Sat Jun 2, 2012, 07:54 PM
dipsydoodle (32,682 posts)
Iran threatens to target U.S. bases if attacked
Source: Reuters
(Reuters) - Iran has warned the United States not to resort to military action against it, saying U.S. bases in the region were vulnerable to the Islamic Republic's missiles, state media reported on Saturday. The comments by a senior Iranian military commander were an apparent response to U.S. officials who have said Washington was ready to use military force to stop what it suspects is Iran's goal to develop a nuclear weapons capability. World powers held talks with Iran in Baghdad on May 23-24 in an attempt to find a diplomatic solution to their concerns over its nuclear programme, which Tehran maintains is entirely peaceful. Another round was set for June 18-19 in Moscow. "The politicians and the military men of the United States are well aware of the fact that all of their bases (in the region) are within the range of Iran's missiles and in any case ... are highly vulnerable," Press TV reported Brigadier-General Yahya Rahim Safavi as saying. Read more: http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/06/02/uk-iran-usa-missiles-idUKBRE85106G20120602
|
21 replies, 2756 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| dipsydoodle | Jun 2012 | OP | |
| MrSlayer | Jun 2012 | #1 | |
| boppers | Jun 2012 | #13 | |
| Zorro | Jun 2012 | #2 | |
| pennylane100 | Jun 2012 | #7 | |
| htuttle | Jun 2012 | #3 | |
| left on green only | Jun 2012 | #11 | |
| Flatulo | Jun 2012 | #12 | |
| teddy51 | Jun 2012 | #4 | |
| boppers | Jun 2012 | #14 | |
| teddy51 | Jun 2012 | #15 | |
| may3rd | Jun 2012 | #20 | |
| DinahMoeHum | Jun 2012 | #5 | |
| Rosa Luxemburg | Jun 2012 | #6 | |
| Lasher | Jun 2012 | #17 | |
| Rosa Luxemburg | Jun 2012 | #21 | |
| woo me with science | Jun 2012 | #8 | |
| pennylane100 | Jun 2012 | #9 | |
| WHEN CRABS ROAR | Jun 2012 | #10 | |
| bhikkhu | Jun 2012 | #16 | |
| solarman350 | Jun 2012 | #18 | |
| may3rd | Jun 2012 | #19 |
Response to dipsydoodle (Original post)
Sat Jun 2, 2012, 08:03 PM
MrSlayer (21,361 posts)
1. They'll fuck up our navy too.
|
When we do war games, the people playing the Iranians always win using small, fast bomb boats like what was done to the U.S.S. Cole. Going to war with these guys is a terrible idea on a good day. With our decimated military, it could be a disaster of epic proportions. We'll be so humiliated we will go nuclear.
|
Response to MrSlayer (Reply #1)
Sat Jun 2, 2012, 11:59 PM
boppers (16,588 posts)
13. "decimated military"? What?
|
We put more on our military than the next top 5 nations.
*Combined*.
The "weak military" is a RW myth, to line the pockets of their defense contractor supporters. |
Response to dipsydoodle (Original post)
Sat Jun 2, 2012, 08:11 PM
Zorro (4,005 posts)
2. They're beginning to sound like the North Koreans
Response to Zorro (Reply #2)
Sat Jun 2, 2012, 09:22 PM
pennylane100 (2,323 posts)
7. The North Koreans usually threaten to strike first.
Response to dipsydoodle (Original post)
Sat Jun 2, 2012, 08:14 PM
htuttle (21,174 posts)
3. "We'll shoot at you if you attack us!"
|
That's pretty much what we would expect if we attacked Iran, right?
Does anyone imagine that they wouldn't shoot back? Does Iran think that we don't think they'd shoot back? |
Response to htuttle (Reply #3)
Sat Jun 2, 2012, 10:37 PM
left on green only (1,077 posts)
11. +1 That is exactly my line of thinking
|
And I also have to assume that the USA military intelligence already knows the locations of Iran's missile strike force, and that any first-strike action on the part of the USA would include the decimation of said locations, whether they be fixed or mobile.
|
Response to left on green only (Reply #11)
Sat Jun 2, 2012, 11:48 PM
Flatulo (3,963 posts)
12. Mobile launchers are notoriously difficult to find and destroy.
|
In the first Gulf War, we actually destroyed very few Iraqi mobile launchers. Thankfully those Scuds were terribly inaccurate.
|
Response to dipsydoodle (Original post)
Sat Jun 2, 2012, 08:20 PM
teddy51 (3,491 posts)
4. If it were that easy for either Israel or the US to attack Iran it would have happened by now.
|
Last edited Sat Jun 2, 2012, 08:23 PM USA/ET - Edit history (3) Just like getting militarily involved in Syria, there may be extreme consequences for an attack on Iran. Who knows what will happen in the region, or what countries might become involved? This certainly could lead to unexpected consequences.
