Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hay rick

(7,607 posts)
Fri Oct 16, 2015, 07:35 PM Oct 2015

CNBC Gives In to Donald Trump on Details of the Debate

Source: New York Times

CNBC will allow the Republican presidential candidates 30-second opening and closing statements at a debate this month, bowing to the demands of Donald J. Trump and other leading candidates that they be allowed to introduce themselves.

The Oct. 28 debate at the Coors Events Center in Boulder, Colo., will last two hours, including commercials, another accommodation to Mr. Trump, who was unhappy with the length of the three-hour Republican debate last month in California.

Officials from the Republican National Committee telephoned senior operatives to the campaigns on Friday to relay the news.

Mr. Trump and Ben Carson, who are leading in many polls of the Republican field, led the push on the opening statements and time limit, threatening to boycott the forum if their demands were not met.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/10/16/cnbc-gives-in-to-donald-trump-on-details-of-the-debate/



Thank you Donald and Ben. Two hours of irritating, misbehaving juveniles in my living room is definitely better than three hours.
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
CNBC Gives In to Donald Trump on Details of the Debate (Original Post) hay rick Oct 2015 OP
BS. No one one "gave in". The network was in negotiations and the two propaganda masters got Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #1
Does this make any sense? yallerdawg Oct 2015 #2
The voting for the candidate in November will be a democracy. christx30 Oct 2015 #8
also Trump got to pick the moderators Enrique Oct 2015 #3
Good one davidpdx Oct 2015 #4
very funny! I thought Amarosa was in, too wordpix Oct 2015 #7
This makes no sense... ejbr Oct 2015 #5
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #6

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
1. BS. No one one "gave in". The network was in negotiations and the two propaganda masters got
Fri Oct 16, 2015, 07:39 PM
Oct 2015

in a preemptive media shot they knew would create the all important "buzz" and automatic media opinionating.....sham artists and sham media were made for each other.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
2. Does this make any sense?
Fri Oct 16, 2015, 07:41 PM
Oct 2015

The top candidates dictating the terms of the debates?

This is a democracy!

Shouldn't the challengers get to make the rules?

christx30

(6,241 posts)
8. The voting for the candidate in November will be a democracy.
Sat Oct 17, 2015, 01:39 PM
Oct 2015

But a private corporation isn't a democracy. They can decide how they are going to do the debates. If they wanted to make everyone wear clown noses (which would paint a more accurate picture), they could have done that.
No one has to show up or watch.

ejbr

(5,856 posts)
5. This makes no sense...
Fri Oct 16, 2015, 09:42 PM
Oct 2015

how will all of the participants introduce themselves by saying, "Hi, my name is ______ and I am batshit crazy" without it sounding redundant?

Response to hay rick (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»CNBC Gives In to Donald T...