Fri Jun 15, 2012, 03:14 PM
Galraedia (2,571 posts)
Mitch McConnell Argues Against More Donor Disclosure, Accuses Obama Of Political Retribution
Source: Huffington Post
WASHINGTON -- In a series of speeches and interviews over the past day, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) argued against adding a further layer of disclosure to the campaign finance system, suggesting that the Obama administration would use it to browbeat political opponents. The Kentucky Republican has long been one of Congress' foremost advocates of a far-reaching interpretation of First Amendment rights. And his remarks, first to Fox News, then to the Faith and Freedom Conference and finally to the American Enterprise Institute, followed in that vein. But in arguing against the Disclose Act -- which would require nonprofit groups that spend money on campaign-related advertisements to disclose their funders -- McConnell trotted out another wrinkle. Donors to politically active nonprofit groups, he said, do not deserve to be subjected to public scrutiny or backlash. "My own view has always been that if you can’t convince people of the wisdom of your policies, then you should come up with some better arguments," McConnell said in his American Enterprise Institute speech, according to advanced remarks. "But for all its vaunted tolerance, the political left has consistently demonstrated a militant intolerance for dissent. Sadly, a growing number of people on the left, and now within government itself, appear to have concluded that they can’t win on the merits. So they’ve resorted to bullying and intimidation instead." Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/15/mitch-mcconnell-donor-disclosure_n_1600487.html?utm_hp_ref=politics
|
22 replies, 3265 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| Galraedia | Jun 2012 | OP | |
| Roland99 | Jun 2012 | #1 | |
| Joe Bacon | Jun 2012 | #22 | |
| leftyohiolib | Jun 2012 | #2 | |
| Dont call me Shirley | Jun 2012 | #12 | |
| Beaverhausen | Jun 2012 | #3 | |
| Blue Owl | Jun 2012 | #4 | |
| savannah43 | Jun 2012 | #5 | |
| SoutherDem | Jun 2012 | #9 | |
| madashelltoo | Jun 2012 | #6 | |
| Phlem | Jun 2012 | #7 | |
| progressivebydesign | Jun 2012 | #10 | |
| GeorgeGist | Jun 2012 | #8 | |
| Swede Atlanta | Jun 2012 | #11 | |
| Teamster Jeff | Jun 2012 | #13 | |
| freshwest | Jun 2012 | #14 | |
| barbtries | Jun 2012 | #15 | |
| Bandit | Jun 2012 | #16 | |
| eggplant | Jun 2012 | #17 | |
| nineteen50 | Jun 2012 | #18 | |
| Brigid | Jun 2012 | #19 | |
| Teamster Jeff | Jun 2012 | #20 | |
| Angry Dragon | Jun 2012 | #21 |
Response to Galraedia (Original post)
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 03:15 PM
Roland99 (36,493 posts)
1. what a dumb sonofamitch...trying to stay relevant.
Response to Roland99 (Reply #1)
Sat Jun 16, 2012, 10:35 AM
Joe Bacon (4,926 posts)
22. The real question is what is that crook hiding?
|
We DEMAND to know what the Republic Party is hiding!
Where is Adelman's money coming from? China? Israel? Elsewhere? WE HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW! |
Response to Galraedia (Original post)
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 03:17 PM
leftyohiolib (3,102 posts)
2. blow it out your shell turtleman
Response to leftyohiolib (Reply #2)
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 04:09 PM
Dont call me Shirley (1,395 posts)
12. Turtles are too good for snitch mcCONnel
Response to Galraedia (Original post)
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 03:23 PM
Beaverhausen (20,524 posts)
3. Is he up for reelection?
|
If so does he have a good opponent we can support?
|
Response to Galraedia (Original post)
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 03:26 PM
Blue Owl (8,451 posts)
4. The GOP can't win elections, so they buy and/or steal them
|
Which is why McConnell wants to keep his little Koch habit a big secret...
|
Response to Galraedia (Original post)
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 03:27 PM
savannah43 (513 posts)
5. Does anyone still listen to this old woman?
Response to savannah43 (Reply #5)
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 03:53 PM
SoutherDem (2,151 posts)
9. Please have more respect to women
|
I would call him pond scum but I have more respect for pond scum.
|
Response to Galraedia (Original post)
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 03:36 PM
madashelltoo (701 posts)
6. No one should respond to McConnell until
|
he explains that face-freeze thing he's got going on. It could be causing issues with his thought processes. Maybe his synapses aren't synapping properly.
|
Response to Galraedia (Original post)
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 03:44 PM
Phlem (1,311 posts)
7. can always count on a heaping
|
pile of facism from Mitch McFuckst!ck.
Squeal you facist pig. -p |
Response to Phlem (Reply #7)
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 03:57 PM
progressivebydesign (19,363 posts)
10. oh it's a heaping pile already.. but it smells worse than fascism. n/t
Response to Galraedia (Original post)
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 03:50 PM
GeorgeGist (9,518 posts)
8. Projecting as usual.
Response to Galraedia (Original post)
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 03:59 PM
Swede Atlanta (2,243 posts)
11. I am a strong proponent of the 1st Amendment..........
|
but the Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized the government can place reasonable restrictions on that freedom. For example, speech that is intended or is likely to cause or encourage violence can be restricted.
Corporations are not people. They themselves do not exist. They are complex man-made creations with shareholders, executives, boards of directors, employees, customers, etc. But they themselves are NOT human beings. Further if the Court has previously ruled that reasonable regulation is permitted, why is it not possible to limit contributions to avoid undue influence or require donor disclosure? |
Response to Galraedia (Original post)
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 04:18 PM
Teamster Jeff (913 posts)
13. Disgusting Cowards
Response to Galraedia (Original post)
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 04:20 PM
freshwest (31,330 posts)
14. That's right, you can't convince anyone of the wisdom of your policies, can you?
|
Your stated policy from January of 2009 is to ensure Obama does not get another term even if you destroy the government, no matter who or what is taken down with it.
You want to hide the names of traitors paying your way, promoting selling this land along with the future of coming generations off to your pals. You dare to say we don't have the right to know who is planning to burn the house down to prevent the arson? Try again. |
Response to Galraedia (Original post)
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 04:53 PM
barbtries (15,010 posts)
15. well.
|
if it was transparent, right minded people would be in a better position to know where they maybe don't want to spend their money. oh well.
fuck him. the republicans imo are getting very OBVIOUS in their "take what you do and use it against your opponent" bullshit. |
Response to Galraedia (Original post)
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 05:05 PM
Bandit (19,768 posts)
16. We want Proof the North Koreans are not buying US politicians...
|
The ONLY way we can KNOW that foreign money is not influencing our elections is by complete disclosure...
|
Response to Galraedia (Original post)
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 05:08 PM
eggplant (973 posts)
17. "the political left has consistently demonstrated a militant intolerance for dissent."
|
Wait, what? Tell that to the Dixie Chicks. And everyone else on the left that has been shouted down.
|
Response to Galraedia (Original post)
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 06:17 PM
nineteen50 (828 posts)
18. America sold to the higest bidder.
Response to Galraedia (Original post)
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 06:24 PM
Brigid (10,523 posts)
19. Yeah right, Mitch . . .
|
And the political right has never resorted to "political retribution" or "bullying and intimidation," right?
|
Response to Brigid (Reply #19)
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 08:23 PM
Teamster Jeff (913 posts)
20. I think they fear
|
consumer retribution. Corporations don't want to piss off 50% of their customers. Cubs couldn't back pedal fast enough when it became known old man Ricketts was about to finance anti Obama TV ads. Cubs 3 Red Sox 0
|
Response to Galraedia (Original post)
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 11:42 PM
Angry Dragon (24,073 posts)
21. The Turtle is a huge idiot
|
The First Amendment guarantees free speech, it does not guarantee anonymous speech
|

