Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ericson00

(2,707 posts)
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 10:16 AM Jan 2016

Iran holds Holocaust-denying cartoon contest

Source: Ynet

Iran has announced that it will be holding a cartoon contest aimed at creating caricatures denying the Holocaust. This year, the contest's grand prize has been increased from $12,000 to $50,000.

The contest, organized by the Teheran municipal authority, is calling for cartoonists worldwide to send in works denying and satirizing the Holocaust. Unlike previous contests of this kind, this one is especially significant due the fact that it is organized by official authorities of the Iranian capital, and has an international emphasis. The prize money is also several times what it was before.

Read more: http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4752645,00.html



stopping this evil un-American crap shoulda been part of the "deal."
131 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Iran holds Holocaust-denying cartoon contest (Original Post) ericson00 Jan 2016 OP
Truth has truly become much, much stranger than fiction. Frank Cannon Jan 2016 #1
Not the first time iran leftynyc Jan 2016 #4
alternative deflection strategy Angel Martin Jan 2016 #19
I had almost forgotten leftynyc Jan 2016 #25
While I think it is a stupid, hateful, and deplorable thing to do, it's no different than what Dustlawyer Jan 2016 #2
The difference is the reaction to it. nt B2G Jan 2016 #6
what the hell are you talking about? ericson00 Jan 2016 #8
Dustlawyer's right. Bigotry and hate, and Hortensis Jan 2016 #21
I don't know where you get your information leftynyc Jan 2016 #28
"eviction of all residents" and you say it didn't happen? Hortensis Jan 2016 #34
I never said it didn't happen leftynyc Jan 2016 #38
Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2016 #33
It took decades for the mainstream in Israel to honor the truth that the Nakba happened karynnj Jan 2016 #35
You are comparing that to the Holocaust? oberliner Jan 2016 #73
No - look at the post that it is responding to karynnj Jan 2016 #85
Right oberliner Jan 2016 #87
The poster I responded to spoke of Israel not hosting contests that denied karynnj Jan 2016 #89
OK oberliner Jan 2016 #106
Aside from the obvious leftynyc Jan 2016 #9
I believe a group of Settlers have already had a protest Dustlawyer Jan 2016 #12
Are you truly comparing leftynyc Jan 2016 #29
But the point is that no one on this side christx30 Jan 2016 #60
The fact it's government sponsored makes it worse, I think. PersonNumber503602 Jan 2016 #23
Yeah, the difference is we don't call for their deaths for it. smirkymonkey Jan 2016 #58
So, if someone sends them a REAL funny one Kelvin Mace Jan 2016 #3
Oh no - that would never do leftynyc Jan 2016 #5
That was kind of the point of my joke Kelvin Mace Jan 2016 #44
I know leftynyc Jan 2016 #48
Not all that new Kelvin Mace Jan 2016 #49
How about The Prophet in bed with a preteen girl? Frank Cannon Jan 2016 #20
Work for me, Kelvin Mace Jan 2016 #45
Or maybe a comic of Mohammed thumbing through The Satanic Verses... name not needed Jan 2016 #46
I wonder how many people leftynyc Jan 2016 #7
I am sorry to say iandhr Jan 2016 #10
The moral relativists leftynyc Jan 2016 #11
Why do the moral relativists on this cartoon issue upset you? nt ZombieHorde Jan 2016 #66
I would think the reason is obvious leftynyc Jan 2016 #69
There are certain aspects of common thought that are lost on me, ZombieHorde Jan 2016 #128
There is nothing relative about leftynyc Jan 2016 #129
My perception of the situation seems to match yours. ZombieHorde Jan 2016 #130
This right here melman Jan 2016 #131
Grrr! This just enrages me! smirkymonkey Jan 2016 #59
Even worse leftynyc Jan 2016 #68
So part of the "deal" shoud have been trying to limit free speech in IRAN? hughee99 Jan 2016 #13
In the U.S. the contest would be sponsored by Stormfront, sufrommich Jan 2016 #15
So your issue isn't the contest, just the sponsor? n/t hughee99 Jan 2016 #17
My issue is that the Iranian government loves them sufrommich Jan 2016 #18
Do you think part of the deal should have been hughee99 Jan 2016 #24
Because the only choice the Iranian government has sufrommich Jan 2016 #26
So what do YOU think should have been in the deal? hughee99 Jan 2016 #27
There is no such thing as free speech in Iran oberliner Jan 2016 #74
But there is such a concept as free speech, and hughee99 Jan 2016 #97
Iran is an Islamic theocracy oberliner Jan 2016 #104
I completely agree. hughee99 Jan 2016 #107
I'm glad they didn't add this to the deal. christx30 Jan 2016 #113
The difference is shown here. christx30 Jan 2016 #14
The US did not sponsor such a contest oberliner Jan 2016 #75
True. It was right wing idiots. christx30 Jan 2016 #91
I predict that this will result in the same number of murders that "Piss Christ" caused (nt) Nye Bevan Jan 2016 #16
Oh, Iran. PersonNumber503602 Jan 2016 #22
Others issues were excluded for good reason - the threat of Iran going nuclear is greater karynnj Jan 2016 #30
Pamela Geller holds Islam hating cartoon contest hoping for a violent response. guillaumeb Jan 2016 #31
And she got her violent response leftynyc Jan 2016 #39
Let me repost what you apparently missed: guillaumeb Jan 2016 #41
I missed nothing leftynyc Jan 2016 #47
i wonder if Jews around the world should start attacking muslims and muslim symbols? MariaThinks Jan 2016 #32
Yes because itcfish Jan 2016 #37
You already know leftynyc Jan 2016 #40
They are, in Palestine and Israel. guillaumeb Jan 2016 #42
Wow EllieBC Jan 2016 #56
I do realize that approximately 20% of Israeli citizens are not Jews. guillaumeb Jan 2016 #119
Fighting between Israelis and Palestinians is not the same as Jews killing Muslims because oberliner Jan 2016 #76
Iranian Government itcfish Jan 2016 #36
6 of 15 - 20 million dead were Jews, the rest were homosexuals, gypsies, people with birth defects, Agnosticsherbet Jan 2016 #52
No truth to the story the Danish King wore a Yellow star or any Dane did so happyslug Jan 2016 #63
Wow oberliner Jan 2016 #77
Iranians are Not Killing Jews itcfish Jan 2016 #108
It seems cartoon who get publicity are full of negativity dead_head Jan 2016 #43
flippin' sweet... Blue_Tires Jan 2016 #121
Is there any detailed explanation for what the "Tehran municipal authority" bullwinkle428 Jan 2016 #50
The governing body of the city of Tehran oberliner Jan 2016 #78
Cmere EdwardBernays Jan 2016 #51
Do you think this story is BS? oberliner Jan 2016 #79
No EdwardBernays Jan 2016 #81
Israel has repeatedly bombed Iran? oberliner Jan 2016 #83
Sorry EdwardBernays Jan 2016 #84
Gotcha oberliner Jan 2016 #86
Yes EdwardBernays Jan 2016 #88
Iran has been sponsoring and financing leftynyc Jan 2016 #92
Add all of those together EdwardBernays Jan 2016 #101
Israel created the Iranian secret police? oberliner Jan 2016 #96
Sure EdwardBernays Jan 2016 #100
Wikipedia isn't an actual source oberliner Jan 2016 #103
sigh EdwardBernays Jan 2016 #115
Thank you for sharing that oberliner Jan 2016 #124
Not buying it. EdwardBernays Jan 2016 #125
OK - fair enough oberliner Jan 2016 #127
I completely agree Uponthegears Jan 2016 #53
It was reported in the Tehran Times back in December Denzil_DC Jan 2016 #65
They've held these sorts of contests several times already oberliner Jan 2016 #80
Is there anything Uponthegears Jan 2016 #90
You must be fucking kidding leftynyc Jan 2016 #93
No, I'm laughing at a joke Uponthegears Jan 2016 #98
I see only ONE person leftynyc Jan 2016 #99
So why is the OP even here? Uponthegears Jan 2016 #102
OK oberliner Jan 2016 #105
Snore Uponthegears Jan 2016 #110
Trying to have a polite and respectful dialogue oberliner Jan 2016 #111
No, actually you're not Uponthegears Jan 2016 #117
OK - I am sorry you feel that way oberliner Jan 2016 #122
I think you are absolutely wrong. christx30 Jan 2016 #120
"un-American crap"? Amerika Uber Alles? Is not Holocaust-denying un-French and un-Nigerian? Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2016 #54
This is Bernin Jan 2016 #55
Same things as on this side of the world: Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2016 #57
Is the Israeli government leftynyc Jan 2016 #94
Israel should worry about this contest, the winners did NOT deny the Holocaust, they used it instead happyslug Jan 2016 #61
Yes they did oberliner Jan 2016 #71
Have you studied the Holocaust? The Death Camps were a MINOR part of the Holocaust. happyslug Jan 2016 #109
Around 100,000 Jews were starved to death in the Warsaw Ghetto oberliner Jan 2016 #112
The Isolation and use of Force is, as are the random killings happyslug Jan 2016 #116
OK oberliner Jan 2016 #123
Idiotic to suggest we should have risked letting Iran get a nuke geek tragedy Jan 2016 #62
What about complaining to the UN? oberliner Jan 2016 #82
I guess. But this is pretty much trolling so I'd just ignore it. nt geek tragedy Jan 2016 #118
Let's go to war over this ... (/sarcasm off) CommonSenseDemocrat Jan 2016 #64
You're not getting the point leftynyc Jan 2016 #95
And yet, nobody will be killed over it, I predict. Quantess Jan 2016 #67
Meh. NutmegYankee Jan 2016 #70
The responses to this post are fascinating. oberliner Jan 2016 #72
This could backfire on them real easy Nolimit Jan 2016 #114
It was specifically not part of the agreement for very good reasons. cheapdate Jan 2016 #126

