HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Democratic senators offer...

Fri Jul 27, 2012, 07:08 PM

Democratic senators offer gun control amendment for cybersecurity bill

Source: The Hill

Democratic senators have offered an amendment to the cybersecurity bill that would limit the purchase of high capacity gun magazines for some consumers.

Shortly after the Cybersecurity Act gained Senate approval to proceed to filing proposed amendments and a vote next week, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), a sponsor of the gun control amendment, came to the floor to defend the idea of implementing some “reasonable” gun control measures.

Read more: http://thehill.com/video/senate/240657-cybersecurity-bill-includes-gun-control-measure

19 replies, 2685 views

Thread informationRemove bookmarkTrash this thread

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 19 replies Author Time Post
Reply Democratic senators offer gun control amendment for cybersecurity bill (Original post)
derby378 Jul 2012 OP
PoliticAverse Jul 2012 #1
-..__... Jul 2012 #13
Serve The Servants Jul 2012 #15
JoeyT Jul 2012 #16
TheCowsCameHome Jul 2012 #2
derby378 Jul 2012 #3
bucolic_frolic Jul 2012 #9
beevul Jul 2012 #18
WilliamPitt Jul 2012 #4
47of74 Jul 2012 #5
Posteritatis Jul 2012 #6
PoliticAverse Jul 2012 #7
LAGC Jul 2012 #8
rhett o rick Jul 2012 #11
Mojorabbit Jul 2012 #14
pocoloco Jul 2012 #19
hack89 Jul 2012 #10
-..__... Jul 2012 #12
Tx4obama Jul 2012 #17

Response to derby378 (Original post)

Fri Jul 27, 2012, 07:14 PM

1. The full text of the proposed amendment can be read in this previous DU thread...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PoliticAverse (Reply #1)

Fri Jul 27, 2012, 08:44 PM

13. Here's the real fly in the ointment...

 

transfer to or possession by a law enforcement officer employed by such an entity for purposes of law enforcement (whether on or off duty);


‘‘(C) the possession, by an individual who is retired from service with a law enforcement agency and is not otherwise prohibited from receiving ammunition, of a large capacity ammunition feeding device transferred to the individual by the agency upon that retirement


O'rly?!

The trusted protectors of the people are allowed to posses these 'murderous devices of mass destruction'... even retired anointed ones, but the common man isn't?

FUCK THAT SHIT

Lets see the gum-flappin, gun-grabbing, blow hards put their money where their mouth is and propose an across the board ban.

But... they'll never do something that would upset or anger their blue legions because its always sound political policy to say to the public, "this common sense, much needed legislation has the support of our brave men and women in uniform... blah...blah.. blah... etc... etc...etc...".

It also looks impressive to have a few 5 star, badge wearing, dick wads with a stick up their asses
standing on the podium nodding in solemn agreement when you try to sell the public this steaming pile of shit.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to -..__... (Reply #13)

Sat Jul 28, 2012, 12:00 AM

15. DU REC /nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to -..__... (Reply #13)

Sat Jul 28, 2012, 03:17 AM

16. +1

Across the board bans or no bans at all.

Especially if they're exempting retired cops. What the fuck? Trying to create special classes of people much?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to derby378 (Original post)

Fri Jul 27, 2012, 07:14 PM

2. See? See? See? Wayne LaPierre told you so.

Has the NRA released a condemnation statement yet?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TheCowsCameHome (Reply #2)

Fri Jul 27, 2012, 07:16 PM

3. Actually, I see no sense in trying to sneak this into a cybersecurity bill

The Intertubes aren't going to be threatened by a Glock magazine that holds 11 shots instead of 10.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to derby378 (Reply #3)

Fri Jul 27, 2012, 07:42 PM

9. Maybe they're making a point ...

that security comes in several forms, safety from crazies with
machine guns being one of them ....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bucolic_frolic (Reply #9)

Sat Jul 28, 2012, 05:06 AM

18. What "crazies with machine guns" are you referring to? N/T

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to derby378 (Original post)

Fri Jul 27, 2012, 07:23 PM

4. Just the bold step I was hoping for.



...and the band played on.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to derby378 (Original post)

Fri Jul 27, 2012, 07:23 PM

5. Stings like hell, doesn't it GOP pigs?

When we play your games.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to derby378 (Original post)

Fri Jul 27, 2012, 07:24 PM

6. Do kinda wish this sort of thing would be in its own legislation

Ridering additional, unrelated causes onto every other bill's enough of a problem as is.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Posteritatis (Reply #6)

Fri Jul 27, 2012, 07:29 PM

7. Lautenberg previously introduced it as a separate Senate bill. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to derby378 (Original post)

Fri Jul 27, 2012, 07:40 PM

8. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid will sink it, just like other gun control non-sense.

Reid knows better than to embarrass rural Democrats in an election year.

This bill is going nowhere fast, despite the usual (urban) suspects advocating for it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LAGC (Reply #8)

Fri Jul 27, 2012, 08:02 PM

11. How sad. The gun crazies rule. nm

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LAGC (Reply #8)

Fri Jul 27, 2012, 09:43 PM

14. And thank goodness for it. We need every vote in Nov.

I know so many people who were softening because they were feeling confident that this sort of thing was not going to happen after all and then this.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LAGC (Reply #8)

Sat Jul 28, 2012, 10:19 AM

19. A little fucking late!

Not many of us rural Democrats left!

Damn sure enough 1st and 2nd generation repugs though!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to derby378 (Original post)

Fri Jul 27, 2012, 07:46 PM

10. Ten round limit? Good luck with that. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to derby378 (Original post)

Fri Jul 27, 2012, 08:19 PM

12. C'mon, Chuckie "Brown" Schumer...

 

Last edited Fri Jul 27, 2012, 08:21 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

I'll hold the ball so you can kick it...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Reply to this thread