Thu Jul 26, 2012, 10:02 PM
146 replies, 11922 views
 146 replies |
Author | Time | Post |
 California gun purchases nearing record (Original post) |
alp227 | Jul 2012 | OP |
| Edweird | Jul 2012 | #1 | |
| NYC_SKP | Jul 2012 | #3 | |
| Mojorabbit | Jul 2012 | #4 | |
| NYC_SKP | Jul 2012 | #5 | |
| 4th law of robotics | Jul 2012 | #22 | |
| NYC_SKP | Jul 2012 | #50 | |
| sarisataka | Jul 2012 | #63 | |
| PavePusher | Jul 2012 | #76 | |
| 4th law of robotics | Jul 2012 | #128 | |
| Ash_F | Jul 2012 | #132 | |
| slackmaster | Jul 2012 | #34 | |
| NYC_SKP | Jul 2012 | #48 | |
| TheWraith | Jul 2012 | #8 | |
| bongbong | Jul 2012 | #26 | |
| SoCalMusicLover | Jul 2012 | #18 | |
| Edweird | Jul 2012 | #11 | |
| sarisataka | Jul 2012 | #64 | |
| -..__... | Jul 2012 | #70 | |
| polichick | Jul 2012 | #6 | |
| LanternWaste | Jul 2012 | #25 | |
| primavera | Jul 2012 | #93 | |
| fascisthunter | Jul 2012 | #2 | |
| TheWraith | Jul 2012 | #9 | |
| bongbong | Jul 2012 | #27 | |
| former9thward | Jul 2012 | #44 | |
| bongbong | Jul 2012 | #53 | |
| former9thward | Jul 2012 | #57 | |
| bongbong | Jul 2012 | #60 | |
| former9thward | Jul 2012 | #62 | |
| bongbong | Jul 2012 | #65 | |
| former9thward | Jul 2012 | #68 | |
| bongbong | Jul 2012 | #71 | |
| NickB79 | Jul 2012 | #117 | |
| bongbong | Jul 2012 | #120 | |
| NickB79 | Jul 2012 | #124 | |
| bongbong | Jul 2012 | #125 | |
| bongbong | Jul 2012 | #73 | |
| Llewlladdwr | Jul 2012 | #126 | |
| bongbong | Jul 2012 | #127 | |
| Clames | Jul 2012 | #141 | |
| bongbong | Jul 2012 | #142 | |
| Clames | Jul 2012 | #144 | |
| hack89 | Jul 2012 | #46 | |
| bongbong | Jul 2012 | #52 | |
| hack89 | Jul 2012 | #54 | |
| bongbong | Jul 2012 | #55 | |
| hack89 | Jul 2012 | #56 | |
| bongbong | Jul 2012 | #61 | |
| hack89 | Jul 2012 | #69 | |
| bongbong | Jul 2012 | #74 | |
| hack89 | Jul 2012 | #75 | |
| Scootaloo | Jul 2012 | #102 | |
| hack89 | Jul 2012 | #103 | |
| X_Digger | Jul 2012 | #131 | |
| bongbong | Jul 2012 | #136 | |
| X_Digger | Jul 2012 | #139 | |
| uh clem | Jul 2012 | #42 | |
| former9thward | Jul 2012 | #45 | |
| hack89 | Jul 2012 | #47 | |
| NickB79 | Jul 2012 | #51 | |
| primavera | Jul 2012 | #95 | |
| TheWraith | Jul 2012 | #7 | |
| onehandle | Jul 2012 | #10 | |
| Eddie Rek | Jul 2012 | #12 | |
| onehandle | Jul 2012 | #13 | |
| The Straight Story | Jul 2012 | #16 | |
| lunatica | Jul 2012 | #21 | |
| onehandle | Jul 2012 | #35 | |
| smirkymonkey | Jul 2012 | #118 | |
| BuddhaGirl | Jul 2012 | #32 | |
| booley | Jul 2012 | #14 | |
| former9thward | Jul 2012 | #49 | |
| booley | Jul 2012 | #134 | |
| former9thward | Jul 2012 | #135 | |
| booley | Jul 2012 | #137 | |
| former9thward | Jul 2012 | #138 | |
| primavera | Jul 2012 | #97 | |
| TouchOfGray | Jul 2012 | #15 | |
