Spicer On AARP Concerns: We're Not Trying To Accommodate 'Special Interests'
Source: Talking Points Memo
By CAITLIN MACNEAL Published MARCH 8, 2017, 3:07 PM EDT
White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer on Wednesday brushed off the AARP's forceful opposition to the House GOP's Obamacare replacement plan, dismissing the group that represents millions of seniors as a "special interest."
When asked about the group's opposition to the GOP health care plan, Spicer noted its support for an Obamacare provision regarding prescription drugs.
"I think the AARP got a really good deal last time when it came to prescription drugs, in particular," Spicer said in the daily briefing. "I think this is a patient-centric bill. Its about patients, its about people, its about the Americans who are left behind. Look at what those deals got people last time. For all those people who are on Medicaid in particular, they don't have choices anymore."
Spicer accused Democrats of using "one deal after another" to "buy votes" to pass Obamacare.
Read more: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/spicer-dismisses-aarp-concerns-obamacare-replacement
Spicer Says No One In White House Participated In #ADayWithoutAWoman
By KRISTIN SALAKY Published MARCH 8, 2017, 2:36 PM EDT
White House press secretary Sean Spicer said he is not aware of any women who work in the White House who are participating in the "Day Without a Woman" protest Wednesday. Spicer added that support for women should not be limited to one day.
"I am not aware of any that are not here. I think everyone that I'm aware of has shown up and is working really hard to advance the president's agenda," Spicer said during his daily press briefing. "They're committed to moving this country forward for those of you who will join the President throughout government, I think but obviously as the President stated today, we want to recognize the contributions that women make to our businesses, to our families, to our economy, to our society, and it's a free country."
Spicer was also asked if he thinks that women's boycott is an effective form of protest. And while he didn't answer that directly, he said he believes that people should be taking a stand for women every day.
"People have the right to express themselves, but I think that we should on a daily basis not just one day a year but 365 days a year appreciate the contributions that women make in all of those categories," he said. "So it's not, it shouldn't be a daily thing and it's, hopefully we can help fix that all bit more."
more
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/spicer-no-women-white-house-day-without-woman
---------------------------------
Spicer Trashes CBO Ahead Of New Analysis: They Were 'Way Off' On O'Care
By MATT SHUHAM Published MARCH 8, 2017, 2:43 PM EDT
The White House press secretary dismissed criticisms that House Republicans replacement for Obamacare hadnt yet been scored by the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office Wednesday. The CBO, Sean Spicer said, had been way off in its enrollment analyses for Obamacare.
While Spicer said that the House GOP proposal will follow regular order and that every member of the House and the Senate will have their opportunity to have amendments offered through the committee process and on the floor, others have been critical that the two House committees in which the proposal originated Ways and Means and Energy and Commerce will vote on it before a CBO report is available.
Various congressional Republicans, anticipating a CBO report likely next week, have cast doubt on the reliability of the offices analyses.
"[Republican] leadership will put out something on the rate of growth, and they'll have to back it up with some spreadsheets or whatever," Rep. David Brat (R-VA) told TPM Wednesday, referring to alternatives to the CBO report. He noted that "the CBO, they've scored everything wrong for decades."
more
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/spicer-trashes-cbo-health-care
asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)in the admin..or the cbo..eh rep brat (R VA)????to hell with constituents..
Rollo
(2,559 posts)Is that alienating the nation's seniors will likely result in the R's losing their Congressional majorities, as well as the White House.
Not to mention hastening the day when single payer or universal healthcare gets a groundswell of popular support.
The stumbling and fumbling of Trump and the R's would be amusing were it not for the millions of people it will hurt.
moonscape
(4,673 posts)RedWedge
(618 posts)I love the idea of age being a "special interest."
Igel
(35,275 posts)If it's not for the common good, it's a special interest.
By "common good" I don't mean for 50% + 1. I mean, really and pretty much, for the common good. At least 90% of the population. Preferably much closer to 100%. "We the people" isn't just "those not in the top 5%." They're people, too, unless we're deep into dehumanizing our "other" and calling it progressive. (The KKK does the same thing. The only difference is that they're part of my "other", and I'm not going to elevate myself to arbiter of the collective moral good for all humanity for all time. That particular field of endeavor is already overcrowded, with the gold medal going to millions, the platinum medal going to thousands, and the iridium, rhodium, and tantalum medals still not going to first place. Silver medals for overachievers in that field can be bought in 12-packs at Walmart.)
I consider teachers, retirees, Latinos, teens, white males between the ages of 45-54, evangelicals, those in poverty, the "1%", and LGBTQA+ all to be "special interests" when their good isn't the same for, well, pretty much every one of those groups all taken together.
"Special interest" isn't obligatorily derogatory, although most of the people I know more than about 1/2 st dev X-of-center (whether right or left) use it that way, but only consider those they don't have any compassion or empathy for to be "special." If they empathize with the group, even if it puts the needs and wants of 2% of the population clearly ahead of the other 98% in a way that's reminiscent of serfdom, it's not really a "special interest."
Solly Mack
(90,758 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)DK504
(3,847 posts)"I think the AARP got a really good deal last time when it came to prescription drugs, in particular," Spicer said..."
If I am recalling it correctly seniors were spitting mad. They couldn't get medications from Canada any longer. (My mother's medication went up 400%) The gubmint didn't bother to negotiate for lower prices on drugs. So fuck you Stupid Spice.
moonscape
(4,673 posts)Ilsa
(61,690 posts)Those seniors love being called a "special interest group" to be ignored. A lot of them have plenty of time and energy to spread the word, give out hand bills, etc for Democrats in 2018.
And I'll be glad to do more than send money this time around. Every repug in government is a hyena.
Alice11111
(5,730 posts)NickB79
(19,224 posts)Preferably soon, so you don't waste any more tax dollars my billionaire friends want.
OnDoutside
(19,948 posts)Alice11111
(5,730 posts)Plus, some won't admit it, ever. A few will. They are still just getting high from watching him give shit to the Dems. That's what they really wanted all along...entertainment...watching DT fuck with the people who try to make sense of the world. They are yukking it up over his nonsence, including Spicer.
Phoenix61
(16,994 posts)Oh, that's going to go over well. All those retirees with hours and hours every day with nothing to do. Does he have any idea how many of them live in Florida? Hope they all pay Twitler a visit the next time he's at Mar-a-Lago.
dchill
(38,449 posts)Corporate sponsors is a 'special interest'.
Friend or Foe
(195 posts)OKNancy
(41,832 posts)keep it up and we will win in 2018 and 2020
Kimchijeon
(1,606 posts)Elderly
Disabled
Poor
Working Class
90% of the American tax bracket
angrychair
(8,684 posts)They have officially reached the "dont give a fuck" stage. To be so dismissive of AARP is a foolish and ignorant thing to say.
To completely disregard, before it is even public or complete, the CBO report is mind-numbingly stupid. The only job of the CBO is to do this type of cost analysis. If congress now only wants this independent organization to produce confirmation biased reports than we are in serious trouble budget wise.
Alice11111
(5,730 posts)Truth is it's somewhat financed by insurance companies, not left at all.
We are up against STUPID, fact free people.
MontanaMama
(23,296 posts)or grand parents with health care concerns. What a nasty little turd.
Marthe48
(16,905 posts)n/t
littlemissmartypants
(22,593 posts)Apologies to blooms.
Alice11111
(5,730 posts)care necessary.
More_Cowbell
(2,190 posts)Hekate
(90,564 posts)vkkv
(3,384 posts)'I thought we made that obvious.. eh? You so-called journalists are liars.'
royable
(1,263 posts)and less nutritious.
Alice11111
(5,730 posts)answer questions and the press kept pressing. He hammers and haws. She as Spicer, took the podium in panic and frustration and plowed it into the press, but never gave answers.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)Ok the Republican bill is dead on arrival with propaganda like that. Asshole.
Blue Idaho
(5,038 posts)As a big part of our base... especially after Spicer finishes sticking his foot in his mouth.
Dyedinthewoolliberal
(15,546 posts)Special interests......
Beartracks
(12,801 posts)"Anyone who says anything that doesn't agree with what WE tell you is true is fake news, unreliable, or sad."
Really?
==============
dalton99a
(81,406 posts)DavidDvorkin
(19,469 posts)sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)Justice
(7,185 posts)caroldansen
(725 posts)Cha
(296,873 posts)that AARP is not some "special interest group".. unless you're saying Millions of Seniors concerned with their Health Insurance is your idea of an insult.
csziggy
(34,131 posts)Congress: Demand impartial data on ObamaCare repeal
David Otto, Gig Harbor
Since 1975, the Congressional Budget Office has produced objective, independent analysis of budget and economic issues to support the congressional budget process. The CBO hires employees solely on the basis of professional competence without regard to political affiliation. It is strictly nonpartisan.
Normally when Congress considers legislation, the bill is scored by the CBO, which estimates whether and by how much federal deficits would increase over the subsequent 50 years as a result of the legislation. But the current Congress forbids the CBO to estimate the deficit impact of a proposed repeal of the Affordable Care Act.
All four Washington Republican members of Congress voted to restrict the CBO from giving a score for an ObamaCare repeal. Why?
Insist that your congressional representative vote to change house rules to require all proposed legislation be scored by the CBO. This is the only way to get a non-partisan estimate of how legislation impacts the federal budget deficit.
http://www.thenewstribune.com/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/article134381959.html
I am not sure if it passed - I had to go through maybe ten pages of Google search to find this letter, even though I have memory of the Republican Congress trying to block the CBO scoring their then yet to be introduced bill.
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
TexasBushwhacker
(20,148 posts)The only people who truly have freedom of choice are private payers. If you get your health insurance through your job, you don't get a choice about which health insurance company they choose and you have to use in network doctors or pay dearly to use out of network. If the insurance company drops your doctor, tough shit.
If you get your insurance through the exchanges, you get to choose the company and the plan, but again, if they dump your doctor your hosed.
The closest we come to freedom to choose the doctor you want is traditional Medicare.