Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Thu Jul 2, 2015, 09:43 AM Jul 2015

BP Agrees to Pay $18.7 Billion in Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Suit

Source: New York Times

The Gulf Coast states and the federal government have reached a tentative settlement with BP for the British oil company to pay $18.7 billion over 18 years, to compensate for damages from the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill, state officials said Thursday.

“This is a landmark settlement,” Gov. Robert Bentley of Alabama said. “It is designed to compensate the state for all the damages, both environmental and economic.”

The settlement covers suits filed by Louisiana, Mississippi, Texas, Florida and Alabama as well as the federal government.

Read more: http://p.nytimes.com/email/re?location=4z5Q7LhI+KVBjmEgFdYACPLKh239P3pghsgJi7Tf9Wh1sHZhwo1UEUHfGiqKlpq47rtRJSgSPXQucILGyHqiU0fE3JQwGLf+JsPzQgkTr1d6QebkYnGfsSexDwkgMzG4/bnSb6hJHoxqTQtvdCcKCb5tslXEmsPahb45ySPiCYtLVfkzFl2B6DbK5f07qKqB&campaign_id=132&instance_id=59386&segment_id=74339&user_id=5fc2acda8f5f8895cc85c5a3fb57458e&regi_id=57435284

31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
BP Agrees to Pay $18.7 Billion in Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Suit (Original Post) DonViejo Jul 2015 OP
So all the plaintiffs are red states. Bummer. d_legendary1 Jul 2015 #1
gulf coast states. 300,000 gulf oil wells and those states have the worse infastructure in America. Sunlei Jul 2015 #5
The tax breaks are courtesy of the Federal Gov't... dixiegrrrrl Jul 2015 #6
Ya but how many of the locals voted for people who voted yes to allow cstanleytech Jul 2015 #10
The real question is how much of the money will the states spend responsibly? dixiegrrrrl Jul 2015 #12
Oh there is no doubt some of it atleast will be misspent. cstanleytech Jul 2015 #13
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2015 #19
Until they decide not to... again. NV Whino Jul 2015 #2
wow does that make 40 billion in damages? good thing President O demanded the camera on the wellhead Sunlei Jul 2015 #3
Don't forget BP was caught falsifying the camera feed. dixiegrrrrl Jul 2015 #8
probably was typical of Oil Corps to lie to the public. A great thing President Obama was in office. Sunlei Jul 2015 #11
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2015 #24
Over 18 years? Fuck that, it didn't take them 18 years to fuck up the Gulf. hobbit709 Jul 2015 #4
And no mention they fought that penalty for years dixiegrrrrl Jul 2015 #7
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2015 #18
I hate to defend an oil corp, but they have paid out multi billions really fast. Sunlei Jul 2015 #9
Actually, BP hired Ken Fienberg to "screen" the claims dixiegrrrrl Jul 2015 #30
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2015 #25
Sure thing! And you joined today just to defend them out of the goodness in your heart. hobbit709 Jul 2015 #28
And some of us are still not going to eat gulf seafood for many years as a result JudyM Jul 2015 #14
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2015 #23
Should be at least 3 times that amount. L0oniX Jul 2015 #15
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2015 #21
Enjoy your stay. L0oniX Jul 2015 #27
BP Spammer didn't last long. hobbit709 Jul 2015 #29
ole "name removed" shows up here a lot... dixiegrrrrl Jul 2015 #31
LOL. $18 billion over 18 years = $1 billion a year (about 1 week's net profit.) PSPS Jul 2015 #16
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2015 #22
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2015 #17
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2015 #20
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2015 #26

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
5. gulf coast states. 300,000 gulf oil wells and those states have the worse infastructure in America.
Thu Jul 2, 2015, 10:07 AM
Jul 2015

Who knows what they spent the revenue on? not schools, not roads.

100 years of easy oil wells and those gulf states didn't seem to directly benefit.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
6. The tax breaks are courtesy of the Federal Gov't...
Thu Jul 2, 2015, 10:11 AM
Jul 2015

The permission to drill is courtesy of the Federal Gov't.

The penalties of pollution and dead fish and animals...THAT's for the locals to bear.

cstanleytech

(26,276 posts)
10. Ya but how many of the locals voted for people who voted yes to allow
Thu Jul 2, 2015, 10:24 AM
Jul 2015

offshore drilling? But anyway thats not important, whats important that this is imo a piss poor settlement that wont really go anywhere near repairing the damage because its really is something that will be effecting the coast for decades probably.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
12. The real question is how much of the money will the states spend responsibly?
Thu Jul 2, 2015, 10:29 AM
Jul 2015

Alabama receives $2.3 billion of BP settlement, with $1 billion paid to the state for economic damages
( read: hotels and resorts on the beaches)
and $1.3 billion earmarked for coastal restoration projects.

Earlier settlement money went, in part, to the resorts and hotels on the beaches, and to tourism ads.

Mississippi to receive nearly $2.2 billion in compensation as a result of Deepwater Horizon settlement with BP.

Jindal of Louisiana has already mis-spent prior settlement money.

cstanleytech

(26,276 posts)
13. Oh there is no doubt some of it atleast will be misspent.
Thu Jul 2, 2015, 10:38 AM
Jul 2015

Notice I said atleast, the odds are (imo) that its going to be most if not all.

Response to dixiegrrrrl (Reply #12)

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
3. wow does that make 40 billion in damages? good thing President O demanded the camera on the wellhead
Thu Jul 2, 2015, 10:03 AM
Jul 2015

If not for his swift actions everything would have been locked in the courts for decades.

Like ALL the other huge oil disasters.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
8. Don't forget BP was caught falsifying the camera feed.
Thu Jul 2, 2015, 10:20 AM
Jul 2015

Astute camera watchers realized BP had put a looped image of the camera, in an attempt to hide how much worse the leak was getting.
All hell broke loose and they were forced to revert back to real time images.

I watched the video feed for days, down here. It was sickening.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
11. probably was typical of Oil Corps to lie to the public. A great thing President Obama was in office.
Thu Jul 2, 2015, 10:27 AM
Jul 2015

Also a good thing for BP that science can now test blobs of oil and tell where they came from.

That's what the court problem is now, people sue BP for some oil and the science proves its from another of the thousands of old leaky capped wellheads in the Gulf or spills from ships.

Response to dixiegrrrrl (Reply #8)

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
7. And no mention they fought that penalty for years
Thu Jul 2, 2015, 10:13 AM
Jul 2015

and will continue to try to with the states involved.

BP is so very high on my Ayra list.

Response to dixiegrrrrl (Reply #7)

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
9. I hate to defend an oil corp, but they have paid out multi billions really fast.
Thu Jul 2, 2015, 10:21 AM
Jul 2015

Halliburton was to Pay $1.1 Billion for their crappy wellhead work and I bet they haven't even paid that 'settled fine' yet.

The Gulf is ruined anyway, there are thousands of old capped, sea water rusting wells out there and no law to fix those.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
30. Actually, BP hired Ken Fienberg to "screen" the claims
Sat Jul 4, 2015, 03:02 PM
Jul 2015

and that materially slowed down the payment rate to the extent that many people missed the payment time line.

There were many complaints against Feinberg for the way he handled the BP payout, including conflict of interest.:

BP is currently paying Feinberg's six-lawyer Washington, D.C., firm, Feinberg Rozen, a flat fee of $1,250,000 a month for labor and overhead costs, but the full details of compensation are unknown.[15] Feinberg has come under harsh criticism[16] from public interest groups for refusing to disclose the amount of his compensation or the details of his arrangement with the company.[17]

On December 6, 2010, the Center for Justice & Democracy (CJ&D) sent a letter[18] to Robert Dudley, the CEO of BP, concerning "serious new issues raised about the lack of transparency and potential conflicts of interest related to the administration of the Gulf Coast Claims Facility." In the letter, CJ&D pointed out actions taken by Feinberg in the administration of the compensation fund that point to serious conflicts of interest:

"Mr. Feinberg, employed by BP, has decided on his own authority that all claims recipients must release all companies who caused this disaster from any and all legal responsibility, no matter how grossly negligent they were. This sweeping release, which assigns victims’ claims to BP, benefits only one actor: BP – the company that happens to pay Mr. Feinberg's salary."

In January 2011, Judge Barbier, the federal judge over the oil spill litigation, after hearing evidence and arguments of the attorneys, ruled that Kenneth Feinberg was not independent of BP and could no longer claim to be so. Feinberg had been telling victims he was their lawyer and did not answer to BP.

The letter also criticized Feinberg's lack of transparency around compensation:

"Despite repeated calls for the release of documents establishing the formal relationship between BP and Feinberg Rozen, as well as its subcontractors who are reviewing and adjudicating claims, almost nothing has been publicly released. And now we learn, as reported by Reuters on November 22, 2010, that BP and Feinberg Rozen consider their arrangement 'verbal,' i.e., they have not committed to writing the firm’s compensation arrangement so there can be no public examination of it. Is the public to believe that there is no paper evidence at all documenting a $10 million per year financial arrangement between BP and Feinberg Rozen? What about the contracts between BP, Feinberg Rozen and the subcontractors who are advising and adjudicating claims and also being paid directly by BP? Surely these contracts must be in writing and released. This failure to release the terms of all these financial arrangements under circumstances of tremendous historic and public significance is simply unacceptable."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_Feinberg


Response to hobbit709 (Reply #4)

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
28. Sure thing! And you joined today just to defend them out of the goodness in your heart.
Sat Jul 4, 2015, 10:26 AM
Jul 2015

Enjoy your short stay.

JudyM

(29,225 posts)
14. And some of us are still not going to eat gulf seafood for many years as a result
Thu Jul 2, 2015, 10:42 AM
Jul 2015

... And the loss of marine life to the ecosystem as well as a moral issue... How is that loss compensated?

Response to JudyM (Reply #14)

Response to L0oniX (Reply #15)

Response to PSPS (Reply #16)

Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»BP Agrees to Pay $18.7 Bi...