HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Judge upholds Montana law...

Tue Jun 26, 2012, 10:30 PM

Judge upholds Montana law forbidding political endorsement of judicial candidates

Source: Missoulian

A federal judge Tuesday refused to block Montana’s law forbidding political parties from endorsing a nonpartisan judicial candidate, saying their involvement could transform judicial contests into partisan races.

U.S. District Judge Charles Lovell of Helena said Montana clearly has an interest in maintaining a fair, impartial judiciary – and that keeping political parties out of judicial elections might be allowed to achieve that goal.

“If … political parties were permitted to endorse nonpartisan judicial candidates, then the elections might be nonpartisan only in form,” he wrote. “Nonpartisan elections, perhaps, can truly be nonpartisan only if political parties are prohibited from endorsing candidates.”

The Sanders County Republican Central Committee has asked to strike down the endorsement ban, saying it’s an infringement on the committee’s free speech. The GOP group wants to endorse candidates in judicial races, saying it would like to promote judges who “share its ideological views.”

Read more: http://missoulian.com/news/local/judge-upholds-montana-law-forbidding-political-endorsement-of-judicial-candidates/article_750f76e4-bfc3-11e1-96ab-0019bb2963f4.html

7 replies, 1803 views

Thread informationRemove bookmarkTrash this thread

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 7 replies Author Time Post
Reply Judge upholds Montana law forbidding political endorsement of judicial candidates (Original post)
Newsjock Jun 2012 OP
freshwest Jun 2012 #1
McCamy Taylor Jun 2012 #4
freshwest Jun 2012 #5
DeSwiss Jun 2012 #2
littlewolf Jun 2012 #3
clang1 Jun 2012 #6
Javaman Jun 2012 #7

Response to Newsjock (Original post)

Tue Jun 26, 2012, 10:57 PM

1. IDK if this will do any good, since the SCOTUS knocked down the finance law.

Because the big money can run a GOP Koch lackey with no brand and still be the same animal. They can run on being non-partisan and later do their bidding.
Do you think it will make a difference?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to freshwest (Reply #1)

Tue Jun 26, 2012, 11:57 PM

4. Depends. Is the GOP now a corporation?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to McCamy Taylor (Reply #4)

Wed Jun 27, 2012, 12:33 AM

5. Does it matter? We're talking about unlimited funding, could be from a real person.

Last edited Wed Jun 27, 2012, 12:34 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

The guys are donating millions apiece to Romney don't have to incorporatred to give the money; and now they don't even have to put it on paper who they are. All under the table, you don't know who they are. Could be frigging Martians for all we know.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Newsjock (Original post)

Tue Jun 26, 2012, 11:00 PM

2. K&R!!! n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Newsjock (Original post)

Tue Jun 26, 2012, 11:35 PM

3. K & R nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Newsjock (Original post)

Wed Jun 27, 2012, 01:56 AM

6. Good

 

Last edited Wed Jun 27, 2012, 02:06 AM USA/ET - Edit history (44)

Because if this happens, all it does is legitimize the politicalization of the judges. Simple. That's why it is an issue.

EVERYTHING that is going on is nothing but an assault against Democracy. ALL of it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Newsjock (Original post)

Wed Jun 27, 2012, 12:10 PM

7. Oh this is going to get good.

the ball is now to you scalia.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread