HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Chief Executive Officer M...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Thu Jul 12, 2012, 04:45 PM

Chief Executive Officer Means Exactly That: Chief Executive Officer

The Boston Globe's reporting the undeniable evidence of Bain Capital's formal filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission now leave zero wiggle room for Presidential candidate, Willard Mitt Romney, to attempt to deceitfully distance himself from his corporation's predatory activities when it was systematically outsourcing and off-shoring American jobs along with closing down American factories. The official filings made by Bain to the SEC not only show that candidate Romney remained as the firm's chairman of the board until 2002, but also reveal in ink that Bain considered him the Chief Executive Office.

That same Chief Executive Officer is now the nominee of the Republican Party to be the Commander and Chief of the United States, our American Chief Executive Officer.

Willard Mitt Romney's much ballyhooed business "experience" has now come to the center stage of our national scrutiny. Romney is in a vice now of his own making because he has, on the record, made his case that he had "left the company" (Bain) prior to its more troubling activities.

Mitt Romney, a politician already with a long, established resume of self-contradictions -- so much so, that at least one of the upcoming televised Presidential Debates should have Romney and a hologram of himself debating each other from two different podiums -- now has, by his own words placed himself into quite a vice. He can't have it both ways with regards to his history at Bain anymore.

Romney leaves us all with a choice of two, hardly flattering images now 1.) he was a very sloppy CEO and asleep at the wheel when the all the nefarious and greedy actions of his corporation took place, or 2.) he was actively engaged and calling the shots of all of the outsourcing and off-shoring that left economic graveyards all around the country. Everyone understand Romney wanting to whistle through those graveyards, it's just that he can't pretend everyone didn't see him doing it now.

It is impossible for Mitt Romney to square his earlier assertions that he had left Bain Capital for years and the stark fact that he was its Chief Executive Officer during that time-frame.

Even George W. Bush, for all of his may foibles, has never suggested that he wasn't actually the Chief Executive of the United States between 2001 and 2009 when his ill-advised and costly war in Iraq took place. I mean, no one would be so stupid as to try to dupe the American People into believing otherwise. Even Karl Rove wouldn't attempt pull off that disappearing act.

Leaving aside that Mitt Romney has established himself as a lousy liar, and even setting aside that his already sketchy business experience -- that would be etchy-sketchy business experience -- was one of destroying American jobs, the weighty decision American voters must make this November comes down to this: Should Mitt Romney be elected to being our national Chief Executive Officer? I believe the American People will want to re-hire President Barack Obama, our current CEO, a man who owns up to every single day of his Presidency thus far.


Edited to add link to referenced news story above, broken here by DU's Tracer earlier today, and requested by DU's liberal N proud below in this thread: http://bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2012/07/11/government-documents-indicate-mitt-romney-continued-bain-after-date-when-says-left/IpfKYWjnrsel4pvCFbsUTI/story.html





19 replies, 2350 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 19 replies Author Time Post
Reply Chief Executive Officer Means Exactly That: Chief Executive Officer (Original post)
David Zephyr Jul 2012 OP
liberal N proud Jul 2012 #1
David Zephyr Jul 2012 #5
liberal N proud Jul 2012 #7
grantcart Jul 2012 #2
David Zephyr Jul 2012 #11
democrat_patriot Jul 2012 #3
siligut Jul 2012 #15
kentuck Jul 2012 #4
David Zephyr Jul 2012 #10
kentuck Jul 2012 #12
rustydog Jul 2012 #6
David Zephyr Jul 2012 #13
tk2kewl Jul 2012 #8
dionysus Jul 2012 #9
David Zephyr Jul 2012 #14
dionysus Jul 2012 #17
David Zephyr Jul 2012 #18
dionysus Jul 2012 #19
malaise Jul 2012 #16

Response to David Zephyr (Original post)

Thu Jul 12, 2012, 04:49 PM

1. You should include the link to the article

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to liberal N proud (Reply #1)

Thu Jul 12, 2012, 05:34 PM

5. Added the link that DU's Tracer provided in LBN this morning.

Thanks.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to David Zephyr (Reply #5)

Thu Jul 12, 2012, 05:42 PM

7. Thanks

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to David Zephyr (Original post)

Thu Jul 12, 2012, 04:50 PM

2. Yep. And his tax records will show that he got millions during the same time


in addition to the $ 100,000 annual salary.

The people may not understand the filings but they will understand the pay.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to grantcart (Reply #2)

Thu Jul 12, 2012, 06:49 PM

11. His hiding his income tax returns is the story that keeps giving, grantcart.

Yes, yes and yes.

Democrats must keep the tax records dodge in high focus. People, as you say, will understand the pay or his hiding his pay (tax returns).

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to David Zephyr (Original post)

Thu Jul 12, 2012, 04:50 PM

3. But Fortune stated Romney wasn't listed in some investment pamphlets


So, like case closed.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to democrat_patriot (Reply #3)

Thu Jul 12, 2012, 07:36 PM

15. From the Fortune article . . .

It then goes on to list 18 managers of the private equity fund. Mitt Romney is not among them. Same goes for an affiliated co-investment fund, whose private placement memorandum is dated September 2000.

Then there is Bain Capital Venture Fund -- the firm's first dedicated venture capital effort -- whose private placement memorandum is dated January 2001. Romney also isn't listed among its "key investment professionals," or as part of its day-to-day operations or investment committee.


Read more: http://finance.fortune.cnn.com/tag/mitt-romney/

So this is why the Romney team emphasizes that Romney wasn't an active member. I really don't think it is an out, a CEO is responsible for company activities, Romney owned Bain.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to David Zephyr (Original post)

Thu Jul 12, 2012, 05:08 PM

4. DZ...

How are you doing? Long time, no see.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kentuck (Reply #4)

Thu Jul 12, 2012, 06:42 PM

10. Hi, back to you, Kentuck.

Doing well, even older than I already was. I've kept reading your many excellent posts all this time.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to David Zephyr (Reply #10)

Thu Jul 12, 2012, 06:51 PM

12. Thanks DZ...

Welcome back. Looking forward to your wonderful insights.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to David Zephyr (Original post)

Thu Jul 12, 2012, 05:37 PM

6. Bain Capital CEO Emeritus Willard Romney

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rustydog (Reply #6)

Thu Jul 12, 2012, 07:07 PM

13. Willard and Rats

Something about that name, Willard, and rats...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to David Zephyr (Original post)

Thu Jul 12, 2012, 05:56 PM

8. k&r

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to David Zephyr (Original post)

Thu Jul 12, 2012, 06:00 PM

9. ain't seen you aroud these parts in a while...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dionysus (Reply #9)

Thu Jul 12, 2012, 07:12 PM

14. Thanks, dionysus.

The country has been in very good hands with President Obama and Michelle in the White House. Four more years!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to David Zephyr (Reply #14)

Thu Jul 12, 2012, 08:10 PM

17. good seeing ya!



there's still some old school DUers kicking

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dionysus (Reply #17)

Thu Jul 12, 2012, 09:47 PM

18. 2001 seems like a million years ago

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to David Zephyr (Reply #18)

Thu Jul 12, 2012, 09:51 PM

19. it does, doesn't it!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to David Zephyr (Original post)

Thu Jul 12, 2012, 07:39 PM

16. Good read

Rec

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread