General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUnderground network readies homes to hide undocumented immigrants
CNN:A hammer pounds away in the living room of a middle class home. A sanding machine smoothes the grain of the wood floor in the dining room.
But this home Pastor Ada Valiente is showing off in Los Angeles, with its refurbished floors, is no ordinary home.
"It would be three families we host here," Valiente says.
By "host," she means provide refuge to people who may be sought by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, known as ICE. The families staying here would be undocumented immigrants, fearing an ICE raid and possible deportation.
The purchase of this home is part of a network formed by Los Angeles religious leaders across faiths in the wake of Donald Trump's election. The intent is to shelter hundreds, possibly thousands of undocumented people in safe houses across Southern California.
samnsara
(17,605 posts)...for a single woman and one child. we will be cramped but its the right thing to do.
nini
(16,672 posts)a good reminder there's more good in the world than evil
ecstatic
(32,653 posts)Aren't underground networks supposed to be secret?
mn9driver
(4,419 posts)By bringing them into private, citizen/owner occupied houses, they can refuse to allow entry to ICE or other police agencies without a specific warrant. That means a court hearing and representation instead of being dragged across the border in the middle of the night.
So far, the 4th amendment still applies to peoples' homes, even with most conservative judges.
ecstatic
(32,653 posts)Like the name of the person ICE is looking for? What if the warrant names the homeowner and grants permission to search the homeowner's home--wouldn't anyone there be subject to arrest?
jmg257
(11,996 posts)mn9driver
(4,419 posts)jmg257
(11,996 posts)(1)
(A) Any person who
(i) knowing that a person is an alien, brings to or attempts to bring to the United States in any manner whatsoever such person at a place other than a designated port of entry or place other than as designated by the Commissioner, regardless of whether such alien has received prior official authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States and regardless of any future official action which may be taken with respect to such alien;
(ii) knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, transports, or moves or attempts to transport or move such alien within the United States by means of transportation or otherwise, in furtherance of such violation of law;
(iii) knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals, harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation;
mn9driver
(4,419 posts)I've never heard of it being used to prosecute someone offering sanctuary. I suppose it could be used that way, but it could be tough to get it to stick on appeal. It would also be a huge legal and media shitstorm.
Let them bring it.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)Hopefully they'll leave them the hell alone!
mn9driver
(4,419 posts)From the 4th amendment:
...no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
The thing to remember is that being in the US without proper documentation isn't actually a crime. ICE can grab you up and toss you out, but they can't charge you with a crime, so a judge would need convincing to issue a warrant to search a citizen's home (who is not actually committing a crime) for unspecified people, who are also not actually committing a crime.
Crossing the border without documentation and inspection is illegal, but that requires very specific information, which ICE doesn't have for most undocumented people.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)chillfactor
(7,573 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)A judge could give a warrant if ICE showed this article. Yes some judges are great. Others....not so much.
brooklynite
(94,341 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)At least anybody in trump world.
brooklynite
(94,341 posts)You'd have to have reasonable belief that a specific alien was in the house to obtain a search warrant.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)(1)
(A) Any person who
(i) knowing that a person is an alien, brings to or attempts to bring to the United States in any manner whatsoever such person at a place other than a designated port of entry or place other than as designated by the Commissioner, regardless of whether such alien has received prior official authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States and regardless of any future official action which may be taken with respect to such alien;
(ii) knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, transports, or moves or attempts to transport or move such alien within the United States by means of transportation or otherwise, in furtherance of such violation of law;
(iii) knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals, harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation;
...
(B) A person who violates subparagraph (A) shall, for each alien in respect to whom such a violation occurs
(i) in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(i) or (v)(I) or in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(ii), (iii), or (iv) in which the offense was done for the purpose of commercial advantage or private financial gain, be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both;
(ii) in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(ii), (iii), (iv), or (v)(II), be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both;
brooklynite
(94,341 posts)a news story is not likely to be considered hard evidence.