Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Baltimore police officer found not guilty of second-degree murder in death of Freddie Gray (Original Post) philosslayer Jun 2016 OP
Sad, sad, sad--and scary. merrily Jun 2016 #1
The problem is we don't get to see the trial not do we get to see jury yeoman6987 Jun 2016 #3
There was no jury. Keefer Jun 2016 #5
I was speaking generally yeoman6987 Jun 2016 #6
I agree with you... the judicial system is rigged against those who can't afford to defend themselves and in favor of crooked law enforcement. InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2016 #8
Most trials are open to the public, though not necessarily broadcast (tho some are). merrily Jun 2016 #9
"If you are innocent ask for a bench trial" - my dad OKNancy Jun 2016 #2
I've heard the same thing. NaturalHigh Jun 2016 #13
Maybe they should just save taxpayer $ and have a mass "not guilty" verdict Bluzmann57 Jun 2016 #4
I don't share your confidence in their innocence. They should have to go through a trial. Akicita Jun 2016 #18
"If it is that obvious that they are innocent, they should never have been charged." NaturalHigh Jun 2016 #27
Well, maybe only one or two cops should have been charged. JustABozoOnThisBus Jun 2016 #28
Screwed up as far as serving justice is concerned but did the right thing for her political career. Akicita Jun 2016 #29
Not anymore... TipTok Jun 2016 #30
Yeah but whether they are innocent or guilty, she will get credit in many quarters for going after Akicita Jun 2016 #33
Sorta like Mike Nifong gladium et scutum Jun 2016 #38
That didn't end well for him did it. Akicita Jun 2016 #40
Maybe the prosecution should try to prove that Calista241 Jun 2016 #7
Outrageous. n/t reflection Jun 2016 #10
They could have probably killed him in broad daylight, and the ruling would have been the same. forest444 Jun 2016 #11
This should have been easy Yupster Jun 2016 #12
And yet there is no conviction. Indydem Jun 2016 #16
Good point. Any news on whether such a video searc was conducted or if witnesses of the Akicita Jun 2016 #19
There was video, and none of the video showed a rough ride. Nye Bevan Jun 2016 #20
Appears you may be right. Akicita Jun 2016 #25
I don't get this at all. alarimer Jun 2016 #14
But there was no proof that such a ride took place TexasMommaWithAHat Jun 2016 #15
Other than the injuries, is there any evidence or proof that a "rough ride" occurred? Akicita Jun 2016 #21
... Crepuscular Jun 2016 #17
He was unable to walk as they put him in the truck LittleGirl Jun 2016 #22
Unfortunately, it's not that uncommon TexasMommaWithAHat Jun 2016 #32
The prosecution did not prove their case. yellowcanine Jun 2016 #23
The expert witness confirmed TexasBushwhacker Jun 2016 #26
Wasn't that an expert for the prosecution? TipTok Jun 2016 #31
I agree, however she would have been damned if she didn't TexasBushwhacker Jun 2016 #34
rec for wider exposure, not because it is good. uppityperson Jun 2016 #24
I am not surprised by the verdict... rexcat Jun 2016 #35
No we aren't. This is the new norm in the United Police States of America Feeling the Bern Jun 2016 #36
People need to really stand up to the Police violence or they will keep doing it rockfordfile Jun 2016 #37
I am so weary duhneece Jun 2016 #39
 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
3. The problem is we don't get to see the trial not do we get to see jury
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 10:58 AM
Jun 2016

deliberations. I think that needs to be changed. Every case should be made available on CSPAN. Otherwise everyone will question a verdict. The only thing we can do now is speak from ignorance because the government keeps trials from the population.

InAbLuEsTaTe

(24,122 posts)
8. I agree with you... the judicial system is rigged against those who can't afford to defend themselves and in favor of crooked law enforcement.
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 11:16 AM
Jun 2016

merrily

(45,251 posts)
9. Most trials are open to the public, though not necessarily broadcast (tho some are).
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 11:18 AM
Jun 2016

If we had decent journalists.....

OKNancy

(41,832 posts)
2. "If you are innocent ask for a bench trial" - my dad
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 10:57 AM
Jun 2016

My father was a criminal defense lawyer, then a prosecutor, and finally a judge.
He told his children, "If it ever comes up just remember.... If you are guilty, ask for a jury trial, if you are innocent ask for a bench trial.

Bluzmann57

(12,336 posts)
4. Maybe they should just save taxpayer $ and have a mass "not guilty" verdict
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 11:02 AM
Jun 2016

They're all going to be acquitted anyway, so why waste time and money with show trials?

Akicita

(1,196 posts)
18. I don't share your confidence in their innocence. They should have to go through a trial.
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 12:48 PM
Jun 2016

If it is that obvious that they are innocent, they should never have been charged.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
27. "If it is that obvious that they are innocent, they should never have been charged."
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 02:09 PM
Jun 2016

A lot of us have made that same point; they should have never been charged. That idiot Mosby really screwed up on this one.

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,338 posts)
28. Well, maybe only one or two cops should have been charged.
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 02:56 PM
Jun 2016

It seemed the prosecutor and the mayor were trying to make political hay out of this, over-charging every cop who might have been in the area.

It made great press at the time.

Akicita

(1,196 posts)
29. Screwed up as far as serving justice is concerned but did the right thing for her political career.
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 03:05 PM
Jun 2016

Apparently that is much more important to her than seeing that justice is served. It looks like she decided to throw those cops under the bus to further her political career. Must be a great morale booster for the Baltimore police dept. I bet they can't wait until she is mayor.

 

TipTok

(2,474 posts)
30. Not anymore...
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 04:31 PM
Jun 2016

She took a calculated risk for political gain those odds went down when they were granted separate trials and then even further down after the hung juries etc...

Not to mention the over charging...

She made this bed and she can sleep in it. She has shown herself to be incompetent and an opportunist.

Akicita

(1,196 posts)
33. Yeah but whether they are innocent or guilty, she will get credit in many quarters for going after
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 04:51 PM
Jun 2016

the cops. As you can see on this thread guilt or innocence is almost an afterthought to many. It's the agenda that really matters.

Akicita

(1,196 posts)
40. That didn't end well for him did it.
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 02:51 AM
Jun 2016

Something tells me that won't happen with Moby unless she is successfully sued by the cops for wrongful prosecution.

Yupster

(14,308 posts)
12. This should have been easy
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 11:39 AM
Jun 2016

There are video cameras all over the city.

If there was a rough ride there should have been plenty of witnesses and video of it.

 

Indydem

(2,642 posts)
16. And yet there is no conviction.
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 12:15 PM
Jun 2016

It says more about the prosecutor and this show trial than it does about the officers.

Akicita

(1,196 posts)
19. Good point. Any news on whether such a video searc was conducted or if witnesses of the
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 12:53 PM
Jun 2016

supposed rough ride ever came forward? Is there any proof at all that a rough ride occurred?

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
20. There was video, and none of the video showed a rough ride.
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 01:01 PM
Jun 2016

And the other prisoner who was transported in the van described the ride as "smooth", but did say that Gray was banging his own head against the wall.

This was classic prosecutorial overreach that never should have gone so far as a trial.

alarimer

(16,245 posts)
14. I don't get this at all.
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 11:56 AM
Jun 2016

How does a guy end up with his spine FUCKING SHATTERED? This kind of "ride" needs to be eliminated.

Even if it was not deliberate, it is still a travesty. Cops need to be held responsible for their actions if someone is injured in their custody. It's that simple. Fuck these MONSTERS. They are a menace and they SHOULD be in prison. Failing that, they need to be completely barred from any sort of law-enforcement responsibilities.

I can only guess that the prosecution deliberately did a shitty job. They should lose their jobs as well. Fuck those monsters too.

TexasMommaWithAHat

(3,212 posts)
15. But there was no proof that such a ride took place
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 12:14 PM
Jun 2016

The prosecution even attempted to use a video of a wide turn as evidence that the ride caused the injuries, but the judge rightly questioned whether or not a sharp turn would have been more likely to cause injuries.

Something happened, but without proof, you can't convict any one particular person. That's just the bedrock foundation of our justice system.

The family has been awarded a large settlement because we know Gray died in their custody. What we don't know is how it happened and who harmed him. Unfortunately, you can't just throw a dart at a wall filled with pictures of the officers, and say "This one's guilty." And you can't convict everyone because they had some association with the case.

Unfortunately, we may have to be satisfied with the large settlement Gray's family received, and the termination of these officers careers. I don't see any of them continuing to work in LE.


Akicita

(1,196 posts)
21. Other than the injuries, is there any evidence or proof that a "rough ride" occurred?
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 01:07 PM
Jun 2016

Last edited Thu Jun 23, 2016, 01:44 PM - Edit history (1)

The AA DA appeared to be solidly on the side of the victim. She is more likely to be totally inept than deliberately doing a shitty job. Someone on this thread pointed out that there should have been lots of security video available and witnesses along the "rough ride" route if a rough ride actually occurred. Did the DA ever search for such evidence and what was the result? I agree the DA should lose her job over this debacle.

LittleGirl

(8,282 posts)
22. He was unable to walk as they put him in the truck
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 01:11 PM
Jun 2016

so somebody needs to be held responsible!

yeah right...so sad for his family.

TexasMommaWithAHat

(3,212 posts)
32. Unfortunately, it's not that uncommon
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 04:47 PM
Jun 2016

for someone in custody to refuse to walk or pretend they can't walk. When everyone else who's acted like that proved to be fine, you just assume the next one is fine, as well. It's human nature.

TexasBushwhacker

(20,174 posts)
26. The expert witness confirmed
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 02:01 PM
Jun 2016

that he saw no evidence of a "rough ride".

Should they have buckled him in with a seat belt? Of course. But the officer being tried was not the one resposible for buckling in Gray.

TexasBushwhacker

(20,174 posts)
34. I agree, however she would have been damned if she didn't
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 04:59 PM
Jun 2016

prosecute. She should have chosen the charges better. As for the cops, no matter how much Gray was thashing about, they should have been able to buckle him in with the seat belt.

rexcat

(3,622 posts)
35. I am not surprised by the verdict...
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 05:01 PM
Jun 2016

but I am disappointed. Just more proof the judiciary in this country is biased and corrupt. No judge is going to rule against a police officer if they can help it because he won't get any cooperation from the police (because they are also corrupt).

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Baltimore police officer ...