Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,807 posts)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 11:56 AM Feb 2016

Gov't Report: 8 States Had Significant Drop in Uninsured

Source: Associated Press

Eight states saw a significant drop last year in the number of residents going without health insurance, according to a government report out Tuesday that has implications for the presidential campaign.

All but Florida had accepted a Medicaid expansion that is one of two major pathways to coverage under President Barack Obama's health care law. The law's other coverage route is subsidized private insurance, available in all 50 states.

GOP presidential candidates are vowing to repeal "Obamacare," while offering hardly any detail on how they'd replace it without millions losing coverage.

Politically, the eight states with statistically significant coverage gains in the National Health Interview Survey are a mix of red, blue and purple. They are Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Kentucky, Michigan, and New York. Five have GOP governors.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/govt-report-states-significant-drop-uninsured-36800096



By RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR, ASSOCIATED PRESS WASHINGTON — Feb 9, 2016, 10:05 AM ET
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gov't Report: 8 States Had Significant Drop in Uninsured (Original Post) Eugene Feb 2016 OP
Yep, TX ain't on that list. hobbit709 Feb 2016 #1
I guess some Texans would rather die than get healthcare. nt valerief Feb 2016 #2
If you can't afford it and the state won't go for the Medicaid expansion or anything else, you're hobbit709 Feb 2016 #4
I understand. And if they vote, they vote for the guy they want to have valerief Feb 2016 #5
Not the ones I know. hobbit709 Feb 2016 #6
I know there are normal, smart people in Texas. Not enough though, since valerief Feb 2016 #7
news enid602 Feb 2016 #3
With the price of ACA coverage and Out of Pocket... Android3.14 Feb 2016 #8
Good point pberq Feb 2016 #10
Kentucky just fixed that shit! Scalded Nun Feb 2016 #9

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
4. If you can't afford it and the state won't go for the Medicaid expansion or anything else, you're
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 12:07 PM
Feb 2016

screwed.
I know people that take home about $300/wk and the $70/mo with a $6K+ deductible is out of their reach.

valerief

(53,235 posts)
5. I understand. And if they vote, they vote for the guy they want to have
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 12:12 PM
Feb 2016

a beer with. Or the gal they want to have a prayer with. That's where they'd rather die. Voting GOP.

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
6. Not the ones I know.
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 12:15 PM
Feb 2016

But we keep getting outvoted by the yahoos.

My precinct went 73% Obama in 2008 and 2012

valerief

(53,235 posts)
7. I know there are normal, smart people in Texas. Not enough though, since
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 12:17 PM
Feb 2016

Teh Stoooopid keep winning.

 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
8. With the price of ACA coverage and Out of Pocket...
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 01:16 PM
Feb 2016

I wonder how many of those newly insured are seeking care.

pberq

(2,950 posts)
10. Good point
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 03:02 PM
Feb 2016

Saying that there is a drop in the uninsured means nothing if they can't use it. With high copays and deductibles, many plans are almost useless.
Which is why we need single payer.


http://www.pnhp.org/facts/what-is-single-payer
What is Single Payer?
Single-payer national health insurance, also known as “Medicare for all,” is a system in which a single public or quasi-public agency organizes health care financing, but the delivery of care remains largely in private hands. Under a single-payer system, all residents of the U.S. would be covered for all medically necessary services, including doctor, hospital, preventive, long-term care, mental health, reproductive health care, dental, vision, prescription drug and medical supply costs.

The program would be funded by the savings obtained from replacing today’s inefficient, profit-oriented, multiple insurance payers with a single streamlined, nonprofit, public payer, and by modest new taxes based on ability to pay. Premiums would disappear; 95 percent of all households would save money. Patients would no longer face financial barriers to care such as co-pays and deductibles, and would regain free choice of doctor and hospital. Doctors would regain autonomy over patient care. . .

Scalded Nun

(1,235 posts)
9. Kentucky just fixed that shit!
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 01:28 PM
Feb 2016

You won't see them on any forward leaning list anytime soon.

And do not fuzzy the issue with KY. They now have a GOP governor. The coverage gains were due to the DEM governor. Hence the resumption of marching to the rear.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Gov't Report: 8 States Ha...