Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jose Garcia

(2,592 posts)
Thu Jan 12, 2017, 12:22 PM Jan 2017

S.D. legislators vote down ban on sexual contact with interns

Source: The Hill

South Dakota lawmakers have blocked a proposed rule that would have banned sexual contact between legislators and their young interns and pages.

State Sen. Stace Nelson (R), who sponsored the proposed ban, told fellow legislators the rule is necessary to prevent a repeat of an ugly incident from 2007, when a member of the state Senate was censured after being accused of fondling an intern.

“There’s been events in history that indicate these rules should have been put in stone and they haven’t,” Nelson told the Joint Committee on Legislative Procedure, according to the Argus Leader. “This is a rule we brought forth to address this so that there is no gray area.”

Those who voted against the proposal said inappropriate sexual advances are already banned under state rules. The committee voted to defer the proposal for more than a month, a step that effectively kills the idea.

Read more: http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/313956-sd-legislators-vote-down-ban-on-sexual-contact-with-interns

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
S.D. legislators vote down ban on sexual contact with interns (Original Post) Jose Garcia Jan 2017 OP
The opponents said: guillaumeb Jan 2017 #1
I'll be honest, I would likely have voted the same way for the same reason. Pacifist Patriot Jan 2017 #5
Agreed. Better to enforce what exists and let the predators know guillaumeb Jan 2017 #6
Wow IntraPolitico Jan 2017 #2
Beware taking employment with a republicon. ffr Jan 2017 #4
Well, isn't that special? Wounded Bear Jan 2017 #3

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
1. The opponents said:
Thu Jan 12, 2017, 12:29 PM
Jan 2017
Those who voted against the proposal said inappropriate sexual advances are already banned under state rules. The committee voted to defer the proposal for more than a month, a step that effectively kills the idea.


Predators will be predators no matter the law.

Pacifist Patriot

(24,653 posts)
5. I'll be honest, I would likely have voted the same way for the same reason.
Thu Jan 12, 2017, 12:41 PM
Jan 2017

It's already prohibited by law, so adding another ban is meaningless.

 

IntraPolitico

(51 posts)
2. Wow
Thu Jan 12, 2017, 12:34 PM
Jan 2017

Well that's just great isn't it? These Predators will continue to be exonerated from their actions and now not even the law can stop them.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»S.D. legislators vote dow...