Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

47of74

(18,470 posts)
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 07:56 PM Jan 2016

Putin points to NATO threat in new security strategy

Last edited Sat Jan 2, 2016, 07:13 PM - Edit history (1)

Source: CNN

(CNN)Russian President Vladimir Putin has endorsed a new security strategy, which points to NATO expansion as a threat to the country.

The document outlines the national interests and strategic priorities of the nation. Putin signed the executive order Thursday, establishing a new posture toward the NATO bloc, which has seen its relationship with Russia deteriorate since the crisis in Ukraine, which began in 2014.

Russian news agency Tass quotes the strategy, which cites a NATO military buildup, and "the alliance's approach to Russia's borders," as a threat to Russia's national security. The document says the organization is illegally extending its reach.

"The buildup of the military potential of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and vesting it with global functions implemented in violations of norms of international law, boosting military activity of the bloc's countries, further expansion of the alliance, the approach of its military infrastructure to Russian borders create a threat to the national security," it says.



Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/01/world/putin-nato-security-strategy/index.html



Ugh. If anything is a threat to Russia, it's Putin himself.

EDIT: He's not a treat to Russia.
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

LS_Editor

(893 posts)
1. Well, NATO is a threat to Russia. And it's expanded since the fall of the USSR.
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 09:34 PM
Jan 2016

Breaking a promise we made.

Igel

(35,197 posts)
2. Except that nowhere was the promise written down.
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 12:57 AM
Jan 2016

Or discussed formally.

It was a possible concession that was mentioned in impromptu discussions. It wasn't a topic for serious discussion and wasn't part of any agreement.

This is Gorbachev's account.

All the talk of "promise" comes from people not present when it was supposed to have been made, based on Gorbachev's account and hearsay. It was rumored enough that it's all but achieved fabled treaty status in the Russian media, thrice ratified by the US Senate and blessed by two Popes and the Grand Mufti and by Stalin's ghost himself, and cited as gospel by those for whom the West can do few things right but who fail to understand why any part of a former empire twice enslaved, for centuries the first time and for decades the second would fear a resurgence and third annexation by the same country. (Of course, these are often those who understand why a country in Latin America, after the extensive annexation and subjugation at the hands of the US harbor animosity.)

Igel

(35,197 posts)
10. Putin needs a threat.
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 09:29 PM
Jan 2016

He also thinks that independence in Russia's sphere of influence is bad.

Think Monroe doctrine but with permanent US bases and veto power over the governments. For the last 220 years. MakesUS imperialism in the area seem slight.

LS_Editor

(893 posts)
11. Putin is going to have an increasing Islamic extremist terrorism threat for a while
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 10:15 PM
Jan 2016

His direct intervention in Syria was a bad move, which the right-wing lunatics have convinced me even more with their support of his "tough" actions.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
5. Historically, Russia, in all it's forms, has always been paranoid about invasion
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 03:45 PM
Jan 2016

Putin's statement isn't really anything new and is probably more for domestic consumption then some major change in foreign policy.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
8. There is a basis to Russia's paranoia
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 08:10 PM
Jan 2016

Just off the top of my head, Russia has been invaded by: Sweden, Poland, Germany, France, the Mongols, Japan, Great Britain and the United States.

According to Wikipedia, during WWII the Soviet Union lost 27 million dead and that one person in four of the ENTIRE country was killed or wounded. There are still people in Russia young enough to remember what their country went through.




*My comments are not meant as support of Putin or meant to ignore Russia's history of invading other countries.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
9. Guess Putin doesn't like it- Turkey is one of 28 member countries.
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 09:18 PM
Jan 2016
http://www.nato.int/nato-welcome/index.html

NATO membership is open to “any other European state in a position to further the principles of this Treaty and to contribute to the security of the North Atlantic area.”

NATO also has what it calls the Membership Action Plan, which offers aspiring members practical advice and targeted assistance. In turn, aspiring members are expected to meet certain key requirements.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Putin points to NATO thre...