HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Navy: Unmanned aircraft c...

Mon Jun 11, 2012, 02:54 PM

Navy: Unmanned aircraft crashes on Eastern Shore (Maryland)

Last edited Mon Jun 11, 2012, 03:00 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

Source: Baltimore Sun

The Navy says an unmanned aircraft has crashed on Maryland's Eastern Shore and there are no injuries.

A spokeswoman for the Patuxent River Naval Air Station's Unmanned Aviation and Strike Weapons program says a 44-foot unmanned aircraft on a routine maintenance flight crashed near Bloodsworth Island around noon Monday.

U.S. Coast Guard Petty Officer Jonathan Lindberg says the Coast Guard is setting up a safety zone around the marshy area.


Read more: http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/breaking/bs-md-unmanned-aircraft-crash-20120611,0,7726453.story



CNN has a few more details:

Navy drone crashes in Maryland

(CNN) -- A U.S. Navy drone crashed Monday in marshy area near Salisbury, Maryland, military officials said.

The unmanned RQ-4A Global Hawk drone went down during a routine training flight from Naval Air Station Patuxent River, according to Jamie Cosgrove, a spokeswoman for the Unmanned Aviation and Strike Weapons Program at the base.

The drone crashed into a tributary of the Nanticoke River, according a U.S. Coast Guard official. The crash site has been blocked to recreational boat traffic while the agency investigates, according to the Coast Guard official.

http://us.cnn.com/2012/06/11/us/maryland-drone-crash/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

22 replies, 3260 views

Thread informationRemove bookmarkTrash this thread

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 22 replies Author Time Post
Reply Navy: Unmanned aircraft crashes on Eastern Shore (Maryland) (Original post)
charlie and algernon Jun 2012 OP
xchrom Jun 2012 #1
charlie and algernon Jun 2012 #3
JaneQPublic Jun 2012 #8
yellowcanine Jun 2012 #22
mbperrin Jun 2012 #2
charlie and algernon Jun 2012 #4
Gregorian Jun 2012 #5
kestrel91316 Jun 2012 #12
Gregorian Jun 2012 #15
kestrel91316 Jun 2012 #16
Gregorian Jun 2012 #17
MADem Jun 2012 #21
MADem Jun 2012 #6
Crowman1979 Jun 2012 #7
NeedleCast Jun 2012 #9
JaneQPublic Jun 2012 #11
kestrel91316 Jun 2012 #13
MADem Jun 2012 #20
HubertHeaver Jun 2012 #10
Ready4Change Jun 2012 #18
mbperrin Jun 2012 #14
lib2DaBone Jun 2012 #19

Response to charlie and algernon (Original post)

Mon Jun 11, 2012, 02:59 PM

1. well, that'll be expensive. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to xchrom (Reply #1)

Mon Jun 11, 2012, 03:02 PM

3. what really sucks is that it crashed in an area that's all nature preserve

So there will be a considerable environmental impact.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to charlie and algernon (Reply #3)

Mon Jun 11, 2012, 03:16 PM

8. Bloodsworth Island is a target range.

Has been for years.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloodsworth_Island

(Speaking as someone who lives in Southern Maryland.)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to xchrom (Reply #1)

Tue Jun 12, 2012, 12:03 PM

22. Well they better find it before the local Christian Taliban does......

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to charlie and algernon (Original post)

Mon Jun 11, 2012, 03:02 PM

2. Crashing is now routine?

That's their line, not mine.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mbperrin (Reply #2)

Mon Jun 11, 2012, 03:03 PM

4. The flight was routine

it was the landing that wasn't.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to charlie and algernon (Original post)

Mon Jun 11, 2012, 03:04 PM

5. What a total waste of resources. Goofing around with military toys.

That energy could be productive. We could have good schools and healthcare. But no, we've got people in rooms sitting behind joysticks, testing out their new hydraulic circuit. Or whatever they were doing. Whatever it was it was counterproductive to a society in need.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gregorian (Reply #5)

Mon Jun 11, 2012, 03:28 PM

12. My dad certainly wasn't "goofing around" all those years during his USAF career

when he war flying drones. They are constantly testing and developing variations on the reconnaissance technology.

I take personal offense at your smartass attitude.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kestrel91316 (Reply #12)

Mon Jun 11, 2012, 06:38 PM

15. Wow, I thought I knew you better. I thought you were joking.

I will not change my stance on this. And it isn't smart ass.

I'm proud that my great uncles were conscientious objectors in World War 1. There is nothing good about war or the money spent to support it. Every dollar spent on it is a dollar not spent on productive and helpful efforts. And that doesn't even take into account the massive ecological damage done.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gregorian (Reply #15)

Mon Jun 11, 2012, 07:35 PM

16. I'm not apologizing for the fact that my father served his country honorably and well for 23 years.

He was a navigator and electronic warfare officer with expertise in radar countermeasures. And he hated war. He felt the best offense was a good DEFENSE.

Military dollars paid for my education via his paychecks.

A person can serve in the military and NOT be a warmongering thug. My dad was a feminist before it was cool, and a Democrat from a family of Democrats. His military career brought him out of poverty.

Oh, and his death from cancer at age 47 may very well have had something to do with exposure to Agent Orange during the Vietnam War.

But go right ahead hating military folks.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kestrel91316 (Reply #16)

Mon Jun 11, 2012, 08:02 PM

17. OK. I never said I hated military folks. You put that in my mouth.

I'm not going to continue this dialog with you as you seem to be very charged up about it. I hear you. I know you're a good person. I do my best to not contribute to war in ever possible way.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kestrel91316 (Reply #16)

Tue Jun 12, 2012, 11:22 AM

21. Jeez, he sounds like someone I would have hung around with at the club! nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to charlie and algernon (Original post)

Mon Jun 11, 2012, 03:04 PM

6. It was a surveillance drone, in essence.

Found more info--it was a GLOBAL HAWK: http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/11/us/maryland-drone-crash/index.html


The unmanned RQ-4A Global Hawk drone went down during a routine training flight from Naval Air Station Patuxent River, according to Jamie Cosgrove, a spokeswoman for the Unmanned Aviation and Strike Weapons Program at the base.




The Navy only has two of 'em, apparently (pic above is a USAF one) --and one crashed. They aren't cheap.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_Grumman_RQ-4_Global_Hawk

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to charlie and algernon (Original post)

Mon Jun 11, 2012, 03:15 PM

7. I sailor with a joystick is not gonna take flying as seriously as an aviator in the cockpit.

Just saying! Especially since they tend to recruit avid video game players, who probably have the mentality that they have multiple lives.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Crowman1979 (Reply #7)

Mon Jun 11, 2012, 03:20 PM

9. As A Person Who's Worked Side by Side With UAV Controllers For Years

I can tell you that the training they go through is pretty much second to none and that they take their jobs very seriously. The idea that they are a bunch of slackers who's best claim to fame is being good at Halo is, to put it bluntly, stupid.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NeedleCast (Reply #9)

Mon Jun 11, 2012, 03:25 PM

11. Very true. (nt)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NeedleCast (Reply #9)

Mon Jun 11, 2012, 03:30 PM

13. My dad, a LtCol at the time, was one of those "slackers" in the AF, flying the drones.

When one went down in the desert, it was a big hairy deal. Back in the late 70s when he worked on them they were really really expensive.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NeedleCast (Reply #9)

Tue Jun 12, 2012, 11:20 AM

20. I agree with you--they're very professional.

The only difference is that they don't die if their craft does. Of course, the old career can take a mortal hit, but that's not quite the same.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to charlie and algernon (Original post)

Mon Jun 11, 2012, 03:25 PM

10. They should have reported "no survivors" just to see if the press corp was awake.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HubertHeaver (Reply #10)

Mon Jun 11, 2012, 09:52 PM

18. Ok, that's funny.

Lol!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to charlie and algernon (Original post)

Mon Jun 11, 2012, 05:50 PM

14. I guess I'll just thank the gods that we have a buncha military hardware instead of

universal medical care or a decent retirement plan for the population.


sigh

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mbperrin (Reply #14)

Mon Jun 11, 2012, 10:26 PM

19. AP News said the drone cost $125 Million per copy....

 

Austerity for everyone...except plenty of money for the War on Drugs, the War in Afghanistan, The War in Yemen, the War in Syria, the War in Libya, the War in (fill in blank)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread