Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sally Yates had revelations for House Intel about when she told WH Flynn lied -Nunes nixed hearing. (Original Post) kpete Mar 2017 OP
Nunes Must Go! Chasstev365 Mar 2017 #1
House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Special Counsel, Michael Ellis, now works for Trump L. Coyote Mar 2017 #2
Could it be Scarsdale Mar 2017 #4
Palin draws the spotlight. Trump could never tolerate not being the only one in the spotlight. nt tblue37 Mar 2017 #6
Americans should be appalled by this manipulation of the legislative branch Mr. Ected Mar 2017 #3
Sally Yates needs to testify Gothmog Mar 2017 #5
Blatant obstruction! nt Cognitive_Resonance Mar 2017 #7
What next? Lets abandon all courts and just let the guilty decide their own fate? BSdetect Mar 2017 #8

Scarsdale

(9,426 posts)
4. Could it be
Tue Mar 28, 2017, 08:08 AM
Mar 2017

that he is searching for Intelligence in tRump's clan? Good luck with that, they all get jobs due to relationships. No experience required, just like the orange oompa loompa. It amazes me that $arah PayME does not have some type of position, so she can stop pretending she was "saved" and now quotes bible verses.

Mr. Ected

(9,670 posts)
3. Americans should be appalled by this manipulation of the legislative branch
Tue Mar 28, 2017, 08:05 AM
Mar 2017

The investigation is uncovering TREASONOUS activities on the part of the Trump team, some of them potentially ongoing.

This goes to the heart of our democracy.

I tell you, if something of this magnitude is allowed to be swept under the rug by procedural means, I will lose faith in our government now and forever.

It doesn't get any more egregious than this. I'm certain the Founding Fathers would have included provisions in the Constitution had they foreseen 2 party politics as an impediment to checks and balances.

Without such provisions, if this is not addressed in a non-partisan manner, I give up home on the USA project.

BSdetect

(8,994 posts)
8. What next? Lets abandon all courts and just let the guilty decide their own fate?
Tue Mar 28, 2017, 11:05 AM
Mar 2017

This is incredible.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sally Yates had revelatio...