HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Billionaire Facebook foun...

Sun May 13, 2012, 07:24 PM

Billionaire Facebook founder 'de-friends' United States to keep more of his fortune

Source: Independent

Billionaire Facebook founder 'de-friends' United States to keep more of his fortune
As Obama plans taxes on super-rich, Eduardo Saverin applies to give up citizenship
Guy Adams
Los Angeles
Monday 14 May 2012

In the argot of social networking, America has been "de-friended". Days shy of Facebook's stratospherically hyped stock market listing, one of the firm's bright young founders has sparked outrage after deciding to renounce his US citizenship.

Eduardo Saverin, a 30-year-old entrepreneur who helped Mark Zuckerberg launch the site from a Harvard dormitory just eight years ago, appears on a list of 1,780 once-proud citizens who last year told Uncle Sam that they would like to give up their passports. The move, which emerged over the weekend, is widely regarded as a tax dodge.

Mr Saverin's 4 per cent stake in Facebook will put his net worth in the region of $4bn (£2.5bn) when the company floats on Thursday. Though liable for back taxes, he will be exempt from future demands on his cash pile, including Barack Obama's mooted levy on high-earners. A spokesman confirmed Mr Saverin decided to change nationality in September, which means his previous capital gains will be calculated based on Facebook's perceived value at that time. Had he waited until the float, the firm would have been more easily valued, leaving less leeway for creative accounting.
"Eduardo recently found it more practical to become a resident of Singapore since he plans to live there for an indefinite period of time," said the spokesman in a statement, which ignored the tax implications of the move, stating that it "made sense" as he plans to devote the coming years to investing in Asian markets. The decision has sparked criticism because of the perceived debt he owes the country where he made his fortune. Born in Brazil, he immigrated to Florida in 1992 after his wealthy parents appeared on a list of kidnap targets held by criminal gangs in their native Sao Paolo.


Read more: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/billionaire-facebook-founder-defriends-united-states-to-keep-more-of-his-fortune-7743506.html

79 replies, 9523 views

Thread informationRemove bookmarkTrash this thread

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 79 replies Author Time Post
Reply Billionaire Facebook founder 'de-friends' United States to keep more of his fortune (Original post)
Judi Lynn May 2012 OP
Bennyboy May 2012 #1
Roland99 May 2012 #57
keroro gunsou May 2012 #2
JHB May 2012 #7
provis99 May 2012 #8
xchrom May 2012 #3
former9thward May 2012 #4
xchrom May 2012 #6
tinrobot May 2012 #19
KamaAina May 2012 #10
former9thward May 2012 #12
Flatulo May 2012 #15
MADem May 2012 #26
DBoon May 2012 #33
MADem May 2012 #34
AverageJoe90 May 2012 #24
former9thward May 2012 #50
allan01 May 2012 #5
KamaAina May 2012 #9
TheDebbieDee May 2012 #11
former9thward May 2012 #13
Hassin Bin Sober May 2012 #44
former9thward May 2012 #53
mainer May 2012 #77
former9thward May 2012 #78
naaman fletcher May 2012 #25
mainer May 2012 #65
proud2BlibKansan May 2012 #14
happerbolic May 2012 #18
SomeGuyInEagan May 2012 #52
truthisfreedom May 2012 #16
happerbolic May 2012 #20
christx30 May 2012 #76
cosmicone May 2012 #22
iamthebandfanman May 2012 #38
Starry Messenger May 2012 #31
iamthebandfanman May 2012 #39
bluedigger May 2012 #46
Fastcars May 2012 #17
harmonicon May 2012 #35
treestar May 2012 #74
jwirr May 2012 #21
onenote May 2012 #43
jwirr May 2012 #51
MindMover May 2012 #23
patrice May 2012 #27
Sarah Ibarruri May 2012 #28
harmonicon May 2012 #36
MindMover May 2012 #37
bluedigger May 2012 #48
MindMover May 2012 #49
bluedigger May 2012 #54
MindMover May 2012 #55
Sarah Ibarruri May 2012 #41
MindMover May 2012 #47
Sarah Ibarruri May 2012 #61
harmonicon May 2012 #56
MindMover May 2012 #58
harmonicon May 2012 #59
Sarah Ibarruri May 2012 #60
harmonicon May 2012 #62
lonestarnot May 2012 #29
Kolesar May 2012 #40
lonestarnot May 2012 #63
Lasher May 2012 #30
truthisfreedom May 2012 #32
sofa king May 2012 #42
mainer May 2012 #64
sofa king May 2012 #67
Blue_Tires May 2012 #70
Thrill May 2012 #45
jmowreader May 2012 #66
SoCalDemGrrl May 2012 #68
Prometheus Bound May 2012 #69
Blue_Tires May 2012 #71
SoCalDemGrrl May 2012 #72
Prometheus Bound May 2012 #73
Prometheus Bound May 2012 #79
treestar May 2012 #75

Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Sun May 13, 2012, 07:27 PM

1. Un American asshole.

Fucking traitor if you ask me.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bennyboy (Reply #1)

Mon May 14, 2012, 12:02 PM

57. Born in Brazil. Resides in Singapore.

hmmmm

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Sun May 13, 2012, 07:33 PM

2. on the plus side...

now that he's no longer a citizen, he can't vote in elections. he strikes me as a typical "i've got mine, so FU," type of person. probably a republican too... but don't quote me on that....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to keroro gunsou (Reply #2)

Sun May 13, 2012, 08:13 PM

7. Oh, he can still vote with his dollars...

...until we can change that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to keroro gunsou (Reply #2)

Sun May 13, 2012, 08:14 PM

8. but he can still give millions to SuperPACS.

 

and that counts more for an election than a single vote.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Sun May 13, 2012, 07:38 PM

3. Shrug.. That's up to him.

I'm guessing he's got a or several residences here that he pays taxes on.

And you know what? Singapore ain't California or NY.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to xchrom (Reply #3)

Sun May 13, 2012, 07:54 PM

4. Not being a citizen does not stop him from traveling here.

Or even owning residences here if he wants. But the story is that he has not been in the U.S. for some time now. I am not sure if you were slamming Singapore or not. I have been there several times and it is nicer than most of CA or NY.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to former9thward (Reply #4)

Sun May 13, 2012, 08:11 PM

6. My point is that in a global world of monied influence

Very little beats California or NY.

If you want consistent contact w/ the global players - you're here.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to xchrom (Reply #6)

Sun May 13, 2012, 09:41 PM

19. Not exactly... London and Tokyo come to mind.

Regardless, I doubt that he's interested in hanging with the global players.

He's already made his billions. Time to go play.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to former9thward (Reply #4)

Sun May 13, 2012, 08:35 PM

10. Singapore is "nicer" than CA or NY?

As in, less chewing gum on the sidewalks? That's punishable there BY LAW! Srsly. Chewing gum! (Don't even get me started on the smelly durian fruit. )

Or, fewer messy protests clogging up the streets? Again, punishable BY LAW! No First Amendment there.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to KamaAina (Reply #10)

Sun May 13, 2012, 08:54 PM

12. I am not aware of any country that has a First Amendment.

At least none that I have been to and I have been to 41 so far. It is for that reason I prefer living in the U.S. to anyplace else. Maybe if I was not interested in politics it would not be a priority. I think most people like living in a society which is clean. Most people do. Don't you? They have a different culture than we do so it might be hard to live there full time I don't know.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to KamaAina (Reply #10)

Sun May 13, 2012, 09:23 PM

15. Singapore is an odd place

The citizens are extremely well educated and civil, but the punishments for even the mildest infractions are quite severe. That seems to be an Asian thing - trading civil liberties for order and full employment. It would not work well here at all, IMO.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to KamaAina (Reply #10)

Sun May 13, 2012, 10:59 PM

26. Awww, what's the occasional caning between friends?

I think he's pretty shallow, actually.

He had an idea and his idea made him some money. He hasn't done anything to actually EARN the money he is making now--he's just living off the interest.

It would serve him right if the place got even more Draconian after he settled in there...!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MADem (Reply #26)

Mon May 14, 2012, 12:50 AM

33. I believe caning for graffiti is because it is a *political* crime

The media is tightly controlled for "acceptable" expression of views.

Opinions not suitable for the controlled media tend to be expressed via spray-painted slogans.

graffiti is punished severely not because it is vandalism but because it is an unauthorized and uncontrolled method of expressing political opinion

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DBoon (Reply #33)

Mon May 14, 2012, 12:59 AM

34. I thought they caned for chewing gum, too!

And "theft and vandalism" as Michael Fay learned....!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_P._Fay

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to former9thward (Reply #4)

Sun May 13, 2012, 10:30 PM

24. Singapore may look nice in spots......

But sadly, in all reality, what the tourists usually don't get to see is that it's a highly corrupt hellhole mostly run by fascist dickheads and unscrupulous CEOs looking to punch their way to the top no matter who gets hurt. Oh, and did you know that old school British-style corporal punishment is still perfectly acceptable for minor infractions over there? It's kinda like Mainland China but without the faux-Marxist cover story.

I just have a feeling that he's going to regret moving there.......and I betcha within a few years he'll be running back to the U.S. begging to get his citizenship back. The other poster may not be slamming Singapore, but I am, and for a damn good reason(I do hope you realize, though, that this is directed at the elite and the government of that nation, and not its citizens).

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AverageJoe90 (Reply #24)

Mon May 14, 2012, 10:54 AM

50. But a billionaire is not going to be concerned with the points you raise in the post.

He was born in Singapore and has lived there for many years. If he does want to come back to the U.S. he does not need citizenship to do so. Plenty of foreign wealthy people live in the U.S. without citizenship.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Sun May 13, 2012, 08:07 PM

5. re:Billionaire Facebook founder 'de-friends' United States to keep more of his fortune

Last edited Sun May 13, 2012, 08:09 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

so long, theres the door . dont let it hit u in the rear as you exit.taxes are the price of civilization.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Sun May 13, 2012, 08:31 PM

9. Why does he hate America so much?

More to the point, why does he hate California so much? We just dug ourselves an extra $7 billion, with a B, of budget hole, and this worthless shitball dodges our taxes along with his federal ones?? After all, all we did was provide the business and intellectual climate where, unlike anywhere else on the planet, he could make those billions in the first place.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Sun May 13, 2012, 08:45 PM

11. No matter which developed country he decides to grace with his citizenship.......

Mr. Severin will wind up paying more in taxes there than he would to the US. The US has the lowest tax rate for wealthy people than any other developed/civilized(?) country in the world, right?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TheDebbieDee (Reply #11)

Sun May 13, 2012, 09:02 PM

13. It depends on your definition of 'developed/civilized'. The U.S. rate is fairly high.

This individual lives in Singapore where the highest rate is 20%. Ours is about 39% not counting state or local income taxes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to former9thward (Reply #13)

Mon May 14, 2012, 09:44 AM

44. Our top rate is 35% and no super wealthy person pays anywhere near that. Especially ...

.... someone, like Saverin, who earns based on cap gains and/or dividends (15%).

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hassin Bin Sober (Reply #44)

Mon May 14, 2012, 11:07 AM

53. You are somewhat outdated.

Next year's top rate will be 43.4%. When you factor in state income taxes it will be over 50%. I suspect Saverin's tax advisers know more about his situation than you do. The poster I was replying to raised the question whether the U.S. had a low rate. There are a lot of countries with lower top rates. http://www.gfc.com/pdf/GFFA/2011-12-21_Insights_on_Income_Tax_Rates_to_Soar_by_2013.pdf

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to former9thward (Reply #53)

Sun May 20, 2012, 11:23 AM

77. I was not aware of this.

So in 2013, we're back to Clinton-era rates for the highest earners.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mainer (Reply #77)

Sun May 20, 2012, 03:41 PM

78. Actually a bit more than that.

The Health care law added a 3.6% (I may be off one or two tenths of a percent) medicare tax on high end incomes (I think above 250k). So it will be that much higher. This of course assumes two things. One that Obama and congress actually let the Bush/Obama tax cuts expire and two that the Supreme Court does not strike down the entire health care law.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TheDebbieDee (Reply #11)

Sun May 13, 2012, 10:58 PM

25. Not at all

Most other countries don't tax you on your offshore income. So, for example, if you are an Itaiian resident you have massive taxes... unless you made that money in another country, and you pay zero on it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TheDebbieDee (Reply #11)

Wed May 16, 2012, 06:36 PM

65. But the US won't give him health care.

He's probably better off abroad. Where he won't have to foot the bill for any stupid wars.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Sun May 13, 2012, 09:09 PM

14. Scumbag

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to proud2BlibKansan (Reply #14)

Sun May 13, 2012, 09:41 PM

18. May the future pat-downs of a 1000...

 

...TSA Security measures be placed on this miserable soul everytime he lays foot on this soil! Ethical terrorist to all that is Decent

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to happerbolic (Reply #18)

Mon May 14, 2012, 11:04 AM

52. The TSA is for the common people ... not the "Job Creator" class ...

... or whatever euphemism those douche bags are using for the ultra-wealthy these days.

(P.S. - I love that two variations for "douche bag" appears in the DU online spell check)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Sun May 13, 2012, 09:36 PM

16. More power to him. I'm sure his tax people told him his options and he went with the one that makes

the most logical sense.

Despite the protestations I see in this thread, I know that every single one of you makes sure you pay the absolute minimum tax. Don't pretend you're any better than he is. If you want to dump a bunch of extra money into the federal coffers just to watch it be used to burn little children to death or blow up their innocent parents, be my guest.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to truthisfreedom (Reply #16)

Sun May 13, 2012, 09:54 PM

20. Because it's always just too easy...

 

... to pitch away something which is broken rather than taking a more ethical path toward fixing it. so... just more the same...huh...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to happerbolic (Reply #20)

Sun May 20, 2012, 11:05 AM

76. If you felt

things got bad enough, you'd bolt too. We all would. He just has the means to do it. Our government can't even come up with a budget. How long has it been? A year? More? Besides. He's one man, in business, not government. He can't change a damn thing. I'm sure a part of him is like, "Call me when you get your shit together."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to truthisfreedom (Reply #16)

Sun May 13, 2012, 10:26 PM

22. +1,000,000

We will all do the same thing if we were in his shoes, knowing that others would hate us for it. The instinct to feather one's own nest is far stronger than any polyannish thoughts. We just envy that he is in a position to be able to do such a despicable thing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cosmicone (Reply #22)

Mon May 14, 2012, 05:41 AM

38. unfortunately

some of us around here practice what we preach..

so maybe not use such broad brushes in the future when speaking for 'all' of us jealous folks.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to truthisfreedom (Reply #16)

Mon May 14, 2012, 12:16 AM

31. Oh please.

Every dime he has was from people who worked *for* him and the company that brought him wealth. Every dime he takes away from US coffers will mean more people who get less support when companies like Facebook start slashing the workforce.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to truthisfreedom (Reply #16)

Mon May 14, 2012, 05:46 AM

39. Youre right.

Last edited Mon May 14, 2012, 05:47 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

We arent billionaires. We dont have 'extra' cash that we dont use to LIVE on daily to give up so freely. So yes, most of us do probably attempt to pay the least we can get away with.

Whats his excuse?


Id gladly pay more in taxes if I had his wealth. Id still be rich, regardless.

Unfortunately, some of us around here do practice what we preach (especially when given the ability to do so) ..

Sorry, some of us ARE better than him. Maybe you need to do some soul searching, maybe youre speaking for yourself.. but 'dont pretend' to speak for all of us.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to truthisfreedom (Reply #16)

Mon May 14, 2012, 10:32 AM

46. You know wrong.

And that is the truth.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Sun May 13, 2012, 09:37 PM

17. It Seems His U.S. Citizenship Was More A Convenience

"Born in Brazil, he immigrated to Florida in 1992..." The move to the U.S. appears to have been because the Brazilian government couldn't ensure his parent's safety. Why would you expect him to have any deep loyalty to the U.S.?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Fastcars (Reply #17)

Mon May 14, 2012, 01:19 AM

35. shhhh!!! (you're making sense!! don't do that!! they'll hear you!!)

Threads like this come up from time to time and people always foam at the mouth and rant and rave for no good reason. I'm just glad to say that, having never used facebook, this guy's not made a dime off of me.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Fastcars (Reply #17)

Sun May 20, 2012, 08:30 AM

74. Maybe we should make it more difficult to obtain

And there are people who want to come and be citizens of the US - why did we grant it to someone who just thought of it as a convenience?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Sun May 13, 2012, 10:15 PM

21. Are those of us who are on FB able to distance ourselves from the site? In other words can we quit?

He is obviously not a patriotic American.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jwirr (Reply #21)

Mon May 14, 2012, 09:29 AM

43. He also isn't involved with FB anymore, other than as a minority shareholder

I'm not defending him or, for that matter, FB. But there seems to be a lot of confusion here about Saverin's role in FB. He was involved at the beginning, but he got squeezed out. Litigation between Saverin and FB resulted in his getting to maintain the title "co-founder" and, while he owns around 5 percent of the company, he is not an officer, director, or otherwise involved in the company's operations at this point (from what I've been able to determine).

So, while there may be reasons to quit FB, I'm not sure that this guy's actions are a particularly compelling reason.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onenote (Reply #43)

Mon May 14, 2012, 10:59 AM

51. Thank you. My whole family is on it so we can communicate and send photos. I would have hated

to quit.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Sun May 13, 2012, 10:30 PM

23. Inequality, corruption, social inequities abound in Singapore....

Last edited Sun May 13, 2012, 10:30 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

It is a lovely place for the likes of this greedy bastard......good riddance....


http://asiapacific.anu.edu.au/newmandala/2011/12/23/singapores-inequality-battle/

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Sun May 13, 2012, 11:27 PM

27. What do you want to bet he'd sure as fucking hell use his billions to get our troops into WAR if

it suited his and his allies' financial interests.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Sun May 13, 2012, 11:29 PM

28. The rich have no country, no allegiance, and don't like being citizens

They're just trash.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sarah Ibarruri (Reply #28)

Mon May 14, 2012, 01:25 AM

36. And what about the poor with no country and no allegiance? Are they trash too?

I should be loyal to the US because I'm a US citizen by accident of birth? Fuck that. I think everyone should be able to live where ever they want if it's in their means and power to do so. I care deeply about the US because it is where I was born, it is where I'm a citizen, and so it's where I vote. I care about my vote in the US because I have it. I care about the government in the US because that's the one that's been entrusted to me to have a small bit of responsibility for. I do not care about it for the sake of allegiance. In fact, the idea of having loyalty or allegiance to a country sickens me. I'm loyal to what I feel is just, true, and right in the world.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to harmonicon (Reply #36)

Mon May 14, 2012, 02:33 AM

37. Ok, lets take FB and its being worth a 100 Billion +.....why....

because of its subscribers, that is why.....and each of its subscribers should be a shareholder and we should have a say in who gets paid and how much and have all the rights that shareholders have of any other corporation....

and when one of the people who admittedly put this together and should get some compensation for that work say 10-20 %, but instead takes billions to another country, and you say that is just, true and right in this world....I say you are wrong.....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MindMover (Reply #37)

Mon May 14, 2012, 10:44 AM

48. I'm not sure why subscribers should have the rights of shareholders.

The only thing I have contributed is some personal content, for which I have received some social contact with friends and associates that I find a fair trade. I have contributed nothing of monetary value, and bear no financial risk in the enterprise's success or failure.

By those standards, as a proud member of Red Sox Nation I should be able to influence Red Sox management to place Beckett on waivers right _______ now, but I cannot.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bluedigger (Reply #48)

Mon May 14, 2012, 10:49 AM

49. If you and I and all 800-900 million FB subscribers were to cancel our accounts....

what value would FB have....?

and yes, all professional sports teams should and will be owned by the public in the new paradigm....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MindMover (Reply #49)

Mon May 14, 2012, 11:08 AM

54. That's a good argument for the power of the consumer in the marketplace.

As the makers of pink slime have discovered. But it still doesn't allow me to participate in management of the enterprise. I have more skin in the game here at DU, with it's pay to play scheme. When is our board meeting?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bluedigger (Reply #54)

Mon May 14, 2012, 11:29 AM

55. Every time you vote in the jury, you participate in management of the enterprise....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to harmonicon (Reply #36)

Mon May 14, 2012, 08:58 AM

41. I'm not entirely sure you understood what I meant, or that I explained myself thoroughly

Last edited Mon May 14, 2012, 08:59 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

What I meant was that THE RICH do not have citizenship, do not feel any sort of bond toward the people of their country, and don't care a RAT's ASS what happens to the people of the country.

What I meant was that they will suck the life blood out of the country they do business in, they will steal from the people of that country, and will move their headquarters wherever they frikkin' want. They'll also move wherever they feel like, and never look back.

In other words, the mega-rich and corporations have no country, and are not citizens of any country because they're greedy shitheads who live for absorbing wealth from wherever they can do so.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sarah Ibarruri (Reply #41)

Mon May 14, 2012, 10:43 AM

47. So true and very well said....thank you....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MindMover (Reply #47)

Mon May 14, 2012, 02:08 PM

61. You're welcome. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sarah Ibarruri (Reply #41)

Mon May 14, 2012, 11:36 AM

56. Well, you'll find no argument with me there, but I don't think blaming the rich will solve things.

It's capitalism that's at fault. It's the economic systems supported and managed by governments which are nominally put in place by people like you and I that make their accumulation of wealth possible. The wealthy aren't the problem - they're just a symptom of it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to harmonicon (Reply #56)

Mon May 14, 2012, 12:09 PM

58. True, so the problem is not wealth per se......or its accumulation...

it is the economic system ....

So the ginormous question being asked today.......

More regulation or Less regulation....?

Democrat or Republican...?

Or is there a much larger question dealing with the human greed factor.....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MindMover (Reply #58)

Mon May 14, 2012, 12:46 PM

59. It's not about more or less regulation, but what regulation.

Same for taxes and wages - not necessarily more or less, but what, and why?

We have the power in the world to see to it that no one lives in poverty, everyone has access to quality healthcare, everyone could eat nutritious meals, etc. but we don't do it.

More regulation won't help if they're the wrong regulations. Some of the regulations in place now are hurting more than helping, but that doesn't mean that less regulation as a rule is better.

I just know that basing things on greed and selfishness won't help.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to harmonicon (Reply #56)

Mon May 14, 2012, 02:07 PM

60. Why wouldn't it? Ignoring the problem and not mentioning it, will continue to leave the problem in

place.

And yes, I agree that capitalism is at fault. The selling of capitalism is the biggest propaganda campaign I know of.

Capitalism is an economic ideal that allows the stronger and richer to control the rest. That's all it is.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sarah Ibarruri (Reply #60)

Mon May 14, 2012, 02:25 PM

62. So complain about capitalism, not the wealthy.

If every rich person today died in a freak accident, they'd be replaced soon enough. That's how capitalism operates - it's part of the system. I get bothered when people are upset for the rich not "giving back" or something when they aren't being taxed equally already. We can't legislate greed, but we can legislate fair taxes. There are some rich folks with a sense of equity who liked to be taxed more, but they're outweighed by those who would pay less and have the finances to make that happen.

Instead of slagging off the rich, how about we work to have publicly funded elections, instant runoff voting, universal healthcare, etc. All of those things would significantly limit the influence of wealth, and likely, the equitable distribution of wealth. It's fine and dandy to point out the outlandish behaviour of the rich, but it's not going to fix things - they're a product of the same system as those doing the pointing. Now, who's going to fix it?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Sun May 13, 2012, 11:43 PM

29. Let the swing'n dick get the fuck out to Singapore. Have a nice life fuckwad, but freeze what he

Last edited Sun May 13, 2012, 11:44 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

owes the country that made him a Richie Rich. Oh and on edit, never come the fuck back! Not ever!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lonestarnot (Reply #29)

Mon May 14, 2012, 06:07 AM

40. And the USA will send aircraft carriers to protect his little one-party state ... eom

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Kolesar (Reply #40)

Wed May 16, 2012, 09:36 AM

63. No doubt!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Mon May 14, 2012, 12:15 AM

30. Just one more reason I'm glad I never signed up to Facebook.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Mon May 14, 2012, 12:35 AM

32. THe question begs... why have loyalty to a country whose government ceases to have loyalty to you?

Unless the US gets its shit together, we'll see this accelerate at an exponential rate.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Mon May 14, 2012, 09:22 AM

42. That. Is. AWESOME!

I've argued for years that the most important thing a tax hike on the rich will do is to remove hundreds or thousands of the greedy rich people who fucked this country up. They don't give a damn about this country and, being the good vulture capitalists they are, will descend upon some other place that charges them less, and fuck up that place instead.

This guy still has to pay people to oversee his possessions and properties here, but he can't vote and can't donate to political campaigns. The nearly useless "trickle-down" his vampiric existence produced never stops while the person's powerful potential political influence is (potentially) reduced.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sofa king (Reply #42)

Wed May 16, 2012, 06:34 PM

64. I don't think he has any possession or properties in the US

He got out of Facebook (or rather, was forced out) and will merely profit when it goes IPO.

A guy who's born in Brazil, who doesn't live in the US -- and hasn't lived in the US for a long time, from what I gather -- doesn't really feel he owes the US anything.

And as for voting? Sheesh, when so many Americans don't even vote, that's how valuable most Americans think their vote is.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mainer (Reply #64)

Thu May 17, 2012, 03:01 PM

67. Then it seems he has every reason to take his toys and leave.

He's the one that gets reported. Behind him are a hundred other people just like him who have already seen the writing on the wall: they're not going to buy this election, and paying a fair share is going to cost them dearly.

And that is the full extent of their patriotism: they're Americans while they can feed on us. When they have to give back, they leave.

It is long since time for them to go steal the future of some other hardworking nation.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mainer (Reply #64)

Fri May 18, 2012, 08:40 AM

70. Well then he should have ditched citizenship awhile ago...

To do it right before the billions come in just looks bad and he deserves to be run through the ringer for it

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Mon May 14, 2012, 10:24 AM

45. Good enough to take American money

Last edited Mon May 14, 2012, 10:25 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

But too good to pay American Taxes. This is the worst kind of Rich person

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Thu May 17, 2012, 02:20 AM

66. I don't really believe this guy is going to be worth $4b for long

We are currently talking about the ultimate paper billionaire: he owns four percent of a currently-privately-held corporation. When the company DOES go public, he will retain his wealth as long as Facebook's market cap remains high.

Now, this Facebook: this is the website that makes money by selling its users' private information to advertisers. This means when the Internet-using public finally decides it's had enough of Mark Zuckerberg's shit, Saverin will NOT be a paper billionaire. He will probably be a paper thousandaire.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Fri May 18, 2012, 02:43 AM

68. What a sleezebag! I like what Schumer proposed today for people like this...

Go ahead and renounce your citizenship. but you still pay US taxes on ALL income earned here and you cannot ENTER THE U.S. again.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Fri May 18, 2012, 03:27 AM

69. Singapore is ranked the best place in the world to do business. The US is 15th.

Since he wants to invest in Asian markets, Singapore or Hong Kong (usually ranked 2nd) is the place to be.

http://www.edb.gov.sg/edb/sg/en_uk/index/why_singapore/singapore_rankings.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-11671839

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Prometheus Bound (Reply #69)

Fri May 18, 2012, 08:48 AM

71. He's already wealthy, and gonna be worth $4 billion more

He doesn't have to work another day in his life...What "business" does he need to conduct other than living large?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Prometheus Bound (Reply #69)

Sun May 20, 2012, 03:05 AM

72. OK Prometheus- so Singapore is the best place to invest-but HE MADE HIS $$$$$$ in the U.S. & wants

Last edited Sun May 20, 2012, 03:06 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

to avoid U.S. taxes - that is FU**ed up!!!! He needs to the pay piper that PAYED HIM!!!!

The U.S. economic system allowed him to prosper beyond the norm and it is IMMORAL

to duck U.S. taxes. By being a resident of the United States he was able to be a participant of

FACEBOOK. If he had been a resident of Singapore during Facebook's formative years - HE'D BE

SHIT OUT OF LUCK LIKE THE REST OF US!!!! His U.S. residency was MATERIAL TO HIS SUCCESS AND HE

SHOULD NOT BE ABLE TO AVOID THAT.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SoCalDemGrrl (Reply #72)

Sun May 20, 2012, 04:46 AM

73. Don't worry, he can't avoid paying his taxes.

As I understand it he has to pay tax on his Facebook shares. So I don't see what the problem is.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SoCalDemGrrl (Reply #72)

Sun May 20, 2012, 09:17 PM

79. Facebook has a lot more Asian users than American, and Asian users are growing while US is flat.

232 million European users
195 million Asian
173 million North American, about 18 million of which are Canadian.

http://www.internetworldstats.com/facebook.htm

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Prometheus Bound (Reply #69)

Sun May 20, 2012, 08:32 AM

75. One never knows that the governments in a country like that will do

So it is a bit of a gamble. They could decide they're going to take all of his property. In that country, at least.

So here we have the rule of law, and that's a good thing for someone like him. On some level, he's dumb.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread