Mon Jun 18, 2012, 09:41 PM
kwassa (15,716 posts)
U2 guitarist may get a second chance at Malibu mansions
Source: Los Angeles Times
SACRAMENTO — The California Coastal Commission rejected a controversial proposal last year by U2 guitarist the Edge to build five mansions on a scenic bluff above Malibu, saying that it would scar a rugged ridgeline and harm sensitive habitat. Now, some of the same powerful lobbyists and lawyers behind the musician's quashed development are working the halls of the Capitol to push a bill that could give the rock star another chance at his dream compound. .................................................. Developers at times try to skirt the issue by claiming each homesite has a different owner. They shield the identities through formation of limited liability corporations. In the case of the Edge, whose real name is David Evans, the agency denied his plans because it said he was attempting to bypass environmental rules and maximize development by submitting five separate applications, each under a different corporate name. Read more: http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-guitarist-coast-20120616,0,5900611.story This really reflects upon the ethics of The Edge, or lack thereof. I expected much better from U2.
|
26 replies, 3784 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| kwassa | Jun 2012 | OP | |
| Politicalboi | Jun 2012 | #1 | |
| Tom Ripley | Jun 2012 | #2 | |
| Earth_First | Jun 2012 | #3 | |
| Richard D | Jun 2012 | #4 | |
| sendero | Jun 2012 | #5 | |
| Bjorn Against | Jun 2012 | #6 | |
| Drum | Jun 2012 | #15 | |
| Ishoutandscream2 | Jun 2012 | #19 | |
| LeftyMom | Jun 2012 | #7 | |
| bluedigger | Jun 2012 | #8 | |
| kwassa | Jun 2012 | #9 | |
| bluedigger | Jun 2012 | #13 | |
| waddirum | Jun 2012 | #23 | |
| calimary | Jun 2012 | #26 | |
| RufusTFirefly | Jun 2012 | #10 | |
| Egalitarian Thug | Jun 2012 | #18 | |
| bluedigger | Jun 2012 | #21 | |
| Egalitarian Thug | Jun 2012 | #22 | |
| japple | Jun 2012 | #11 | |
| JI7 | Jun 2012 | #12 | |
| Puzzledtraveller | Jun 2012 | #17 | |
| SHRED | Jun 2012 | #14 | |
| xxqqqzme | Jun 2012 | #16 | |
| Liberal_in_LA | Jun 2012 | #20 | |
| Marrah_G | Jun 2012 | #24 | |
| The Stranger | Jun 2012 | #25 |
Response to kwassa (Original post)
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 09:44 PM
Politicalboi (9,624 posts)
1. Let's hope Mother Nature
|
Fixes it back.
|
Response to kwassa (Original post)
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 09:52 PM
Tom Ripley (2,752 posts)
2. Just another reason to hate that wool-hatted twit
Response to kwassa (Original post)
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 09:55 PM
Earth_First (11,819 posts)
3. Never fear, he will just carbon credit his footprint...
|
|
Response to kwassa (Original post)
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 09:58 PM
Richard D (6,533 posts)
4. I lived in Malibu . . .
|
. . . many years ago, before it was "The Malibu". So sad to see people with too much money ruin such a beautiful place on this planet.
|
Response to kwassa (Original post)
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 10:00 PM
sendero (25,000 posts)
5. If you paid attention.
|
.... you would not expect better of "U2", especially Bono.
He's a fucking fraud. |
Response to kwassa (Original post)
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 10:07 PM
Bjorn Against (8,287 posts)
6. U2 has to be one of the biggest frauds in the music industry
|
I like some of U2's music, a few of their songs even approach the level of greatness. While I think their musical abilities are highly overrated, they are certainly not bad musically. As people though they are complete frauds, acting as spokespeople for the poor while simultaneously doing everything they can to make themselves look superior to the people they set out for photo ops with. Don't get me wrong they have done some good things, but they do plenty of harm as well. Roger Waters and David Gilmour have also done a lot of really great things and given huge amounts of money to charity and don't suck up to the right-wing while they do it, their music is also a hell of a lot better than U2. Their work may not grab the headlines like Bono's does, but it has been far more admirable.
|
Response to Bjorn Against (Reply #6)
Tue Jun 19, 2012, 10:48 AM
Drum (6,242 posts)
15. Kick, for Roger Waters and David Gilmour.
|
U2 sux
|
Response to Bjorn Against (Reply #6)
Tue Jun 19, 2012, 07:18 PM
Ishoutandscream2 (6,061 posts)
19. +infinity. Another sucky 80s band
|
U2 - pretentious frauds, and every damn song sounds the same. And amen to Waters and Gilmore - hell, I believe Waters' own mother was a registered socialist.
|
Response to kwassa (Original post)
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 10:20 PM
LeftyMom (44,469 posts)
7. U2 sucks, their music sucks, and I hate Bono's stupid glasses.
|
On the other hand, I think the other douchecanoes who live in Malibu deserve them. Somebody approve the guitarist with a stage name so stupid I can't bear to type it, on the condition that he builds next to Mel Gibson's spread. I'll make popcorn.
|
Response to kwassa (Original post)
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 10:25 PM
bluedigger (10,726 posts)
8. There's undeveloped land in Malibu?
|
How did that happen?
|
Response to bluedigger (Reply #8)
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 10:50 PM
kwassa (15,716 posts)
9. Malibu covers a large area ...
|
Last edited Mon Jun 18, 2012, 10:54 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) and people head up higher and higher into those fire-prone hills .....
not to mention mudslides and earthquakes. edit to add: The Malibu coastline is 27 miles long. I just looked it up. |
Response to kwassa (Reply #9)
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 11:46 PM
bluedigger (10,726 posts)
13. I've never been to SoCal.
|
I just have an impression of unlimited urban sprawl, which doesn't attract me. Good to know there's some space left.
|
Response to bluedigger (Reply #13)
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 02:43 PM
waddirum (517 posts)
23. I used to think that too
|
I finally went to LA for the first time at age 42. I was quite surprised how beautiful it is. There is a considerable amount of open space and undeveloped land, within LA city limits.
I also had this vision of unlimited urban sprawl, but was pleased to find lots of nice hikes and open space. |
Response to kwassa (Reply #9)
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 03:13 PM
calimary (30,765 posts)
26. The mudslides can be really devastating. Especially after fire season.
|
A lot of that terrain in upper Malibu is almost unreachable, so when there are brushfires, it's just really shitty.
What the fuck does this dude need five mansions for? It's funny - their public image doesn't suggest living so lavishly, in such obscene opulence. I've always had issues with celebrities, especially rock stars, who "title" themselves with these pretentious names. What's so wrong with the name yer mama gave you? Oooooh, Mr. Edge. Ooooooh. I'm impressed. NOT. |
Response to bluedigger (Reply #8)
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 11:30 PM
RufusTFirefly (4,933 posts)
10. They have their problems, but the California Coastal Commission has been a godsend
|
Visitors from other parts of the country who come to visit me on the California coast are often amazed at how relatively undeveloped things are. Given the growing trend toward rapacious privatization and so-called "austerity measures," I don't know how much longer our coastline will survive.
|
Response to bluedigger (Reply #8)
Tue Jun 19, 2012, 07:14 PM
Egalitarian Thug (7,935 posts)
18. Sure, lots of it. Every rich asshole that moves in goes to work trying to stop the
|
next rich asshole from being able to move in.
That is when they're not begging the state for emergency funds to rebuild their mansions at taxpayer expense when the ocean washes them out to sea. |
Response to Egalitarian Thug (Reply #18)
Tue Jun 19, 2012, 08:48 PM
bluedigger (10,726 posts)
21. Now that makes perfect sense.
|
|
Response to bluedigger (Reply #21)
Tue Jun 19, 2012, 08:54 PM
Egalitarian Thug (7,935 posts)
22. I wish it were at least an exaggeration, but that's what goes on all the time.
|
I've lost count of the suits/counter-suits of Mel Gibson alone. OTOH, it is a pretty entertaining diversion for those of us outside looking in.
|
Response to kwassa (Original post)
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 11:31 PM
japple (4,119 posts)
11. All the more reason to support this
|
:
|
Response to kwassa (Original post)
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 11:41 PM
JI7 (40,475 posts)
12. why do rich people need to do these things ?
|
if i was wealthy i would travel around the world. maybe even buy a small home in various places. why the need to have these huge things, especially when it could hurt the land ?
|
Response to JI7 (Reply #12)
Tue Jun 19, 2012, 11:41 AM
Puzzledtraveller (2,377 posts)
17. Human nature?
|
If you were made a multi-millionaire today, do you think it would change who you are, over time? Rhetorical question, not an accusation.
|
Response to kwassa (Original post)
Tue Jun 19, 2012, 12:34 AM
SHRED (10,196 posts)
14. It all makes sense
|
Over inflated egos and crappy music. U2 = barf. -- |
Response to kwassa (Original post)
Tue Jun 19, 2012, 11:23 AM
xxqqqzme (13,458 posts)
16. Isn't there some coast line
|
in Ireland just begging to be ruined forever?
|
Response to xxqqqzme (Reply #16)
Tue Jun 19, 2012, 07:32 PM
Liberal_in_LA (28,979 posts)
20. Bwaaah!
|
|
Response to kwassa (Original post)
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 02:56 PM
Marrah_G (22,701 posts)
24. It's a stupid place to build anything
Response to kwassa (Original post)
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 03:06 PM
The Stranger (10,584 posts)
25. U2 is an absolute embarrassment.
|
Their music is horrible too.
|