They had better think long and deep before taking that step. How many people will die, what will it do to the region, and what will it do to the world? |
Response to teddy51 (Reply #4)
Sun Jun 3, 2012, 12:03 AM
boppers (16,588 posts)
14. Oh, it's easy, just pointless.
|
What, we're going to take out centrifuges, and then what? Play whack a mole when they rebuild them?
Keep in mind that we built nuclear our weapons in dusty shacks in a freaking desert, fed by centrifuges scattered and hidden "in plain sight" all over the place. |
Response to boppers (Reply #14)
Sun Jun 3, 2012, 12:32 AM
teddy51 (3,491 posts)
15. It's probably very easy to do, but it's what happens after that will be the problem. nt
Response to teddy51 (Reply #15)
Sun Jun 3, 2012, 07:38 AM
may3rd (593 posts)
20. Perhaps a Persian spring will moot the point
|
hey,
it could happen if the iranian internet filters fail to protect the people from all the LIES happening in the world. |
Response to dipsydoodle (Original post)
Sat Jun 2, 2012, 08:23 PM
DinahMoeHum (12,318 posts)
5. Neah neah-neah neah neah booga booga booga. . .
|
More saber rattling (ie. c**k-wagging)
(yawn!) |
Response to dipsydoodle (Original post)
Sat Jun 2, 2012, 08:23 PM
Rosa Luxemburg (22,021 posts)
6. Why do we keep hearing about Iran, it's annoying
|
I'm not complaining about your post but the media are obsessed with it. Pakistan is more worrisome with its pile of nuclear weapons. They have even tested it! Any of these could travel a long way.
|
Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Reply #6)
Sun Jun 3, 2012, 02:05 AM
Lasher (20,479 posts)
17. Because Iran is next on the neocons' hit list, after Iraq.
|
The media, serving in their familiar role as MIC toadies, are drumming up support for this next disaster. This increased media obsession is an ominous sign.
Iran: Next Target of US Military Aggression dated February 2005 |
Response to Lasher (Reply #17)
Sun Jun 3, 2012, 09:07 AM
Rosa Luxemburg (22,021 posts)
21. the old axis of evil
|
who is actually running this country? The media?
|
Response to dipsydoodle (Original post)
Sat Jun 2, 2012, 09:24 PM
woo me with science (19,679 posts)
8. All the poking is having the desired effect.
|
Occupy now.
|
Response to dipsydoodle (Original post)
Sat Jun 2, 2012, 09:28 PM
pennylane100 (2,323 posts)
9. Obama is way to smart to attack Iran unless provoked.
|
The Iranians keep saber rattling to annoy Israel and Obama knows it. However, Romney is a whole different story. Let us hope that we never have to know what he would do, it may lead to world war III.
|
Response to pennylane100 (Reply #9)
Sat Jun 2, 2012, 10:27 PM
WHEN CRABS ROAR (2,525 posts)
10. Another valid reason to oppose a Romney Presidency.
|
Talk it up.
|
Response to dipsydoodle (Original post)
Sun Jun 3, 2012, 01:39 AM
bhikkhu (7,653 posts)
16. I'd say they're nuts, but that's how too much of the media plays it
|
They have to know that an escalating conflict would wreck a bunch of stuff, but they'd lose their whole country before leaving much of a dent in ours. Most of what they can do doesn't really matter.
So maybe its just asshattery, or maybe its a trumped up line of questioning to a guy who was unprepared - played for all its worth by the media outlet for the sake of ratings. |
Response to dipsydoodle (Original post)
Sun Jun 3, 2012, 02:49 AM
solarman350 (136 posts)
18. What Would bush do...again?
![]() |
Response to dipsydoodle (Original post)
Sun Jun 3, 2012, 07:33 AM
may3rd (593 posts)
19. What do you need to disrupt nuclear facilities of your enemy? ? ? A thumb drive !
|
Iran, US: Cyber missiles mean war without bloodshed
.... “You’re seeing an evolution of warfare that’s really intriguing,” said Phil Lieberman, a security consultant and chief executive of Lieberman Software in Los Angeles. “Warfare where no one is dying.” ... http://www.yalibnan.com/2012/06/02/iran-us-cyber-missiles-mean-war-without-bloodshed/ |


