Sun Jun 24, 2012, 07:19 PM
Huey P. Long (1,932 posts)
Members of Congress trade in companies while making laws that affect those same firms
Source: Washington Post
Members of Congress trade in companies while making laws that affect those same firms By Dan Keating, David S. Fallis, Kimberly Kindy and Scott Higham, Published: June 23 - One-hundred-thirty members of Congress or their families have traded stocks collectively worth hundreds of millions of dollars in companies lobbying on bills that came before their committees, a practice that is permitted under current ethics rules, a Washington Post analysis has found. The lawmakers bought and sold a total of between $85 million and $218 million in 323 companies registered to lobby on legislation that appeared before them, according to an examination of all 45,000 individual congressional stock transactions contained in computerized financial disclosure data from 2007 to 2010. Almost one in every eight trades — 5,531 — intersected with legislation. The 130 lawmakers traded stocks or bonds in companies as bills passed through their committees or while Congress was still considering the legislation. The party affiliation of the lawmakers was almost evenly split between Democrats and Republicans, 68 to 62. Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) reported buying $25,000 in bonds in a genetic-technology company around the time that he released a hold on legislation the firm supported. Rep. Ed Whitfield (R-Ky.) sold between $50,000 and $100,000 in General Electric stock shortly before a Republican filibuster killed legislation sought by the company. The family of Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Tex.) bought between $286,000 and $690,000 in a high-tech company interested in a bill under his committee’s jurisdiction. The trades were uncovered as part of an ongoing examination by The Post of the intersection between the personal finances of lawmakers and their professional duties. Earlier this year, Congress responded to criticism of potential conflicts of interest by passing the Stock Act, which bars lawmakers, their staffs and top executive branch officials from trading on inside information acquired on Capitol Hill. - Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/members-of-congress-trade-in-companies-while-making-laws-that-affect-those-same-firms/2012/06/23/gJQAlXwVyV_story.html
|
19 replies, 2825 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| Huey P. Long | Jun 2012 | OP | |
| progressoid | Jun 2012 | #1 | |
| Duer 157099 | Jun 2012 | #18 | |
| Savannahmann | Jun 2012 | #2 | |
| AnotherMcIntosh | Jun 2012 | #3 | |
| Huey P. Long | Jun 2012 | #19 | |
| BadtotheboneBob | Jun 2012 | #4 | |
| jtuck004 | Jun 2012 | #5 | |
| clang1 | Jun 2012 | #6 | |
| 2banon | Jun 2012 | #10 | |
| FreakinDJ | Jun 2012 | #7 | |
| clang1 | Jun 2012 | #9 | |
| The Wielding Truth | Jun 2012 | #8 | |
| Enrique | Jun 2012 | #11 | |
| clang1 | Jun 2012 | #12 | |
| Major Nikon | Jun 2012 | #13 | |
| clang1 | Jun 2012 | #14 | |
| wordpix | Jun 2012 | #15 | |
| clang1 | Jun 2012 | #16 | |
| L0oniX | Jun 2012 | #17 |
Response to Huey P. Long (Original post)
Sun Jun 24, 2012, 07:25 PM
progressoid (27,344 posts)
1. Golly gee. It's almost like...oh...what's that word...?
|
Corruption?
Who wudda thunk it. |
Response to progressoid (Reply #1)
Mon Jun 25, 2012, 11:50 AM
Duer 157099 (16,540 posts)
18. Two words
|
Insider trading
|
Response to Huey P. Long (Original post)
Sun Jun 24, 2012, 07:53 PM
Savannahmann (535 posts)
2. I can't believe that they manage to keep getting elected
|
Anyone who did that should be thrown out of Congress.
|
Response to Huey P. Long (Original post)
Sun Jun 24, 2012, 08:19 PM
AnotherMcIntosh (7,618 posts)
3. What are the odds that any of the Supreme Court Justices have bought or shorted stock in
|
health insurance companies?
They wouldn't do that would they? |
Response to AnotherMcIntosh (Reply #3)
Mon Jun 25, 2012, 01:42 PM
Huey P. Long (1,932 posts)
19. 34 Lawmakers Changed Their Investments after Receiving Private Briefings About 2008 Economic Crisis
|
34 Lawmakers Changed Their Investments after Receiving Private Briefings About 2008 Economic Crisis
Last November, 60 Minutes aired a report showing that House Financial Services Chairman Spencer Bachus (R-AL) made tens of thousands of dollars trading stock as he was receiving private economic briefings during the height of the 2008 financial crisis. Due to weak insider trading rules, Bachus was cleared of any legal wrong doing by the Congressional Ethics Committee, but the case still motivated Congress to pass the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act, which supposedly prevents lawmakers from profiting off information they receive in private briefings with top economic officials. However, the problem may go far beyond just Bachus. As the Washington Post reported on Monday, 34 lawmakers — including Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH) — shuffled their investment portfolios during the financial crisis, after speaking to high-ranking economic officials: Pat Garofalo, News Analysis: After speaking with Paulson, Boehner shifted $50,000 to $100,000 out of a risky mutual fund, and spent tens of thousands of dollars more on a less-risky fund. Other lawmakers who were making investment decisions after receiving private information at the time included Sen. Kent Conrad (D-ND), Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), and Sen. Ben Nelson (D-NE). The lawmakers contend that their investments are overseen by outside advisers and that the private information had no bearing on their portfolio moves. - http://www.nationofchange.org/34-lawmakers-changed-their-investments-after-receiving-private-briefings-about-2008-economic-crisis- |
Response to Huey P. Long (Original post)
Sun Jun 24, 2012, 08:22 PM
BadtotheboneBob (357 posts)
4. I'm shocked!
|
Shocked, I say! What's up with that?
|
Response to Huey P. Long (Original post)
Sun Jun 24, 2012, 08:24 PM
jtuck004 (5,104 posts)
5. The Real News - "No One Seems All That Worked Up About It."
|
I'm wonder if it is a side effect from drinking of the ever popular highpopalorum or lopopahirum all these years...there is a big difference, you know. |
Response to Huey P. Long (Original post)
Sun Jun 24, 2012, 09:12 PM
clang1 (884 posts)
6. It is called Insider Trading
|
Last edited Sun Jun 24, 2012, 09:14 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) Obama signs STOCK Act to ban "congressional insider trading"
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57409314-503544/obama-signs-stock-act-to-ban-congressional-insider-trading/ President Obama on Wednesday signed the STOCK Act into law, a bipartisan bill designed to stop so-called "congressional insider trading." All part of the racket. Guess no more easy money via this route now. |
Response to clang1 (Reply #6)
Sun Jun 24, 2012, 09:38 PM
2banon (970 posts)
10. Yep.. However, Congress Critters are not subject to criminal law if they ignore the Stock Act
|
Last edited Sun Jun 24, 2012, 09:39 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) Unless the original language has been re-inserted since last Sunday, law makers will be able to continue as they have without facing Felony consequences. The provision clause as of last week essentially allows for them to simply ignore the Legal intention and Ethical spirit of the "Stock Act"...
|
Response to Huey P. Long (Original post)
Sun Jun 24, 2012, 09:15 PM
FreakinDJ (13,064 posts)
7. Let's face it - "It's perfectly legal for the 1% to do that"
Response to FreakinDJ (Reply #7)
Sun Jun 24, 2012, 09:21 PM
clang1 (884 posts)
9. EVERYTHING is bought and paid for n/t
Response to Huey P. Long (Original post)
Sun Jun 24, 2012, 09:21 PM
The Wielding Truth (8,440 posts)
8. Major investigation needed. I wish we could clean house.
Response to Huey P. Long (Original post)
Sun Jun 24, 2012, 09:39 PM
Enrique (22,652 posts)
11. 8% approval rating
|
look who's running the house, the guy that passed out tobacco checks on the house floor.
|
Response to Enrique (Reply #11)
Sun Jun 24, 2012, 09:44 PM
clang1 (884 posts)
12. It's the best Democracy money can buy. What's to complain about? n/t
Response to Huey P. Long (Original post)
Sun Jun 24, 2012, 09:44 PM
Major Nikon (9,728 posts)
13. What's interesting is that congress specifically prohibits other federal employees from doing this
|
The golden rule is those with the gold make the rules.
|
Response to Major Nikon (Reply #13)
Sun Jun 24, 2012, 10:06 PM
clang1 (884 posts)
14. ...Can't share the wealth now... lol. n/t
|
Last edited Sun Jun 24, 2012, 10:08 PM USA/ET - Edit history (4) |
Response to Huey P. Long (Original post)
Sun Jun 24, 2012, 10:13 PM
wordpix (12,479 posts)
15. These congressmen should be indicted on insider trading laws
|
Nuff said. If it's illegal on Wall St., it's illegal in Congress ---or should be.
|
Response to wordpix (Reply #15)
Sun Jun 24, 2012, 10:17 PM
clang1 (884 posts)
16. Those who make the laws can also break the laws
|
Last edited Sun Jun 24, 2012, 10:23 PM USA/ET - Edit history (7) One-hundred-thirty members of Congress
Good luck...I don't think most people quite get the depth of all this (across the board). But hey, that's just me. I understand corruption when I see it and I see a huge rot. It's overwhelming. |

