General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThere was a poll done in Mass where 100% of all children and 98% of all adults are covered
by Health Insurance and 75% said they love it... That means quite a few Republicans love their Insurance and do not object to the Mandate....I find that very interesting. I know there is a lot of concern here about how the Government will go about enforcing the Mandate.. Just look to Mass for your answer. They are doing just fine with it..
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)on it would sound like?
Romulox
(25,960 posts)kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)pnwmom
(108,972 posts)Romulox
(25,960 posts)http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2012/07/01/court_approval_of_health_law_sets_national_stage_for_the_cost_limits_that_massachusetts_is_seeking/
So is it true? Do we have the most expensive premiums in the U.S.? The answer may surprise you.
Let's start with the data most people know: average family health insurance premiums, state-by-state, 2009. See that state way over on the right? That's Massachusetts, and the data are federal (courtesy of the Commonwealth Fund) showing our premiums #1, the most costly in the nation (Arkansas is the cheapest). Guilty as charged.
Some things help to explain the difference. Massachusetts health insurance tends to include lower deductibles and other kinds of cost sharing which are much higher in most other states, a difference that inflates MA premiums as compared with those in other states. Massachusetts has the highest proportion of physicians, nurses and many other health professional categories than all other states. And our costs have always been the highest, not just since the Massachusetts health reform law passed in 2006. But still, guilty as charged.
http://www.boston.com/lifestyle/health/health_stew/2011/11/does_massachusetts_have_the_na.html
pnwmom
(108,972 posts)It's also interesting that MA premiums were the highest even before this plan went into effect.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)not paint a one-sided picture, nonetheless.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)Doesn't sound bad to me.
ananda
(28,854 posts)I like the conclusion. That if the costs are bad for MA, and they are,
they are much worse for many other states.. and we need a better law.
Of course, ACA is certainly better than nothing.. but it could be so MUCH
better.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)I'm glad though, as it opens the door. Plenty of people will benefit from it as it stands now.
pnwmom
(108,972 posts)The most recent was closing the donut hole in drug coverage, which was accomplished in the ACA.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)snot
(10,515 posts)not so much what the relative premium costs are, but what the total health care costs are vs. total health results.
I.e., I think you'd have to find states or societies with different systems but similar per capita health stats, like mortality rates or the like, and then compare their total health care costs; etc.