Mon May 21, 2012, 12:56 PM
Eugene (15,533 posts)
Supreme court rules for government on immigrants' residence
Source: Reuters
By James Vicini WASHINGTON | Mon May 21, 2012 11:20am EDT (Reuters) - The Supreme Court ruled on Monday that the length of lawful residence in the United States by immigrant parents cannot be considered by the federal government in deciding whether their children should be deported. The justices unanimously handed a victory to the Obama administration and overturned a ruling by a U.S. appeals court that immigrants who entered the United States as children may count their parents' years in this country to satisfy the residency requirements. Under federal immigration law, people who have been lawful permanent residents in the United States for at least five years and have lived continuously in the country for seven years can seek leniency from the government when facing deportation. -snip- Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/21/us-usa-court-immigration-idUSBRE84K0T920120521
|
7 replies, 1838 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
| Author | Time | Post | |
| Eugene | May 2012 | OP | |
| McCamy Taylor | May 2012 | #1 | |
| msanthrope | May 2012 | #6 | |
| happyslug | May 2012 | #2 | |
| msanthrope | May 2012 | #5 | |
| EFerrari | May 2012 | #3 | |
| msanthrope | May 2012 | #7 | |
| blackspade | May 2012 | #4 |
Response to Eugene (Original post)
Mon May 21, 2012, 02:33 PM
McCamy Taylor (13,710 posts)
1. So, the parents can come here legally to work, but the kids have to stay at home?
|
Sounds a bit unfair to me. The parents are here paying taxes that support schools, the government etc. but their children can not benefit from this.
|
Response to McCamy Taylor (Reply #1)
Mon May 21, 2012, 07:26 PM
msanthrope (16,505 posts)
6. No--the kids do not have to stay home. But when the kids commit crimes, and removal proceedings
|
begin, they do not get a stay based on the status/time of their PARENTS.
|
Response to Eugene (Original post)
Mon May 21, 2012, 05:58 PM
happyslug (10,765 posts)
2. Here is the Actual Opinion
Response to happyslug (Reply #2)
Mon May 21, 2012, 07:15 PM
msanthrope (16,505 posts)
5. Note it's the second opinion today that relies heavily on Chevron deference?
|
You have Kagan and Ginsburg, taking the 9th and 3rd to task, respectively, and calling for judicial restraint.
Something's coming. |
Response to Eugene (Original post)
Mon May 21, 2012, 06:39 PM
EFerrari (163,986 posts)
3. What a disgrace this court is. n/t
Response to EFerrari (Reply #3)
Mon May 21, 2012, 07:31 PM
msanthrope (16,505 posts)
7. Why should criminals get a pass based on their parents' time in this country?
|
This applies to adult criminals who are in removal proceedings post-conviction. Why should their parents' time in this country impute to them?
|
Response to Eugene (Original post)
Mon May 21, 2012, 07:13 PM
blackspade (2,442 posts)