Frank Cannon

(7,570 posts)
1. Truth has truly become much, much stranger than fiction.
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 10:21 AM
Jan 2016

This is the first, and probably last, time I will ever see the terms "Holocaust-denying" and "cartoon contest" used in the same sentence.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
4. Not the first time iran
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 10:45 AM
Jan 2016

has done this:

Here are the "cartoons" from 2006

http://irancartoon.com/120/holocaust/index.htm

From last year:

http://www.timesofisrael.com/iran-holocaust-cartoon-contest-draws-hundreds-of-entries/

The contest from last year was in response to the Charlie Hebdo massacre.


I see there are already moral relativists trying to downplay or deflect. Far too predictable around here these days.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
25. I had almost forgotten
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 12:40 PM
Jan 2016

about that one. Pretty hard to make that claim with cartoons. But wouldn't be surprised in the slightest if someone tried.

Dustlawyer

(10,494 posts)
2. While I think it is a stupid, hateful, and deplorable thing to do, it's no different than what
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 10:24 AM
Jan 2016

Idiots here and in Israel have been doing. Bigotry and hate are, unfortunately, universal. The fact that it is government sponsored is worse though.

 

ericson00

(2,707 posts)
8. what the hell are you talking about?
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 11:00 AM
Jan 2016

what has Israel been doing that is anything close to similar? Aside from the obvious (they don't deny The Holocaust), they don't sponsor cartoons denying the Armenian Genocide, the Herero Genocide or the Rwandan Genocide.

And no, the Palestinian "nakba" is nothing close in any way to The Holocaust. And yes, the 'T' in The Holocaust gets a capital letter, as does 'Holocaust'

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
21. Dustlawyer's right. Bigotry and hate, and
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 12:17 PM
Jan 2016

religious extremism, are found in groups of people in all nations. Just look at our share here. Absolutely nothing would be beyond many in our own virtuous right wing if the wrong leader came along and generated enough angry energy. (If he succeeded in drawing left-wing extremists, too, definitely time run for the border!)

Extremists in all countries, but especially their far rights, are always so convinced of their own virtue and the evil of their enemies that they believe whatever they do must be necessary and right or they wouldn't be doing it. Their virtue fuels ongoing holocausts all over the planet. Such as the hostile, aggressive, right-wing zealots settling illegally in the Gaza Strip with the specific (holy) purpose of forcing its residents from their remaining land, alive or dead.

Wife of a Jew

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
28. I don't know where you get your information
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 12:59 PM
Jan 2016

but there are ZERO settlements in the gaza strip. The Israeli's unilaterally left the strip in 2005 - and were promptly rewarded for that with thousands of rockets. Read and learn:

The eviction of all residents, demolition of the residential buildings and evacuation of associated security personnel from the Gaza Strip was completed by September 12, 2005.[2] The eviction and dismantlement of the four settlements in the northern West Bank was completed ten days later.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_disengagement_from_Gaza

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
34. "eviction of all residents" and you say it didn't happen?
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 01:35 PM
Jan 2016

I know what you meant, though. Please understand what I am saying even if you don't agree on the presence of evil among all peoples.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
38. I never said it didn't happen
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 01:44 PM
Jan 2016

Your post was in the present tense and I was pointing out that hasn't been the case in over a decade. That's all.

Response to ericson00 (Reply #8)

karynnj

(59,498 posts)
35. It took decades for the mainstream in Israel to honor the truth that the Nakba happened
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 01:37 PM
Jan 2016

I think the first mainstream book that spoke of what happened was the recent Avi Shavit book, which does not use the word, that was controversial for doing so. Shavit, in the book, writes in a fair amount of detail of the horror, but, in the end, argues it is the "black box" at the heart of creating Israel.

“If need be,” he asserts, “I’ll stand by the damned” — referring to those Israeli war criminals who are responsible for Lydda. “If it wasn’t for them,” he explains, “the State of Israel would not have been born. They did the dirty, filthy work that enables my people, myself, my daughter, and my sons to live.”


https://lareviewofbooks.org/review/tragedy-political-correctness-ari-shavit-confusion-zionist-liberal-left

My husband and I read the book to prepare for a synagogue discussion of the book soon after it came out. The rabbi had suggested the book and it was a very uncomfortable read for many. (The review I linked to to back the quote is itself interesting, but I had not read it before. )
 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
87. Right
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 08:09 AM
Jan 2016

It still seems to me like you are comparing those two things, so maybe I am not fully understanding your point.

karynnj

(59,498 posts)
89. The poster I responded to spoke of Israel not hosting contests that denied
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 08:30 AM
Jan 2016

three other genocides -- and then gratuitously, added that the nakba was not close in any way to the Holocaust. You could argue that the 3 he mentioned don't match the scale of the Holochaust either.

I would not have commented had he not gratuitously mentioned the Nakba, which he brought up -- only to diminish. Because I had never heard the word until about three years ago, I assumed that there were likely some other posters who had no idea what he was saying. I realized a nerve had been touched of that poster.

It is very true that Israel for years denied the reality of the Nakba.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
106. OK
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 11:27 AM
Jan 2016

It is true that most countries present a version of their history that is steeped in mythology moreso than facts. Certainly the US is guilty in that regard as well - along with many countries all over the world, including Israel.

But in this case, we have a country (Iran) hosting a contest related to a genocidal historical event which is unconnected to Iran. Isn't that a different kind of situation?

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
9. Aside from the obvious
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 11:14 AM
Jan 2016

which you already mentioned - that the GOVERNMENT of Iran is sponsoring this, let's sit back and watch the reaction to cartoons. We already know what happened when Charlie Hebdo dared to portray Mohammad, let's see if Jews or any other group of victims of the holocaust are so pissed at cartoons they start shooting people and cause a massacre. I'll bet my paycheck the answer is no.

Dustlawyer

(10,494 posts)
12. I believe a group of Settlers have already had a protest
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 11:38 AM
Jan 2016

where they drew the Prophet too. There is no side of this that is innocent.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
29. Are you truly comparing
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 01:01 PM
Jan 2016

drawing another harmless cartoon with what happened to the employees at Charlie Hebdo (and the people at that Jewish deli)? Really? Those are the same in your eyes?

christx30

(6,241 posts)
60. But the point is that no one on this side
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 11:19 PM
Jan 2016

of the deal is advocating death for people involved with Holocaust denial. They draw the pictures, we're offended, and some people draw their Prophet. We draw the Prophet, they burn stuff and kill people. It's not even the same.

PersonNumber503602

(1,134 posts)
23. The fact it's government sponsored makes it worse, I think.
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 12:29 PM
Jan 2016

Last edited Thu Jan 14, 2016, 01:44 PM - Edit history (1)

Whereas the stuff is here done by bigoted individuals. As others have said too, there a very low chance of any sort of violent retaliation for this offensive drawing contest.

I think it's best to just ignore it from all sides, because there isn't anything anyone can say to change the minds of these sorts of people. The best we can hope for is that some of them will eventually have an epiphany that allows them to realize how awful they are behaving.

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
3. So, if someone sends them a REAL funny one
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 10:42 AM
Jan 2016

of The Prophet making fun a of The Holocaust, they print that one, right?

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
5. Oh no - that would never do
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 10:47 AM
Jan 2016

Some poor muddled minded souls would have every reason in the world to start killing people over the portrayal of their messiah in print.

Frank Cannon

(7,570 posts)
20. How about The Prophet in bed with a preteen girl?
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 12:09 PM
Jan 2016

Her dad is standing there, enraged. The Prophet is saying, "'She's underaged'? Bullshit! The next thing you're going to tell me is that The Holocaust really happened!"

I'm going to draw this one. I think I might actually have a shot at this! And I could really use the dough.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
7. I wonder how many people
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 10:50 AM
Jan 2016

will take a second to realize there will be ZERO violence as a result of this - that no Jews - or any other holocaust victims - will be shooting up public places as a result of this contest. In fact, last years contest was a direct result of the Charlie Hebdo massacre - they were probably hoping for violence so they could say "see, they do it too". Thankfully, nobody obliged their insanity.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
11. The moral relativists
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 11:20 AM
Jan 2016

on this cartoon issue are working my last fucking nerve. Great onion cartoon and commentary.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
69. I would think the reason is obvious
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 06:15 AM
Jan 2016

Cartoons about their prophet brings violence. Cartoons about holocaust denial bring mocking and derision. There is nothing relative about the two at all.

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
128. There are certain aspects of common thought that are lost on me,
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 05:40 AM
Jan 2016

so I appreciate when people are patient with me on moral issues. You seem to be talking about a double standard between the reaction of some toward the Mohammad cartoons and the Holocaust denial cartoons, and this double standard is what bothers you. Is that correct?

There is nothing relative about the two at all.


How can meaning and value be anything other than subjective? Killing people isn't right or wrong, we just often add the subjective, emotional response of right or wrong to killing when we witness or learn about it. I don't like when most people are killed, but my feelings don't create an objective right or wrong. According to my subjective feelings, mass murder is extremely significant and horrible compared to a light breeze, but objectively speaking, it's all just atoms in motion. Value seems strictly imaginary to me.
 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
129. There is nothing relative about
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 06:29 AM
Jan 2016

the RESPONSES. The very same content - what is considered an insulting CARTOON is the subject - one brings violence, the other one doesn't - depending on who is the one getting insulted. One can't simply ignore or mock the cartoon - it must be punished. There is no double standard - I EXPECT both to ignore or mock - only one meets my expectations (or standard if that makes it easier to understand).

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
130. My perception of the situation seems to match yours.
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 06:37 AM
Jan 2016

Our values on this subject also seem to be aligned. I'm not often bothered by what "faceless" posters post, but I would also like to see no violence or threats due to cartoons. Thanks for explaining your thoughts on this to me.

 

melman

(7,681 posts)
131. This right here
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 06:48 AM
Jan 2016

"Killing people isn't right or wrong, we just often add the subjective, emotional response of right or wrong to killing when we witness or learn about it"

is total bullshit.

 

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)
59. Grrr! This just enrages me!
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 11:12 PM
Jan 2016

I can't even tell you how much this pisses me off. They do it and expect to get away with it. We do it and we can expect terrorist attacks and death threats.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
68. Even worse
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 06:13 AM
Jan 2016

I think they are ACTIVELY hoping that there would be some response so they can apply some of that moral relativism that makes me sick. Thankfully, they can only look forward to mocking and derision for having that disgusting contest.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
13. So part of the "deal" shoud have been trying to limit free speech in IRAN?
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 11:48 AM
Jan 2016

In the US, that same contest would have been just as disturbing, but constitutionally protected. To put such a thing in a deal would certainly not be "spreading freedom and democracy".

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
15. In the U.S. the contest would be sponsored by Stormfront,
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 11:56 AM
Jan 2016

not the government. There's no comparison,no matter how you try to spin it.

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
26. Because the only choice the Iranian government has
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 12:44 PM
Jan 2016

is to outlaw holocaust denial or encourage and promote it?

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
27. So what do YOU think should have been in the deal?
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 12:48 PM
Jan 2016

The US tells Iran what kind of speech they're not allowed to sponsor or appear to encourage?

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
97. But there is such a concept as free speech, and
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 09:32 AM
Jan 2016

Our politicians (on both sides) talk about promoting freedom and democracy around the world. It seems a little hypocritical to have a deal that has anything to do with what their government or people can't say. If you think something like this should have been part of the deal, what specifically do you think it should have said?

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
104. Iran is an Islamic theocracy
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 11:16 AM
Jan 2016

There are laws against criticizing the regime, insulting Islam, and so forth.

Personally, I do not think the Iran deal should have included anything related to this; however, I do believe that the US and the UN ought to release statements of condemnation at the very least.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
107. I completely agree.
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 11:40 AM
Jan 2016

The issue I had with the op was that they suggested that putting a stop to this sort of stuff should have been part of the Iran deal, and I have no idea how that would even be workable.

christx30

(6,241 posts)
113. I'm glad they didn't add this to the deal.
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 12:34 PM
Jan 2016

We tell them don't do any holocaust denial. They tell us to stop with the Muhammad cartoons. We can't, because of the First Amendment. The deal falls apart, and Iran gets nukes, because of some stupid drawings.

christx30

(6,241 posts)
14. The difference is shown here.
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 11:54 AM
Jan 2016

They hold this contest, and we speak out about it. We hold one about Muhammed, and they threaten to murder us. Orin the case of Pamela Geller's event in Garland, attempt.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
75. The US did not sponsor such a contest
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 07:32 AM
Jan 2016

In this case, the Iranian government is behind it. They have held conferences like this:

Holocaust deniers gather in Iran for 'scientific' conference

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/dec/12/iran.israel

christx30

(6,241 posts)
91. True. It was right wing idiots.
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 09:03 AM
Jan 2016

But the point remains that when they do something offensive like this, the West doesn't threaten to kill them. The most we do is make fun of them.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
16. I predict that this will result in the same number of murders that "Piss Christ" caused (nt)
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 11:58 AM
Jan 2016

Last edited Thu Jan 14, 2016, 12:37 PM - Edit history (1)

PersonNumber503602

(1,134 posts)
22. Oh, Iran.
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 12:22 PM
Jan 2016

As stupid as these things are, I can't say I agree with the idea of adding something to any deal that would make any sense. I also find the idea of attempting to restrict anyone (let alone a sovereign nation) from having an offensive drawing contest to be far more un-american than the contest itself. Not that something being un-american should even matter anyway.

Your comment just seems weird to me, and I hope you're just having some fun.

karynnj

(59,498 posts)
30. Others issues were excluded for good reason - the threat of Iran going nuclear is greater
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 01:06 PM
Jan 2016

It is very clear that there are two power centers in Iran. Rouhani/Zarif are the more moderate of the two and it with that side the nuclear deal was negotiated and IMPORTANTLY, the Ayatollah when it came down to it - backed them over the other power center - the revolutionary guard.

Note that obviously the Ayatollah must have backed the Rouhani/Zarif faction leading to the release of the 10 sailors and their riverine (swiftboats?) boats in less than 23 hours. In addition, Rouhani/Zarif were at least as responsive to Kerry's calls to calm things down between SA and Iran.

Now, the leaders of the city of Tehran doing this is despicable, but I see it more as a reaction of the reactionary side to a huge shift in power away from them. Not to mention, odious as it is, the change in relationship that increases the breakout time to over a year from what even Netanyahu claimed was 2 months and the ability to avoid a screwup escalating to what would be a political nightmare here and a terrifying long term imprisonment for these 10 sailors, is a FAR BIGGER DEAL.

The reason the deal was never meant to deal with every other issue is because the consensus of the P5 + 1 is that it was far more important to deal with the nuclear issue -- a reason that Netanyahu apparently thought important enough that he twice proposed a military strike that other Israelis rejected. Are you seriously saying that because Iran is still a bad actor - just as everyone thought - it would be better for Jerusalem if they had NOT done the deal?

In fact, given their release of the sailors and their important participation in the UN Syrian resolution, which though a long shot is the first real shot of getting a ceasefire and diplomatic end to the Syrian nightmare, the change in relations with Iran has been broader and better than most would have expected.

Not to mention, it may be that - deal or no deal - there will be these despicable actions by some in Iran. The world is better off if it is with the deal. I am not diminishing the odiousness or the problems of denying the holocaust and I am Jewish, but here ACTIONS of the government are more important than something like this.

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
31. Pamela Geller holds Islam hating cartoon contest hoping for a violent response.
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 01:13 PM
Jan 2016
The American Freedom Defense Initiative said it specifically picked the venue for Sunday's event, a school district-owned facility, because it had hosted an event denouncing Islamophobia in January.

SoundVision, the organizers of the January "Stand with the Prophet" event, denounced Sunday's attackers and also criticized Geller's organization for "hate mongering."

"Unfortunately, some insane persons, however, decided to give hate-mongers the attention they desired with their violent act. ... Once again, a bad name for the community," SoundVision said on its website. "We, the people of faith, must counter the war-terror-hate cycle with peace-love-respect."

Shortly after the Sunday night shooting, a prominent Muslim leader in Dallas tweeted about it.

"The community stayed away from event," Imam Zia Sheikh wrote. "Seems like a lone wolf type of attack. Just what we didn't want."


http://www.cnn.com/2015/05/04/us/garland-mohammed-drawing-contest-shooting/

Many at DU defended professional Islamophobe Pamela Geller's cartoon contest as a legitimate expression of First Amendment rights. Is this contest not also free speech? Yes, both contests are reflective of a vicious world view, but to defend one is to defend the other.
 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
39. And she got her violent response
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 01:49 PM
Jan 2016

There has never been anything comparable to that response to these Holocaust denying cartoon contests. THAT's the difference.

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
41. Let me repost what you apparently missed:
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 01:56 PM
Jan 2016
The American Freedom Defense Initiative said it specifically picked the venue for Sunday's event, a school district-owned facility, because it had hosted an event denouncing Islamophobia in January.

SoundVision, the organizers of the January "Stand with the Prophet" event, denounced Sunday's attackers and also criticized Geller's organization for "hate mongering."

"Unfortunately, some insane persons, however, decided to give hate-mongers the attention they desired with their violent act. ... Once again, a bad name for the community," SoundVision said on its website. "We, the people of faith, must counter the war-terror-hate cycle with peace-love-respect."

Shortly after the Sunday night shooting, a prominent Muslim leader in Dallas tweeted about it.

"The community stayed away from event," Imam Zia Sheikh wrote. "Seems like a lone wolf type of attack. Just what we didn't want."


Note that the attacks were denounced by Soundvision, and Geller was also criticized for hate mongering. Soundvision also called for countering war with peace.

Are you a supporter of Geller's brand of hate speech?
 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
47. I missed nothing
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 02:20 PM
Jan 2016

Speech should never bring about a violent response - NEVER. I was furious that hateful cow geller got the response she was looking for even if it only came from one asshole. The proper response is to ALWAYS ignore it - the same way all Jews are ignoring these repulsive cartoon contests. NEVER give the haters ammunition. I don't support geller but I do support her right to free speech, even when it's hateful. That's what a free society is all about.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
40. You already know
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 01:50 PM
Jan 2016

that's not going to happen. This isn't the first time iran had this kind of contest.

EllieBC

(2,990 posts)
56. Wow
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 05:07 PM
Jan 2016

You do realize that not all Jews are Israelis?

Or is this just a common thing to combine Jews and Israelis for for anti-Semitic fun?

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
119. I do realize that approximately 20% of Israeli citizens are not Jews.
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 04:30 PM
Jan 2016

I also realize that these non-Jewish Israeli citizens are very much second class citizens.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
76. Fighting between Israelis and Palestinians is not the same as Jews killing Muslims because
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 07:36 AM
Jan 2016

They are offended by the existence of these cartoons - which will not happen.

Whereas, were a "Draw Mohammed" contest held under the auspices of the US government, I would feel confident in suggesting that the reaction would be different.

itcfish

(1,828 posts)
36. Iranian Government
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 01:42 PM
Jan 2016

Sucks, but the Iranian people are warm good people. Please do not confuse the two.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
52. 6 of 15 - 20 million dead were Jews, the rest were homosexuals, gypsies, people with birth defects,
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 03:14 PM
Jan 2016

criminals, and anyone that Nazi's considered inferior.

We were told that there were good people in Germany, too, but they stood by and watched as millions disappeared into the ovens.

Good people are those who take a stand against such things. Good people like Schindler, the Japanese ambassador who signed visas so that Jews cold flee to Hong Kong, the King of Denmark and all the Danes who wore a yellow star, risking their lives for those among them, the people in Poland who hid Jews and other inferiors at risk of death.

Those were the good people.

People who refuse to stand up do not qualify for the word "good."

 

happyslug

(14,779 posts)
63. No truth to the story the Danish King wore a Yellow star or any Dane did so
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 11:44 PM
Jan 2016

That was a US Propaganda Story spread by Danish immigrants to the US during WWII.

On the other hand, when the Germans finally decided to shut down the Danish Government and impose Martial Law, August 1943, the Danes managed to hide almost all of the Jews in Denmark. This prevented the Jews from falling into the hands of the Nazi. The Danes then managed to get almost all of the Jews to Sweden between October 1 and 2 1943 (The Nazis had decided to round up the Jews during Yom Kipper, hoping most Jews would be at home, celebrating Yom Kipper). The Nazis did captured some of their intended victims but most managed to get to Sweden, it was only a 10 KM trip from Copenhagen to Sweden so a doable act, The Swedes helped by announcing they would take in any Jew who reached their shores, not just Jews with connections to Sweden (Which had been the Swedish policy till October 1943).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rescue_of_the_Danish_Jews

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
77. Wow
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 07:37 AM
Jan 2016

Thanks for sharing this. I had heard and believed the old mythology on this topic. Did not realize it had been debunked.

itcfish

(1,828 posts)
108. Iranians are Not Killing Jews
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 11:42 AM
Jan 2016

Contrary to propaganda you might hear. Jews live in Iran. They are free to practice their religion as are Christians. They both have representation in parliment. Please do no compare to the Germans and the Nazis

dead_head

(81 posts)
43. It seems cartoon who get publicity are full of negativity
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 01:58 PM
Jan 2016

so instead check out mine!




www.deadheadcomicks.com

bullwinkle428

(20,628 posts)
50. Is there any detailed explanation for what the "Tehran municipal authority"
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 02:31 PM
Jan 2016

actually is? That sounds awfully ambiguous.

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
81. No
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 07:51 AM
Jan 2016

I don't.

But it's a propaganda cartoon contest.

Israel has threatened to repeatedly ACTUALLY bomb Iran. And the US has done so much actually evil crap to Iran that I find it hard - very hard - to really care about some propaganda. Especially considering the endless US anti-Iran propaganda the US government and US politicians have foisted on us for decades.

Maybe it wasn't in cartoon form, but so what?

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
84. Sorry
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 08:01 AM
Jan 2016

I meant to say threatened to bomb. On my phone. I'll correct it now.

The point remains though, Israel AND America have repeatedly threatened to bomb Iran. And Israel was actually planning to between 2010 and 2012 but it was thwarted by politics I believe.

It was in a biography a few years back. Caused a huge stink.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
86. Gotcha
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 08:08 AM
Jan 2016

I would point out, though, that Iran has made bellicose and threatening statements with respect to Israel as well.

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
88. Yes
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 08:15 AM
Jan 2016

But. And this is important. How my countries has Iran started a war with in the last 200 years?

If you don't know for sure you should check.

Israel has stated AT LEAST three.

And also has a horrible record of attack civilian populations.

And US ally with the same horrible record was Sadam, who was helped procure, develop and US WMDs against Iranian civilians in then US' proxy war with Iran, the Iran Iraq war.

And of course Israel and the US created, trained and funded the Iranian secret police. Which killed many thousands of civilians to help keep the Wests dictator in power in Iran.

Again, those aren't in cartoon form, but compared to having your genitals crushed by US/Israeli trained and funded secret police I'd take a dickish cartoon any day.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
92. Iran has been sponsoring and financing
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 09:08 AM
Jan 2016

terrorist groups for DECADES. That ridiculous talking point about how they haven't started a war in 200 years is complete bullshit when you consider hezbollah, hamas, islamic jihad.....hardly peaceful groups.

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
101. Add all of those together
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 10:00 AM
Jan 2016

And the number of Americans they've killed. They multiple that number by 10.

The result wouldn't come close to the number of Iranian civilians the US has killed or helped kill.

Plus the US itself has funded many terrorist groups. We funded a guy in Afghanistan known for throwing acid in people's faces.

We funded decades of death squads in South America.

Iran could only hope to compete with our massacres...

So you'll forgive me I'm not horribly swayed by your argument.

Also, how many US presidents has Iran overthrown and replaced with murderous dictators?

How many times has Iran given WMDs to our enemies then helped them target our cities?

Because the US happily did that.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
96. Israel created the Iranian secret police?
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 09:19 AM
Jan 2016

Can you point to a source for that for me to check out so I can learn more?

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
100. Sure
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 09:52 AM
Jan 2016

Google SAVAK

Not just Israel but Israel and the US.

We also helped run them for years as they tortured the opponents of the US installed dictator...

Hurray.

Actually here you go:

"SAVAK (Persian: ساواک, short for سازمان اطلاعات و امنیت کشور Sāzemān-e Ettelā'āt va Amniyat-e Keshvar, Organization of Intelligence and National Security) was the secret police, domestic security and intelligence service established by Iran's Mohammad Reza Shah with the help of the United States' Central Intelligence Agency (the CIA) and Israel.[1] SAVAK operated from 1957 to 1979, when the prime minister Shapour Bakhtiar ordered its dissolve during the outbreak of Iranian Revolution. SAVAK has been described as Iran's "most hated and feared institution" prior to the revolution of 1979 because of its practice of torturing and executing opponents of the Pahlavi regime."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAVAK

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
103. Wikipedia isn't an actual source
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 11:10 AM
Jan 2016

It is a collection of information from other sources.

That paragraph is sourced to "Iran, Library of Congress Country Studies (pp 276). Retrieved August 12, 2015."

I believe that is this book:

https://www.loc.gov/item/2008011784/

I am not seeing anything on page 276 that relates to Israel or SAVAK.

Here is that page:

http://www.loc.gov/resource/frdcstdy.irancountrystudy00curt_0?sp=276

In any case, I know that there are claims that the CIA and, to a much lesser extent, Mossad worked with Savak - as both the US and Israel were friendly with Iran at that time.

Conceding that there was some assistance there, that would have been over 50 years ago.

Would you agree that Iran is presently and has in the past funded organizations that have committed terrorist attacks against Israel over the past two decades?

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
115. sigh
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 01:35 PM
Jan 2016

"SAVAK (Sazeman-i Ettelaat va Amniyat-i Keshvar) was the National Organization for Intelligence and Security. Formed under the guidance of United States and Israeli intelligence officers in 1957, SAVAK developed into an effective secret agency. Bakhtiar was appointed its first director, only to be dismissed in 1961, allegedly for organizing a coup; he was assassinated in 1970 under mysterious circumstances, probably on the shah's direct order. His successor, General Hosain Pakravan, was dismissed in 1966, allegedly for having failed to crush the clerical opposition in the early 1960s. The shah turned to his childhood friend and classmate, General Nematollah Nassiri, to rebuild SAVAK and properly "serve" the monarch. Mansur Rafizadeh, the SAVAK director in the United States throughout the 1970s, claimed that General Nassiri's telephone was tapped by SAVAK agents reporting directly to the shah, an example of the level of mistrust pervading the government on the eve of the Revolution.

http://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/world/iran/savak.htm

"Under a CIA operation called “Operation Ajax,” Schwarzkopf Sr. had been sent to Iran to encourage the Shah to return to power and, most crucially, helped him in the quest by forming and training security forces that would be loyal to the Shah. These security agents would eventually metamorphose into the dreaded and feared SAVAK secret police, one of the most brutal foundations of the Shah’s power.

Israel’s Mossad spy agency also assisted in training SAVAK agents in the arts of interrogation, surveillance and torture.
"

http://www.ibtimes.com/irans-feared-savak-norman-schwarzkopfs-father-had-greater-impact-middle-east-affairs-976502

And this: http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/central-intelligence-agency-cia-in-persia

Now, I'm sure you won't believe those either, but I've never met anyone that knows the history of the region very well that didn't believe this. And I've met more than a few. It's also discussed in several books I've read. Like Devil's Game by Robert Dreyfuss, which last I checked is not considered to be fiction.

Now.

Has Iran funded groups the US considers to be terrorists? Absolutely. Has the US funded, do they still fund groups other people consider to be terrorists? Absolutely.

Did Israelis used terrorism during the formative years of their state? Absolutely.

On balance the US has done a LOT more bad than Iran could ever dream of, including to Iran.

I also find it relativity humorous that you say, "both the US and Israel were friendly with Iran at that time". The US was friendly with the dictator they installed, yes. As you might expect. Pretty sly way of ignoring that reality. The dictator that they installed was LESS friendly to his population, turning SAVAK loose, and killing many thousands of civilians. That is - the US and UK installed dictator - with the support of the US, the US and Israel, killed many Iranians.

Read that a few times and get your head around it, then talk to me about Hezbollah.

EDIT:

I just went and checked page 276, about which you said "I am not seeing anything on page 276 that relates to Israel or SAVAK."



It's clear now to me that you're just lying... god knows why, so never mind with any response. I shoulda guessed that someone that tried to manipulate the story like yourself was actually just lying to push some agenda.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
124. Thank you for sharing that
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 07:15 PM
Jan 2016

Can you give me a link to that excerpt you found from that text? Did I type in the wrong page number or did you find that at the link I provided for you? I must have missed it when I read through the page, or typed in the wrong page number, my mistake.

I would point out that I did note that the claim that Mossad had some role in training this organization 60 years ago is most likely accurate. That would make sense since those countries had a good relationship at that time. As you point out, the US and the UK installed a "pro-West dictator" - thus the friendly relationship. It does appear that the CIA had a much greater role in their training, which would also make sense. But this was 60 years ago. Currently they have an anti-West dictator (i.e. the Supreme Leader). In any case, the US ought not to have meddled in their affairs in the first place.

I am not trying to push any agenda or manipulate any story, and I am genuinely glad to learn things that I don't know - so I appreciate you pointing me in the right direction.

That being said, would you agree that Iran currently and in the recent past has financed and is financing groups that have engaged in terrorist attacks against Israeli civilians?

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
125. Not buying it.
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 07:30 PM
Jan 2016

Sorry man, but just not buying it.

If you really want to learn about this stuff there's dozens of books, God knows how many websites and at least a few documentaries.

But like I said. Not buying it.

Best of luck.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
127. OK - fair enough
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 08:08 PM
Jan 2016

I like engaging in discussions with folks much better than reading books. More interesting give and take. I try to not only learn new things myself but to also help others maybe see things from a different perspective too. I especially like finding common ground even when there are areas of disagreement.

That's what I like about DU, anyway - getting to interact with really thoughtful people about interesting topics. I understand that not everyone feels the same way.

All the best!

 

Uponthegears

(1,499 posts)
53. I completely agree
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 03:16 PM
Jan 2016

that there are few things more disgusting than denying the slaughter of 7+ million innocent people.

However, I noticed that your story came from ynet (and most of the other stories on the subject cited ynet as their source). Because ynet is perhaps not the most reliable site when it comes to news from Iran, I went to the Tehran Municipal website. There, I was unable to find the contest to which the article refers. Not saying it isn't true, I just didn't find it.

Here's what I wonder, if it is true. Considering:

(a) the dozens of highly publicized (and endorsed in the responses to your OP) "Draw the Prophet" contests;
(b) the extreme offensiveness of such contests to Muslims;
(c) the West's mocking of Muslims for being so offended over a cartoon; and,
(d) the Tehran Municipal Authority's almost certain knowledge that the belittling of the single most horrific
event of the 20th century would be extremely offensive to virtually everyone, but almost certainly those
who relish in "Draw the Prophet" contests,

Is it possible that this contest is more of a send up of all those Westerners who laugh in the face of Muslims who become upset over "Draw the Prophet" contests and then tell them "It's only a cartoon," than it is an attempt to promote Holocaust denial?

Are we getting played?

Denzil_DC

(7,222 posts)
65. It was reported in the Tehran Times back in December
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 01:10 AM
Jan 2016

And this is the second year it's been held.

TEHRAN – Organizers of the 11th Tehran International Cartoon Biennial has allocated a cash prize of $50,000 for the best cartoon on the Holocaust, the organizers announced on Wednesday.

Three other cartoonists will also receive cash prizes of 12,000, 8,000 and 5,000 dollars respectively, the secretary of the biennial, Masud Shojai-Tabatabai, told the Persian service of MNA.

He added that the competition will be held in June 2016 in Mashhad with cartoonists participating from 50 countries.

“We do not mean to approve or deny the Holocaust, however, the main question is that why is there no permission to talk about the Holocaust despite their (the West) belief in freedom of speech.

“Moreover, why should the oppressed people of Palestine pay the price for the Holocaust? We are also worried about the contemporary holocausts in which a great number of women and children are being killed in Iraq, Yemen and Syria,” he added.

http://www.tehrantimes.com/index_View.asp?code=251584


You're right that most English-language links to the story seem to be involve ynet. I'm not clear whether it's the municipal authority that's really organizing it - 2015's was staged by a newspaper, Hamshahri.

As you suggest, if reports elsewhere are to be believed, it's justified as tit for tat for the Prophet cartoons:

Organisers say the competition is designed to highlight the world’s double standard in defending caricatures of the Muslim prophet Mohammed, whose depiction is forbidden in Islam.


Last year's winner didn't directly depict the Holocaust or deny it:


 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
80. They've held these sorts of contests several times already
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 07:51 AM
Jan 2016

Last edited Fri Jan 15, 2016, 09:14 AM - Edit history (1)

Tehran biennial to grant $50,000 cash prize to best cartoon on Holocaust

TEHRAN – Organizers of the 11th Tehran International Cartoon Biennial has allocated a cash prize of $50,000 for the best cartoon on the Holocaust, the organizers announced on Wednesday.

http://www.tehrantimes.com/index_View.asp?code=251584

Is that a better source for you?

I would also point out that Westerners don't laugh in the face of Muslims who "become upset" over draw the prophet contests. They express revulsion towards Muslims who "kill people" over draw the prophet contests.

 

Uponthegears

(1,499 posts)
90. Is there anything
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 08:40 AM
Jan 2016

more to say than, "Hogwash?"

How many hundred, or dare I say thousand, links should I waste my time putting in here to rebut that jingoistic falsehood.

None

If the West is mocking Muslim values, it's free speech. If Muslims mock Western values (and even more so if they point out Western hypocrisy), it's "evil un-American crap."

'Nuff said.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
93. You must be fucking kidding
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 09:13 AM
Jan 2016

When the west mocks Muslim values and especially anything to do with the prophet - even a fucking cartoon - there are threats and ACTUAL violence. When iran holds a holocaust denying contest, they get mocking and derision. Unless you think we should all just meekly agree with their ridiculous taboos, I think the ACTUAL violence is much, much worse.

 

Uponthegears

(1,499 posts)
98. No, I'm laughing at a joke
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 09:42 AM
Jan 2016

To claim that the ONLY thing condemned by Muslim-haters are the random and isolated acts of violence by people claiming to be motivated by provocative cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is utterly hilarious.

I am not saying that you should "meekly agree" with ANYONE'S "ridiculous taboos" or even refrain from criticizing them. All I am saying is that you can't, on one hand, yell "free speech" to defend offensive "Mock the Prophet" contests (even though they are INTENTIONALLY designed to promote violence just so Muslim haters can say, "see, I told you about those Muslims&quot and then whine about silencing "un-American crap" when Muslims hold offensive "Mock the Holocaust" contests.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
99. I see only ONE person
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 09:46 AM
Jan 2016

the person writing the OP who agrees with silencing this as speech. And plenty of others disagreeing, including myself.

 

Uponthegears

(1,499 posts)
102. So why is the OP even here?
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 10:05 AM
Jan 2016

What is the point of it?

To provide a jumping off point for the umpteenth millionth attempt to attract posters who will equate justifiable Muslim outrage over Western arrogance with unjustifiable Muslim violence? To bemoan the fact that most DU members will not stand arm in arm with Netanyahu and Likud when he/they conspired with REPUBLICANS to obstruct US foreign policy AND foment war with Iran?

Why do you, and others, spend your time twisting (LYING ABOUT) the fact that I (and others) refused to be silent about an outrageous OP into some sort of tacit support for those who misuse the Quran to justify their hatred for, and/or abuse of, women, homosexuals, and people of other faiths? Why aren't you calling out the OP?

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
105. OK
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 11:23 AM
Jan 2016

Personally, I think folks should be able to mock the holocaust without fearing for their lives (which they are) and they should also be able to draw cartoons of Mohammed without fearing for their lives (which they are not).

There are many books written by holocaust deniers. There are conferences. There are cartoons - viscously antisemitic ones. And people have gotten upset about them (justifiably), but no one has been killed for it and no one is afraid to publish such material for fear of being murdered.

People have been murdered for drawing images of the prophet.

Do you dispute that?

 

Uponthegears

(1,499 posts)
110. Snore
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 11:54 AM
Jan 2016

You are equating Muslim outrage with Muslim murder. They aren't the same. Without that false equivalency, your comparison of the Muslim reaction to "Insult the Prophet" contests vs. the Western reaction to "Insult History" contests is utterly baseless.

You are saying, because a handful of murderers kill while CLAIMING to do so over a cartoon, Western outrage over an Holocaust-mocking cartoon is somehow not as antithetical to the idea that we should all be free to speak our minds as Muslim outrage over a Prophet-mocking cartoon.

IF you mean to say, "X, Y, and Z, killing people over a cartoon is despicable," SAY IT.

Don't say, "We westerners are so much better than Muslims because we don't kill people over cartoons" That is ridiculous and IT'S A LIE.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
111. Trying to have a polite and respectful dialogue
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 12:24 PM
Jan 2016

I don't see any reason for the snarky remarks.

Around what percentage of Muslims, would you say, believe that a person who draws a cartoon of the prophet ought to be killed for doing so?

 

Uponthegears

(1,499 posts)
117. No, actually you're not
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 01:46 PM
Jan 2016

You're actually trying to play the same tired games Muslim-haters use every time they are confronted with the fact that they are trying to convince people that Muslims are "worse" than non-Muslims.

This post is no exception.

Here's my answer to your junior-Socratic method question:

I don't care. What's more, I don't care what some poll says. None of it matters. It is a simple FACT that the number of Muslims who would ACTUALLY kill someone over a cartoon is infinitely small and THAT is the only figure that matter . . . PARTICULARLY when having a polite and respectful dialogue with someone who believes there is an ounce of intellectual integrity in equating Muslim anger with Muslim murder.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
122. OK - I am sorry you feel that way
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 07:00 PM
Jan 2016

I believe that I have been polite and courteous and have sought to understand a perspective different from my own.

I personally do not understand the reaction to the prophet cartoons, and I find it strange that people would be so angry to the point of (at least in some significant numbers) condoning acts of violence as a potentially legitimate response to someone drawing a cartoon.

I am sure there are people who find other things strange that seem perfectly reasonable to me, which is why I am trying to get a handle on this from someone who doesn't seem to agree with my point of view.

Absent more information, my position on the subject stands.

I am happy to withdraw from this discussion if you aren't interested in continuing.

Bernardo de La Paz

(48,959 posts)
54. "un-American crap"? Amerika Uber Alles? Is not Holocaust-denying un-French and un-Nigerian?
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 03:19 PM
Jan 2016

Yes, Holocaust-denying is despicable and stupid. But just other countries can be un-American and enjoy tea and crumpets and cricket and rugby and didgeridoo and yoga and incense and much more.

We don't have to pave the earth and turn everyone into an American.

Holocaust-denying is much more than un-American. It is inhuman. Or are Americans supposed to be more human than humans? American Exceptionalism run amok again?

 

Bernin

(311 posts)
55. This is
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 04:20 PM
Jan 2016

just as classy as Rachel Corrie pancake day.
WTF is wrong with people on that side of the world?

Bernardo de La Paz

(48,959 posts)
57. Same things as on this side of the world:
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 07:09 PM
Jan 2016

Same things as on this side of the world, mostly rooted in ignorance and religion, but I repeat myself.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
94. Is the Israeli government
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 09:16 AM
Jan 2016

sponsoring that pancake day (which I've never heard of)? Or are citizens engaging in free speech? The difference is so freeking stark, I can't believe people are trying to draw a comparison.

 

happyslug

(14,779 posts)
61. Israel should worry about this contest, the winners did NOT deny the Holocaust, they used it instead
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 11:23 PM
Jan 2016

The winning cartoon showed the Temple Mount being surrounded by a wall, with the photo of Auschwitz, implying Israel was using the Holocaust as an excuse to take the Temple Mount.

The second showed an Arab, with a Crescent on his strip shirt, implying he was like the Jews in the Death Camps (The Crescent is were Jews were suppose to wear the Star of David under the Nazis), unable to escape the Wall that Israel has put around the West Bank.

Both Cartoons actually accept that the Holocaust took place, but then use it against Israel.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Holocaust_Cartoon_Competition

The Number 7256 seems to be 1972, 5 and 6, the date of the Munich massacre, 5th and 6th of September 1972

Iran uses Year, Month day system of dates:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Date_format_by_country

Thus 72 being first makes sense for Iran. The 5 and 6 implies the day of the massacre of Jews. Thus it recalls TWO massacres of Jews and then compares what happened to the victims of those massacre to Arabs living on the West Bank.

Thus the cartoons that won, both gave HOMAGE to the victims of the Holocaust and then pointed out the similarity to those crimes to what Israel is doing to the West Bank. That use of the Holocaust and Munich appears to have been more offensive to Israel then any denial of the Holocaust could be.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
71. Yes they did
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 07:26 AM
Jan 2016

The created a cartoon comparing the situation in Israel and the Occupied Territories to what went on in Nazi Germany and across Europe during the Holocaust.

By definition, that is what Holocaust Denial is - minimizing the reality of what occurred during the Holocaust.

Holocaust deniers question the extent of what went on during the Holocaust and suggest it was much less what it really was. "It was exaggerated" is a common refrain.

 

happyslug

(14,779 posts)
109. Have you studied the Holocaust? The Death Camps were a MINOR part of the Holocaust.
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 11:42 AM
Jan 2016

The Death Camps (and that is what they were NOT concentration camps) were very efficiently run, the victims arrived by train and in the early years, 1942 and 1943, were taken by truck to where they had to disrobe to go to the "Showers&quot In laet 1943 through 1944 a train siding was built so trucks were no longer needed). The"Showers" was were they were gassed. After being gassed the bodies where either burned or buried, the whole operation took less then six hours from the time the victims left the train till their bodes were disposed of (and that included gathering various items from the victims including any gold teeth they had).

People concentrate on the Death Camps, for that is where most of the killing occurred. The problem is that was just the end of a long process, and that process started with gathering the Jews up and putting them into Ghettos. Ghettos is an old term, originally meant the Jewish quarter of a city with a substantial Jewish population. Treatment of the Jews in those Jewish Ghettos varied over time and place. Some times the Ghettos were destroyed, but in most cases the Ghettos survived, even after the movement in the 1800s to permit Jews to live anywhere in European Cities.

Hitler and the Nazis brought back the Ghetto AND added additional characteristics, First the Nazis walled them off. Older Ghettos did have walls, but more a demarcation line then a wall to prevent movement (i.e. In time and place where Jews were NOT to be outside the Ghetto, those older walls defined where a Jew could be, in less restrictive time periods, where a Jew should be).

Compared this to a Nazi Jewish Ghetto. There is the famous photo and movie showing Jews walking up a Staircase in the Warsaw Ghetto and then down the other side so the Jews living in the Ghetto did not cross the main street below them. The old Warsaw Ghetto had that main street right through the old Jewish Ghetto, for the Ghetto was where Jews should live, but Jews were permitted to go in and out of the Ghetto, thus having the main street go through the Jewish Ghetto was NOT a problem for the Poles and even the Russians when they ruled Poland. That the Main Street went through the Jewish Ghetto was a HARD problem for the Nazis, and thus the Steps up and down so that the Jews did not come in contact with the rest of the people using that street.

The Nazis used force, threats and other means to get the Jews of Warsaw into that Warsaw Ghetto, The Nzis used similar tactics elsewhere in Central and Eastern Europe (Western Europe had long broke up their Jewish Ghettos, so in those countries the Nazis gathered up the jews and moved them East to Eastern and Central European Ghettos, to holding camps to be sent to the Death Camps, or directly to the Death Camps). Please note, most Western Nations had in the Renaissance and later strict laws on Jews, forbidding them in most Western European Countries, thus no Jews no Jewish Ghettos. Until Oliver Cromwell permitted Jews into England, it was illegal to be a Jew in England from the 1300s till the mid 1600s (When Cromwell permitted the Jews back into England), thus no Jewish Ghettos in Western Europe, for they were almost no Jews till the 1800s).

In the WWI era Nazi Ghettos, Jews barely survived, that is where they were beaten by Nazis, if a Nazis wanted to beat up a Jew, Starved, worked to death etc. You had stories of such actions in the Death Camps, but to the Jews and others that the Nazis had selected to help them run the Death Camps. The number of people reserved to run the Death Camps were a small percentage of the people sent to those camps, unlike the Ghettos where starvation, beatings and being worked to death was the norm for ANYONE in the Ghetto.

Without the Ghettos, the Death Camps were impossible for the Death Camps needed a constant supply of new victims and most of those victims came from the Ghettos, with Western European Jews coming in when collected. Since the Majority of Jews in Europe lived in Poland, the Ghettos of Poland ended up as a rich source of victims (AND Hitler in the 1930s expelled a lot of German Jews to Poland on the grounds they families originally came from Poland and thus they were Polish not German).

You can actually make the case that the Death Camps were Humane, people who were being starved and worked to death were taken to a place where they were quickly put out of their "Misery" I personally reject that comparison, but compared to the conditions in the Ghettos and how bad there were, that argument can be made (Is it more humane to quickly kill someone off, or starved him or her to death, the better answer is feed the person and stop working them so hard, but the Nazis refused to even considered that option).

Once you understand the Holocaust and the role the Ghettos played in it, then the Cartoons really hits home. The Nazis knew no one would accept them killing the Jews, but if the Jews died of natural causes, the Nazis could claim all they did was isolate the Jews, it was the fault of the Jews themselves if their starved or worked themselves to death. This was the purpose of the Ghettos, to isolate the Jews and slowly kill them off, out of sight and technically NOT by the hands of nay German. This is what the Cartoons are comparing how Israel is treating the Arabs of the West Bank, like the Jews in the Jewish Ghettos under the Nazis. Those Ghettos were bad and almost everything you hear of the Israelis doing on the West Bank the Nazis did in the Jewish Ghettos (Raids, killings, destroying homes etc). The wall being built around the West Bank to keep the Arabs out, is similar to the walls built around the Jewish Ghettos. That is what the Cartoons are comparing Israel to, and anyone who has truly studied the Holocaust learns the Death Camps were a minor part of the Nazis attack on the Jews of Europe, the main attack was done by getting the Jews into the Ghettos and then treating them badly. The Rail Lines to Austerlitz were the end of the Holocaust not the beginning, the beginning was the Ghettos.

As to the Death Camps themselves, the Death Camps ONLY came about do to the Nazis being at war with the whole world and thus what the World thought of the Nazis for killing the Jews no longer mattered (the Nazis could then speed up the process). Israel has NEVER been in a position where it could do a death camp situation, it needs US support and a mass oververt killing of Arabs would not be accepted by the US. Now, if the US ends up unable to even protest a Israeli killing of Arabs, then, like the Nazis after 1941, all checks would have been removed and given the politics of Israel, something like the Holocaust will occur (Through shipping all of the Arabs to Jordan would be Israel's first choice, just like Hitler's first choice was to ship the Jews to Israel, till WWII and the British blockade ended that option).

Thus it is comparing the Palestinians to the Jews in the Ghettos that makes these Cartoons effective. If you study the Holocaust the Death Camps are the result of the total isolation of Germany after December 1941. With that isolation, all checks were off and the Death Camps occur, but only because the Nazis had already set up the Ghettos that could be used to feed those death camps. Furthermore the Ghettos themselves were set up to kill off the Jews without actually killing them. The Nazis set up the Ghettos not only to isolate the Jews of Europe but also to have them slowly die out. No direct killing, authorized by law was done, but it was perfectly OK for anyone to kill a Jew in or out of the Ghetto (and in the Ghetto it was hard to show that the Jew did NOT cause the fight, which was the defense most killers of jews prior to 1941 used and was accepted by the Police). The same is being seen in the West Bank with Settlers being permitted to commit murder and unless the victim has overwhelming evidence that they were the victims, the Police/ Israeli Army takes the side of the Settlers.

Thus if you want to isolate the Holocaust to the Death Camps, these Cartoons minimize that part of the Holocaust, for the MAJOR part of the Holocaust was gathering the Jews and sending them into the Ghettos. To most of the victims of the Holocaust, the Death Camps took up less then a day in their lives. The Ghetto took up years of their lives and set them up to be sent to the Death Camps. The Cartoon is comparing what Israel is doing to the Arabs of the West Bank to what the Nazis did to the Jews by setting up and forcing the Jews into the Jewish Ghettos. The Ghettos is where the Holocaust was set up and drew its life blood from and these Cartoons are clearly make that Comparison.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
112. Around 100,000 Jews were starved to death in the Warsaw Ghetto
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 12:34 PM
Jan 2016

Most of the remanding Jews were deported to death camps and exterminated or killed inside the ghetto itself. Approximately 300,000 Jews were killed all told. This all occurred over the course of less than two years.

Nothing resembling this is going on in the West Bank.

 

happyslug

(14,779 posts)
116. The Isolation and use of Force is, as are the random killings
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 01:45 PM
Jan 2016

The holocaust started with the ISOLATION of the Jews from the rest of the Population, just like what Israel has done with the Arabs of the West Bank. The Nazis claimed is was to protect the rest of the population from crimes of the Jews in the Ghetto just like Israel is saying it is isolating the Arabs in the West Bank to protect Israelis from attacks by the Arabs of the West Bank.

The problem is that isolation, it is the isolation and use of force that makes the two comparable. Furthermore, the reason actual deaths are smaller for Israel, is that Israel has considered outside public opinion, something Hitler did not have to worry about after December 1941 and gave little weight to after September 1, 1939.

My point is WHAT permitted the Holocaust to occur, is occurring in the West Bank but held in check by the need for Israel to consider foreign public opinion. Israel is like Germany in the 1930s, a clear case of discrimination and isolation and a desire to eliminate a minority, but fear a backlash if the acts are to overt. Thus you had the Star of David, the Nuremberg laws etc, but no mass killings by the Nazis of Jews TILL WAR BROKE OUT. It is with the war breaking out that the Nazis could increase its policy to eliminate the Jews. Israel has NEVER been so isolated that it could do something to the Arabs of the West Bank without repercussions.

The removal of the checks on the acts of the Nazis do to they being at war with the rest of the world has NEVER occurred in the case if Israel (with exception of the War of Independence and the removal of Palestinians from parts of what is now Israel). Thus such checks have always existed and prevented another Holocaust (This time as to the Arabs). The Holocaust only occurred do to those checks NOT existing for the Nazis. In WWI when Germany was even MORE Isolated (Italy was on the ALLIED side in WWI) no attacks on the Jews occurred for Germany of WWI did not have a policy of being anti-Jewish (Germany of WWI was anti-semitic but violate attacks on Jews were treated as crimes not as a right).

The reason the Germans of WWI did not exterminate the Jews was that was NOT a policy of the Kaiser. During WWII, when the Nazis ruled Germany, it was the Policy of the Nazis to eliminate the Jews, thus once the checks were gone, killing of Jews was done. In Israel today it is the clear policy of the Israeli Government to remove all of the Arabs from the West Bank. The use of more violence to achieve has NOT occurred do to fear of foreign reaction as oppose to any desire not to increase violence. Thus the checks on Germany in the 1930s are similar to the checks on Israel today, but what will happen if those checks are removed? We know what happened in the 1940s when the checks were removed, that is when the mass killings of Jews began (including killing them in the field as the German Army advanced into Russia in 1941).

The problem was the POLICY drove the Nazis to the Holocaust, not the isolation of the Nazi (The Kaiser had been even more isolated but since removing the Jews from Germany was NOT a policy of The Kaiser, no holocaust in WWI as to the Jews). During WWII, it was a clear policy of the Nazis to do SOMETHING about the Jews. Till the start of WWII the drive to achieve that policy was prevented by the fear of foreign public opinion. Thus no major killings of Jews till the Nazis no longer had to consider such public opinion. Fortunately for the Arabs of the West Bank, since 1967 Foreign public opinion has always been a check on Israeli policy. This included the policy of driving out the Palestinians. Thus any increase in violence to achieve that Policy have been held in check by such foreign public opinion for except for that foreign public opinion, there are NO internal checks on the Israel Army from doing what the Nazis did to the Jews. That is the message of those cartoons, as long as the policy of Israel is to treat the Palestinians as second class citizens, something like the Holocaust, this time with the Palestinians as the victim, is not only possible, but the logical end result of Israeli policy that on West Bank must be Jewish.

That is the trust of those cartoons and apparently you hate any attack on Israel so much you consider those cartoons not only Anti-Semitic but also Holocaust denial. A Cartoon using the Holocaust to make a point can NOT be a denial of the Holocaust, it is not only an acknowledgement that the Holocaust occurred but that we have to watch to make sure it does not occur again. Just because the former victims of the Holocaust are setting up a situation for another holocaust, does not mean pointing out the later is a Holocaust denial nor is it minimizing the horror of the Holocaust. In fact by bring up the Holocaust the cartoons are warning to watch for similar actions and that is NOT denying the Holocaust it is acknowledging it,

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
123. OK
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 07:08 PM
Jan 2016

I appreciate you sharing your perspective on this subject.

I would again remind you that Holocaust denial does not generally mean making a claim that the historical event did not happen, but rather it means claiming that it was greatly exaggerated or partially fabricated in some way.

By comparing the Holocaust, which, in fairly short order, led to the systemic extermination of millions of people, to the current situation in West Bank where nothing of the kind has happened would fall under that general understanding of denial.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
62. Idiotic to suggest we should have risked letting Iran get a nuke
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 11:25 PM
Jan 2016

by insisting they promise to not be assholes and hold assholish cartoon contests.

The point of the Iran deal was to prevent royal assholes from getting nukes, not to get them to stop being offensive assholes.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
82. What about complaining to the UN?
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 07:53 AM
Jan 2016

And asking that they release a statement condemning this contest.

Would you support that?

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
95. You're not getting the point
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 09:19 AM
Jan 2016

There will be NO violence about this - NOBODY is talking about going to war about this (other than those like yourself who think they're making some kind of cute point). Unlike when cartoons of the prophet are printed and the bullets start flying. THAT's the difference.

NutmegYankee

(16,199 posts)
70. Meh.
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 06:40 AM
Jan 2016

Nobody will be murdered over this. Nobody will have to go in hiding over this. And Iran's attempt to demonstrate a double standard will fail.

Nolimit

(142 posts)
114. This could backfire on them real easy
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 12:55 PM
Jan 2016

If it's international, anyone around the world could sent in submissions. What would their reaction be to mailing them profane images of Mohammed? Or the Ayatollah? Why is this their reaction to Mohammed comics? They hate Israel, sure, but the Holocaust happened to Jews in Europe, no Israelis.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Iran holds Holocaust-deny...