Fri Jul 27, 2012, 07:08 PM
derby378 (28,480 posts)
Democratic senators offer gun control amendment for cybersecurity bill
Source: The Hill
Democratic senators have offered an amendment to the cybersecurity bill that would limit the purchase of high capacity gun magazines for some consumers. Shortly after the Cybersecurity Act gained Senate approval to proceed to filing proposed amendments and a vote next week, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), a sponsor of the gun control amendment, came to the floor to defend the idea of implementing some “reasonable” gun control measures. Read more: http://thehill.com/video/senate/240657-cybersecurity-bill-includes-gun-control-measure
|
19 replies, 2685 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| derby378 | Jul 2012 | OP | |
| PoliticAverse | Jul 2012 | #1 | |
| -..__... | Jul 2012 | #13 | |
| Serve The Servants | Jul 2012 | #15 | |
| JoeyT | Jul 2012 | #16 | |
| TheCowsCameHome | Jul 2012 | #2 | |
| derby378 | Jul 2012 | #3 | |
| bucolic_frolic | Jul 2012 | #9 | |
| beevul | Jul 2012 | #18 | |
| WilliamPitt | Jul 2012 | #4 | |
| 47of74 | Jul 2012 | #5 | |
| Posteritatis | Jul 2012 | #6 | |
| PoliticAverse | Jul 2012 | #7 | |
| LAGC | Jul 2012 | #8 | |
| rhett o rick | Jul 2012 | #11 | |
| Mojorabbit | Jul 2012 | #14 | |
| pocoloco | Jul 2012 | #19 | |
| hack89 | Jul 2012 | #10 | |
| -..__... | Jul 2012 | #12 | |
| Tx4obama | Jul 2012 | #17 |
Response to derby378 (Original post)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 07:14 PM
PoliticAverse (5,536 posts)
1. The full text of the proposed amendment can be read in this previous DU thread...
Response to PoliticAverse (Reply #1)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 08:44 PM
-..__... (7,776 posts)
13. Here's the real fly in the ointment...
|
transfer to or possession by a law enforcement officer employed by such an entity for purposes of law enforcement (whether on or off duty);
‘‘(C) the possession, by an individual who is retired from service with a law enforcement agency and is not otherwise prohibited from receiving ammunition, of a large capacity ammunition feeding device transferred to the individual by the agency upon that retirement O'rly?! The trusted protectors of the people are allowed to posses these 'murderous devices of mass destruction'... even retired anointed ones, but the common man isn't? FUCK THAT SHIT Lets see the gum-flappin, gun-grabbing, blow hards put their money where their mouth is and propose an across the board ban. But... they'll never do something that would upset or anger their blue legions because its always sound political policy to say to the public, "this common sense, much needed legislation has the support of our brave men and women in uniform... blah...blah.. blah... etc... etc...etc...". It also looks impressive to have a few 5 star, badge wearing, dick wads with a stick up their asses standing on the podium nodding in solemn agreement when you try to sell the public this steaming pile of shit. |
Response to -..__... (Reply #13)
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 12:00 AM
Serve The Servants (320 posts)
15. DU REC /nt
Response to -..__... (Reply #13)
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 03:17 AM
JoeyT (4,549 posts)
16. +1
|
Across the board bans or no bans at all.
Especially if they're exempting retired cops. What the fuck? Trying to create special classes of people much? |
Response to derby378 (Original post)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 07:14 PM
TheCowsCameHome (27,695 posts)
2. See? See? See? Wayne LaPierre told you so.
|
Has the NRA released a condemnation statement yet?
|
Response to TheCowsCameHome (Reply #2)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 07:16 PM
derby378 (28,480 posts)
3. Actually, I see no sense in trying to sneak this into a cybersecurity bill
|
The Intertubes aren't going to be threatened by a Glock magazine that holds 11 shots instead of 10.
|
Response to derby378 (Reply #3)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 07:42 PM
bucolic_frolic (708 posts)
9. Maybe they're making a point ...
|
that security comes in several forms, safety from crazies with
machine guns being one of them .... |
Response to bucolic_frolic (Reply #9)
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 05:06 AM
beevul (6,881 posts)
18. What "crazies with machine guns" are you referring to? N/T
Response to derby378 (Original post)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 07:23 PM
WilliamPitt (54,469 posts)
4. Just the bold step I was hoping for.
|
...and the band played on. |
Response to derby378 (Original post)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 07:23 PM
47of74 (6,659 posts)
5. Stings like hell, doesn't it GOP pigs?
|
When we play your games.
|
Response to derby378 (Original post)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 07:24 PM
Posteritatis (17,280 posts)
6. Do kinda wish this sort of thing would be in its own legislation
|
Ridering additional, unrelated causes onto every other bill's enough of a problem as is.
|
Response to Posteritatis (Reply #6)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 07:29 PM
PoliticAverse (5,536 posts)
7. Lautenberg previously introduced it as a separate Senate bill. n/t
Response to derby378 (Original post)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 07:40 PM
LAGC (4,539 posts)
8. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid will sink it, just like other gun control non-sense.
|
Reid knows better than to embarrass rural Democrats in an election year.
This bill is going nowhere fast, despite the usual (urban) suspects advocating for it. |
Response to LAGC (Reply #8)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 08:02 PM
rhett o rick (26,694 posts)
11. How sad. The gun crazies rule. nm
Response to LAGC (Reply #8)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 09:43 PM
Mojorabbit (12,777 posts)
14. And thank goodness for it. We need every vote in Nov.
|
I know so many people who were softening because they were feeling confident that this sort of thing was not going to happen after all and then this.
|
Response to LAGC (Reply #8)
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 10:19 AM
pocoloco (2,708 posts)
19. A little fucking late!
|
Not many of us rural Democrats left!
Damn sure enough 1st and 2nd generation repugs though! |
Response to derby378 (Original post)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 07:46 PM
hack89 (21,258 posts)
10. Ten round limit? Good luck with that. nt
Response to derby378 (Original post)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 08:19 PM
-..__... (7,776 posts)
12. C'mon, Chuckie "Brown" Schumer...
|
Last edited Fri Jul 27, 2012, 08:21 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) I'll hold the ball so you can kick it...
![]() |
Response to derby378 (Original post)
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 03:24 AM
Tx4obama (28,872 posts)


