HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » High court agrees no inde...

Fri Jun 29, 2012, 11:42 AM

High court agrees no indecency fine for CBS "wardrobe malfunction"

Source: Reuters

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday let stand a lower court decision to throw out a federal agency's $550,000 indecency fine against CBS Corp for airing singer Janet Jackson's "wardrobe malfunction" during the 2004 Super Bowl broadcast.

Jackson's right breast was briefly exposed to almost 90 million TV viewers after singer Justin Timberlake ripped off part of her bustier during a halftime show performance. CBS was fined $27,500 for each of the 20 stations it owned.

The justices, in a brief order, rejected an appeal by the Federal Communications Commission, declining to review a ruling by a U.S. appeals court based in Philadelphia that held the FCC had acted arbitrarily and capriciously in imposing the fine.

The Supreme Court rejected the FCC's appeal in the CBS case after its June 21 ruling in two separate cases that went against the FCC's crackdown on broadcast profanity and nudity. It unanimously ruled the FCC standards were vague and the agency had failed to give fair notice of its indecency policy change.

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/06/29/cbs-janetjackson-court-idUSL2E8HT6RD20120629

10 replies, 2184 views

Thread informationRemove bookmarkTrash this thread

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 10 replies Author Time Post
Reply High court agrees no indecency fine for CBS "wardrobe malfunction" (Original post)
alp227 Jun 2012 OP
Catherine Vincent Jun 2012 #1
jpak Jun 2012 #2
Swede Atlanta Jun 2012 #3
dipsydoodle Jun 2012 #4
NYC_SKP Jun 2012 #5
mysuzuki2 Jun 2012 #6
needmoreammo Jun 2012 #7
louis-t Jun 2012 #8
solarman350 Jun 2012 #9
Enrique Jun 2012 #10

Response to alp227 (Original post)

Fri Jun 29, 2012, 11:46 AM

1. Now that's entertainment

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to alp227 (Original post)

Fri Jun 29, 2012, 11:48 AM

2. Bush puritanical fail

yup

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to alp227 (Original post)

Fri Jun 29, 2012, 11:50 AM

3. Wow...the Court got 3 right this week.

1. Arizona "hate the immigrants" law reduced to "papers please" only. Still an atrocity but a big win.

2. ACA upheld - conservatives in convulsions

3. Janet Jackson "Boobgate" not indecency.
This one always had me scratching my head. There was no evidence this was intentional or that Janet Jackson or CBS had acted negligently that could reasonably be expected to result in her baring her breast. If it was clearly a "malfunction", a mistake, an "accident" if you will, how could you levy a charge of indecency.

Are you telling me that if a woman walks down the street and a sudden gust of wind blows her skirt over her head and she isn't wearing any undergarments she is guilty of indecent exposure?

The Montana extension of CU excepted, these few cases are ones with which I agree with the Court.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to alp227 (Original post)

Fri Jun 29, 2012, 11:52 AM

4. There was no real merit in the charge in the first place

Accidents happen. Our Puritanical cousins would have a fit here in the UK.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to alp227 (Original post)

Fri Jun 29, 2012, 11:55 AM

5. OMG exposed BREASTS!111!!! shocking and evil!!!

I cannot believe how ass-backwards and puritanically inept our society has become.

Boobies.

Big deal.



I got em, you got em, we all got boobies!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to alp227 (Original post)

Fri Jun 29, 2012, 12:14 PM

6. I don't understand why an issue like this gets into the court system in the first place.

It's not like the sight of a breat is going to hurt anybody. How much public money was spent on this I wonder.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mysuzuki2 (Reply #6)


Response to alp227 (Original post)

Fri Jun 29, 2012, 01:09 PM

8. Are we really still talking about that?

Eight years ago!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to alp227 (Original post)

Fri Jun 29, 2012, 02:10 PM

9. Tell that to john ashcroft et al...

 

Last edited Fri Jun 29, 2012, 02:11 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to alp227 (Original post)

Fri Jun 29, 2012, 02:33 PM

10. what about CNN and Fox?

they just showed their asses over the Supreme Court decision.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread