Watch: Earthquake hits Oklahoma, felt in Texas
Source: Austin American-Statesman
The magnitude-4.7 earthquake that rattled the northern town of Medford, Oklahoma early this morning could be felt as far Texas, the Weather Channel reported. Originally registered at magnitude-4.5, the quake was upgraded to a 4.7 a few hours after, making it the states strongest earthquake of 2015. Another 4.7 shook the state just 11 days earlier, during a month in which the state has seen a record number of magnitude-4 or higher earthquakes.
Several people reported feeling tremors in Lovelady, Texas more than 650 miles away. Currently no damages or injuries have been reported.
The earthquake follows a power outage affecting more than 70,000 after a storm hit the area with ice and freezing rain.
Read more: http://weather.blog.statesman.com/2015/11/30/watch-earthquake-hits-oklahoma-felt-in-texas/
Video at link.
LiberalArkie
(15,707 posts)ruffburr
(1,190 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)A study needs to be done in Oklahoma to find out for sure what is going on.
Tempest
(14,591 posts)Fracking in NM is limited to two small areas of the state, the northwest and southeast corners.
Fracking in Oklahoma is statewide.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Speaking without full knowledge again.
Kingofalldems
(38,440 posts)longship
(40,416 posts)...and a DUer responded, "Is there fracking there?"
Dumb... DE Dumb-Dumb.
Whether or not there is fracking, there are earthquakes in CA every fscking day, no matter where you are in CA.
Not every earthquake on the planet is from fucking fracking. There are many places there is fracking which have no earthquakes. And CA has many hundreds of earthquakes every year, whether or not there is fracking.
Now, am I saying we should frack? Nope! I think we should not. However, this earthquake == fracking stuff has got to stop here. Correlation does not mean causation and an earthquake does not mean fracking.
Would I recommend fracking in an earthquake zone? I would not recommend fracking anywhere. And certainly not because of earthquakes. Or ground water.
Earthquakes were practically non-existent in Oklahoma before fracking was started.
Now earthquakes are daily there.
http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/08/man-made-earthquakes-are-altering-the-geologic-landscape/372243/
longship
(40,416 posts)What do the geologists say?
And what does practically non-existent mean?
Anecdotal evidence is not science. And earthquake causation is likely multi-factorial. If one is getting earthquakes with fracking one likely would be getting them without fracking. There are many places with fracking which do not have earthquakes. And there are lots of places with earthquakes without fracking. Therefore, fracking cannot be the sole cause of earthquakes.
**The question is Does fracking in an earthquake zone increase the number of earthquakes? That is a question for geologists, not some random person on a Inet forum.
So it is safe to say that it is likely that these earthquakes are not solely from fracking. My ** question is the one that needs to be answered by a qualified expert in the field.
Tempest
(14,591 posts)But I suspect you already knew that.
And the seismic record of Oklahoma for the last 150 years shows few earthquakes a year before fracking. Now there's hundreds a month. That's not anecdotal evidence, that's hard science.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/22/us/oklahoma-acknowledges-wastewater-from-oil-and-gas-wells-as-major-cause-of-quakes.html
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/04/21/us-oklahoma-fracking-quakes-idUSKBN0NC2F220150421
http://kfor.com/2015/04/21/oklahoma-geological-survey-earthquakes-linked-to-oil-and-gas-activity/
https://stateimpact.npr.org/oklahoma/tag/earthquakes/
http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/31673-frackquake-madness-35-fracking-earthquakes-rock-oklahoma-in-a-week-regulators-call-event-a-game-changer
longship
(40,416 posts)But I also suspect that there would only be tremblers if there was an active fault in the fracking region.
BTW, I think fracking is horrible. But the reason to oppose them goes far beyond the tremblers.
progree
(10,901 posts)The central US state of Oklahoma has gone from registering two earthquakes a year to nearly two a day and scientists point to a controversial culprit: wastewater injection wells used in fracking.
Located in the middle of the country, far from any major fault lines, Oklahoma experienced 585 earthquakes of a magnitude of 3.0 or greater in 2014. That's more than three times as many as the 180 which hit California last year.
As of last month, Oklahoma has already experienced more than 600 quakes strong enough to rattle windows and rock cars. The biggest was a 4.5-magnitude quake that hit the small town of Crescent.
.... From 1975 to 2008, the state experienced anywhere from zero to three earthquakes a year which registered at 3.0 or higher. Then the numbers jumped: there were 20 in 2009, 35 in 2010, 64 in 2011, 35 in 2012, 109 in 2013 and 585 in 2014.
More: http://news.yahoo.com/one-us-state-went-two-quakes-585-054259418.html
The source of this article is Agence France-Presse (AFP). Yahoo is just the news aggregator which posts news from multiple sources, e.g. similarly news.google.com
Even the Republican Oklahoma governor has accepted the link between fracking (particularly the injection of waste water into the ground) and earthquakes.
http://kfor.com/2015/08/04/gov-mary-fallin-acknowledges-direct-correlation-between-earthquakes-and-disposal-wells/
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Entertaining how your facts changed his premise.
Tempest
(14,591 posts)With a simple Google search.
olddad56
(5,732 posts)I have felt a couple, and they have a had a few big ones in my lifetime, but none that impacted me. Had they ever had one in Oklahoma or the Dakotas prior to fracking? Was in a huge one in Montana in 1962 while on vacation. Floods are a bigger concern for me, obviously not during the drought.
Tempest
(14,591 posts)The 1989 quake pretty much shut down major travel routes in the Bay area for weeks.
"Had they ever had one in Oklahoma or the Dakotas prior to fracking? "
Oklahoma averaged about one a year before fracking. Now it's 500+ a year after fracking.
Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)I am north of there but didn't feel anything. But I was probably either asleep or feeding cats.
TexasTowelie
(112,063 posts)it's always a convenient excuse!
Stevepol
(4,234 posts)and I never felt an earthquake until the last two years. I've felt 4 now, the last two 4.7 M.
Laffy Kat
(16,376 posts)Can't remember the magnitude but it was an eye-opener. Memphis sits on the New Madrid fault line... "Any day" they say. Haven't lived there in over 30 years, though.
Behind the Aegis
(53,936 posts)I was actually reading DU and my chair rocked and vape pen on my desk almost fell over.
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)Runningdawg
(4,514 posts)a big one hits, Cushing falls into a sink hole and every well for 100 miles around blows. Remember those pictures of Iraq during GWI and the oil wells burning? A drop in the bucket. Those wells were in the desert, the wells in question here are in populated areas. Cushing is also within 100 miles of OKs 2 largest cities, the 2 largest state universities AND Keystone dam. This is a recipe for unprecedented disaster in the US. The fires from the wells will pollute the air, the oil on the ground will pollute the water, kill the crops and livestock, and if the dam goes, all bets are off, it will make Katrina and Sandy look like a walk in the park.
valerief
(53,235 posts)Holland suspects that modern oil production techniques are triggering the jump in quakes. A few years back, companies figured out how to drill sideways through layers of shale, then break, or frack, the rock, releasing a torrent of oil.
madokie
(51,076 posts)about 175 maybe 200 miles or so and I never felt a thing. Why o why do I miss out on all the fun.
Just in case
A repeat of this will not be good: http://www.new-madrid.mo.us/index.aspx?NID=102
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)MuseRider
(34,103 posts)all the way up into NE Kansas. One shook pretty good I hear, I slept through it.