Sanders flies home to Vermont
Source: Politico
Sen. Bernie Sanders took a flight home to Vermont Tuesday night as he lost the New York Democratic primary to Hillary Clinton.
Sanders spoke at length at a rally at Pennsylvania State University's University Park early Tuesday evening, before New York polls closed.
Sanders' decision to hold campaign events in Pennsylvania, the most delegate rich state next up on the Democratic primary calendar, suggested he didn't expect to win New York though at the rally, he suggested his campaign would do better than expected in the state.
"Now the polls don't close there until 9 pm so we don't know who is going to be winning or losing but you know what? We're going to do a lot better, I think, than people thought we would," Sanders said during his rally speech.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-dem-primary-live-updates-and-results/2016/04/bernie-sanders-vermont-new-york-primary-night-222178
Grim.
Indydem
(2,642 posts)Back to the life of (I-VT) after tearing apart the party that you were never a member of, or did anything for.
Stay there, and shut your trap.
annie48
(11 posts)Broke up the Democratic Party. What have you been smoking? The party has been broken and nonfunctional since the 80's when they created the dlc and added super delegates so that less desirables wouldn't have a chance for the nomination. Less desirables meaning anyone who bucked the establishment. Wake up, you are part of the problem not the solution.
pnwmom
(108,973 posts)annie48
(11 posts)Less desirables meaning any grassroots group candidate that has the support of the majority of the American people. It's not about who the people want anymore, it's about how much money you have when you run for office. The dems were sickened when Romney ran because he was so far from an average person. Well how is Hillary why different? She made 11 million in speaking fees to wall street and others. She no longer represents the average person, period. To sure she ever did.
pnwmom
(108,973 posts)And so was Bill Clinton. He helped pull the party together from the wreckage after 8 years of Reagan and Bush.
annie48
(11 posts)Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)ananda
(28,856 posts)A bit left socially, but totally corporate otherwise.
I'll take Sanders any day!
pandr32
(11,574 posts)...have been supported Sec. Clinton who is millions of votes up on Bernie.
By the way, over the period that included her paid speaking fees, the Clintons gave $15 million to charity.
Bernie Sanders has been outspending Hillary Clinton during this election by at least 2 to 1.
rpannier
(24,329 posts)So my question is, "Of what 49 states do you speak?"
If you are trying to make a link between Sanders and Mondale, that was 32 years ago
The world has changed dramatically in 3 decades
pnwmom
(108,973 posts)They are salivating at the prospect of facing him in the general. His supporters would be in for a rude awakening. The same people who turned John Kerry, a war hero, into a coward; and Barack Obama into a communist from Kenya are perfectly capable of beating up Sanders.
Hillary has shown she can stand up to an attack from their national machine and Bernie hasn't. So the polls don't factor this in yet. But they would, and very soon.
TimeToEvolve
(303 posts)hillary will become a magnet for all sorts of scandal. You don't think the RePugs know how to undo Hillary?? you are naive.
pnwmom
(108,973 posts)by the Clintons, and by the Obamas.
In the avowed "Democratic Socialist," the Vermont Senator who "honeymooned" in Russia and gave speeches in Cuba (before we had relations with Cuba), they see a much easier target.
TimeToEvolve
(303 posts)when the rubber meets the road, she'll fold faster than superman on laundry day. as i've said in previous comments
DemocracyDirect
(708 posts)She's only been elected to one elected position.
And that was in a state where in today's primary Bernie Sanders nearly equaled the number of votes for all Republican candidates combined .. in a losing effort.
You are right she's withstood criminal indictment so far...
stopbush
(24,395 posts)Dems don't like him. He isn't going to be the nominee. The smart money has know that since he lost NV.
rpannier
(24,329 posts)You didn't address the issue
Some people have been pushing the 1984 and 1972 meme to death
The world has moved drastically in that time -- That's the So. and the What.
And you know Dems don't like him how exactly?
Have you polled the party membership or are you just making your own assertion based on what you (and maybe some people around you) think?
If you have done the polling please share
If you are referring to the numbers of people who have voted as being some sort of indictment against Sanders, I would disagree.
I voted for Sanders in Dem Abroad, not against HRC.
I don't dislike her, nor do I have anything against her.
Most of my friends voted Clinton. They like Sanders, but they prefer her to him.
I realize that they are my friends and they number only about 60 people.
So... as I said... if you have that poll where Democrats have said they don't like Sanders, feel free to share it
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)stopbush
(24,395 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)I would not even bother to read anything they say about Clinton or Bernie.
stopbush
(24,395 posts)The WP article cites a Gallup poll that shows that Clinton supporters are more-enthusiastic than are Sanders voters. So, is Gallup also "professionally pro-Clinton?"
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)to poll me because when they did the NSA was watching and listening. There are probably a lot of people like me who disapprove the NSA spying and stopped answering polls for that reason.
stopbush
(24,395 posts)Wow!
You need a hat to go with those blinders.
Demsrule86
(68,539 posts)I am a Democrat....he is not.
MADem
(135,425 posts)held a steady job until he was forty, he polls well. Once they learn the details of his life, not so much.
Then people think less of him.
He doesn't get better the more one gets to know him. He sounds great at first blush, and then, once getting down in the weeds, one realizes that a) He hasn't done much in over a third of a century in politics, b) He talks a great game, can complain mightily, but offers no real practical solutions to anything and c) He attracts a cadre of people who like to find the negative in anything and everything.
He's just a flash in the pan. A quirky rabble rouser with no workable plans.
rpannier
(24,329 posts)Are we both talking about the guy that HRC supporters said wouldn't win anymore than one or two states?
The guy who would they said would lose Michigan?
The guy who her supporters wouldn't have any affect on her or her campaign?
That guy?
Because if you're talking about Sanders, he's the guy who barely registered a blip back in early fall. Was the guy who, according to the polls, would lose Michigan. The guy who, in many states, was 20, 30, 50 percent behind in the polls and won in some, came close in others and lost in some as well
Seems the more people heard of him and from him the more he rose in the polls and national esteem
MADem
(135,425 posts)Frankly, if they'd spoken up and started shitflinging the way Sanders' supporters do, he'd have been gone months ago.
You could run Bozo the Clown and he'd barely be a blip a year ago. With time comes recognition.
Many of his supporters are not Democrats. That's just a fact. For many of his supporters, the alternative is TRUMP, and always has been. He is a candidate between the parties, for assorted reasons. He said, from the get-go, that he wanted to energize the "white working man" to vote for him, and he has done that.
Frankly, his "esteem" has taken a hit with me. I'm not alone, either, I don't think.
It doesn't matter at the end of the day. It's becoming clear that, no matter what he does, no matter how much name-calling, shitflinging, personal invective, or nastiness his "team" issues forth, that he's not going to be the nominee. And all the HIDES and insults in the world won't change that fact.
I'll wait until he figures it out. Hopefully he won't wait until he's crossed his own personal Rubicon.
I just hope his supporters aren't ripped off too badly. One doesn't want to dissuade people from supporting the process.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Hillary will not win the Southern states that are the mainstay of her delegate count.
pnwmom
(108,973 posts)hoping desperately that they would be facing him in the General.
Do you know what percent of Democratic voters in the South -- the South that Bernie dismissed as not progressive enough -- are African American? In Mississippi it's 71%. But it's not just Southern state black people who support Hillary. In New York three times as many black people voted for Hillary as Bernie.
So what propelled her win in the South is the same thing that will propel her in the General -- her strong support among minority voters. This was first evidenced in the South, but has been repeated in every primary since then. Bernie hasn't carried African American voters in a single state -- not even Vermont.
President Obama beat Romney even though Romney carried both white men and white women. It was minority voters who ensured Obama's election, and they're going to do the same thing for Hillary. (Though she will probably carry white women, too; she has been so far.)
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Are you saying that what the white voters think doesn't matter in the Democratic Party?
I don't get your gist. Please explain.
I am as much a Democrat as any Southern Democrat, and my state is at most just barely 1/2 white. In California, racial differences are not so important. So Hillary will have to compete on some basis other than race in California. Here, the environment, the minimum wage and economic issues including Social Security and legalization of marijuana (not to me but to many other Californians that is a big issue) are important. Those are not big issues in the South to my knowledge.
I think that voters of all races are important in the Democratic Party and that we have to work together.
We all have dreams. Police brutality and racism are big issues in California -- for voters of all races. White people in California are just as outraged about these issues as are voters who are not white. It's just a different scene when it comes to race in California. So that may not be such a big issue here.
California lost a lot in the 2008 crash. It really hurt us. Many lost their homes. Student loans are also a big problem out here. Our state colleges and universities pre-Reagan were tuition-free. Reagan changed that. The Clinton revolution or deformation of the Democratic Party was not good for California. So the issues are a bit different here than in New York State.
Immigration is a big, big issue here. We do not like to see hardworking, wonderful, loving families divided up when dad or mom is sent back to somewhere and the children who are born here and are citizens stay here. We want families to be reunited.
I recently attended an arts show of portraits of Bernie. One of the best was done by a dreamer. We have a lot of very talented young people who are dreamers.
The issues here are not what they are in other parts of the country. And Bernie has come down very well on the issues that will matter here. I think he will do as well here as he has in other Pacific Coast states.
pnwmom
(108,973 posts)Last edited Wed Apr 20, 2016, 08:03 AM - Edit history (1)
"racial differences are not so important." That isn't true of those I know. Discrimination is still a real problem everywhere, even in sunny California.
Have you ever seen this movie? It's based on a true story, in that special state of California. Except it's not so special for everyone. White people may get just as outraged by police brutality -- I'll take your word on that. But they are not as often the victims of it.
http://www.philly.com/philly/entertainment/movies/20130719__Fruitvale_Station___Gritty_life_of_a_young_black_man_killed_by_police.html
6000eliot
(5,643 posts)to accuse their party of being corrupt? Who knew?
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)...people to vote for you in the General Election is not to bash, smash and degenerate them right?
6000eliot
(5,643 posts)None of it has had the least effect on my support for her. I always like Bernie very much, but these attacks on Hillary's supporters, of whom I am one, and on the Democratic Party, of which I have proudly been a lifelong member, have started to really piss me off. I think he has a bad campaign manager who is advising him wrongly and needs to be fired.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)to me a lifelong Dem (over 40 years voting same). It seems as if both sides have their haters and ugliness. It seems to me that when I post what I see as perfectly good reasons for NOT voting for Hillary all I get is personal attacks - nothing on to counter my statement. It is very sad to see it so.
Feeling the Bern
(3,839 posts)Let's see. . .DWS actively works with the GOP to defeat Democrats and HRC gives secret speeches for her corporate sponsors.
Yeah, corruption is only a Republican issue.
Party over principle is what this election has become.
Response to Feeling the Bern (Reply #62)
Post removed
Feeling the Bern
(3,839 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)No speaking slot at the convention, and no role in creating the party platform. Hillary should see that he is defeated in his next election for Senate after all the things he's said about her.
Indydem
(2,642 posts)The party, President Obama, and everyone in between.
He is a terrible human being who took advantage of the party infrastructure to hurt the party itself.
Response to Indydem (Reply #8)
Post removed
turbinetree
(24,688 posts)how is he a terrible person and his supporters, what would make you say that........................ and as for keeping us from the convention are you really serious, do you fully understand the process.
Do you understand that the delegates count is this from the NY Times.............................
"With 247 delegates at stake, Clinton will pick up at least 135. Sanders will win at least 104. Eight remain to be allocated pending final vote tallies."
Honk---------------for a political revolution Bernie 2016
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)These people are democrats? My fucking ass they are. What nasty divisive assholes you are.
Beartracks
(12,806 posts)turbinetree
(24,688 posts)and seeing the "gloating" from what is called "democrats" in this thread, and all of the jury duties and such and like I said, reading the gloating, just reinforces my position for Sanders.
After watching my BlackHawks in there quest for another Stanley Cup, I turned my attention to what was going on in NY, and on MSNBC, that panel gab fest was revolting, they made it look like a coronation, and they were all smacking there collective gums, trying to set up today's head lines>
And then to only give half truths of how they want to continue the mantra of what Thomas Frank is basically saying in his book Listen, Liberal, that the New Democrat professionals want to continue with inequality in all of its disastrous forms------------------it is amazing--------------------and it is just so wrong.
And a caveat , Just like in Frank's book on the pages in Chapter 5, it is amazing, in its reading and what is transpiring from the past through today------------------it is amazing, the shell game continues
Honk--------------------for a political revolution Bernie 2016
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)I wonder how smug they will be when Bernie supporters stay home and Hillary loses to Herr Drumpf!
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)Can you explain more?
Beartracks
(12,806 posts)Oh, wait...
========================
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)turbinetree
(24,688 posts)and I am not naive in any respect.................................but to gloat, without not knowing the process, is amazing...............
We, Democratic -Socialist supporters are going to be at the table at the convention-------------end of story, the "New Democrats" may not like it, but we are here--------------
I truly believe that if people read some books and magazines like "Dark Money", Whats the Matter with Kansas, Listen, Liberal, Read the Fine Print, Harper's Magazine, The Progressive, American Prospect, The Nation, they could then put two and two together and see that what they are being "told" is not what is being fact.
Thomas Franks, Listen , Liberal Chapter 5 is amazing-----------------it was items that I had forgotten about, and it reinforced my vote on why I support Sanders, and throughout his book its shows how "New Democrats" are still using "inequality" as a mantra for the money agenda, and what the "professionals" in the book want-------------its like using a shell game on the street, they say one thing and tell you to do something to make yourself better, but then hire professionals to do another, to undermine what you where just being told to do to get yourself out of inequality, and then blaming you the person in inequality has being the
problem---- ------------amazing
Like I said earlier to another thread writer who commented on what I said:
I watched my BlackHawks, and then went to MSNBC, and the smacking of the collective gums by this panel, the gloating, and the mantra of deceit basically coming out of the collective mouth, it was like it was a coronation, and was completely disingenuous, they are what Frank calls the professionals from both parties, they talk the status quo, the shell game to continue.
Honk--------------------for a political revolution Bernie 2016
rockfordfile
(8,701 posts)Response to rockfordfile (Reply #35)
Post removed
rockfordfile
(8,701 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)WIProgressive88
(314 posts)Absolutely disgusting.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)from your own side shows how divisive this season has become. I see plenty of acrimony on both sides. I've been called some disgusting names by Bernie supporters and particularly one that I find repulsive that is quite prolific in posting.
newthinking
(3,982 posts)MY party has not served their constituents well in recent years by tryinng to server "two masters" (The People (some) and Money (a LOT)). They deserve TRUTH and criticism. If they react in such a manner they will do nothing but hurt the party further.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)Now you encourage corruption in making sure he is not re-elected for the Senate.
You are one of the worst.
rpannier
(24,329 posts)if he has 25% or more of the delegates
It's called the Minority Report
Under Democratic Party rules any candidate with 25% or more of the delegates automatically gets proportional representation on the Platform Committee as delegates they hold.
If he has 33% of the delegates, he gets 33% of the members
Also, under party rules, they can contest anything in the platform and try and insert anything into they wish.
They are entitled to bring everything they want to add or remove to the convention floor for open discussion and vote by all delegates there
That is how the Civil Rights platform got added to the Democratic Party platform in 1948... even though then-President Harry S Truman opposed adding it
Sen Humphrey gave an excellent speech in support
So your hope of totally locking him out is likely not going to happen
on edit:
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/huberthumphey1948dnc.html
That's his speech at the 48 Convention. It has both the speech and the text
alarimer
(16,245 posts)You truly do. Sure, just ignore all the things he's been saying and watch Trump win, because at least he's addressing them, if in the wrong ways. I will laugh.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Speaking at every occasion, including our convention.
Only Republican-Baggers play the 'ruin a good person 'game'' and tell people to shut-up.
k8conant
(3,030 posts)riversedge
(70,183 posts)vercetti2021
(10,156 posts)That's the biggest crock of shit I've ever read.
mwooldri
(10,302 posts)Not that I'd use it but this came close for me.
Bernie not a Democrat? Maybe he'd be better off caucusing with the Republicans considering he does nothing for the Democrats? Of course I'm being sarcastic.... for a supposed "non-Democrat" he sure walks and talks abd ACTS like one. Though not in the "New Democrats" mold that Bill Clinton adopted, and that Hillary Clinton is continuing. Sorry, no Tony Blair type policies for me. Though it's much better than Thatcherism on steroids.
Beartracks
(12,806 posts)The whole "he's not a Democrat!!!11!!" thing is stupid.
You know your atheist friend who's more Christian than even your church-going bible-thumping neighbor? Yeah -- it's like that.
===========================
WIProgressive88
(314 posts)The behavior of the Clinton supporters here and elsewhere tonight has been very telling and reflects poorly on their candidate of choice. Certainly not a group of people who know how to be humble in victory.
alarimer
(16,245 posts)It's striking to me how these so-called progressives have abandoned all progressive positions that reflect badly on Clinton. Suddenly, making voting easier (in New York) is a bad thing, because it would mean allowing people to vote who might not vote for your choice, or who might not be in the club, officially.
Honestly, they cannot see what is wrong with the Democratic Party because they are so blinded either by hate for Bernie or winning at all costs. Now, I don't think Bernie or anyone else has all the answers, but what is clear to me is that more and more people are not registering for either political party because they are sick of politics as usual. The Republicans are toxic, of course. But the Democrats have also lost their way. And much of that responsibility belongs to the first Clinton administration.
I honestly don't know what I will do in November. I think it might depend on how close the election is in my state. I cannot stomach Hillary (really, more that I cannot stomach what she represents).
FarPoint
(12,317 posts)I have to agree.
rockfordfile
(8,701 posts)He can say anything he wants to.
Feeling the Bern
(3,839 posts)Bernie Sanders.
Gotta love that Center-Right candidate.
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)Feeling the Bern
(3,839 posts)Lean
(39 posts)Perhaps Bernie Should Run As An Independent Against Hillary and Trump in the General Election. Surely, she and Mr. Trump will get their clocks
cleaned.
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)creeksneakers2
(7,473 posts)Some of the Republicans visited home before they quit.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Response to Thinkingabout (Reply #3)
Post removed
vercetti2021
(10,156 posts)Wat to get the youth and independent vote. By telling us to crawl back into our holes. True mind of a Hillary supporter.
Response to vercetti2021 (Reply #15)
Post removed
Andy823
(11,495 posts)Of some of the Bernie supporters on DU, but you sound just as bad as they do when you spew crap like this.
Beartracks
(12,806 posts)Response to Post removed (Reply #20)
Post removed
Response to Post removed (Reply #20)
Gene Debs This message was self-deleted by its author.
WIProgressive88
(314 posts)seen during this election, the Clinton supporters have been no saints either. And yet, they're given a pass...
k8conant
(3,030 posts)I will concede the "Democratic Party" to her and know that it's really "Republican Light".
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)And the initial exit polling had Hillary winning NY by only four points.
The central, exit polling question, "Who did you vote for Bernie or Hillary?" has the race at 4 percent.
This is unsettling.
Does anyone know if the initial exit polling that CNN did--happened in a certain part of New York? In one area? Or was it conducted all over the state?
I notice that CNN has made no mention of that 4 percent exit polling.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)the wrong answer 60% of the time.
What a fucking corrupt system. It's a perfect for Hillary.
msongs
(67,394 posts)k8conant
(3,030 posts)riversedge
(70,183 posts)k8conant
(3,030 posts)I'm not in New York.
Prove Hillary didn't back Wall Street in her speeches!
Response to k8conant (Reply #24)
Post removed
annie48
(11 posts)CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)I would be disappointed to the core--if Bernie had lost by 15, 20 points in NY.
However, we've got Bernie's own internal polling showing that this was a close race. He mentioned at his PA rally that they were going to do well. Better than people were thinking. I think Bernie saw exactly what CNN's exit polling showed--that this was a very close race. CNN showed it a 4-point advantage for Clinton.
Furthermore, Bernie knew that he was doing extremely well in upstate New York. Losing in a close race--but winning in most of those counties, would have made the delegate count possibly go in his favor.
Something seems off. I'm sorry, but we've seen cheating throughout this primary. It happened in my own state. And believe me, I can live with losses. It's very, very hard to volunteer, donate money, put your heart into something and feel like a very corrupt person is stealing their way to some wins.
I would much RATHER not feel that way. Believe me.
But how can you ignore that highly accurate internal polling and CNN exit polling did not match with the final result, and was off by 10+ points?
beastie boy
(9,293 posts)Bernie's internal pollsters ought to sue the NY Board of Elections and demand an adjustment of the election results to match their projections.
Clearly, DWS rigged it for Hillary!
glinda
(14,807 posts)The apparent massive discrepancies, issues and missing voters as well as changed Parties has begun the cycle to totally destroy our Country. The PTB will have to just blatantly take over or face insurgence by the population. No putting this genie back in the bottle now. We are at a Planetary crisis point and given that games are being played, only a fool would sit this one out.
Beartracks
(12,806 posts)Just asking.
Republicans did the fake shrug that time and claimed that all that polling was just "guessing," that it wasn't scientific, etc.
I don't remember any Democrat taking that "meh, whatcha gonna do" nose-thumbing response without justifiable suspicion or anger.
My, how times have changed. Not only has technology improved to make such polling even MORE accurate than 12 years ago... but a lot of Democrats now don't seem to care so much about these important discrepancies. Many are even doing the nose-thumbing.
===================
w4rma
(31,700 posts)I need to know about Clinton's neoconservative supporters.
Maybe you should read up on the history of exactly WHEN and WHY DemocraticUnderground was built?
Beartracks
(12,806 posts)Of course Bush "won." But I was technically referring to 2004.
And, I was trying to explain why the accuracy of Hillary's margin SHOULD BE suspect: because so much internal polling and exit polling says it was slimmer than the "official" reported margin, even though such polling is pretty damn accurate, even more so than 12 years ago.
If no Dems accepted those discrepancies 12 years ago, then some shouldn't shrug it off now just because "their" candidate was the beneficiary.
================
w4rma
(31,700 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)At one time, right here on DU, it was gospel, backed up by all the factual evidence you might need. Of course, the river of time has erased much of what we were just a few short years ago.
Those who forget their past are doomed to repeat it. I think I am safe in saying, we and our children are doomed. And not just on this issue, either.
**Disclaimer: Not valid until Bernie drops out or otherwise releases me to vote my conscience.
beastie boy
(9,293 posts)At least this charade is over...
Feeling the Bern
(3,839 posts)You people are really doing a bang up job uniting the party. You need our votes too. All this gloating and insulting because we dared challenge the queen and the coronation is really making me look third party or stay home completely.
Why should I give my cherished vote to a candidate who doesn't seem to have any desire to earn it and thinks I will just vote for her because the alternative is just so odious?
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)Just nasty vile shit spewing all over the place. You are in for a rude awakening.
RandySF
(58,728 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)It's too little too late now.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)stopbush
(24,395 posts)Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)lancer78
(1,495 posts)getting major Clinton fatigue tonight?
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)Gamecock Lefty
(700 posts)Maybe she can serenade Bernie with "It's Too Late" as he flies back to VT?
Fly, fly away!
Demsrule86
(68,539 posts)She is amazing...I did not know she and her first husband wrote so many songs including you've lost that loving feeling which I first heard when watching Top Gun.
dmosh42
(2,217 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Onward to the next States.
pandr32
(11,574 posts)Yep--left them behind scrambling to figure out how to find their own individual ways back without any prior notice.
http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/4/19/1517713/-Sanders-Returns-to-Vermont-Strands-National-Press
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Grim.
Unicorn
(424 posts)Maybe he had an emergency?
Unicorn
(424 posts)"When he landed Sanders told local Vermont reporters that he was coming back to Burlington "to get recharged and take a day off."
He also said he still believed he has a path to victory and that he expected to do well in the next set of states
"