Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BREMPRO

(2,331 posts)
Tue Jan 24, 2017, 01:31 AM Jan 2017

U.S. judge finds that Aetna misled the public about its reasons for quitting Obamacare

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by DonViejo (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).

Source: Los Angeles Times

"Aetna claimed this summer that it was pulling out of all but four of the 15 states where it was providing Obamacare individual insurance because of a business decision — it was simply losing too much money on the Obamacare exchanges.

Now a federal judge has ruled that that was a rank falsehood. In fact, says Judge John D. Bates, Aetna made its decision at least partially in response to a federal antitrust lawsuit blocking its proposed $37-billion merger with Humana. Aetna threatened federal officials with the pullout before the lawsuit was filed, and followed through on its threat once it was filed. Bates made the observations in the course of a ruling he issued Monday blocking the merger."

"The judge’s conclusions about Aetna’s real reasons for pulling out of Obamacare — as opposed to the rationalization the company made in public — are crucial for the debate over the fate of the Affordable Care Act. That’s because the company’s withdrawal has been exploited by Republicans to justify repealing the act. Just last week, House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wisc.) cited Aetna’s action on the “Charlie Rose” show, saying that it proved how shaky the exchanges were.

Bates found that this rationalization was largely untrue. In fact, he noted, Aetna pulled out of some states and counties that were actually profitable to make a point in its lawsuit defense — and then misled the public about its motivations. Bates’ analysis relies in part on a “smoking gun” letter to the Justice Department in which Chief Executive Mark Bertolini explicitly ties Aetna’s participation in Obamacare to the DOJ’s actions on the merger, which we reported in August. But it goes much further.

Smoking gun? Aetna threatened to quit Obamacare if the government blocked its Humana merger"

Read more: https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.latimes.com%2Fbusiness%2Fhiltzik%2Fla-fi-hiltzik-aetna-obamacare-20170123-story%2Camp.html#a-e9c9cc92-52dc-44b8-b982-8424fda37471





So.. they tried to extort the feds to get their merger, then when they didn't get what they wanted the lied to the public to try to make the ACA look bad when in fact they were profitable in many markets.. Wow...
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. judge finds that Aetna misled the public about its reasons for quitting Obamacare (Original Post) BREMPRO Jan 2017 OP
In other words the real reason was extortion. tenorly Jan 2017 #1
Just another reason to go to a comprehensive single payer health care. YOHABLO Jan 2017 #2
Dupe progree Jan 2017 #3
Locking... DonViejo Jan 2017 #4

tenorly

(2,037 posts)
1. In other words the real reason was extortion.
Tue Jan 24, 2017, 01:52 AM
Jan 2017

Par for the course in corporate America.

 

YOHABLO

(7,358 posts)
2. Just another reason to go to a comprehensive single payer health care.
Tue Jan 24, 2017, 04:59 AM
Jan 2017
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. judge finds that Aet...