Sat May 5, 2012, 07:15 PM
steve2470 (14,742 posts)
9/11 defendants ignore judge at Guantanamo hearing
Source: AP
GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL BASE, Cuba (AP) — They knelt in prayer, ignored the judge and wouldn't listen to Arabic translations as they confronted nearly 3,000 counts of murder. The self-proclaimed mastermind of the Sept. 11 attacks and four co-defendants defiantly disrupted an arraignment that dragged into Saturday night in the opening act of the long-stalled effort to prosecute them in a military court. Their refusal to participate in the hearing helped bring their arraignment to a crawl. It took more than eight hours for the judge at the U.S. military base in Cuba to ask the men to enter pleas to 2,976 counts of murder and terrorism in the 2001 attacks that sent hijacked jetliners into New York's World Trade Center and the Pentagon. The men all deferred their pleas. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the admitted 9/11 architect, cast off his earphones providing Arabic translations of the proceeding and refused to answer Army Col. James Pohl's questions or acknowledge he understood them. All five men refused to participate in the hearing; two passed around a copy of The Economist magazine and leafed through the articles. Walid bin Attash was confined to a restraint chair when he came into court, released only after he promised to behave. Read more: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iCptyyoiKAL2YwchDcReV-h6SqkA?docId=c43d242c2fb04abd851b60e7eec60bd5
|
9 replies, 2090 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
| Author | Time | Post | |
| steve2470 | May 2012 | OP | |
| Robb | May 2012 | #1 | |
| PSPS | May 2012 | #2 | |
| Arctic Dave | May 2012 | #3 | |
| Adsos Letter | May 2012 | #4 | |
| Solly Mack | May 2012 | #5 | |
| Archae | May 2012 | #6 | |
| lunatica | May 2012 | #7 | |
| may3rd | May 2012 | #8 | |
| coalition_unwilling | May 2012 | #9 |
Response to steve2470 (Original post)
Sat May 5, 2012, 07:30 PM
Robb (38,351 posts)
1. They would've been a real hit had the trial taken place in NYC, that's for sure.
Response to steve2470 (Original post)
Sat May 5, 2012, 08:11 PM
Arctic Dave (12,556 posts)
3. What a joke.
|
Anyone involved with the nonsense should burn their degree in Law, they are not fitting to have one.
|
Response to steve2470 (Original post)
Sat May 5, 2012, 09:11 PM
Adsos Letter (13,995 posts)
4. The Economist?
Response to steve2470 (Original post)
Sat May 5, 2012, 11:00 PM
Archae (26,396 posts)
6. They literally have no incentive to cooperate.
|
They've been locked up for years, tortured, gee, makes them happy, doncha think?
|
Response to steve2470 (Original post)
Sun May 6, 2012, 08:56 AM
lunatica (28,859 posts)
7. This will make them heroes back home
|
In the mind of many not only are these men in the belly of the beast, but they're also standing up to the beast knowing full well they will not escape. They'll become martyrs and therefore a rallying cry.
Cheney must be happy today because his plot to perpetuate eternal war will work out as he dreamed. |
Response to steve2470 (Original post)
Sun May 6, 2012, 09:46 AM
may3rd (593 posts)
8. Why didn't they close GITMO years ago ? Since they didn't I see no reason why it can't be televised
|
court TV ratings would go through the roof
|
Response to steve2470 (Original post)
Sun May 6, 2012, 11:45 AM
coalition_unwilling (14,180 posts)
9. Let's torture them a little more, shall we? We've got a kangaroo
|
court to run here.
|


