Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

orangecrush

(19,430 posts)
Thu Mar 23, 2017, 12:03 PM Mar 2017

A Guide to Treason, 2.0

On Monday, Federal Bureau of Investigation Director James Comey confirmed that the FBI is investigating the possibility of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. Following Comey’s testimony, historian Douglas Brinkley declared, “There’s a smell of treason in the air.”

Between revelations about “longtime [President Donald] Trump confidant” Roger Stone and the controversies surrounding former Trump campaign chair Paul Manafort, it’s clear that key Trump campaign staff were in contact with Russia. Stone has admitted to being in contact with Guccifer 2.0, likely a front for the Russian government, and repeatedly gave advance notice of disclosures from WikiLeaks, which has been acting suspiciously like an agent of the Russian government. Stone is now on the hook with the Senate Intelligence Committee. And at Monday’s White House briefing, Press Secretary Sean Spicer conceded that Stone worked on the campaign, and that he and the president “had a long relationship going back years where [Stone] would provide counsel.”

Media outlets and social media are filled with accusations of collusion, calls for a special counsel, and queries about treason. Representative Maxine Waters tweeted simply, “Get ready for impeachment.”
If Trump participated in, facilitated, or encouraged a Russian cyber attack intended to overthrow the United States government by changing the outcome of the 2016 election — and then promoted Russia’s interests after assuming office — Waters may get her wish. Those acts could amount to an impeachable offense. They could even be treason.

Should cyberspace be understood as a theater of war?
Treason has traditionally been understood as a crime defined by clear binaries — at war vs. at peace; enemy vs. ally — and requiring physical conflict. Here, no shots have been fired, no battles pitched, unless cyberspace can be understood as a theater of war within the meaning our Framers envisioned. And perhaps it can.

https://psmag.com/a-guide-to-treason-2-0-3dbf93f4e415#.vg5ahvc43



4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A Guide to Treason, 2.0 (Original Post) orangecrush Mar 2017 OP
tRump and all of them are traitors. It's clear as day. They're here to line their pockets ffr Mar 2017 #1
And damn everyone MFM008 Mar 2017 #2
Great Meme Gothmog Mar 2017 #3
Great - so we are at war with China, NK, Russia, etc. and commit acts of war regularly. jmg257 Mar 2017 #4

ffr

(22,665 posts)
1. tRump and all of them are traitors. It's clear as day. They're here to line their pockets
Thu Mar 23, 2017, 12:08 PM
Mar 2017

at our expense. If they help Putin in the process and bring the United States of America to its knees, oh well. They got theirs. And that's always been a Republican Value.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A Guide to Treason, 2.0