Post removed

[Honeycombe8]

1. Normally, I'm against teabagging the Blue Dogs, but I gotta agree w/you on this one.

Voting to do something like this, that has never been done before, in the face of such weak evidence, is traitorous.

[pintobean]

2. You should self-delete this

before it's alerted on. This could be a TOS violation.

That said, I understand your frustration, but we need as many Democrats as possible elected.

[maxrandb]

5. Even those that would stand shoulder-to-shoulder with Issa????

I don't think so!

There aren't many things that I demand "purity" for, but supporting that "schwarmy-little-beady-eyed asspickle Issa is a line that I won't allow to be crossed.

Let those Democrats see how much "support" they get from the "Tea-baggers" in the next election.

At some point, you have to draw a line...or YOU HAVE TO STOP CALLING YOURSELF A DEMOCRAT

[pintobean]

6. Good luck.

[cynatnite]

10. It is a TOS violation...

Advocating violence no matter the reason is wrong. Period.

[el_bryanto]

8. I don't know if it would be an issue; OP is not advocating voting against them

or removing them from power. He or she just feels they shouldn't call themselves Democrats.

Bryant

[GarroHorus]

3. Yep, any Dem who votes to hold Holder in contempt must LOSE this year regardless. n/t

[Freddie Stubbs]

7. Even the ones who have already been renominated?

[GarroHorus]

9. I won't go that far. n/t

[mmonk]

4. Being a Democrat seems to always mean being under-represented.

Sign of the times.