HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Righthaven ordered to pay...

Thu Jun 14, 2012, 10:55 PM

Righthaven ordered to pay attorney’s fees in another case ($131,457 to DU)

Last edited Thu Jun 14, 2012, 11:36 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

Source: Vegas Inc (Las Vegas Sun)

Righthaven LLC, the Las Vegas copyright infringement lawsuit filer, was ordered Thursday to pay $131,457 in attorney's fees to a defendant that prevailed against Righthaven in court.

U.S. District Judge Roger Hunt in Las Vegas ordered that Righthaven pay the fees to attorneys for the Democratic Underground, a political website operator in the Washington, D.C., area.

The order lifts to $318,138 the amount Righthaven has been ordered to pay copyright defendants in Righthaven cases in Nevada and Colorado.

... In the Democratic Underground case, Righthaven didn't respond to its attorney's fee request. In fact, the only sign of life at Righthaven in recent months is that it may continue pursuing at least one of its appeals of its legal setbacks.

Read more: http://www.vegasinc.com/news/2012/jun/14/righthaven-ordered-pay-attorneys-fees-another-case/



Full ruling here (PDF):
http://ia700509.us.archive.org/5/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.75386/gov.uscourts.nvd.75386.201.0.pdf

31 replies, 3850 views

Thread informationRemove bookmarkTrash this thread

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 31 replies Author Time Post
Reply Righthaven ordered to pay attorney’s fees in another case ($131,457 to DU) (Original post)
Newsjock Jun 2012 OP
freshwest Jun 2012 #1
Robb Jun 2012 #2
klook Jun 2012 #3
Hassin Bin Sober Jun 2012 #4
Lasher Jun 2012 #5
dsc Jun 2012 #8
Hassin Bin Sober Jun 2012 #11
boppers Jun 2012 #12
Hassin Bin Sober Jun 2012 #22
boppers Jun 2012 #26
MrModerate Jun 2012 #10
freshwest Jun 2012 #17
Hassin Bin Sober Jun 2012 #19
LynneSin Jun 2012 #27
Hassin Bin Sober Jun 2012 #28
wingzeroday Jun 2012 #30
NRaleighLiberal Jun 2012 #6
longship Jun 2012 #7
KT2000 Jun 2012 #9
Art_from_Ark Jun 2012 #13
NBachers Jun 2012 #14
philly_bob Jun 2012 #15
left on green only Jun 2012 #16
dsc Jun 2012 #18
Hassin Bin Sober Jun 2012 #21
Posteritatis Jun 2012 #25
Rhiannon12866 Jun 2012 #20
dkf Jun 2012 #23
MADem Jun 2012 #24
xfundy Jun 2012 #29
FiveGoodMen Jun 2012 #31

Response to Newsjock (Original post)

Thu Jun 14, 2012, 10:58 PM

1. YAY! Love it!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Newsjock (Original post)

Thu Jun 14, 2012, 11:00 PM

2. Ha ha!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Newsjock (Original post)

Thu Jun 14, 2012, 11:03 PM

3. That Grovelbot is really effective.

Great news - congrats, guys!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Newsjock (Original post)

Thu Jun 14, 2012, 11:04 PM

4. Don't forget: Freerepublic wet their pants and paid Righthaven off when threatened.

Whaddya expect from a bunch of chicken-hawks?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hassin Bin Sober (Reply #4)

Thu Jun 14, 2012, 11:06 PM

5. No shit?

I did not know that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hassin Bin Sober (Reply #4)

Thu Jun 14, 2012, 11:18 PM

8. free republic was much liklier to have been guilty

we are very diligent about enforcing a 4 paragraph rule which meant we were really within fair use bounds. Free Republic was way laxer about enforcing such a rule.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dsc (Reply #8)

Thu Jun 14, 2012, 11:28 PM

11. I haven't followed the case VERY closely but don't think it hinged on our...

Last edited Thu Jun 14, 2012, 11:29 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

... 4 paragraph rule adherence.

No matter which way you slice it, Righthaven was a paper tiger based on a sham transaction business model. Righthaven folded like a cheap suit under the slightest scrutiny.

Rimjob is a sucker/idiot. Maybe he will claim he thought Righthaven was an off-shore bank and THAT'S why he cut them a check.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hassin Bin Sober (Reply #11)

Thu Jun 14, 2012, 11:32 PM

12. Intent to follow rules goes a long way for a judge or a jury.

It wasn't the deciding factor, according to what I've read, but it's one of those little things that matter.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boppers (Reply #12)

Fri Jun 15, 2012, 12:15 AM

22. Did that piece even get adjudicated?

My understanding is it never got past "standing" and the whole mess unraveled.

But, yes, I agree on your point.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hassin Bin Sober (Reply #22)

Fri Jun 15, 2012, 01:02 AM

26. Harm comes before standing.

In order to show standing, you have to demonstrate the harm you are standing for.

Imagine it the other way around:
"I'm here to sue"
"Why?"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hassin Bin Sober (Reply #4)

Thu Jun 14, 2012, 11:21 PM

10. Making distinctions between what is just and unjust . . .

Isn't exactly Free Republic's long suit.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hassin Bin Sober (Reply #4)

Thu Jun 14, 2012, 11:50 PM

17. Freeperville's 'colors do run.' Unlike Skinner, who took a principled stand.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to freshwest (Reply #17)

Fri Jun 15, 2012, 12:01 AM

19. Maybe the freepers run to confuse their enemies more!

Last edited Fri Jun 15, 2012, 12:02 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hassin Bin Sober (Reply #4)

Fri Jun 15, 2012, 01:25 AM

27. Free Republic was sued by the LA Times and Washington Post.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L.A._Times_v._Free_Republic

L.A. Times v. Free Republic is a 1998 United States district court copyright law case. Several newspapers sued the Internet forum Free Republic for allowing its users to repost the full text of copyrighted newspaper articles, asserting that this constituted copyright infringement. Free Republic claimed that they under the doctrine of fair use and the First Amendment guarantee of freedom of speech the reposting of articles were not liable. The federal courts ruled in favor of the newspapers.



Not by some shitass company that tried to make a buck by copyrighting articles they found posted on websites, which is pretty much what Righthaven did.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Righthaven

Righthaven LLC is a copyright holding company founded in early 2010, which enters agreements from its partner newspapers after finding that their content has been copied to online sites without permission, in order to engage in litigation against the site owners for copyright infringement. The lawsuits have been heavily criticized by commentators, who describe the activity as copyright trolling and the company as a "lawsuit factory". Righthaven LLC's CEO, Steven Gibson, is a partner in the Las Vegas office of American law firm Dickinson Wright and regularly speaks to the media about Righthaven.


As far as I know, no major newspaper has ever sued Democratic Underground.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LynneSin (Reply #27)

Fri Jun 15, 2012, 01:31 AM

28. Free repubic was also sued and settled with righthaven:

http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/oct/20/righthaven-defendant-wins-first-lawsuit-dismissal-/
Separately, Righthaven reached additional confidential settlements with these defendants:

--Gaming industry publisher Anthony Curtis, whose case attracted attention since it involved a story Curtis had made possible by supplying information to the Review-Journal

--The Free Republic, a big conservative website
--John Glenn

--Herbalscience Ltd.

--Bisig Impact Group

--American Political Action Committee

--Tom Johnson and Alan Potasnik

--Breakdown of America and Stacy Nason

--Dr. Shezad Malik Law Firm

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LynneSin (Reply #27)

Fri Jun 15, 2012, 12:30 PM

30. FR

Did settle with RH. It was buried somewhere in between all the posts they made about how the Somali Piracy incidents would cease if ransoms were no longer paid.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Newsjock (Original post)

Thu Jun 14, 2012, 11:08 PM

6. great news! Now the MIRT can finally get paid!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NRaleighLiberal (Reply #6)

Thu Jun 14, 2012, 11:14 PM

7. They earn every penny!

Keeping DU neat and clean, free from SPAM and Trolls.

Good show DU legal team. And good show MIRT.

Thanks, Skinner and Co.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Newsjock (Original post)

Thu Jun 14, 2012, 11:19 PM

9. Good news!

Hope the Democratic Party knows about this and learns from it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Newsjock (Original post)

Thu Jun 14, 2012, 11:33 PM

13. Congratulations to DU!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Newsjock (Original post)

Thu Jun 14, 2012, 11:36 PM

14. The Big Political Website Democratic Underground

This just hasta be rec'd

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Newsjock (Original post)

Thu Jun 14, 2012, 11:42 PM

15. I'm so proud of you folks! /nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Newsjock (Original post)

Thu Jun 14, 2012, 11:50 PM

16. As I understand the legal world, there is a difference between receiving a judgement and actually..

collecting on it. Would any of you legal types out there care to comment on what the chances are of DU actually receiving any pay dirt on this one?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to left on green only (Reply #16)

Thu Jun 14, 2012, 11:59 PM

18. let's just say I wouldn't be spending the money yet

We are definitely behind all the previous judgements handed out (presuming those lawyers followed through on attaching assets). My guess is we will get nothing unless either a) right haven has been hiding assets and we find them before any other creditors do or b) the limited assets that right haven has turn out to be less limited than we think.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to left on green only (Reply #16)

Fri Jun 15, 2012, 12:05 AM

21. Slim to none and slim just left town.

Last edited Fri Jun 15, 2012, 12:06 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

Righthaven's office shit has already been auctioned. Much to my chagrin, the CEO's headset was a popular item. I suggested Skinner buy it and mount it on the DU office wall. I wasn't the only one who thought that would be a nice trophy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to left on green only (Reply #16)

Fri Jun 15, 2012, 12:55 AM

25. Righthaven's basically a gently smoking crater as is, so pretty slim. (nt)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Newsjock (Original post)

Fri Jun 15, 2012, 12:04 AM

20. K&R!!! Terrific news!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Newsjock (Original post)

Fri Jun 15, 2012, 12:41 AM

23. Woohoo!!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Newsjock (Original post)

Fri Jun 15, 2012, 12:49 AM

24. Soooo....free stars for everyone? No? Not even a few? ... nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Newsjock (Original post)

Fri Jun 15, 2012, 02:11 AM

29. I had a crappy day

until just this minute. Way to go!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Newsjock (Original post)

Fri Jun 15, 2012, 01:05 PM

31. Ah, now that feels good!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread