Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

arendt

(5,078 posts)
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 11:42 PM Apr 2016

Selective Leaks Of The #PanamaPapers Create Huge Blackmail Potential

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by BooScout (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).

Source: Moon of Alabama

A real leak of data from a law firm in Panama would be very interesting. Many rich people and/or politicians hide money in shell companies that such firms in Panama provide. But the current heavily promoted "leak" of such data to several NATO supporting news organization and a US government financed "Non Government Organization" is just a lame attempt to smear some people the U.S. empire dislikes. It also creates a huge blackmail opportunity by NOT publishing certain data in return for this or that desired favor.

Essentially the Sueddeutsche compiled a list of known criminals and people and organizations the U.S. dislikes and cross checked them with the "leaked" database. Selected hits were then further evaluated. The outcome are stories like the annual attempt to smear the Russian president Putin, who is not even mentioned in the Mossak Fonseca data, accusations against various people of the soccer association FIFA, much disliked by the U.S., and a few mentions of other miscreants of minor relevancy.

There is no story about any U.S. person, none at all, nor about any important NATO politician. The highest political "casualty" so far is the irrelevant Prime Minister of Iceland Sigmundur David Gunnlaugsson who, together with his wife, owned one of the shell companies. There is no evidence that the ownership or the money held by that company were illegal.

What do you expect? The leak is being managed by the grandly but laughably named “International Consortium of Investigative Journalists”, which is funded and organised entirely by the USA’s Center for Public Integrity. Their funders include:Ford Foundation; Carnegie Endowment; Rockefeller Family Fund; W K Kellogg Foundation; Open Society Foundation (Soros). The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) is part of the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP) which is financed by the U.S. government through USAID.

Read more: http://www.moonofalabama.org/2016/04/selected-leak-of-the-panamapapers-creates-huge-blackmail-potential.html



When I saw all the "six degrees of separation" BS "links" that managed to target only people that are already on the US's shit list, I started to smell a rat. And, surprise, surprise - just like the Car Wash "investigation" in Brazil, only people whom we don't like now, or whom we intend to blackmail later should worry.

NOT saying there isn't massive tax avoidance. But, this War on Some Tax Dodgers has the same screenplay as the War on Some Drug Dealers. As with drugs, connected folks need not worry; only "rogue" shops or competition will be targeted.

It will be really interesting to see if we ever find out who actually got their hands on the data, and how connected they might be to US/Israeli spooks.
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Selective Leaks Of The #PanamaPapers Create Huge Blackmail Potential (Original Post) arendt Apr 2016 OP
Names of US people are coming next week. onecaliberal Apr 2016 #1
First impressions are important arendt Apr 2016 #2
+1 daleanime Apr 2016 #9
Conveniently steps on Unaoil arendt Apr 2016 #3
I immediately smelled the rat as well. Business as usual... bjo59 Apr 2016 #4
This isn't a "leak" roamer65 Apr 2016 #5
Right! JDPriestly Apr 2016 #11
Ah, the Consortium funders! What a hoot! Thank you, so much. n/t Judi Lynn Apr 2016 #6
Thanks for the validation arendt Apr 2016 #7
Guy lost me when he started his hand wringing for poor old fifa rpannier Apr 2016 #8
Yes, blackmail, slander, political leverage, you name it. I'm guessing it's only Lodestar Apr 2016 #10
Locking... BooScout Apr 2016 #12

onecaliberal

(32,816 posts)
1. Names of US people are coming next week.
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 11:43 PM
Apr 2016

arendt

(5,078 posts)
2. First impressions are important
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 11:49 PM
Apr 2016

If there really is a US contingent, are they not more important than small fry like FIFA and the PM of Iceland? I mean if Donald Trump or the Koch Brothers turn up next week, I would question their choice of whom to lead with. OTOH, if no serious US billionaire turns up, I question the validity of the entire exercise.

As for first impressions, I read (possibly incorrectly) that Macri of Argentina was on the list. But the US media isn't mentioning that.

I completely distrust the corporate media. They spin and blackout and lie. As for the IJIC, I have no reason to trust a bunch of people funded by USAID.

I will read what comes out, but I will read with an eye towards full context.

daleanime

(17,796 posts)
9. +1
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 02:23 AM
Apr 2016

arendt

(5,078 posts)
3. Conveniently steps on Unaoil
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 12:10 AM
Apr 2016

From the comments at MoA:

The contrast between the treatment of the 'Panama papers' and the Unaoil scandal is noteworthy. Yves Smith at nakedcapitalism.com wrote about the media blackout wrt Unaoil.

b informs us that the data was provided to Sueddeutsche Zeitung a year ago. What took so long to publish it? Was the recent Unaoil scandal a factor in publication timing? As in: Hey look over here - a big(ger) scandal!!!

bjo59

(1,166 posts)
4. I immediately smelled the rat as well. Business as usual...
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 12:19 AM
Apr 2016

Not even demoralizing anymore, just incredibly tiring.

roamer65

(36,745 posts)
5. This isn't a "leak"
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 12:20 AM
Apr 2016

It's an orchestrated "event".

Sitting on the data for one year means it release has been planned.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
11. Right!
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 02:34 AM
Apr 2016

Judi Lynn

(160,515 posts)
6. Ah, the Consortium funders! What a hoot! Thank you, so much. n/t
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 12:34 AM
Apr 2016

arendt

(5,078 posts)
7. Thanks for the validation
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 12:37 AM
Apr 2016

I was afraid I would get slammed for CT.

rpannier

(24,329 posts)
8. Guy lost me when he started his hand wringing for poor old fifa
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 01:55 AM
Apr 2016

It isn't that the US hates fifa, almost everyone does
It's a crooked organization that does crooked things
But, he's hitting on almost all the basic foils. Only missing the Illuminati and Rothschild family

Lodestar

(2,388 posts)
10. Yes, blackmail, slander, political leverage, you name it. I'm guessing it's only
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 02:32 AM
Apr 2016

a matter of time before the tables are turned and some U.S. companies and elites business dealings
will be hacked and leaked. What I can't understand is how blatant these intentions are. Who in our
government gave the green light for this hack job?

BooScout

(10,406 posts)
12. Locking...
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 05:22 AM
Apr 2016

Post the latest news from reputable mainstream news websites and blogs. Important news of national interest only. No analysis or opinion pieces.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Selective Leaks Of The #P...