EPA chief Scott Pruitt says carbon dioxide is not a primary contributor to global warming
Source: CNBC
Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt said Thursday he does not believe carbon dioxide is a primary contributor to global warming.
"I think that measuring with precision human activity on the climate is something very challenging to do and there's tremendous disagreement about the degree of impact, so no, I would not agree that it's a primary contributor to the global warming that we see ," he told CNBC's "Squawk Box."
"But we don't know that yet ... We need to continue the debate and continue the review and the analysis," he added.
Pruitt's view is at odds with the opinion of NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Read more: http://www.cnbc.com/2017/03/09/epa-chief-scott-pruitt.html
This is what we're up against - hacks, ideologues, grifters and assholes who Do Not Care about reality, and who certainly don't care about us.
LonePirate
(13,408 posts)Is a prerequisite and requirement for being considered for a position in the trump administration!
Nitram
(22,765 posts)LonePirate
(13,408 posts)I tend to believe their motives are due to nefarious reasons rather than simple ignorance. However, your case is a solid one as well.
gordianot
(15,233 posts)Flaleftist
(3,473 posts)He just doesn't care because $$$$$. There are too many people in power that would let people die and poison the planet if it makes their bank account bigger. Then again, there are also people like Ben Carson. Just because they have a degree and a skill doesn't mean they aren't an idiot.
Judi Lynn
(160,450 posts)long before the effects become deadly for their children and grandchildren.
As long as it doesn't affect them personally, they will never care. They are perverted, greedy human-shaped blobs.
Welcome to D.U., Flaleftist.
sinkingfeeling
(51,438 posts)same as where he got is degrees in chemistry and biology? Trump University?
bullsnarfle
(254 posts)Box o' Cracker Jack.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)Environmental Science 101 covers that.
neeksgeek
(1,214 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,487 posts)redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)Sounds like the energy companies are still writing his stuff for him.
n2doc
(47,953 posts)Just in case!
JudyM
(29,194 posts)CousinIT
(9,224 posts)....I'll stick with the climate scientists thankyouverymuch.
Submariner
(12,497 posts)This ahole has a degree in political science, NOT real science. Please die in a tornado MF'er
Judi Lynn
(160,450 posts)Just imagine him, side by side, with Kansas Governor Sam Brownback, trying to outrun this tornado and some angry farmers:
[center][/center]
groundloop
(11,514 posts)Every single day I'm astounded by the idiocy of this administration. 45* is certainly well on his way to destroying not only the USA but the entire civilized world.
Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)After all, you can't ask a dead person (or planet) if it was the cigarettes (carbon dioxide) that killed them.
Eyeball_Kid
(7,429 posts)Tobacco induced lung damage that leads to cancer can also come from radioactive isotopes from the tobacco combustion process. Some studies in the past have suggested that additives in the curing process can be factors.
But we're discussing our friend Mr. Pruitt, who, by his equivocating, conveys to us that he really doesn't know about the science of climate change and atmospheric pollution. If there is ONE knucklehead scientist out of thousands who tells us fallacies about climate change, Pruitt will use that one person as justification to call the issue debatable. That's because 1. He's intellectually lazy, and 2. He's protecting polluters.
Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)that among THOUSANDS that come to the same basic conclusions in a legitimate way.
world wide wally
(21,738 posts)Just a lot of money spent lobbying by oil companies.
There IS a difference.
SunSeeker
(51,513 posts)davekriss
(4,616 posts)Botany
(70,447 posts)Oh what the hell here is some real science
http://www.grida.no/publications/vg/climate/page/3057.aspx
SHRED
(28,136 posts)Laxman
(2,419 posts)who would take their climate advice from a rodent before they would believe an entire field of science and scientists with PHD's. That's the state of our nation today and is exhibit A in the list of evidence of why we are doomed.
mwooldri
(10,299 posts)Might be worse than CO2. And apparently there's a lot of it in the permafrost up north. The now melting permafrost.
So he might be right... But CO2 emissions helped start it.
Moostache
(9,895 posts)And Fuck you Donald Trump. You are an even bigger lying piece of shit.
And Fuck you GOP....you are all a gigantic pile of lying pieces of shit.
You are all also whores...taking money and providing fellatio for the oil interests that pay you off.
I hope you all live long enough to see the dammage done and to bury members of YOUR families that die in the impending carnage.
I also hope everyone of you lying motherfuckers lose money on waterfront properties that the sea claims imminently.
These sons of bitches need to ALL be identified and recorded in history so that whatever remains of humanity after the next century NEVER forgets their names and they become eternal pariahs to mankind like Pol Pot, Hitler, Ghengis Khan, or other madmen reviled for all time.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,106 posts)Because the stolen election has guaranteed all but an end to us, all of us.
War Pigs
(252 posts)Has nothing to do with Drilling and fracking. Just a coincidence science is for losers according to them
Eliot Rosewater
(31,106 posts)This is undeniable now.
Too bad we cant fast forward and watch his grandchildren treading water.
Vinca
(50,237 posts)The entire planet is at risk.
vlyons
(10,252 posts)What analysis? There can't be any analysis after he takes a sledge hammer to the EPA and NOAA and flushes all the years of data down the toilet.
mn9driver
(4,419 posts)The fossil fuel industry has many trillions of dollars worth of product in the ground. They are determined to pump it all.
Over the next several hundred years, the result will be the worst case scenario.
turbinetree
(24,683 posts)Have you seen this video ass**** here let me remind you of what we need to survive and this is what your cronies and you are trying to deny, so again FU again
MFM008
(19,803 posts)Just there to muddy the waters.
ffr
(22,665 posts)Me: Carbon as a greenhouse gas is not debatable. He can have the opinion that its not, but he's denying SCIENTIFIC FACT. Good luck with that Scott, you MORAN!
Here's the important part. He's the captain of our environmental ship. His willful ignorance is going to get people killed.
tclambert
(11,084 posts)dalton99a
(81,404 posts)LuckyLib
(6,817 posts)defund the National Atmospheric and Oceanic research wing, and gut agencies that focus on climate change. Stupid, stupid, stupid!
NickB79
(19,224 posts)Long after every one of those lying bastards in the Trump admininstration are dead and buried, their legacy will live on through the suffering, humanitarian crises, mass extinction of species and deaths of millions of people around the world as our climate falls apart around us.
This is the reason I can't forgive anyone who voted for Trump, ever. The last election was literally humanity's LAST SHOT at holding climate change to a level slightly below completely catastrophic for human civilization and the planet's ecosystems.
We failed.