BP Agrees to Pay $18.7 Billion in Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Suit
Source: New York Times
The Gulf Coast states and the federal government have reached a tentative settlement with BP for the British oil company to pay $18.7 billion over 18 years, to compensate for damages from the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill, state officials said Thursday.
This is a landmark settlement, Gov. Robert Bentley of Alabama said. It is designed to compensate the state for all the damages, both environmental and economic.
The settlement covers suits filed by Louisiana, Mississippi, Texas, Florida and Alabama as well as the federal government.
Read more: http://p.nytimes.com/email/re?location=4z5Q7LhI+KVBjmEgFdYACPLKh239P3pghsgJi7Tf9Wh1sHZhwo1UEUHfGiqKlpq47rtRJSgSPXQucILGyHqiU0fE3JQwGLf+JsPzQgkTr1d6QebkYnGfsSexDwkgMzG4/bnSb6hJHoxqTQtvdCcKCb5tslXEmsPahb45ySPiCYtLVfkzFl2B6DbK5f07qKqB&campaign_id=132&instance_id=59386&segment_id=74339&user_id=5fc2acda8f5f8895cc85c5a3fb57458e®i_id=57435284
d_legendary1
(2,586 posts)That means more tax breaks for BP as well.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Who knows what they spent the revenue on? not schools, not roads.
100 years of easy oil wells and those gulf states didn't seem to directly benefit.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)The permission to drill is courtesy of the Federal Gov't.
The penalties of pollution and dead fish and animals...THAT's for the locals to bear.
cstanleytech
(26,276 posts)offshore drilling? But anyway thats not important, whats important that this is imo a piss poor settlement that wont really go anywhere near repairing the damage because its really is something that will be effecting the coast for decades probably.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Alabama receives $2.3 billion of BP settlement, with $1 billion paid to the state for economic damages
( read: hotels and resorts on the beaches)
and $1.3 billion earmarked for coastal restoration projects.
Earlier settlement money went, in part, to the resorts and hotels on the beaches, and to tourism ads.
Mississippi to receive nearly $2.2 billion in compensation as a result of Deepwater Horizon settlement with BP.
Jindal of Louisiana has already mis-spent prior settlement money.
cstanleytech
(26,276 posts)Notice I said atleast, the odds are (imo) that its going to be most if not all.
Response to dixiegrrrrl (Reply #12)
Name removed Message auto-removed
NV Whino
(20,886 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)If not for his swift actions everything would have been locked in the courts for decades.
Like ALL the other huge oil disasters.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Astute camera watchers realized BP had put a looped image of the camera, in an attempt to hide how much worse the leak was getting.
All hell broke loose and they were forced to revert back to real time images.
I watched the video feed for days, down here. It was sickening.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Also a good thing for BP that science can now test blobs of oil and tell where they came from.
That's what the court problem is now, people sue BP for some oil and the science proves its from another of the thousands of old leaky capped wellheads in the Gulf or spills from ships.
Response to dixiegrrrrl (Reply #8)
Name removed Message auto-removed
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)and will continue to try to with the states involved.
BP is so very high on my Ayra list.
Response to dixiegrrrrl (Reply #7)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Halliburton was to Pay $1.1 Billion for their crappy wellhead work and I bet they haven't even paid that 'settled fine' yet.
The Gulf is ruined anyway, there are thousands of old capped, sea water rusting wells out there and no law to fix those.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)and that materially slowed down the payment rate to the extent that many people missed the payment time line.
There were many complaints against Feinberg for the way he handled the BP payout, including conflict of interest.:
On December 6, 2010, the Center for Justice & Democracy (CJ&D) sent a letter[18] to Robert Dudley, the CEO of BP, concerning "serious new issues raised about the lack of transparency and potential conflicts of interest related to the administration of the Gulf Coast Claims Facility." In the letter, CJ&D pointed out actions taken by Feinberg in the administration of the compensation fund that point to serious conflicts of interest:
"Mr. Feinberg, employed by BP, has decided on his own authority that all claims recipients must release all companies who caused this disaster from any and all legal responsibility, no matter how grossly negligent they were. This sweeping release, which assigns victims claims to BP, benefits only one actor: BP the company that happens to pay Mr. Feinberg's salary."
In January 2011, Judge Barbier, the federal judge over the oil spill litigation, after hearing evidence and arguments of the attorneys, ruled that Kenneth Feinberg was not independent of BP and could no longer claim to be so. Feinberg had been telling victims he was their lawyer and did not answer to BP.
The letter also criticized Feinberg's lack of transparency around compensation:
"Despite repeated calls for the release of documents establishing the formal relationship between BP and Feinberg Rozen, as well as its subcontractors who are reviewing and adjudicating claims, almost nothing has been publicly released. And now we learn, as reported by Reuters on November 22, 2010, that BP and Feinberg Rozen consider their arrangement 'verbal,' i.e., they have not committed to writing the firms compensation arrangement so there can be no public examination of it. Is the public to believe that there is no paper evidence at all documenting a $10 million per year financial arrangement between BP and Feinberg Rozen? What about the contracts between BP, Feinberg Rozen and the subcontractors who are advising and adjudicating claims and also being paid directly by BP? Surely these contracts must be in writing and released. This failure to release the terms of all these financial arrangements under circumstances of tremendous historic and public significance is simply unacceptable."
Response to hobbit709 (Reply #4)
Name removed Message auto-removed
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Enjoy your short stay.
JudyM
(29,225 posts)... And the loss of marine life to the ecosystem as well as a moral issue... How is that loss compensated?
Response to JudyM (Reply #14)
Name removed Message auto-removed
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Response to L0oniX (Reply #15)
Name removed Message auto-removed
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)PSPS
(13,584 posts)Response to PSPS (Reply #16)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed