Wed Jul 11, 2012, 07:53 AM
Adenoid_Hynkel (11,598 posts)
Romney Bain Capital Attacks Weaken Him In Swing States, Priorities USA Action Poll FindsLast edited Wed Jul 11, 2012, 07:56 AM USA/ET - Edit history (3)
Source: The Huffington Post
Mitt Romney's Bain Capital business experience is increasingly turning into a political liability, according to a swing-state poll released today by Priorities USA Action, the super PAC supporting President Barack Obama. The survey, conducted by Democratic pollsters Global Strategy Group and the Garin-Hart-Yang Research Group on behalf of the super PAC, supports growing evidence that voters are less likely to vote for Romney based on what they are seeing and hearing about his tenure at private equity firm Bain Capital. Larger polls late last month first showed the shift toward Obama that experts attributed to the president's attacks on Romney's business career. Among voters polled from battleground states Colorado, Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Virginia, 37 percent said Romney's business experience would make them less likely to vote for him, compared with 27 percent who responded that it would make them more likely to vote for him. Another 58 percent of respondents said they feel Romney's priority as CEO was to earn millions for himself and his investors, irrespective of the consequences for jobs and employees. The poll adds fresh proof that Obama's attacks on Bain Capital are working, despite criticism from Democratic leaders and prominent Obama backers. The Priorities USA Action memo describing the poll noteed that the super PAC has run advertising in 11 media markets across the five battleground states where voters were polled. In those markets, 40 percent of voters said Romney's record at Bain Capital makes them less likely to vote for him. Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/11/romney-bain-capital-swing-states-priorities-usa-action_n_1663763.html That's really going to break the hearts of the corporatist pundits in the "lib'rul media" who have been needing someone to fetch the smelling salts since the issue was raised.
|
5 replies, 1330 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
| Author | Time | Post | |
| Adenoid_Hynkel | Jul 2012 | OP | |
| Cary | Jul 2012 | #1 | |
| NRaleighLiberal | Jul 2012 | #2 | |
| JoeyT | Jul 2012 | #3 | |
| Deep13 | Jul 2012 | #5 | |
| Deep13 | Jul 2012 | #4 |
Response to Adenoid_Hynkel (Original post)
Wed Jul 11, 2012, 08:02 AM
Cary (4,063 posts)
1. Gee, my heart bleeds for the lying sack of crap
|
Well, actually no. My heart doesn't bleed for him at all but I bet there's lots and lots of hand wringing amongst the fascists about the success of attacks on their precious oligarchs. It's so tough these days to have excessive wealth. You actually get taxed on your unprecedented share of the GDP at half the rate you were taxed 30 years ago and now your excesses are actually a political liability!
The horror. The horror. |
Response to Adenoid_Hynkel (Original post)
Wed Jul 11, 2012, 08:40 AM
NRaleighLiberal (28,577 posts)
2. Boo F*#in' hoo, Mittster.
Response to Adenoid_Hynkel (Original post)
Wed Jul 11, 2012, 08:40 AM
JoeyT (4,549 posts)
3. In other news, fire is hot.
|
Who would have thought "Hey, guy X was a shitheel that plundered companies and thought firing people was an awesome way to spend an afternoon." would make people hate him when unemployment is high.
That 27 percent are the same bunch that thought Bush was doing an awesome job, even at the end. We'll never get them because they're a combination of sociopaths and morons. |
Response to JoeyT (Reply #3)
Wed Jul 11, 2012, 09:30 AM
Deep13 (37,197 posts)
5. LOL. Who should we put in our party? Sociopaths or morons?
|
Hell, why should we choose when we can have both!
|
Response to Adenoid_Hynkel (Original post)
Wed Jul 11, 2012, 09:29 AM
Deep13 (37,197 posts)
4. Wow, that is really sad.
|
I hope I do not seem callous when I exploit this tragic development by pointing out what an asshole Romney is.
|

