HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Activism » Activist Headquarters (Group) » Please Sign White House P...

Sun Dec 2, 2012, 03:46 AM

Please Sign White House Petition to Investigate Mitt Romney/ Bain Capital Fraud 2001

For 11 1/2 years - I've been fighting this cumquats and beating them up - winning many battles. (Closed a couple of law firms, helped put some billionaire fraudsters behind bars and made many bad faith Federal Employees RESIGN).

Now that we got a focus on Mitt Romey's / Bain Capital - true nature;
I need your help to get 25,000 signatures.

Mitt Romney's Bain Capital stole eToys.com by federal fraud & perjury. We forced the lawyers to confess to lying under oath and deliberate fraud on the court 34 times. What they keep Covering UP - is the fact that they are also connected to Mitt Romney/ Bain Capital.

Toys R Us is in possession of the stolen property of the eToys federal estate - using federal CORRUPTION!




See DU Thread here http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014315589

and



WHITE HOUSE PETITION LINK

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/request-dept-justice-open-investigation-mitt-romney-bain-capital-retroactive-issues-etoys-2001/GxJX3qvX?


5 replies, 1163 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 5 replies Author Time Post
Reply Please Sign White House Petition to Investigate Mitt Romney/ Bain Capital Fraud 2001 (Original post)
laserhaas Dec 2012 OP
freshwest Dec 2012 #1
laserhaas Dec 2012 #2
obxhead Dec 2012 #3
laserhaas Dec 2012 #4
jberryhill Dec 2012 #5

Response to laserhaas (Original post)

Sun Dec 2, 2012, 03:47 AM

1. K & R. End vulture capitalism!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to freshwest (Reply #1)

Sun Dec 2, 2012, 04:04 AM

2. Thanks - 'freshwest' - appreciate the help....

very much

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to laserhaas (Original post)

Sun Dec 2, 2012, 06:04 AM

3. Signed and forwarded

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to obxhead (Reply #3)

Sun Dec 2, 2012, 03:15 PM

4. appreciate it 'obxhead'

Trying continuously - to beat up big sleazy - I am doing

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to laserhaas (Original post)

Sun Dec 9, 2012, 02:26 AM

5. So, it didn't work out very well, eh?

WHEREAS, since July 2004, Mr. Haas, appearing pro se and acting purportedly on behalf of Collateral Logistics Inc.(“CLI”), has filed dozens of pleadings in this bankruptcy case;and

...

WHEREAS, CLI, a corporation, is a legal entity separate from its president and shareholder, Mr. Haas; and

WHEREAS, by Order dated November 10, 2011, the Court held that Mr. Haas did not have standing to be heard on behalf of CLI or himself because he was not a creditor, shareholder or party in interest in this case (D.I. 2459); and

WHEREAS, on October 24, 2012, Mr. Haas filed an emergency motion for payment asserting an individual claim for payment under the Court-approved contracts between the Debtor and CLI (the “Haas Motion”) (D.I. 2478); and

WHEREAS, to the extent that the Haas Motion is a claim on behalf of Mr. Haas as an individual, that claim is barred because it was filed almost a decade after the Bar Date and Mr. Haas has been actively involved in this case and never asserted any individual claim; and

...

WHEREAS, Mr. Haas’ numerous filings in this case are repetitive, without merit, and border on harassment;

....

ORDERED, that the Haas Motion is DENIED; and it is further

ORDERED, that any further pleadings filed by Mr. Haas in this case shall be deemed stricken; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk’s Office is hereby directed to return, without docketing, any further pleadings which Mr. Haas may file in this case.


http://wtsglobal.com/newsletters/the-vexatious-litigant/

Anyone in the professions concerned with dispute resolution will eventually encounter the claimant – rigid and suspicious but perhaps initially ingratiating – who often appears with many documents, pleading or demanding that they be read. On inspection the arguments are poorly constructed and often confusing and rambling. Excessive highlighting and underlining are common, as well as many attachments, often of no relevance to the case or touting broad principles of human rights. They may utterly deny obvious undisputed facts known to others. Although they certainly may engage in conscious lying, fundamentally it is more the case of a passionate belief in the truth of their perceptions. Personal blogs, chat room dialogue reinforcing their perceptions, and other internet activity will accompany their quest.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread