General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI just checked the Forbes 400 list. Not a single union boss on there.
http://www.forbes.com/forbes-400/list/#p_1_s_arank_All%20industries_All%20states_All%20categories_Hmph. I guess when Scott Walker broke the unions they got shoved off the list to be replaced by "real working Americans".
Or maybe if Forbes had bothered to do #401 to 500, it would be just chock-full of union bosses, leveraging their vast wealth in their tireless, greed-fueled drive to make it to the Top 100?
senseandsensibility
(16,933 posts)Ignorance is why the republicans can throw around terms like union bosses as though they are equal to CEO's in terms of power. The corporate media never misses a chance to demonize labor, so if the Dems won't stand up for their largest contributor.....
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)which of course is unprovable.
krispos42
(49,445 posts)How droll. How... proletarian.
Jeeves, tomorrow we move my millions to a bank in a new neighborhood.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)We can not ignore that there has been mob involvement and graft involving unions, but they are the rarer exceptions. Repukes and the media would have everyone believe that it is the norm.
Each of us who are union members needs to be involved at some level in their union. That is what will keep them clean and functioning as they should.
Greybnk48
(10,162 posts)See what my friends here in Wisconsin have to say.