Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 11:13 AM Feb 2017

Top Trump science adviser candidate thinks climate scientists are a 'glassy-eyed cult'

Source: RawStory


BRAD REED
15 FEB 2017 AT 09:54 ET

Princeston physicist William Happer is reportedly the top candidate to be President Donald Trump’s official science adviser — and he really does not think much of climate scientists.

In an interview with the Guardian, the 77-year-old Happer describes climate scientists as more of a “cult” that he believes will undermine the public’s trust in science as a whole. “There’s a whole area of climate so-called science that is really more like a cult,” Happer told the Guardian. “It’s like Hare Krishna or something like that. They’re glassy-eyed and they chant. It will potentially harm the image of all science.”

Happer’s skepticism of climate change research makes him a good fit for President Trump, who at one point claimed that climate change was merely a hoax concocted by the Chinese government to undermine American industry.

In addition to his opposition to mainstream climate science, Happer also supports muzzling scientists within the government from independently talking about their work without first getting clearance. “So many people are fed up of listening to the government lie to them about margarine and climate change that when something is actually true and beneficial they don’t listen,” he told the publication. “The government should have a reputation of being completely reliable about facts – real facts.”

###

Read more: http://www.rawstory.com/2017/02/top-trump-science-adviser-candidate-thinks-climate-scientists-are-a-glassy-eyed-cult/

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Top Trump science adviser candidate thinks climate scientists are a 'glassy-eyed cult' (Original Post) DonViejo Feb 2017 OP
Great. He will fit right in with the antivaxxers. nt leftyladyfrommo Feb 2017 #1
Facts Botany Feb 2017 #2
9,000 authors? 2200 peer-reviewed articles? Yavin4 Feb 2017 #3
LOL !!!!!!! pangaia Feb 2017 #6
I am sitting about 3 miles from Ohio State U's Institute of Polar Studies Botany Feb 2017 #8
The debasement of science. TranssexualKaren Feb 2017 #4
Projection Orrex Feb 2017 #5
Sounds like the top Trump doctor who pronounced him the healthiest individual ever elected dalton99a Feb 2017 #7
Those folks in China surely have glassy eyes from all that coal produced angstlessk Feb 2017 #9
Sigh. MBS Feb 2017 #10
Happer is pro-warming and pro-CO2 muriel_volestrangler Feb 2017 #11
He actually said higher CO2 is good in front of Congress. cab67 Feb 2017 #13
The Trump Administration is circling the bowl at this point. cab67 Feb 2017 #12
"The demonization of carbon dioxide is just like the demonization of the poor Jews under Hitler." RedWedge Feb 2017 #14
Why does Princeton have this guy in their employ? BumRushDaShow Feb 2017 #15
At 77, he's probably emeritus, so he works cheap . . . hatrack Feb 2017 #16
My first thought was that he should be retired BumRushDaShow Feb 2017 #17

Botany

(70,496 posts)
2. Facts
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 11:18 AM
Feb 2017

In over 2,200 peer-reviewed articles about climate change by over 9,000 authors, published between November 2012 and December 2013, just one author and paper rejected human actions as the cause.

http://www.popsci.com/article/science/infographic-scientists-who-doubt-human-caused-climate-change

Botany

(70,496 posts)
8. I am sitting about 3 miles from Ohio State U's Institute of Polar Studies
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 11:29 AM
Feb 2017

Where they have ice cores from all over the world that show
millions of data points about the link between green house
gases and the climate. The ice cores give the picture of what
the earth's climate was like in some cases they go back to
400,000 years.

TranssexualKaren

(364 posts)
4. The debasement of science.
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 11:24 AM
Feb 2017

A few years ago the climate denial crowd produced 3,000 "scientists" who purportedly challenged the science of climate change.
I am a scientist!
I resent the fact that even if you can face down psuedoscientists the overall effect is to diminish the currency of the scientific method. Which is their ultimate goal.

MBS

(9,688 posts)
10. Sigh.
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 11:40 AM
Feb 2017

So upsetting. So insulting. So dangerous.
And such a contrast with the deeply competent scientific appointees to the Obama administration, at the Office of Science and Technology Policy, Dept. of Energy, and NOAA: John Holdren, Jane Lubchenco, Kathryn Sullivan, Steven Chu, and Ernie Moniz.

cab67

(2,992 posts)
13. He actually said higher CO2 is good in front of Congress.
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 12:34 PM
Feb 2017

Not just that it's not a problem - that it's actually beneficial.

cab67

(2,992 posts)
12. The Trump Administration is circling the bowl at this point.
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 12:34 PM
Feb 2017

I don't know if the science advisor needs congressional approval, but I would ask Congress to withhold approval on anyone Lord Dampnut nominates on the grounds that he won't be in office for a whole lot longer.

hatrack

(59,584 posts)
16. At 77, he's probably emeritus, so he works cheap . . .
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 12:46 PM
Feb 2017

Beyond that, can't think of a single reason why.

BumRushDaShow

(128,872 posts)
17. My first thought was that he should be retired
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 12:54 PM
Feb 2017

and off somewhere at a kook convention spouting his nonsense outside of a real academic environment. But then emeritus makes sense (to establish some sort of "alternate" point of view).

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Top Trump science adviser...