HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Michael Tomasky: My Supre...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Wed Jun 27, 2012, 08:46 PM

Michael Tomasky: My Supreme Court-Health Care Prediction

This is easy. I take the darkest and most cynical possible view of the conservative majority; I believe, as I've written, that they are politicians in robes (with the partial exception of Kennedy); as such, I believe that they will behave here like politicians, and they will render the decision that will inflict the maximum possible political damage on Obama and the Democrats.

That means overturning the mandate 5-4. But it means doing so narrowly, carefully, almost regretfully. In other words, they want more than anything else not to rile up liberals. Tossing the whole thing would do that. Tossing the Medicaid expansion would kinda do that. Tossing guaranteed issue would kinda do it too, and would even have reach into independents and Republicans, since guaranteed issue is so popular.

They'll want to minimize backlash, in other words--both backlash against them as an institution and electoral backlash that might help Obama and the D's. So they'll limit their overturning to the mandate. And as I say, the majority opinion will say things like gee, we are deeply sympathetic to the problems inherent in the health-care system, but regretfully, we simply can't endorse this method under our reading of the Constitution.

SNIP

If there's an off chance for a more positive ruling, it's this, which struck me after I read the Arizona opinion. With regard to the "show your papers" aspect of that law that the Court upheld, it did so by saying in essence, look, we're not endorsing this exactly, and we're not NOT endorsing it; we're just saying that it has to be put into practice, and we'll see how it's actually being implemented before we can determine its validity.

That made me think, maybe they can contrive to do something similar on the mandate. We're skeptical of it. We presume against it. But until it's implemented and put into practice, we can't really say whether it's coercion or not. We have to see how it works for a couple of years before we can decide that.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/06/27/my-supreme-court-health-care-prediction.html


Thought both of those takes were very interesting. I'm extremely cynical about the Supreme Court, so I think I agree with his take about the Republican Justices being politicians in robes who will strike down the mandate in a way to make Obama look bad and themselves look good. What are you all expecting?

4 replies, 810 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 4 replies Author Time Post
Reply Michael Tomasky: My Supreme Court-Health Care Prediction (Original post)
boxman15 Jun 2012 OP
bigdarryl Jun 2012 #1
longship Jun 2012 #2
sadbear Jun 2012 #3
bluestateguy Jun 2012 #4

Response to boxman15 (Original post)

Wed Jun 27, 2012, 08:52 PM

1. Bottom line you don't know shit

And just guessing like every other pundit

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boxman15 (Original post)

Wed Jun 27, 2012, 09:04 PM

2. Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

Confirmation bias

More popcorn, please.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boxman15 (Original post)

Wed Jun 27, 2012, 09:07 PM

3. If Kennedy isn't a politician in a robe

then why would he vote to "inflict the maximum possible political damage on Obama and the Democrats"?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boxman15 (Original post)

Wed Jun 27, 2012, 10:16 PM

4. They could always go down the Anti-Injunction Act road

and then we get to do this all again in 2014.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread