Mon Jun 11, 2012, 10:40 PM
alp227 (20,484 posts)
Justice Department aims to avoid contempt vote on Holder over Fast and Furious
Source: Washington Post
Justice Department officials are working behind the scenes to avert a vote in Congress next week on contempt charges against Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. stemming from the investigation of Operation Fast and Furious. Justice officials are talking to staffers for Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, to reach a compromise on the documents that Issa has subpoenaed on the botched “gun walking” operation. Deputy Attorney General James M. Cole offered again Monday to meet with Issa, saying, “We believe that an amicable resolution of these matters is achievable.” He also has offered to meet with House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio). Several other current and former Justice officials said they are skeptical that they will be able to stop the contempt vote. “This is political theater, and it’s been political theater from the beginning,” said Holder’s former spokesman, Matthew Miller. “There is no evidence that the attorney general or senior Justice officials knew anything about the Fast and Furious tactics. I don’t think Chairman Issa wants a solution. He wants a contempt vote.” Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/justice-department-aims-to-avoid-contempt-vote-on-holder-over-fast-and-furious/2012/06/11/gJQAVHnzVV_story.html?wprss=rss_politics
|
22 replies, 2922 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| alp227 | Jun 2012 | OP | |
| TrollBuster9090 | Jun 2012 | #1 | |
| truedelphi | Jun 2012 | #7 | |
| Nye Bevan | Jun 2012 | #10 | |
| TrollBuster9090 | Jun 2012 | #21 | |
| Liberal_Stalwart71 | Jun 2012 | #19 | |
| TrollBuster9090 | Jun 2012 | #20 | |
| Drale | Jun 2012 | #2 | |
| truedelphi | Jun 2012 | #8 | |
| HillbillyBob | Jun 2012 | #22 | |
| bluestateguy | Jun 2012 | #3 | |
| creeksneakers2 | Jun 2012 | #4 | |
| OnyxCollie | Jun 2012 | #6 | |
| Iliyah | Jun 2012 | #5 | |
| castnet55 | Jun 2012 | #9 | |
| pscot | Jun 2012 | #11 | |
| PavePusher | Jun 2012 | #12 | |
| naaman fletcher | Jun 2012 | #13 | |
| msongs | Jun 2012 | #14 | |
| creeksneakers2 | Jun 2012 | #17 | |
| bemildred | Jun 2012 | #15 | |
| Lurks Often | Jun 2012 | #16 | |
| former9thward | Jun 2012 | #18 |
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Mon Jun 11, 2012, 10:44 PM
TrollBuster9090 (1,604 posts)
1. This is not about a botched sting on Mexican drug gangs.
|
a) The contempt charge against Holder is actually a shot across Holder's bow to get him to stop halting the Republican voter purge, IMHO, and
b) Fine, go ahead and vote him in contempt. It might actually teach him that it's a waste of time trying to appease Republicans, and he can start doing his job. Finally, c) If they bring enough heat down on Holder that he's forced to resign, I vote we replace him with ELIOT SPITZER! |
Response to TrollBuster9090 (Reply #1)
Mon Jun 11, 2012, 11:48 PM
truedelphi (25,961 posts)
7. I do love each of your ideas.
|
Number three was the very best of them. But they are all good.
|
Response to TrollBuster9090 (Reply #1)
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 12:15 AM
Nye Bevan (10,873 posts)
10. On (c), seriously? Someone who was bragging about prosecuting prostitution rings,
|
while at the same time arranging to transport prostitutes across state lines for his own use? Who laundered money to pay for these services, being careful to break up his transactions into chunks of less than $10,000 each? Who, without getting permission, used the name of a close friend (George Fox) while enjoying the "services" provided? Who somehow escaped prosecution himself while one of the women involved in the scandal had to serve several months on Rikers Island?
Yeah, that would be great. |
Response to Nye Bevan (Reply #10)
Wed Jun 13, 2012, 03:51 AM
TrollBuster9090 (1,604 posts)
21. I wouldn't care if he was sneaking into the seafood store and screwing dead tunafish
|
he's the only politician who ever seriously went after Wall Street corruption, which is a FAR greater threat to America than playing hide the pickle with high end call girls.
|
Response to TrollBuster9090 (Reply #1)
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 01:12 PM
Liberal_Stalwart71 (13,853 posts)
19. You're spot on on every point except for c). I love Eliot Spitzer but do you really
|
think that the Senate will allow Spitzer to be confirmed?
|
Response to Liberal_Stalwart71 (Reply #19)
Wed Jun 13, 2012, 03:47 AM
TrollBuster9090 (1,604 posts)
20. They might, in a lame duck session. nt
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Mon Jun 11, 2012, 10:47 PM
Drale (7,324 posts)
2. The fastest and best way to stop it
|
is to arrest ever repuke for treason. They are all guilty and the evidence is everywhere.
|
Response to Drale (Reply #2)
Mon Jun 11, 2012, 11:49 PM
truedelphi (25,961 posts)
8. That would not be keeping to the theme of the
|
Obama re-election campaign:
Forward! |
Response to Drale (Reply #2)
Wed Jun 13, 2012, 12:08 PM
HillbillyBob (3,208 posts)
22. contempt?
|
It seems to me that the Tpots in congress are much more worthy of contempt for their sabotage of our economy.
|
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Mon Jun 11, 2012, 10:59 PM
bluestateguy (40,060 posts)
3. Oh no! Just like Harriet Meirs and Josh Bolten went to jail for "contempt" of Congress
|
|
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Mon Jun 11, 2012, 11:12 PM
creeksneakers2 (6,289 posts)
4. The rules change when right wingers get power
|
George W. Bush refused to provide staff members to testify to Congress and withheld documents during the US Attorneys scandal. The House voted for contempt, but a contempt finding must be prosecuted by the Justice Department, which is, of course, part of the executive branch. Bush simply ordered the US Attorney not to prosecute. Could Obama get away with doing the same thing? You'd hear the right wingers calling for impeachment if he did.
There is a history of Attorneys General refusing to provide Congress with documents. Previous Attorneys General cited reasons like confidentiality of internal deliberations. In all other cases, Congress ended up backing down. The tea party Congress is unlikely to be as reasonable at their predecessors. |
Response to creeksneakers2 (Reply #4)
Mon Jun 11, 2012, 11:35 PM
OnyxCollie (6,570 posts)
6. The House could have bypassed the US Attorneys
|
Last edited Tue Jun 12, 2012, 02:54 AM USA/ET - Edit history (2) by going for inherent contempt instead of statutory contempt.
But since Monica Conyers, the wife of Rep. John Conyers, then chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, was being investigated by the FBI, Johnny Letter chose to let them off the hook. Monica Conyers got three years for corruption, IIRC. |
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Mon Jun 11, 2012, 11:28 PM
Iliyah (2,359 posts)
5. Issa is full of shit
|
where are the effing jobs Isaa jerk man!
|
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Mon Jun 11, 2012, 11:50 PM
castnet55 (62 posts)
9. Why the resistance
|
I don't see anything wrong with getting to the bottom of this. For Christ sakes people have died because of this operation and more will certainly die.
Why doesn't Holder give up the documents and why hasn't someone been fired? Something's not right here,if some low level knothead can do something like this then it needs to stop. If it's the higher ups then we need to get something in place to stop it. The Mexicans are even demanding information about how this happened. |
Response to castnet55 (Reply #9)
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 12:50 AM
pscot (13,930 posts)
11. Issa's not trying to get to the bottom of anything
|
He's just fucking with the AG.
|
Response to castnet55 (Reply #9)
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 12:51 AM
PavePusher (15,374 posts)
12. The word some people are missing....
|
is "transparency".
Apparently, it only applies selectively. But I think we knew that... |
Response to castnet55 (Reply #9)
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 01:03 AM
naaman fletcher (6,852 posts)
13. Holder blatantly perjured himself
|
Why DU defends him I have no idea. Sure the repubs are assholes and there is a double standard, but let's just replace Holder with someone who is good and NOT a perjurer.
|
Response to naaman fletcher (Reply #13)
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 01:17 AM
msongs (30,532 posts)
14. obama can find a conservative looking for a new job lol nt
Response to castnet55 (Reply #9)
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 12:37 PM
creeksneakers2 (6,289 posts)
17. How could police anywhere
|
run an undercover operation if their informant had to blow the whistle at the first crime he saw? I don't see how letting some crimes go on while going after bigger fish is unusual.
Also, there's no reason to believe that the drug cartels wouldn't have just obtained guns elsewhere if a source was cut off. The right wingers always insist with domestic gun control that eliminating a source of firearms for criminals does nothing to deter crime. |
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 09:14 AM
bemildred (67,509 posts)
15. I can't say I want to take either side in this argument.
|
|
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 10:22 AM
Lurks Often (1,337 posts)
16. DOJ has been stalling this for over a year now
|
And for those of you who haven't been following this here is a link worth reading:
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/atf-fast-furious-sg,0,3828090.storygallery Holder & DOJ should have resolved this a year ago, now it has the possibility of having an impact on the election and it not likely to be a positive impact. |
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 01:07 PM
former9thward (6,426 posts)
18. Fast and Furious is a terrible scandal.
|
People died. Obama and Holder should fire anyone involved and get it over with. The cover up is always worse than the crime.
|