| bongbong | Jul 2012 | #29 | |
| PavePusher | Jul 2012 | #77 | |
| bongbong | Jul 2012 | #89 | |
| Grassy Knoll | Jul 2012 | #17 | |
| smirkymonkey | Jul 2012 | #119 | |
| Odin2005 | Jul 2012 | #19 | |
| lunatica | Jul 2012 | #20 | |
| polichick | Jul 2012 | #23 | |
| PavePusher | Jul 2012 | #78 | |
| primavera | Jul 2012 | #98 | |
| dixiegrrrrl | Jul 2012 | #24 | |
| slackmaster | Jul 2012 | #31 | |
| dixiegrrrrl | Jul 2012 | #36 | |
| slackmaster | Jul 2012 | #28 | |
| bongbong | Jul 2012 | #30 | |
| slackmaster | Jul 2012 | #33 | |
| bongbong | Jul 2012 | #37 | |
| slackmaster | Jul 2012 | #38 | |
| bongbong | Jul 2012 | #39 | |
| slackmaster | Jul 2012 | #40 | |
| bongbong | Jul 2012 | #41 | |
| Blue_Tires | Jul 2012 | #58 | |
| bongbong | Jul 2012 | #59 | |
| sarisataka | Jul 2012 | #66 | |
| bongbong | Jul 2012 | #67 | |
| PavePusher | Jul 2012 | #79 | |
| slackmaster | Jul 2012 | #80 | |
| bongbong | Jul 2012 | #82 | |
| Bertha Venation | Jul 2012 | #84 | |
| bongbong | Jul 2012 | #86 | |
| bongbong | Jul 2012 | #81 | |
| Bertha Venation | Jul 2012 | #83 | |
| bongbong | Jul 2012 | #85 | |
| Bertha Venation | Jul 2012 | #87 | |
| bongbong | Jul 2012 | #90 | |
| Bertha Venation | Jul 2012 | #94 | |
| bongbong | Jul 2012 | #100 | |
| slackmaster | Jul 2012 | #88 | |
| Bertha Venation | Jul 2012 | #91 | |
| bongbong | Jul 2012 | #92 | |
| bongbong | Jul 2012 | #114 | |
| PavePusher | Jul 2012 | #96 | |
| bongbong | Jul 2012 | #105 | |
| slackmaster | Jul 2012 | #111 | |
| bongbong | Jul 2012 | #115 | |
| PavePusher | Jul 2012 | #116 | |
| Missycim | Jul 2012 | #122 | |
| PavePusher | Jul 2012 | #123 | |
| LanternWaste | Jul 2012 | #130 | |
| primavera | Jul 2012 | #99 | |
| slackmaster | Jul 2012 | #101 | |
| primavera | Jul 2012 | #106 | |
| slackmaster | Jul 2012 | #108 | |
| primavera | Jul 2012 | #110 | |
| slackmaster | Jul 2012 | #112 | |
| primavera | Jul 2012 | #113 | |
| uh clem | Jul 2012 | #43 | |
| -..__... | Jul 2012 | #72 | |
| crimson77 | Jul 2012 | #104 | |
| slackmaster | Jul 2012 | #107 | |
| crimson77 | Jul 2012 | #109 | |
| Kablooie | Jul 2012 | #133 | |
| crimson77 | Jul 2012 | #140 | |
| Kablooie | Jul 2012 | #143 | |
| crimson77 | Jul 2012 | #145 | |
| Kablooie | Aug 2012 | #146 | |
| may3rd | Jul 2012 | #121 | |
| jaycube | Jul 2012 | #129 |
Response to Edweird (Reply #1)
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 10:09 PM
NYC_SKP (49,545 posts)
3. "Obama: New Gun Laws Not on the Agenda
Response to NYC_SKP (Reply #3)
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 10:11 PM
Mojorabbit (12,881 posts)
4. I thought he just made a speech saying he might consider it? nt
Response to Mojorabbit (Reply #4)
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 10:13 PM
NYC_SKP (49,545 posts)
5. I heard him say that AR15s ought not to be on the street or in the hands of criminals.
Response to 4th law of robotics (Reply #22)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 01:57 PM
NYC_SKP (49,545 posts)
50. Ah, thanks...
Response to 4th law of robotics (Reply #128)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 10:16 AM
132. The Saiga rifle is one of many AK type weapons.
Response to slackmaster (Reply #34)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 01:56 PM
NYC_SKP (49,545 posts)
48. This sounds like an opportunity for improvement that doesn't require an act of Congress.
Response to Mojorabbit (Reply #4)
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 10:16 PM
8. He made some vague, "not ruling anything out" comments.
Response to Mojorabbit (Reply #4)
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 11:28 PM
SoCalMusicLover (350 posts)
18. Promises..
Response to NYC_SKP (Reply #3)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 03:14 PM
sarisataka (2,296 posts)
64. Unfortunately...
Response to Edweird (Reply #1)
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 10:14 PM
6. Sure, the "don't take my gun" crowd is showing its paranoia.
Response to Edweird (Reply #1)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 11:57 AM
25. Less to do with Pres Obama, more to due with the Aurora mass-killing I would think...
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 10:08 PM
fascisthunter (28,619 posts)
2. wonderful... don't y'all feel safer?
|
Last edited Thu Jul 26, 2012, 10:19 PM USA/ET - Edit history (2) |
Response to fascisthunter (Reply #2)
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 10:17 PM
9. Given that more guns don't cause more crime, I certainly don't feel less safe.
Response to bongbong (Reply #27)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 01:49 PM
former9thward (6,654 posts)
44. If false then you should be able to prove it.
Response to former9thward (Reply #44)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 02:09 PM
53. More laughs
|
Can't prove a negative.
Most people over the age of 5 understand this.  |
Response to bongbong (Reply #53)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 02:29 PM
former9thward (6,654 posts)
57. You haven't added one fact to this discussion.
Response to bongbong (Reply #60)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 03:06 PM
former9thward (6,654 posts)
62. You made a baseless assertion.
Response to bongbong (Reply #65)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 03:42 PM
former9thward (6,654 posts)
68. The amount of guns has gone up and crime has gone down.
Response to bongbong (Reply #71)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 11:48 PM
117. I've taken philosophy and college-level biostatistics for my degree. Try me
Response to bongbong (Reply #120)
Sun Jul 29, 2012, 12:40 AM
124. Point out where anyone in this thread said "more guns = more safety"
Response to NickB79 (Reply #124)
Sun Jul 29, 2012, 02:02 PM
125. Reading comprehension
|
Last edited Sun Jul 29, 2012, 02:06 PM USA/ET - Edit history (2) > Point out where anyone in this thread said "more guns = more safety"
Start with post #9. > is "more guns does NOT equal more crime", which is not the same thing as "more guns = more safety." "More guns = more safety" is my shorthand for any of the dozens of illogical & impaired "arguments" (AKA NRA Talking Points) (AKA NRA Big Lies) on that theme that gun-relgionists like to post over & over to try to gain acceptance for their Precious. Sometimes gun-relgionists just like to take the subtle route, implying without stating directly that "more guns = more safety". If you use Venn Diagrams or another elementary logic tool you can see that the two statements that you claim are different are actually the same. Get a refund. > As for my supposed contradiction, where is it? Your statement 1: "All you have is to say that maybe it would be even lower if there weren't so many guns on the streets, which is possible but completely unprovable." Your statement 2: "All we can say with the evidence at hand is that adding millions more guns to the US didn't cause gun crimes to increase." I can prove contradiction if #2 is inconsistent with #1. Could #1 be true if #2 was true? Could you both add millions of guns to the street and actually CAUSE, instead of NOT CAUSE (your secondary premise in #2) crimes to go down? That is all it would take to prove a contradiction - does #1 support the conclusion that adding millions of guns to the street CAUSES (or COULD CAUSE) crime to go up? Well, by golly, yes it does. QED. You contradicted yourself. Maybe you should pay ME for the logic class I just gave you.
(And before you or any other gun-relgionist asks, my teaching rates are very high, and I don't take barter, like "I can give you a buncha guns that will mow down dozens of thugs (wink wink) in a second if you just share some of that book larnin' with me!") |
Response to bongbong (Reply #127)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 07:02 PM
141. You can't even find "logic" in the dictionary.
|
Last edited Tue Jul 31, 2012, 07:03 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) But if you ever do there would be the phrase "antonym: see bongbong on DU"
 |
Response to Clames (Reply #141)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 09:30 PM
142. Usual crap
|
Yeah, that's the ticket. When I demonstrate the lack of logic from the gun-relgionists, just toss out the usual (tired & non-witty) insult.
Be sure to declare "VICTORY!" |
Response to bongbong (Reply #142)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 10:40 PM
144. Let everyone know when you demonstrate anything...
|
...more than grade school insults. Must be pocketing a check from the Brady Campaign or some other gun-control extremist group for as much as you are doing to wear out their memes.
|
Response to bongbong (Reply #27)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 01:55 PM
46. So you deny that every category of violent crime has been steadily falling for decades? Really. nt
Response to hack89 (Reply #46)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 02:08 PM
52. Really?
|
And you're trying to attribute that to guns? PROVE IT. Make sure you take every other variable out of the equation.
|
Response to bongbong (Reply #52)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 02:11 PM
54. Crime did not go down because of more guns - we have had this conversation before, remember?
Response to bongbong (Reply #55)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 02:23 PM
56. Except you could not provide a single fact to make your point.
Response to bongbong (Reply #61)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 03:43 PM
69. But murders with guns went down. Is that making things worst? Interesting logic there. nt
Response to bongbong (Reply #74)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 04:15 PM
75. So not going down more = getting worse? Really. nt
Response to hack89 (Reply #46)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 05:32 PM
Scootaloo (6,108 posts)
102. Don't the gun stufffers ignore the same fact?
Response to bongbong (Reply #27)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 09:09 AM
X_Digger (13,269 posts)
131. Just for you..
Response to bongbong (Reply #136)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 06:32 PM
X_Digger (13,269 posts)
139. Had I asserted it did, then you'd have a point.
Response to uh clem (Reply #42)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 01:53 PM
former9thward (6,654 posts)
45. What crime statistics?
Response to uh clem (Reply #42)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 01:56 PM
47. Here are the FBI stats - make your case.
Response to uh clem (Reply #42)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 02:03 PM
51. Yes, let's do that. Lowest crime rates since 1963
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 10:16 PM
7. A friend of mine here in NY is getting ready to purchase both a shotgun and a handgun.
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 10:19 PM
onehandle (36,001 posts)
10. Paranoid Lunatics. nt
Response to Eddie Rek (Reply #12)
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 10:47 PM
onehandle (36,001 posts)
13. Additionally...
|
Response to onehandle (Reply #13)
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 11:09 PM
The Straight Story (41,763 posts)
16. Let's start a new one for women that buy guns
Response to The Straight Story (Reply #16)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 07:41 AM
21. Why start a new one when everyone knows women buy guns because
|
they have penis envy
Everyone's got penis on the brain, in one way or other. LOL!  |
Response to lunatica (Reply #21)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 12:19 PM
onehandle (36,001 posts)
35. Thanks. I didn't feel comfortable mentioning that.
|
Having a penis and all...
|
Response to onehandle (Reply #13)
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 07:59 AM
smirkymonkey (11,713 posts)
118. I haven't seen that one before, but it's extremely funny - my sentiments exactly!
 |
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 10:56 PM
14. of course it's because Obama is going to ban guns
Response to booley (Reply #14)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 01:56 PM
former9thward (6,654 posts)
49. I agree Obama has done nothing to restrict gun ownership.
Response to booley (Reply #134)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 01:41 PM
former9thward (6,654 posts)
135. That was not really the Obama administration.
Response to booley (Reply #137)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 03:27 PM
former9thward (6,654 posts)
138. Yes and you are right I had forgotten about the national park gun carry.
Response to Grassy Knoll (Reply #17)
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 08:03 AM
smirkymonkey (11,713 posts)
119. That's not funny - my great uncle was smothered by Top Ramen.
|
|
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 07:27 AM
19. Anyone else think it's pathetic that the first response of gun nuts after a shooting...
|
...is to buy more guns and ammo?
 |
Response to Odin2005 (Reply #19)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 04:22 PM
78. Yeah, no-one should buy tools for self-defense...
|
immediately after nationally televised proof that it's possible to have a need for them.
 |
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 11:13 AM
dixiegrrrrl (31,436 posts)
24. Wait a sec...couple of things:
Response to slackmaster (Reply #31)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 12:19 PM
dixiegrrrrl (31,436 posts)
36. I used the word "big" incorrectly.
Response to bongbong (Reply #30)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 12:12 PM
33. It's always uplifting to see such a negative stereotype with no facts to back it up posted on DU
|
|
Response to slackmaster (Reply #33)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 12:25 PM
37. Yeah!
|
> 's always uplifting to see such a negative stereotype with no facts to back it up posted on DU
And it's always uplifting to see such a lack of clear thinking on the part of gun-relgionists. For the less-inspired among us, for your post to have any truth would require that there be not ONE SINGLE instance of a mullet-wearing, tooth-challenged gun-nut in America.
This post has been a service of Reading Comprehension Helpers, Inc. |
Response to slackmaster (Reply #38)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 12:32 PM
39. More laughs
|
> One example wouldn't qualify as "since some of the most"
Oh, yeah, you're right. I'd need TWO examples.
> De-humanization through baseless insults. Ah, the ever-so-sensitive, but "tough as nails!", gun-relgionist. Just like Tom Tomorrow pointed out so succinctly in his toon. |
Response to slackmaster (Reply #40)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 12:43 PM
41. Now more irony to go along with the laughs
|
> t's clear that you have no interest in anything resembling a civil dialogue
followed by > You smug, authoritarian gun prohibitionists all sound alike. GREAT STUFF! You should audition for Leno's show. |
Response to Blue_Tires (Reply #58)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 02:50 PM
59. Huh
|
> That doesn't help the discussion any more than the tie-dyed, peacenik pacifist hippie pinko stereotype
People that fit both stereotypes exist. Frankly puzzled by your post. Do you have a point?  |
Response to bongbong (Reply #59)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 03:21 PM
sarisataka (2,296 posts)
66. Shoe...
|
welcome to the other foot
And so on |
Response to sarisataka (Reply #66)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 03:42 PM
67. Grab for the gusto
|
Pink ordeals dance on green insects.
|
Response to bongbong (Reply #82)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 04:46 PM
Bertha Venation (20,240 posts)
84. By stereotyping people you don't know?
Response to PavePusher (Reply #79)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 04:41 PM
81. LOL
|
How is it bigotry? My post was 100% neutral.
Did I say ONE WORD negative or positive about the gun-nuts? All I said is they exist, which of course they do (at least two of them  There are bumper stickers that say things like "I'm proud to be a redneck" and the like, so I probably even complimented some of them.
Hilarious. Classic. Too funny! Gun-relgionists looking for something, ANYTHING, to pounce on. And failing. x 1000000 |
Response to bongbong (Reply #30)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 04:46 PM
Bertha Venation (20,240 posts)
83. I can't believe that this has been allowed to stand.
Response to Bertha Venation (Reply #83)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 04:49 PM
85. LOL
|
Last edited Fri Jul 27, 2012, 04:49 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) How is it bigotry? My post was 100% neutral.
Did I say ONE WORD negative or positive about the gun-nuts? All I said is they exist, which of course they do. There are bumper stickers that say things like "I'm proud to be a redneck", "I'm proud to be a gun-nut", and the like, so I probably even complimented some of them. |
Response to bongbong (Reply #85)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 04:53 PM
Bertha Venation (20,240 posts)
87. You used a stereotype and painted broadly with a paint gun.
Response to bongbong (Reply #90)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 05:03 PM
Bertha Venation (20,240 posts)
94. I'm not very good at debate, nor am I good at articulating my thoughts.
Response to slackmaster (Reply #88)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 04:58 PM
Bertha Venation (20,240 posts)
91. Clearly, slackmaster
Response to slackmaster (Reply #88)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 05:58 PM
114. LOL
|
> It's every bit as bigoted as saying that black people sink in water, or that French people all stink
Yeah, because owning a gun is the same kind of thing as skin color or nationality. You're born with a gun in your hand and can't change it.
Good luck with your toothy problem. Always good to nip those problems early because of the danger of an infection working its way into the brain. Almost lost a GF years ago to that; she was at a party when it happened, and it just so happened a nurse was at the same party, realized the seriousness, and rushed her to the hospital. |
Response to PavePusher (Reply #96)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 05:46 PM
105. LOL
|
> Apparently, when it comes to bigotry against gun owners, the limits are pretty far out there. Sad, but it's the reality we deal with here.
Do gun-relgionists go to school to learn how to construct such elaborate Strawmen? |
Response to bongbong (Reply #105)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 05:53 PM
111. I doubt that anyone takes bongbong seriously at this point
|
Last edited Fri Jul 27, 2012, 05:55 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) 
Evil Clown is very quick with a joke, but his jests always have a barb. He has little patience for in-depth discussions and will often disrupt exchanges between serious forum participants by introducing irrelevant topics, fatuous quips, and offhand comments. His greatest thrill is to taunt and humiliate weaker or more plodding Warriors with his snappy ripostes. Not a particularly powerful Warrior, Evil Clown will attempt to avoid defeat by accusing his attacker of having no sense of humor. http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/evilclown.htm |
Response to slackmaster (Reply #111)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 06:04 PM
115. I'm a BAD BOY
|
Evil Clown? I thought that was the mass-murderer gun-nut in Denver. There is evidence he was modeling his behavior after the Joker.
Yeah, I'm a BIG BAD OLD MEANIE! I like the posts from gun-relgionists that attack me personally after I merely attack their ideas. Not to say I'm above insults, but you'll find I post them only after I get one from somebody else. I'm not one of those "spineless wimpy Liberals" that the right-wing fantasizes about. |
Response to Missycim (Reply #122)
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 08:51 PM
123. Indeed they are. You get used to it, but it's nice to kick back occasionally.
|
And welcome to D.U.!!
 |
Response to PavePusher (Reply #96)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 08:52 AM
130. I s'pose we hold our own cows sacred, and those of others as simply more sirloin for the grill...
Response to slackmaster (Reply #108)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 05:53 PM
110. Oh, fuck me.
|
Damn, slackmaster, I'm so sorry!
 Are you sure it you really need to have that molar replaced after all? I think I might consider gumming my food for the rest of my life to avoid that. |
Response to primavera (Reply #110)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 05:54 PM
112. I think the bone-drilling, reaming, and tapping part is done under general anesthesia
|
Last edited Fri Jul 27, 2012, 05:54 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) Either way I'll take my mom there with me.
 |
Response to uh clem (Reply #43)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 04:00 PM
72. I'll say...
|
I anticipate prices to go up and shortages/back orders of a lot of firearms related products... magazines, ammo, etc.
|
Response to crimson77 (Reply #104)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 05:47 PM
107. I have a few friends in Hollywood and West Hollywood who came to that very conclusion in 1992
 |
Response to crimson77 (Reply #104)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 12:17 PM
Kablooie (8,942 posts)
133. I'm lucky to live in a little known corner of LA County that no one bothers.
Response to crimson77 (Reply #140)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 10:16 PM
Kablooie (8,942 posts)
143. La Canada Flintridge. Near Pasadena.
Response to crimson77 (Reply #145)
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 12:00 AM
Kablooie (8,942 posts)
146. It has more of a small town feel in the mountain foothills.
