Tue Jun 26, 2012, 10:30 PM
Newsjock (9,871 posts)
Judge upholds Montana law forbidding political endorsement of judicial candidates
Source: Missoulian
A federal judge Tuesday refused to block Montana’s law forbidding political parties from endorsing a nonpartisan judicial candidate, saying their involvement could transform judicial contests into partisan races. U.S. District Judge Charles Lovell of Helena said Montana clearly has an interest in maintaining a fair, impartial judiciary – and that keeping political parties out of judicial elections might be allowed to achieve that goal. “If … political parties were permitted to endorse nonpartisan judicial candidates, then the elections might be nonpartisan only in form,” he wrote. “Nonpartisan elections, perhaps, can truly be nonpartisan only if political parties are prohibited from endorsing candidates.” The Sanders County Republican Central Committee has asked to strike down the endorsement ban, saying it’s an infringement on the committee’s free speech. The GOP group wants to endorse candidates in judicial races, saying it would like to promote judges who “share its ideological views.” Read more: http://missoulian.com/news/local/judge-upholds-montana-law-forbidding-political-endorsement-of-judicial-candidates/article_750f76e4-bfc3-11e1-96ab-0019bb2963f4.html
|
7 replies, 1803 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| Newsjock | Jun 2012 | OP | |
| freshwest | Jun 2012 | #1 | |
| McCamy Taylor | Jun 2012 | #4 | |
| freshwest | Jun 2012 | #5 | |
| DeSwiss | Jun 2012 | #2 | |
| littlewolf | Jun 2012 | #3 | |
| clang1 | Jun 2012 | #6 | |
| Javaman | Jun 2012 | #7 |
Response to Newsjock (Original post)
Tue Jun 26, 2012, 10:57 PM
freshwest (31,524 posts)
1. IDK if this will do any good, since the SCOTUS knocked down the finance law.
|
Because the big money can run a GOP Koch lackey with no brand and still be the same animal. They can run on being non-partisan and later do their bidding.
Do you think it will make a difference? |
Response to freshwest (Reply #1)
Tue Jun 26, 2012, 11:57 PM
McCamy Taylor (13,710 posts)
4. Depends. Is the GOP now a corporation?
Response to McCamy Taylor (Reply #4)
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 12:33 AM
freshwest (31,524 posts)
5. Does it matter? We're talking about unlimited funding, could be from a real person.
|
Last edited Wed Jun 27, 2012, 12:34 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1) The guys are donating millions apiece to Romney don't have to incorporatred to give the money; and now they don't even have to put it on paper who they are. All under the table, you don't know who they are. Could be frigging Martians for all we know.
|
Response to Newsjock (Original post)
Tue Jun 26, 2012, 11:00 PM
DeSwiss (17,218 posts)
2. K&R!!! n/t
Response to Newsjock (Original post)
Tue Jun 26, 2012, 11:35 PM
littlewolf (1,583 posts)
3. K & R nt
Response to Newsjock (Original post)
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 01:56 AM
clang1 (884 posts)
6. Good
|
Last edited Wed Jun 27, 2012, 02:06 AM USA/ET - Edit history (44) Because if this happens, all it does is legitimize the politicalization of the judges. Simple. That's why it is an issue.
EVERYTHING that is going on is nothing but an assault against Democracy. ALL of it. |
Response to Newsjock (Original post)
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 12:10 PM
Javaman (40,645 posts)
7. Oh this is going to get good.
|
the ball is now to you scalia.
|

