Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MowCowWhoHow III

(2,103 posts)
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 06:09 PM Apr 2016

No decline in child obesity in US, despite efforts: study

Source: AFP

Miami (AFP) - Childhood obesity is a persistent problem in the United States, and researchers said Tuesday they found no sign of a reversal in the rising trend over the past three decades.

In 2013-2014, 33.4 percent of children aged two to 19 were overweight, and 17.4 percent of those were obese, said the findings in the journal Obesity.

"Despite some other recent reports, we found no indication of a decline in obesity prevalence in the United States in any group of children aged two through 19," said lead author Asheley Skinner, an associate professor at Duke University's Clinical Research Institute.

"This is particularly true with severe obesity, which remains high, especially among adolescents."

Read more: https://www.yahoo.com/news/no-decline-child-obesity-us-despite-efforts-study-195738119.html?ref=gs

52 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No decline in child obesity in US, despite efforts: study (Original Post) MowCowWhoHow III Apr 2016 OP
Obesity will remain high as long as there is HFCS in our processed foods. PADemD Apr 2016 #1
Obesity will remain high so long as the average daily calories are 3,800 Major Nikon Apr 2016 #3
Yes. Children don't play 840high Apr 2016 #14
Plastics cause obesogenic effects due to endocrine disrupting chemicals Baobab Apr 2016 #38
When 6 big bags of potato chips are cheaper laundry_queen Apr 2016 #15
Yep... awoke_in_2003 Apr 2016 #22
Per capita we consume almost 500 calories of sugar per day Major Nikon Apr 2016 #25
Yep, and I am guilty myself... awoke_in_2003 Apr 2016 #28
Fructose alters hundreds of brain genes, which can lead to a wide range of diseases TalkingDog Apr 2016 #7
blame the Doctors PatrynXX Apr 2016 #2
So you're saying all we need to do is revise our standards upwards Major Nikon Apr 2016 #5
No. The government revised the standards downwards meow2u3 Apr 2016 #35
Actually the standards are based on the WHO Major Nikon Apr 2016 #36
that's ridiculous - kids aren't getting fat because someone hurt their feelings maxsolomon Apr 2016 #11
Okay, I'm going to stick my head in the lion's mouth and take one for the team. Aristus Apr 2016 #16
Change the meaning or words and war doesn't exist Democat Apr 2016 #30
Not surprising considering how kacekwl Apr 2016 #4
Every grocery store I've been in has a fruit and vegetable section.. EX500rider Apr 2016 #20
I lived in a neighborhood with one grocery store and five corner stores/bodegas in a 5 mile radius. haele Apr 2016 #40
Attention, parents Blandocyte Apr 2016 #6
Good news for Coca-Cola, McDonald's, Kraft and Frito-Lay. reformist2 Apr 2016 #8
Thanks to the megafood corporations who have gotten America addicted to their fattening poison. Dont call me Shirley Apr 2016 #9
And I am trying to pull away from that... awoke_in_2003 Apr 2016 #23
I don't eat much meat. It's not hard. leftyladyfrommo Apr 2016 #32
I love sweet potatoes awoke_in_2003 Apr 2016 #43
What a shocker with that, Hows about you loook at the culprits. HFCS Autumn Apr 2016 #10
Endocrine disrupters (EDCs)/Obesogens Baobab Apr 2016 #39
When worthless parents pack those disgusting "Lunchables" for the kids to eat for lunch in school Feeling the Bern Apr 2016 #12
The regular Lunchables are 250 calories. Indydem Apr 2016 #19
Processed food is never good for you. Feeling the Bern Apr 2016 #21
Creative movement of your goalposts. LanternWaste Apr 2016 #41
Never? awoke_in_2003 Apr 2016 #44
Because they contain no vegetables, fruits, or whole grains in substantial form? NickB79 Apr 2016 #47
Lunches the religious cults would be proud of are being served all over America. CIA anyone?! Dont call me Shirley Apr 2016 #52
you are what you eat..... noneof_theabove Apr 2016 #13
^^^^^^^ this Feeling the Bern Apr 2016 #24
I feel like I'm on the wrong site laundry_queen Apr 2016 #17
Legumes are some of the cheapest sources of carbohydrates Major Nikon Apr 2016 #27
Yes, I've tried to increase those recently. laundry_queen Apr 2016 #29
They should be a staple. leftyladyfrommo Apr 2016 #33
Lentils have the added advantage that they actually taste good! closeupready Apr 2016 #50
Society should not judge how parents treat their children? Democat Apr 2016 #31
Ridiculous strawman laundry_queen Apr 2016 #34
It's easy...calories in Vs calories out.. EX500rider Apr 2016 #45
I think lack of parental control around food intake is one factor Blandocyte Apr 2016 #46
It's not the food. It's the QUANTITY of food consumed NickB79 Apr 2016 #48
On DU, you'll never want for the condescending derision put upon busy working parents... LanternWaste Apr 2016 #42
We'll have childhood obesity harrose Apr 2016 #18
On average, children ages 2-5 spend 32 hours a week in front of a TV. EX500rider Apr 2016 #26
That's insane! That's almost 5 hours per day, every day of the week! NickB79 Apr 2016 #49
Bring back daily PE for K-12 TexasBushwhacker Apr 2016 #37
This B2G Apr 2016 #51

Major Nikon

(36,817 posts)
3. Obesity will remain high so long as the average daily calories are 3,800
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 06:33 PM
Apr 2016

...and the most strenuous task is pushing an elevator button.

Calories

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
38. Plastics cause obesogenic effects due to endocrine disrupting chemicals
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 09:28 AM
Apr 2016

in a dose related way. The more exposed we are to EDCs the fatter animals and people get. The effects are transgenic. For example in non-stick cookware. plastic lined cans, plastic bottles and so on.

They build up in the environment, we need to stop this.

"Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals"

Major Nikon

(36,817 posts)
25. Per capita we consume almost 500 calories of sugar per day
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:18 PM
Apr 2016

So yes, not only does the American diet have far too many calories for the average activity level, far too many of those calories are in the form of simple carbohydrates like breads, pasta, and supplemental sugars.

 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
28. Yep, and I am guilty myself...
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:25 PM
Apr 2016

I am starting to scale back. It is hard when you really like bread and pasta

TalkingDog

(9,001 posts)
7. Fructose alters hundreds of brain genes, which can lead to a wide range of diseases
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 06:35 PM
Apr 2016
http://medicalxpress.com/news/2016-04-fructose-hundreds-brain-genes-wide.html

A range of diseases—from diabetes to cardiovascular disease, and from Alzheimer's disease to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder—are linked to changes to genes in the brain. A new study by UCLA life scientists has found that hundreds of those genes can be damaged by fructose, a sugar that's common in the Western diet, in a way that could lead to those diseases.

PatrynXX

(5,668 posts)
2. blame the Doctors
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 06:28 PM
Apr 2016

who generally call you overweight when your not and Obese when your overweight X_X it's extremely condescending to say so. it has the opposite effect

Major Nikon

(36,817 posts)
5. So you're saying all we need to do is revise our standards upwards
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 06:35 PM
Apr 2016

Then we would have less overweight and obese people.

Sounds like a good plan until you realize all the health issues associated with those things probably aren't going to change as a result.

meow2u3

(24,757 posts)
35. No. The government revised the standards downwards
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 08:16 AM
Apr 2016

to make normal weight out to be overweight, overweight to be obese, and obese to be morbidly obese, not taking into account people with large frames or muscular physiques.

Major Nikon

(36,817 posts)
36. Actually the standards are based on the WHO
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 08:49 AM
Apr 2016

BMI does take into account the things you mentioned because each of those classes include a range of values, not just one, but it's not a perfect standard, just one that's easy to calculate and it works for the vast majority of the population.

While it's possible to be below the specified category based on your BMI, it's also possible to be above the specified category based on your BMI.

The following chart (for men) shows dots in the lower left and upper right that are classified correctly based on their BMI. The lower right shows people who are classified above where they should be and the upper left shows people who are classified below what they actually are.

maxsolomon

(33,220 posts)
11. that's ridiculous - kids aren't getting fat because someone hurt their feelings
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:19 PM
Apr 2016

if you're beyond the BMI range, you're generally overweight. even if you're "long-waisted" or "muscle-y", or some other rationale.

its not condescending to be told that; it's an unpleasant truth. deal with it.

portion size, processed foods, activity, and HFRC.

Aristus

(66,250 posts)
16. Okay, I'm going to stick my head in the lion's mouth and take one for the team.
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 10:16 PM
Apr 2016

I'm a Physician Assistant, not a doctor; but as a licensed medical practitioner, I have to push back at the charge of condescension. 'Obese' isn't an epithet; it's medical terminology; we use it if the patient fits the medical profile.

I make sure that as much as is possible, my patients are informed and educated about what lifestyle choices constitute healthy behavior. There is a lot of misinformation out there that confuses my patients; Gatorade being marketed as a health drink, for example, which it very much is not. Once I tell my patients that regular Gatorade consumption can lead to obesity and tooth decay, they pretty much lay off the stuff.

Compliance is everything. About three months ago, I lost three patients in the space of about ten days, all from smoking-related diseases. I didn't have to tell them that smoking kills; they knew. But they wouldn't quit. Nothing about my concern for them was condescending. And when I was informed of their deaths, it tore me up; ask anyone here who knows me. I was looking for a window to jump out of.

If your medical provider refuses to educate you properly on your condition, or refuses to prescribe the appropriate treatment, then yeah, blame him or her. But if you refuse to follow your treatment plan because your provider used a term that offended you, that's a compliance issue, and not the provider's fault.

EX500rider

(10,782 posts)
20. Every grocery store I've been in has a fruit and vegetable section..
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 10:46 PM
Apr 2016

.....and the raw ingredients to make whatever you want.

haele

(12,627 posts)
40. I lived in a neighborhood with one grocery store and five corner stores/bodegas in a 5 mile radius.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 09:50 AM
Apr 2016

The one grocery store - an IGA - was a medium-sized store about eight aisles; one entire section dedicated to frozen and an old-school 14 ft. unused butcher section and chill case area along the back and only one aisle of fruit and veggies that were pretty much always close to over-ripe. Which is good when you want to eat and cook with them quickly, but not when you can only get out and shop once a week.
The corner stores - about 800 sq. ft. - do have about 8 to 10 ft. of fresh produce area which ended up leaving shoppers with a choice of maybe a dozen bins of various fruits and veggies that were pretty much cleared out if you got there after 1pm. Only two of the bodegas provide a halfway decent selection of fresh meat, dairy, eggs or a decent selection of canned or dry veggies and grains where someone could actually make healthy meals for their families on a regular basis - so long as the stores don't sell out of what's on the menu that day or week.
And there were lots of non-drivers and people on limited in that neighborhood.
That's not even considering the food desert areas, where all they have available within walking or public transportation distance are neighborhood corner stores or gas station/convenience store mini-marts. If there's more than a couple bags of fresh fruit, more than four boxes of rice and two cartons of eggs available to shoppers in those places every day, they're lucky. This is not like the old days; when I was growing up, the corner grocery store was a grocery store rather than a corner liquor-and-junk-food store that provided high-priced groceries for emergency shopping - there was always a fresh meat and dairy area, and at least a half aisle of fairly fresh fruit and veggies that, while generally sourced locally, had enough variety where there was something for everyone.

You're pretty lucky to live in an area where every grocery store has a good fruit and vegetable section.

Haele

 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
23. And I am trying to pull away from that...
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:07 PM
Apr 2016

especially scaling back the meat. I really wanted a burger yesterday, but I grabbed a pita, spread some hummus in it, then put cucumber (with the skin) and onions in it with a touch of blue cheese (just enough for the flavor, which I happened to be craving). I am amazed at how tasty and filling it was. I have very little experience with hummus (I may have had some as a kid). I am on day 2 without meat. I may not totally cut it out, but it is time to scale it way back.

leftyladyfrommo

(18,861 posts)
32. I don't eat much meat. It's not hard.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 06:26 AM
Apr 2016

I do have scrambled eggs for breakfast. And I eat Greek yogurt and some cheese once in a while.

If I get really hungry I eat sweet potatoes. They are a nutritional powerhouse and really high in fiber so they really stick with you. I also fix a lot of brown rice. Or beans are really good for you and really stay with you.

I fix everything myself mostly using my extremely versatile rice cooker and steamer. It cooks stuff really fast and no grease. I can steam veggies while the rice cooks. And I steam my sweet potatoes.

It just takes a little getting used to but it's very doable.

 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
43. I love sweet potatoes
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 12:45 PM
Apr 2016

I do beans in the crock pot. I add a ham hock during cooking to help flavor, and toss it when done.

 

Feeling the Bern

(3,839 posts)
12. When worthless parents pack those disgusting "Lunchables" for the kids to eat for lunch in school
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:05 PM
Apr 2016

You're going to have fat, obese kids.

Don't worry though. We'll solve the problem by forcing another unfunded mandate on the schools and blaming them for unhealthy lunches. . .then the administrators will end recess and most anything else that gets kids off their butts and moving around.

Oh, and the parents won't do anything because God knows parents don't raise kids unless the school "does something" to their precious little angel.

American schools are nightmares (thank you parents, politicians and principals) and no one seems to care about it unless a teacher is caught doing something with or to a student. . .then it's front page news.

NickB79

(19,214 posts)
47. Because they contain no vegetables, fruits, or whole grains in substantial form?
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 03:44 PM
Apr 2016

Ritz crackers, ham and cheese are not a substitute for a healthy meal, even if it's only 250 calories.

If anything, the low calorie count and lack of filling fiber and proteins can actually encourages the kids to top off later in the day with chips, candy bars and soda to bridge that gap between lunch and dinner.

There are far better options that are actually cheaper on a per-serving basis than a Lunchable.

noneof_theabove

(410 posts)
13. you are what you eat.....
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:45 PM
Apr 2016

Food processed to be nothing more than simple starches with two dozen flavorings,
stabilizers, sugars, artificial ingredients, antibiotics and pesticides added to make it appear
to be food -- is not "food".
It is "feed" -- what you give to livestock to fatten them up for slaughter.

"The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it." -- Neil DeGrasse Tyson

"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored." -- Aldous Huxley

laundry_queen

(8,646 posts)
17. I feel like I'm on the wrong site
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 10:35 PM
Apr 2016

First the "pull yourself up by your bootstraps" thread. Now this.

YOU try being a single parent of 4 and feed your kids a pristine diet when you are away from the house 11 hours a day making a shit wage.

The issue is our society. How our society values work flexibility, decent wages, family and free time. Hint: it doesn't.

Add in subsidies for crops that lead to the most unhealthy additives: HFCS, cheap fats, cheap and plentiful carbs. Oh, and make sure to add plenty of antibiotics to animal feed, antibiotics that have been linked to weight gain, so we can consume them en masse through our meat.

As I noted above, 6 big bags of potato chips at our local grocery store were cheaper than a small bag of apples.

About a year ago, I made a pledge to myself to eat super healthy.

It lasted 3 months. I couldn't afford the grocery bill. I couldn't afford to give my kids super healthy lunches and dinners.

I still try to cook everything from scratch. I stick to cheap vegetables, like celery, carrots, cabbage, onions etc.

But we've had to use less meat and more things like rice and pasta. This is bad, as I have type 2 diabetes (very recently diagnosed. No shock, I have PCOS, had gestational diabetes nearly 20 years ago, and with every pregnancy after that, managed to hold off the type 2 numbers for a long time). I do best on a low carb diet with tons of fresh veggies and meat - grassfed/organic as much as I can afford it. But - I *cannot* afford it. I'm considering asking my dr for insulin, because, well, at least I have insurance for that, then I can at least eat some carbs and lower my grocery bill.

Plus, when are people supposed to find the time for exercise, relaxation and family time, in addition to cooking from scratch? Guess what - c'est impossible.

To blame overworked, overtired, over stressed parents for this issue is ridiculous. I'm lucky enough to live in a very safe area, so my kids sometimes go for walks or bike rides while I'm still at work. I tend to get my exercise at work - my co-workers and I walk every break. But it's not enough. I'd love to do more with my kids. I get home at 6pm. My youngest goes to bed at 9pm. Not much time to cook, clean, help with homework, do laundry, catch up with personal email (half of which comes from the schools), have a bath and bedtime routine etc.

Luckily, my kids are not obese. Only my second daughter is a bit on the heavy side (maybe mildly overweight on the BMI, nowhere near obese though), and she's been like that since she was 3 months old as an exclusively breastfed infant. My others range from normal to skinny. All were breastfed, fed the same diet, same level of exercise generally (actually, my heavier daughter is the athletic one who is always exercising and my skinny one is the junk food eating couch potato). Perhaps the reason they are not is I was a stay at home parent for the first years of their lives and wasn't divorced and had money for good food.

I would never judge a parent who is trying to make ends meet, who doesn't have adequate child care so her preteen or teen has to stay at home alone while the parent works, and they are instructed to stay inside because it's not safe to be outside alone. I wouldn't judge if that parent bought a lot of cheap carbs because they didn't have the money for less filling food like raw fresh fruits and vegetables. It's easy for people who haven't been there to pontificate. Heck, sometimes people who were able to do it will get on their soapbox, forgetting that everyone is not like them, don't have the same support/background/resources.

I think they are going about this whole childhood obesity thing wrong. All wrong.

Major Nikon

(36,817 posts)
27. Legumes are some of the cheapest sources of carbohydrates
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:23 PM
Apr 2016

They are also one of the best choices as they tend to have lots of dietary fiber and a very low glycemic index.

Legumes are a big staple in my house, not just because they are cheap, but mainly because they are an excellent source of nutrition.

laundry_queen

(8,646 posts)
29. Yes, I've tried to increase those recently.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 12:01 AM
Apr 2016

I even splurged on a pressure cooker so I can cook bean dishes quickly (and so I can keep dried beans on hand) but it still takes a long time to cook them. And, my kids hate them, so I have to mash them or blend them into the dish so they don't notice them (it's just a texture thing). It does help with costs, and they do help me feel full longer so that's good. For when I'm pressed for time I do buy canned as well. It's tough to find recipes that we like though. I did not grow up with beans at all, so there is a lot of trial and error. And error can get costly, I hate when that happens. I tried making dahl in my pressure cooker and burnt the crap out of it. That was fun, lol. But yeah, I'm trying all the tricks. I'm quite well versed in nutrition, (for reasons I won't get into here, it would turn into a novel). Because I'm fat, and doctors figure I must know nothing about nutrition, they always try to send me to a nutritionist, even though I protest I'm told, "just try it you might learn something or at least get ideas." However there has been more than one nutritionist who has kicked me out because they said it was pointless for me to be there as I knew as much as they did. And nowadays with Pinterest, and the internet, there are plenty of ideas at least.

leftyladyfrommo

(18,861 posts)
33. They should be a staple.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 06:33 AM
Apr 2016

My only problem is that they take so long to cook. I have to think a few hours ahead for those. They go in the crockpot.

But brown rice and sweet potatoes cook fast in my rice cooker.

I also eat high fiber cereal with coconut milk if I get hungry.

I usually buy frozen fruit because it's cheaper out of season. One little box of blueberries was six dollars bit a whole big bag of frozen blueberries was only about 7.

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
50. Lentils have the added advantage that they actually taste good!
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 04:22 PM
Apr 2016

I especially like the green/French ones. But also Indian-style dal - red, yellow, black. I like them all.

Democat

(11,617 posts)
31. Society should not judge how parents treat their children?
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 04:21 AM
Apr 2016

Let's use your argument about how hard it is to be a parent, so no parent should be blamed for helping their kids become obese and suffer possible lifelong medical problems.

What do you say to the parent who says "don't judge people for spanking their kid, everyone is not like them, they don't have the same support/background/resources."

At some point, if you cause harm to your child, society has to make a judgement. If not, then child abuse becomes legal.

laundry_queen

(8,646 posts)
34. Ridiculous strawman
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 08:13 AM
Apr 2016

and no, parents should not be blamed for the circumstances that are leading to obesity. It's not a case of 'terrible parents these days' as so many would like to frame it. I'm guessing the percentage of crappy parents is pretty constant. Are there parents out there who are stuffing their kids full of junk food on purpose? Possibly. I've seen the talk shows where there are 100 lb toddlers. In that case it would be child abuse, but those same parents would have done the same thing 50 years ago. However, there is such an incredible increase in obesity there is no possible way to simply blame it on crappy parenting. That's a cop out. There is something deeper, more systemic here. To blame the parents is simply lazy thinking. I have several friends, solidly middle class who have over weight children despite being well versed in nutrition and enrolling their kids in sports. These parents are constantly worried that people think they are being horrible parents because their kids are heavy. They know people think that they are feeding their kids pizza and McDonald's every night. They are not.

I was looking at some old videos the other days taken in the 1980's in our community when I was growing up. I was amazed at how much smaller, in general, EVERYONE looked. Everyone was thinner. Kids, adults, old people. And it's not a sedentary lifestyle thing necessarily in my community - my town has put in a substantial investment into walking/biking paths, our local recreation center and parks. And people use them FAR more than when I was a kid and there were fewer of those things. On any given day, there are people walking, biking, kids playing at the park etc. There is a huge push in town for kids to be involved in sports - my kids are one of the few who aren't enrolled in multiple sports. When I was a kid, many kids weren't in sports at all. Yet kids are bigger. No, it's systemic. It's not bad parenting. It's not lazy parenting. When I was a kid, people at junk food the same way, yet were thinner. Heck, my dad's parents owned a store and they ate candy and junk all the time and a crappy diet (lots of white flour, fat, few vegetables) and no one was fat, even though they owned the only TV in town and sat around all the time watching it.

No, there is something in the food supply and something in the environment that is priming some people to gain wait more easily. Some say it's chemicals disrupting hormones, some say it's antibiotics disrupting our bacterial balance in our guts. Whatever it is, it's not 'bad parenting'. So no, I will not judge parents for this one thing. Which is what my post was about. The rest of your post is strawman.

EX500rider

(10,782 posts)
45. It's easy...calories in Vs calories out..
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 01:55 PM
Apr 2016

Last edited Wed Apr 27, 2016, 03:32 PM - Edit history (1)

When the kids spend over 30 hours a WEEK watching a screen and still eats a lot they will gain weight.

Anybody could lose weight and even starve to death on ANY diet, pure sugar, pure lard whatever if they only got 500 or less calories per day. (for an adult, a toddle might be less)

Blandocyte

(1,231 posts)
46. I think lack of parental control around food intake is one factor
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 03:10 PM
Apr 2016

as well as the lack of control over amount of physical activity. There are lots of other factors, in my opinion.

I agree with you about our culture making it difficult to parent. We could see the kids' obesity as a symptom of an unhealthy culture where parents have to make many compromises as they try to raise kids while stretching money and time as far as they can. I feel bad for the parents who want to be super parents but are chronically too short of time, energy and money to do all they would like to for their kids.

As far as the dietary stuff, I wish everyone who could would help one of those parents out by bringing over a big healthy entree they could freeze and use for a few days.

NickB79

(19,214 posts)
48. It's not the food. It's the QUANTITY of food consumed
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 03:56 PM
Apr 2016

Portion sizes are bigger. Food is actually CHEAPER today than it was 40 years ago, when adjusted for inflation. Soda consumption has skyrocketed compared to the 1970's (though it has leveled off and actually fallen a bit in the past decade, thank God). And more than anything, the mindless snacking between meals that has become so prevalent adds hundreds of calories per day. Hell, just three Oreo cookies add 150 calories! You want to blame the food itself for the problem, but the science is saying something entirely different: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/05/090508045321.htm

New research that uses an innovative approach to study, for the first time, the relative contributions of food and exercise habits to the development of the obesity epidemic has concluded that the rise in obesity in the United States since the 1970s was virtually all due to increased energy intake.

How much of the obesity epidemic has been caused by excess calorie intake and how much by reductions in physical activity has been long debated and while experts agree that making it easier for people to eat less and exercise more are both important for combating it, they debate where the public health focus should be.

A study presented on Friday at the European Congress on Obesity is the first to examine the question of the proportional contributions to the obesity epidemic by combining metabolic relationships, the laws of thermodynamics, epidemiological data and agricultural data.

"There have been a lot of assumptions that both reduced physical activity and increased energy intake have been major drivers of the obesity epidemic. Until now, nobody has proposed how to quantify their relative contributions to the rise in obesity since the 1970s. This study demonstrates that the weight gain in the American population seems to be virtually all explained by eating more calories. It appears that changes in physical activity played a minimal role," said the study's leader, Professor Boyd Swinburn, chair of population health and director of the World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Obesity Prevention at Deakin University in Australia.
 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
42. On DU, you'll never want for the condescending derision put upon busy working parents...
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 11:01 AM
Apr 2016

On DU, you'll never want for the condescending derision put upon busy working parents... there's always a half-wit who pretends to discredit you as a parent. Worse than religious proselytizers.

harrose

(380 posts)
18. We'll have childhood obesity
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 10:41 PM
Apr 2016

as long as we allow Rethugs to authorize giving our children garbage in school instead of healthy nutritious food because they want to save a few bucks.

NickB79

(19,214 posts)
49. That's insane! That's almost 5 hours per day, every day of the week!
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 03:59 PM
Apr 2016

My 6-yr old will sometimes go DAYS between getting to watch TV in the living room. We let her play games on her tablet or our computer and watch a movie like Minions or Ice Age before bed, but weekends we're usually outside, with friends, doing arts and crafts, etc.

TexasBushwhacker

(20,116 posts)
37. Bring back daily PE for K-12
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 09:09 AM
Apr 2016

All the high stakes testing has chipped away at time for exercise. When I was in elementary school we had PE every day, as well as recess after lunch. In junior high and high school we had PE every day. I think this not only cut down on childhood obesity, it would probably cut down on ADHD. Kids are not meant to have their butts stuck in a desk 6 hours a day. Get them outside in the fresh air and sunshine.

They amount of TV viewing and video games is out of control. I know I'm sounding like the old lady that I am but weather permitting, kids need to be outside in the fresh air and sunshine, playing and socializing with their peers.

For those who say it's too dangerous, the rate of child molestation is actually DOWN over the last 20 years. Most child molestors are still family members other people the child knows, not strangers. The same goes for child abductions. Children need to be educated about "stranger danger", but just because we hear about about every incident via the internet and Amber alerts, doesn't mean it happens more often. It just means we are more aware.

Last but not least, the broad spectrum use of antibiotics in farm animals needs to be banned. Most of the antibiotics are not given because animals are sick. It's because it gets them to market weight faster, is it makes them FATTER quicker. What's it doing to us?

 

B2G

(9,766 posts)
51. This
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 04:42 PM
Apr 2016

As kids we ate like ravenous animals...and there was PLENTY of processed food out there decades ago. The obese child was the exception, not the rule.

The difference is there was no cable, internet, gaming systems and cell phones.

We went outside and ran our asses off.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»No decline in child obesi...