HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » This message was self-del...

Tue Jul 3, 2012, 08:03 AM

 

This message was self-deleted by its author

This message was self-deleted by its author (bupkus) on Thu Aug 2, 2012, 09:47 AM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.

27 replies, 4677 views

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 27 replies Author Time Post
Reply This message was self-deleted by its author (Original post)
bupkus Jul 2012 OP
permatex Jul 2012 #1
loudsue Jul 2012 #2
bupkus Jul 2012 #3
Remmah2 Jul 2012 #7
bupkus Jul 2012 #8
greiner3 Jul 2012 #13
permatex Jul 2012 #15
davepdx Jul 2012 #16
permatex Jul 2012 #18
freshwest Jul 2012 #24
The Stranger Jul 2012 #20
Hassin Bin Sober Jul 2012 #25
snot Jul 2012 #4
truth2power Jul 2012 #5
Plucketeer Jul 2012 #11
truth2power Jul 2012 #19
davidpdx Jul 2012 #6
bupkus Jul 2012 #9
davidpdx Jul 2012 #26
GodlessBiker Jul 2012 #10
PADemD Jul 2012 #12
greiner3 Jul 2012 #14
davepdx Jul 2012 #17
jimmil Jul 2012 #21
freshwest Jul 2012 #22
bvar22 Jul 2012 #23
Fantastic Anarchist Jul 2012 #27

Response to bupkus (Original post)

Tue Jul 3, 2012, 08:32 AM

1. Execellent

 

now maybe the cops will be a little more careful on how they treat citizens if they think they might be recorded. Your right, Occupy needs this for future protests.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to permatex (Reply #1)

Tue Jul 3, 2012, 08:36 AM

2. No. These tapes will just be made illegal, and not allowed into evidence.

Gotta keep the 99% in line, dontcha know.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to loudsue (Reply #2)


Response to bupkus (Reply #3)

Tue Jul 3, 2012, 09:21 AM

7. I believe if the person is directly involved then it is legal.

 

If I'm stopped or detained and I record then the recording is good. If I'm acting as an outside party then the law may be different.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Remmah2 (Reply #7)


Response to bupkus (Reply #8)

Tue Jul 3, 2012, 11:07 AM

13. Great job of supporting;

The A.L.C.U.!!!!!!!!

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bupkus (Reply #3)

Tue Jul 3, 2012, 11:13 AM

15. I wonder if the A.C.L.U. could set it up to have the recording

 

go straight to a secure site at their headquarters just in case the cops decide to confiscate or otherwise destroy the phone. I don't trust cops in the least.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to permatex (Reply #15)

Tue Jul 3, 2012, 11:39 AM

16. This is not exactly what you wanted

but there is a free app (Android and Apple) called "QIK Video" that will automatically upload a video to their cloud site (up to 25 recordings I think), even while recording live video. There is at least one (can't remember the name) other Android app that provides this capability.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.qik.android&hl=en

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to davepdx (Reply #16)

Tue Jul 3, 2012, 11:44 AM

18. Thanks.

 

It's better than nothing. I'm sick and tired of cops thinking that they are above the law and all we are, are potential suspects. I know this because for 30+ years, in my job capacity, I had to work with the cops and I have 2 relatives in LE and they have the same attitude. This new app. is a good thing in my opinion.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to permatex (Reply #15)

Tue Jul 3, 2012, 06:45 PM

24. In the Bush era, demonstration coverage was protected was by uploading directly to youtube.

Once it was there, it was multipled. A person could be holding up their cellphone as if in a conversation but recording video. If the equipment was taken away it was already there. As Bloomberg said when asked why he was not more aggressive with OWS in 2011, as if he wasn't enough, he answered simply, 'Youtube.'

Some PDs started trying to confiscate cellphones and this could still have that vulnerability. Your idea is much better, though than the time involved with youtube and livesteam.

But at times communications are cut off, like the Twitter, etc. And Livestream for Occupy goes down, not certain if it is systematic or if witness's equipment is going down. Cellphone coverage could be interupted. It's something to think about. ACLU hworked to allow people to demonstrate; it just never seems enough.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to loudsue (Reply #2)

Tue Jul 3, 2012, 12:07 PM

20. Care to tell us under what provision they would be made illegal?

These would be clearly admissible under the Law of Evidence as well as any known rules of evidence.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to The Stranger (Reply #20)

Tue Jul 3, 2012, 06:52 PM

25. Um, they are illegal in many jurisdictions.

Last edited Tue Jul 3, 2012, 06:54 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

Police are alleging these tapes are "wire taps"... that's right. If you tape a cop on a public street you are guilty of wire tapping laws.

At least that is the case here in Illinois. The cops are saying the audio portion is tapping a conversation. Illinois specifically removed the "tapping a public official in their duties" provision to protect the pigs.

I believe any illegal "wire taps" would be inadmissible.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bupkus (Original post)

Tue Jul 3, 2012, 08:50 AM

4. K&R'd.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bupkus (Original post)

Tue Jul 3, 2012, 08:52 AM

5. Good for the ACLU. About time the police had to play by their own rules...

If they're not doing anything wrong, why should they complain about being videotaped or recorded? Hmmm??

too

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to truth2power (Reply #5)

Tue Jul 3, 2012, 10:27 AM

11. And beyond that.....

if a recorded event was evidence of an officers professionalism, couldn't that be used as justification for a promotion?

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Plucketeer (Reply #11)

Tue Jul 3, 2012, 12:03 PM

19. Of course! I'm not opposed to giving credit where it's due. eom

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bupkus (Original post)

Tue Jul 3, 2012, 09:00 AM

6. I can see this being used in other places including overseas

Wouldn't it be great if you could get that on an iPhone in China.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to davidpdx (Reply #6)


Response to bupkus (Reply #9)

Wed Jul 4, 2012, 04:26 AM

26. I hear you

I don't have one either. Most of my spoiled Chinese students had iPhones.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bupkus (Original post)

Tue Jul 3, 2012, 10:09 AM

10. Most excellent!

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bupkus (Original post)

Tue Jul 3, 2012, 11:00 AM

12. I hope it's available for people who still have 3G.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bupkus (Original post)

Tue Jul 3, 2012, 11:09 AM

14. I could only find the app;

Available for the Android?!?

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to greiner3 (Reply #14)

Tue Jul 3, 2012, 11:43 AM

17. Here's the Android link

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bupkus (Original post)

Tue Jul 3, 2012, 01:01 PM

21. Why is it...

When you see something on the news (or elsewhere) where someone is videoing an embarrassing arrest the first thing a cop says is that it is against the law for a citizen to be recording the arrest taking place. I always wondered how that worked and never thought for a second that was really the law. However, in the situation of a citizen videoing an arrest you usually see the camera being snatched away and the person doing it shoved back being told to leave.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bupkus (Original post)

Tue Jul 3, 2012, 05:20 PM

22. There's a thread on a couple who were put on 'wanted' posters by NYPD for filming..

This is a new level of transparency. Many police in the past didn't fear what they did being observed in public. Then the nation went into SWAT and undercover for 'drugs' and 'terrorism' and hiding behind their gear. This is an interesting development, but the leadership at the top that gives the orders has got some explaining to do about these actions, too, or they will just keep going. This is so emblematic of our era, that 'they' are watching us and 'we' are watching 'them' now, too. And things do change when they are being observed, or stop to take the time to look back, normally.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bupkus (Original post)

Tue Jul 3, 2012, 05:29 PM

23. Great News

NOW,
all we need is our own Surveillance Drones!

Even a rumor of privately owned Surveillance Drones would be effective if
a few remote controlled planes and copters showed up over protests.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bupkus (Original post)

Wed Jul 4, 2012, 09:34 AM

27. This is right up my alley!

recced!

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink