Hillary Clinton says Afghanistan 'major non-Nato ally'
Source: BBC
The United States has given Afghanistan the status of "major non-Nato ally".
The designation, which includes countries such as Australia, Egypt and Israel, gives preferential access to US arms exports and defence co-operation.
The announcement was made by US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on an unannounced visit to Kabul.
She was due to meet President Hamid Karzai, a day ahead of a major conference of Afghanistan's foreign donors in Japan.
Read more: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-18750732
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Then do the same in India.
[img][/img]
Those two countries need to go back to their old rivalry of seeing who can design the silliest headgear.
[img][/img]
crimson77
(305 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Are we doubling down on Afghanistan? Or just pretending to?
may3rd
(593 posts)I wonder when the Syrians invite us in to play poker
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)The donors conference in Tokyo is looking to get major funding for Afghanistan from 70 donors.
The objective is undoubtedly to funnel most of this back into the US arms industry. Arms accounts for a large fraction of US manufacturing output. War is a racket.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)It tells Pakistan they don't need to become allies with Iran and thus share their nukes with Iran in return.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)And thought this was linked.
may3rd
(593 posts)just putting in my two cents
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)It's either that or continuing civil war. And remember, we are trying to negotiate with them as Western forces skedaddle.
Will the Taliban then become a "major non-NATO ally," too?
sofa king
(10,857 posts)... they ARE a NATO country.
may3rd
(593 posts)Time to cut and run. They love allah more than their own children anyway
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/asia/2012/07/201277222459392722.html
Brigid
(17,621 posts)Women's rights are being sacrificed on the altar of -- what, exactly? Diplomacy? It's sickening. Why do we need a primitive rockpile like that for an ally?
alp227
(32,016 posts)may3rd
(593 posts)and accept our friends for what they are..... Maybe be more like them
/sarc
No.
And some wonder why I think of the Afghans as a bunch of backward barbarians.
earthside
(6,960 posts)More military commitments to failed states is ultimate a 'FAIL' for the United States and working and middle class taxpayers.
For those on the far reactionary right, where is the appeasing socialist in this kind of policy decision?
And, for those who argue that Pres. Obama is a progressive ... well, this is a pretty rightwing foreign policy action.
Needless to say, I am very disappointed that the Obama administration has done this -- we are never getting out of Afghanistan.