nah, we don't need anymore gun control ... WTF
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 05:32 PM
Tx4obama (28,859 posts)
126. Kick! n/t
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 06:04 PM
brewens (3,011 posts)
135. " A sikh must have the courage to defend the rights of all who are wrongfully
|
Last edited Sun Aug 5, 2012, 06:05 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) oppressed or persecuted irrespective of religion, color caste or creed." I never bothered to read anything about what the sikh's believe. I'm impressed by that. I did know they weren't muslim but I wonder if the shooter thought they were?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sikhism |
Response to brewens (Reply #135)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 06:21 PM
kestrel91316 (45,386 posts)
141. I pretty much guarantee you he did. I wonder what his FR handle was?
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 06:12 PM
primavera (5,137 posts)
136. A moment of silence, please, for the victims of this senseless act of gun violence
|
... and for the victims of the one before, and the one before that, and the one before that...
|
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 06:12 PM
kestrel91316 (45,386 posts)
137. FBI and ATF at a home in Cudahy, neighborhood being evacuated.
|
Per live tv
|
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 06:22 PM
kestrel91316 (45,386 posts)
143. Stoopit journalist on the live feed asked what "domestic terrorism" was.
Response to kestrel91316 (Reply #143)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 07:21 PM
get the red out (7,305 posts)
152. OMG
|
|
Response to get the red out (Reply #152)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 08:51 PM
kestrel91316 (45,386 posts)
159. She talked like a fresh young news babe.
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 08:13 PM
Kalidurga (4,820 posts)
157. This is so sad...
|
More good people dead, because someone knows not what they hate. We will probably never get the full story as if we ever do. But, what we do know is that there are too many people carrying around hate and it is too often becoming deadly.
|
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 08:24 PM
lib2DaBone (8,124 posts)
158. Well, I can see that everyone will have to give up their freedom to remain safe....
|
Bring on the TSA Roadblocks... everyone will have to be stripped-searched at the supermarket on a daily basis to remain safe.
|
Response to lib2DaBone (Reply #158)
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 01:07 AM
Mojorabbit (12,775 posts)
164. I think people would do it too which scares me more than anything.
|
I am getting up there but I think it will be a different world for the younger people. They can be talked so easily into giving up their freedoms for an illusion of safety.
I am reading this guy was a military vet. I hope that he was not one of those people sent for multiple tours and was damaged by it. |
Response to lib2DaBone (Reply #158)
Tue Aug 7, 2012, 11:28 AM
Doctor_J (26,355 posts)
182. By "give up their right to be safe",
|
I suppose you mean support a little gun control. Strange, people in the civilized parts of the world are far safer than we are, and don't have strip-searches at the supoermarket. I wonder if there is some other difference...wait! I know! They don't have 200 million guns in circulation!
Occum's Razor |
Response to Doctor_J (Reply #182)
Tue Aug 7, 2012, 12:57 PM
friendly_iconoclast (8,854 posts)
184. So how do you propose to get rid of those 200 million guns?
Response to friendly_iconoclast (Reply #184)
Tue Aug 7, 2012, 01:27 PM
Doctor_J (26,355 posts)
185. how do you propose to stop the shooting rampages?
Response to Doctor_J (Reply #185)
Tue Aug 7, 2012, 01:33 PM
hack89 (21,254 posts)
186. How about single payer health care with mental health coverage? nt
Response to hack89 (Reply #186)
Tue Aug 7, 2012, 01:36 PM
Doctor_J (26,355 posts)
187. about as likely as the gun ban the NRA is screaming about
Response to Doctor_J (Reply #187)
Tue Aug 7, 2012, 01:39 PM
hack89 (21,254 posts)
188. If you could devote your time and effort to health care or gun control which would you pick?
|
I would pick health care - it would save many more lives.
|
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 07:21 AM
davidpdx (8,781 posts)
166. It's hard to not come to the conclusion that this was a deranged act of hate
|
based on religion. I hope the FBI figures out what happened and makes the evidence public. The guy maybe dead, but people have a right to know what happened and why.
|
Response to Whoa_Nelly (Original post)
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 09:34 AM
sufrommich (13,510 posts)
170. An interesting freeper post...
|
Claims to be a post on ATF board from shooter:
A letter from Wade M. Page is posted on the ATF website... “From: Badman400 Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 7:19 PM To: Terrell, Barbara A. Subject: No registering of long guns Wake Up!!!! No more restrictions on law abiding gun owners! These restrictions do nothing about the criminals they are meant to affect. Why punish and render defenseless the very people that deserve to be protected while HELPING the offenders with such laws? The only other use for such laws is for government to gain control over the people. This is America, and I AM THE GOVERNMENT, not you! Remember who you work for, and your oath! “Laws that forbid the carrying of arms... disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve to encourage rather than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” -Thomas Jefferson Sincerely, Wade M. Page Stop tying the hands of the good guys!” http://www.atf.gov/about/foia/demand-letters/B%20Responses.pdf http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2915144/posts#comment |
Response to sufrommich (Reply #170)
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 12:14 PM
Doctor_J (26,355 posts)
175. Something nearly identical has been or will be posted in the gungeon
|
most of them are freepers
|
Response to Doctor_J (Reply #175)
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 02:51 PM
friendly_iconoclast (8,854 posts)
180. Of *course* they are, because no Real Progressives (TM) disagree with you!
|
Seriously, are you Fred Colon?
Sergeant Colon had had a broad education. He’d been to the School of My Dad Always Said, the College of It Stands to Reason, and was now a postgraduate student at the University of What Some Bloke In the Pub Told Me.
Terry Pratchett, Jingo |


