HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Supreme court rules for g...

Mon May 21, 2012, 12:56 PM

Supreme court rules for government on immigrants' residence

Source: Reuters

By James Vicini

WASHINGTON | Mon May 21, 2012 11:20am EDT

(Reuters) - The Supreme Court ruled on Monday that the length of lawful residence in the United States by immigrant parents cannot be considered by the federal government in deciding whether their children should be deported.

The justices unanimously handed a victory to the Obama administration and overturned a ruling by a U.S. appeals court that immigrants who entered the United States as children may count their parents' years in this country to satisfy the residency requirements.

Under federal immigration law, people who have been lawful permanent residents in the United States for at least five years and have lived continuously in the country for seven years can seek leniency from the government when facing deportation.

-snip-


Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/21/us-usa-court-immigration-idUSBRE84K0T920120521

7 replies, 1838 views

Thread informationRemove bookmarkTrash this thread

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 7 replies Author Time Post
Reply Supreme court rules for government on immigrants' residence (Original post)
Eugene May 2012 OP
McCamy Taylor May 2012 #1
msanthrope May 2012 #6
happyslug May 2012 #2
msanthrope May 2012 #5
EFerrari May 2012 #3
msanthrope May 2012 #7
blackspade May 2012 #4

Response to Eugene (Original post)

Mon May 21, 2012, 02:33 PM

1. So, the parents can come here legally to work, but the kids have to stay at home?

Sounds a bit unfair to me. The parents are here paying taxes that support schools, the government etc. but their children can not benefit from this.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to McCamy Taylor (Reply #1)

Mon May 21, 2012, 07:26 PM

6. No--the kids do not have to stay home. But when the kids commit crimes, and removal proceedings

begin, they do not get a stay based on the status/time of their PARENTS.



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to happyslug (Reply #2)

Mon May 21, 2012, 07:15 PM

5. Note it's the second opinion today that relies heavily on Chevron deference?

You have Kagan and Ginsburg, taking the 9th and 3rd to task, respectively, and calling for judicial restraint.

Something's coming.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Eugene (Original post)

Mon May 21, 2012, 06:39 PM

3. What a disgrace this court is. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EFerrari (Reply #3)

Mon May 21, 2012, 07:31 PM

7. Why should criminals get a pass based on their parents' time in this country?

This applies to adult criminals who are in removal proceedings post-conviction. Why should their parents' time in this country impute to them?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Eugene (Original post)

Mon May 21, 2012, 07:13 PM

4. disgusting

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread