Obama to Turn Up Attacks on Congress in Campaign
President Obama, heading into a grueling re-election campaign, plans to intensify his attacks against an unpopular Congress, concluding that he cannot pass any major legislation in 2012 because of unrelenting Republican hostility to his agenda, according to a senior administration official.
Mr. Obamas election-year strategy is an attempt to capitalize on his recent victory on a short-term extension of the payroll tax cut and on his rising poll numbers. As the stage is set for the general election in November, he intends to hammer the theme of economic justice for ordinary Americans rather than continue battling with Congressional Republicans, said the official, Joshua R. Earnest, the deputy press secretary, previewing the White Houses strategy.
In terms of the presidents relationship with Congress in 2012, Mr. Earnest said at a briefing here, the president is no longer tied to Washington, D.C. Winning a full-year extension of the cut in payroll taxes is the last must-do piece of legislation for the White House, he said.
Instead, Mr. Earnest said, Mr. Obama will step up his efforts to showcase unilateral measures he is taking to try to revive the economy, though he declined to give details. Mr. Obama has used his executive authority in recent weeks to provide job training for returning military veterans and help students pay back their student loans. Further underscoring the jobs theme, Mr. Obama plans to return to the road, starting with a trip to Cleveland in early January to speak about the economy.
full: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/01/us/politics/obama-to-focus-on-congress-and-economy-in-2012-campaign.html?pagewanted=all
SlimJimmy
(3,180 posts)Democrats who have voted against his policies in nearly every case. Don't think for a minute that the repubs won't point this out.
CatWoman
(79,295 posts)these far and few in between Dems sorely lack in size compared to the Republicans who have blocked him at every turn.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)Enrique
(27,461 posts)so why shouldn't the be included in the attack?
A wise Man
(1,076 posts)It will be the people that will decide what they want...."BACK TO THE BUSH REPUBLICANS OR FORWARD TO POSITIVE CHANGE. I choose President Obama before I sink into abliss by any rebuplican.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)As the GOP leaders, from Rush to O'Connell, have openly said.
Not only that, Paul's biggest supporter has made an industry of painting Obama as planning to slaughter American citizens...
It's all on their side, really.
CatWoman
(79,295 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)CatWoman
(79,295 posts)Lionessa
(3,894 posts)BO is only good at speeches and rhetoric, so I'm not surprised.
Just remember everyone, he lied about his goals and hopes for us in 2008 and instead after election had a homophobe deliver the inauguaral prayer, re-instaled Bush's financial team almost to a tee, has embraced and offered to protect the corps that killed our living wages and the banks that then took our homes, pushed for a health care bill that most Americans won't be able to afford and still keeps our care in the hands of private insurers who like to say no to anything costing more than a bandaid....
Just remember these are SPEECHES and RHETORIC, and Obama himself has proven he isn't able to be trusted when he speaks.
Maraya1969
(22,477 posts)BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)but that's what Republicans are saying, too. Fancy that. But then again, they're clueless and a bunch of sore losers, and they'll lie, cheat, promise, beg, and nag whatever and however they can in the hope to disenchant as many voters as possible so they can win in 2012. They're even paid to go on Democratic and Progressive blogs to spread that kind of B.S.
Sad, huh?
Lionessa
(3,894 posts)Obama has disappointed me all by himself.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)... and all of us Progressives better get our nose to the grindstone pushing truly progressive candidates!!!!
russspeakeasy
(6,539 posts)as a true progressive?
Scuba
(53,475 posts)russspeakeasy
(6,539 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)The wingnuts elected by RW radio and conspiracy punditry. Obama already proved he would sign what the people wanted, if he had a progressive majority.
This lands the problem back in the people's court, if they want to waste time blaming Obama instead of doing the grunt work or standing aloof as if they are too good to get involved.
As far as Ron Paul is concerned, any Democrats thinking he's a change because of his (quickly fading) social liberal/libertarian stances, he's pure GOP/TeaParty.
The TeaParty was organized by Alex Jones for Ron Paul. Anyone who likes what the TeaParty has been doing to America, should vote for their real leader, Ron Paul.
Check out InfoWars and the RW religious websites and see the hysteria they've generated against Obama since Day One. It's bad company for any Democrat to get involved with.
Thanks, Scuba, for doing the groundwork, it's the only thing that will change your state or the balance of power in D.C.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)since Antebellum , We are being imprisoned them.
to point out the dinos too....
Lionessa
(3,894 posts)Bucky
(53,997 posts)I'm not happy with everything he's done, but I'm not so blind as to think a Republican president wouldn't have been far worse.
barbtries
(28,787 posts)and the media and the republicans cry and call it an attack. boo fucking hoo
cstanleytech
(26,281 posts)republicans cry all they want about it because they were the ones that choose to behave the way that they have been behaving.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)Link: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-ap-us-obama-fourthyear,0,2044655.story
And...
Obama's resolution? To limit dealings with Congress
Link: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-obama-plans-20120101,0,2595075.story
FredStembottom
(2,928 posts)This will work.
Dollars can't vote.
Desperate people who have been helped (or at least stood up for) can.
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Post removed
Lionessa
(3,894 posts)pledgeburngrl
(1 post)We are trying to get the word out about what/who is causing this situation. Please visit our website: www.pledgeburn.com and/or our blog: www.pledgeburn.blogspot.com/ to learn more our group is G.A.G - Groups Against Grover.
Thank you!
txlibdem
(6,183 posts)Should we dare think that President Obama will stop being the champion of corporate America and the rich and return to his persona of Candidate Obama '08?
I *want* to hope. But when I try to stretch my hope muscles I find they've atrophied beyond uselessness.
FredStembottom
(2,928 posts)I see O as quite the go along to get along type (among other qualities).
The general disillusionment among a great many 2008 supporters seems to be getting through to him.
FredStembottom
(2,928 posts)I want the Democratic behavior that began emerging this past month to continue.
Seems the un-hinged, disloyal, pony-wishing here at DU is working.
Gonna get our rainbows soon!
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Gringostan
(127 posts)With a 9% approval rating, attacking congress should not be too hard concerning the blue dogs, they can go pound sand.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)This will resonate well with the public. Their approval rating is what, 9%?